[Bug c++/57082] brace initialization requires public destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57082 lucdanton at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lucdanton at free dot fr ---

[Bug middle-end/78138] missing warnings on buffer overflow with non-constant source length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78138 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78138] New: missing warnings on buffer overflow with non-constant source length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78138 Bug ID: 78138 Summary: missing warnings on buffer overflow with non-constant source length Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c/53562] Add -Werror= support for -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE / __builtin___memcpy_chk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53562 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/54535] gcc fails to warn when functions are inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54535 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/77860] [7 Regression] ICE in gimple_build_assign_1, at gimple.c:420

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77860 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/78003] [7 Regression] c++17: ICE in build_over_call, at cp/call.c:7847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78003 Eric Niebler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric.niebler at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/78137] [C++1z] braced initializer in defaulted function argument causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78137 Eric Niebler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78026] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_omp_declare_simd, at fortran/openmp.c:5190

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78026 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/78137] New: [C++1z] braced initializer in defaulted function argument causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78137 Bug ID: 78137 Summary: [C++1z] braced initializer in defaulted function argument causes ICE Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 Pierre-Marie de Rodat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||derodat at adacore dot com ---

[Bug fortran/78026] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_omp_declare_simd, at fortran/openmp.c:5190

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78026 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Oct 27 19:55:12 2016 New Revision: 241630 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241630=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/78026 * parse.c (decode_statement): Don't create

[Bug fortran/54679] Erroneous "Expected P edit descriptor" in conjunction with L descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679 --- Comment #5 from Nick Maclaren --- That's the right message. Warning or error, it doesn't matter.

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 --- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen --- Can you post your configure command (or gcc -v output).

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 Matt Godbolt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at godbolt dot org --- Comment #8

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 39914 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39914=edit preprocessed input and assembler output before and after the culprit patch

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/70975] experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70975] experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Oct 27 18:55:55 2016 New Revision: 241629 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241629=gcc=rev Log: PR70975 Pass valid offset argument to sendfile PR libstdc++/70975

[Bug middle-end/78025] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in simd_clone_adjust, at omp-simd-clone.c:1126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78025 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Oct 27 18:51:28 2016 New Revision: 241628 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241628=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78025 * omp-simd-clone.c (simd_clone_adjust): Handle

[Bug testsuite/78133] Commit r241489 adds printf specifiers not supported by newlib.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78133 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug testsuite/78133] Commit r241489 adds printf specifiers not supported by newlib.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78133 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/77735] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c (test for warnings, line 358)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77735 --- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks for the heads up! Yes, the tests will need to be disabled but I'll also need to fix the gimple-ssa-sprintf pass to avoid assuming that %a is supported when it isn't. Unless one already exists that

[Bug c/78135] In an unsigned long (64 bit) 1<<31 gives rubbish

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78135 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #26 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to wilco from comment #25) > > Alternatives can be disabled, there are flags, eg: > > (set_attr "arch" "neon_for_64bits,*,*,avoid_neon_for_64bits") > Ok I see, thanks. Still lots of insns

[Bug c/78135] In an unsigned long (64 bit) 1<<31 gives rubbish

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78135 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > wk = 0x1 << j; > > That is still int << j That is not true, that is actually either long int << j or long long int << j on most targets (e.g. LP64 the

[Bug c/78135] In an unsigned long (64 bit) 1<<31 gives rubbish

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78135 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to John Hunter from comment #4) > The annotation of Constants with `ul' is a fudge. Not in this case as: ((1 << 24) << 7)) is an int.

[Bug c/78135] In an unsigned long (64 bit) 1<<31 gives rubbish

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78135 --- Comment #4 from John Hunter --- The annotation of Constants with `ul' is a fudge. In the specimen program, a constant (1) is assigned to an unsigned long variable (wk) which forces it to be `ul'. The optimiser, in trying to eliminate a local

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #25 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #24) > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #23) > > @@ -5020,7 +5020,7 @@ > > (define_insn_and_split "one_cmpldi2" > >[(set (match_operand:DI 0

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #24 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #23) > @@ -5020,7 +5020,7 @@ > (define_insn_and_split "one_cmpldi2" >[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "s_register_operand" "=w,,,?w") > (not:DI

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 --- Comment #5 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Yes, some virtual register are allocated on stack and we got more loads from stack to get their values.

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 --- Comment #4 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #2) > WE also found out performance drop on another important benchmark with the > same symptoms after r241170, namely loop marked with .L18 has +12 more fills > from

[Bug rtl-optimization/78132] [7 Regression] GCC produces invalid instruction (kmovd and kmovq) for KNL.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78132 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #23 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to wilco from comment #22) > > What I meant is that your patch still makes a large difference on the > original test case despite making no difference in simple cases like the > above. For sure

[Bug rtl-optimization/78132] [7 Regression] GCC produces invalid instruction (kmovd and kmovq) for KNL.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78132 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- This is actually a bug in the REE pass, HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK is false for the mask registers and DImode unless -mavx512bw, that pass should honor it. I'll fix it.

