[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #62 from Bernd Edlinger --- Both parts of the patch are now posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00523.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00830.html

[Bug target/78243] incorrect byte offset in vextractuh with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78243 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/78285] New: error on duplicate switch label where a note should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78285 Bug ID: 78285 Summary: error on duplicate switch label where a note should be Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug c++/78283] -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 9 22:56:35 2016 New Revision: 242026 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242026=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78283 * mangle.c (start_mangling): Reset

[Bug fortran/44348] ICE in build_function_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/77414] ICE in create_function_arglist, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77414 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/77531] __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))) could also warn on multiplication overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77531 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/78284] warn on malloc with very large arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78284 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug c/78284] New: warn on malloc with very large arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78284 Bug ID: 78284 Summary: warn on malloc with very large arguments Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/78236] regex_iterator constructor is incomplete and creates uninitialized values that may be used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61450] ICE in gfc_global_used()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61450 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > If it helps, I can take care of the packaging. PING!

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10) > > Attaching untested fix. > > Dominique, could you try it? > > Now breaks with [...] > In file included from /usr/include/Availability.h:180:0, >

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/78283] -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Created attachment 40011 [details] > gcc7-pr78283.patch > > Untested fix. OK.

[Bug c++/78283] -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40011 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40011=edit gcc7-pr78283.patch Untested fix.

[Bug libstdc++/78276] regex_search is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78276 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/78283] -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78283] New: -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78283 Bug ID: 78283 Summary: -Wc++1z-compat warning is sticky Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 9 20:41:17 2016 New Revision: 242022 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242022=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78262 * config/i386/i386.md (*3_doubleword): Mark

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Nov 9 20:33:24 2016 New Revision: 242020 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242020=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Mikael Morin Janus Weil

[Bug c++/78282] [6/7 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kondratskiy --- Created attachment 40010 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40010=edit The source before the preprocessing step

[Bug c++/78282] New: [6/7 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78282 Bug ID: 78282 Summary: [6/7 Regression] Overload resolution failure, in parameter pack expansion, inside a template class Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/78278] ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 --- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Well, it's an extension ... $ gfortran-7-20161106 -std=f95 -c z2.f90 # or -std=f2008 z2.f90:3:17: data x /null()/ 1 Error: GNU Extension:

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 --- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0) > Either r241990 or r241989 causes a new ICE From a bisect I did it is definitely r241990.

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 9 19:44:22 2016 New Revision: 242014 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242014=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78262 * config/i386/i386.md (*3_doubleword): Mark

[Bug target/77685] rs6000 target has builtin expansion for memcpy but not memcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77685 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/78281] [7 regression] spec2006 test case 471.omnetpp fails to compile (ICE) starting with r241990

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78281 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 --- Comment #8 from louis.krupp at zoho dot com --- The patch is no longer necessary, because it looks like the problem with combine.c was fixed on 1 November: === r241744 | foreese | 2016-11-01 09:29:51 -0600 (Tue, 01 Nov 2016) | 5