[Bug testsuite/78136] New: gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c fails with newer glibc versions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78136 Bug ID: 78136 Summary: gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c fails with newer glibc versions Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/78135] In an unsigned long (64 bit) 1<<31 gives rubbish

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78135 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78135] In an unsigned long (64 bit) 1<<31 gives rubbish

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78135 John Hunter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jmdh01 at btinternet dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/78135] In an unsigned long (64 bit) 1<<31 gives rubbish

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78135 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- wk = 0x1 << j; That is still int << j Try changing it to be the following: wk = 0x1ull << j;

[Bug c/78135] New: In an unsigned long (64 bit) 1<<31 gives rubbish

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78135 Bug ID: 78135 Summary: In an unsigned long (64 bit) 1<<31 gives rubbish Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/77735] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c (test for warnings, line 358)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77735 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tamar.christina at arm dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/78098] error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098 --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15) > > > > Not with interrupt handler which needs different epilogue and prologue. > > I see, however I'm not sure it's known information when IPA ICF is running. > Or

[Bug target/78132] [7 Regression] GCC produces invalid instruction (kmovd and kmovq) for KNL.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78132 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- The failing instruction is pre-existing movdi_internal. movzwl c(%rip), %eax # 5 zero_extendhidi2/1 [length = 8] kmovw e(%rip), %k1# 9 *movhi_internal/6 [length =

[Bug libstdc++/78134] New: set::set lower_bound() for transparent comparator returns const_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78134 Bug ID: 78134 Summary: set::set lower_bound() for transparent comparator returns const_iterator Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/78133] Commit r241489 adds printf specifiers not supported by newlib.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78133 --- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina --- These are coming from gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c

[Bug testsuite/78133] New: Commit r241489 adds printf specifiers not supported by newlib.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78133 Bug ID: 78133 Summary: Commit r241489 adds printf specifiers not supported by newlib. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Created attachment 39910 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39910=edit another test-case Must be compiled with "-Ofast -fopenmp -funroll-loops -march=knl"

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- WE also found out performance drop on another important benchmark with the same symptoms after r241170, namely loop marked with .L18 has +12 more fills from stack. The test-case will be attached.

[Bug fortran/54679] Erroneous "Expected P edit descriptor" in conjunction with L descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54679 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- I should have looked at this sooner. We actually do diagnose this, but our warning/error logic is not right. pr54679.f90:8:56: PRINT "(A,1X,I2,1X,A,1X,I2,1X,A,2(1X,I0,1X),A,2(1X,L0,1X))"

[Bug rtl-optimization/77919] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE converting DC to V2DF mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase: struct A { A (double) {} _Complex double i; }; typedef int __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))) B; typedef struct { B b; } C; struct D { D (const B ) : b (x) {} B b; }; static inline B foo

[Bug middle-end/78098] error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098 --- Comment #15 from Martin Liška --- > > Not with interrupt handler which needs different epilogue and prologue. I see, however I'm not sure it's known information when IPA ICF is running. Or am I wrong?

[Bug c++/78130] Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78130 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78132] [7 Regression] GCC produces invalid instruction (kmovd and kmovq) for KNL.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78132 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Related to bug 77476.

[Bug target/78132] [7 Regression] GCC produces invalid instruction (kmovd and kmovq) for KNL.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78132 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78130] Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78130 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- Reduced a bit more: struct B { B(); void m_fn2(int p1) { if (p1 <= storage_) throw; } int storage_; }; void f() { B span_; int b = span_.storage_; span_.m_fn2(b - 1); } The warning

[Bug c++/78130] Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78130 --- Comment #6 from Rian Quinn --- Correct me if I'm wrong, but it would appear that this is indeed an bug with GCC (based on current activity). If that is the case, what would be your recommendations on how to resolve this issue in the GSL. At

[Bug c++/78130] Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78130 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- markus@x4 tmp % cat string_span_tests.ii class A { public: using index_type = int; index_type m_fn1() { return size_; } index_type size_; }; struct B { using element_type = int; using

[Bug target/78132] New: GCC produces invalid instruction (kmovd and kmovq) for KNL.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78132 Bug ID: 78132 Summary: GCC produces invalid instruction (kmovd and kmovq) for KNL. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/78098] error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10) > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > > > > (In reply to Richard Biener

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #22 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #21) > (In reply to wilco from comment #20) > > > Wilco, where have you seen the additional registers used with my > > > previous patch, maybe we can try

[Bug c++/78130] Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78130 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|WAITING

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #21 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to wilco from comment #20) > > Wilco, where have you seen the additional registers used with my > > previous patch, maybe we can try to fix that somehow? > > What happens is that the move of

[Bug c++/78130] Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78130 --- Comment #3 from Rian Quinn --- Created attachment 39908 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39908=edit ii and s file

[Bug c++/78130] Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78130 --- Comment #2 from Rian Quinn --- The output: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/c++ Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.2'

[Bug rtl-optimization/77919] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE converting DC to V2DF mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > I guess the first question is if it is valid for expand_expr that requests > some mode to return a rtx with some completely different mode. If not, then > the bug is somewhere in normal_inner_ref: code: >

[Bug c++/78130] Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78130 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78130] New: Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78130 Bug ID: 78130 Summary: Strict overflow warning appears to be invalid Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/77730] Fortran performance on aarch64 (6/7 regression heads-up)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77730 --- Comment #8 from PeteVine --- I thought I was clear it was just a heads-up. All relevant data is already inside and anyone willing to look closer should just run the benchmark on any machine/platform like this, e.g.: $ phoronix-test-suite

[Bug bootstrap/77917] ARM/AARCH64 bootstrap-lto fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77917 PeteVine changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/77917] ARM/AARCH64 bootstrap-lto fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77917 --- Comment #11 from PeteVine --- Well, I finally managed to complete an LTO bootstrap on ARM (even leaving the full complement of C(XX)FLAGS in place, bar -flto) but it seems using ld.bfd is a must.

[Bug middle-end/78115] Missed optimization for "int modulo 2^31"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78115 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- For the first part, when we transform (X+C1)+C2 to X+(C1+C2), we check that C1+C2 doesn't overflow. But if C1+C2 would give INT_MIN, we still have the possibility to generate X-INT_MIN without going to an

[Bug target/77730] Fortran performance on aarch64 (6/7 regression heads-up)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77730 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/77930] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -g -funroll-loops -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77930 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/77919] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE converting DC to V2DF mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/70975] experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- > Does following patch work: > > --cut here-- > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/ops.cc > b/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/ops.cc > index

[Bug middle-end/78115] Missed optimization for "int modulo 2^31"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78115 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug fortran/78122] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in get, at cgraph.h:395

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78122 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug lto/78129] -Werror=suggest-final-types leads to -ENOSPC.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78129 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/78127] [5/6/7 Regression] AArch64 internal compiler error: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78127 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug c++/78124] [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78124 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/77919] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE converting DC to V2DF mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77919 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/77783] ICE in gfc_compare_union_types, at fortran/interface.c:545

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77783 foreese at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/70975] experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- Does following patch work: --cut here-- diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/ops.cc b/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/ops.cc index 9abcee0..b709858 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/ops.cc +++

[Bug fortran/78026] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_resolve_omp_declare_simd, at fortran/openmp.c:5190

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78026 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/70975] experimental/filesystem/operations/copy.cc FAILs on Solaris 12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70975 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth --- Just FYI, in a recent Solaris 12 build sendfile was changed to accept a NULL off for Linux compatibility. However, the separate Solaris 10/11 (which isn't used yet) doesn't have that change and probably wont.

[Bug lto/78129] New: -Werror=suggest-final-types leads to -ENOSPC.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78129 Bug ID: 78129 Summary: -Werror=suggest-final-types leads to -ENOSPC. Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Can you attach then preprocessed copy.ii, cc1plus command line and copy.s > (with > additional -dA) from both r241136 and r241137 + >

[Bug middle-end/78128] [7 regression] fortran/resolve.c:resolve_operator miscompiled at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78128 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||71002 --- Comment #3 from Richard

[Bug middle-end/78128] [7 regression] fortran/resolve.c:resolve_operator miscompiled at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78128 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78128] [7 regression] fortran/resolve.c:resolve_operator miscompiled at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78128 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc

[Bug middle-end/78025] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in simd_clone_adjust, at omp-simd-clone.c:1126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78025 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/78128] New: fortran/resolve.c:resolve_operator miscompiled at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78128 Bug ID: 78128 Summary: fortran/resolve.c:resolve_operator miscompiled at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/78127] New: [5/6/7 Regression] AArch64 internal compiler error: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78127 Bug ID: 78127 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] AArch64 internal compiler error: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1440 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/78124] [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78124 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/78122] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in get, at cgraph.h:395

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78122 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/78098] error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > > > > Why would we be not

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can you attach then preprocessed copy.ii, cc1plus command line and copy.s (with additional -dA) from both r241136 and r241137 + http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg02062.html ? The test is

[Bug rtl-optimization/63281] powerpc64le creates 64 bit constants from scratch instead of loading them

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78125] New: Shifted const forming is had

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78125 Bug ID: 78125 Summary: Shifted const forming is had Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3

  1   2   >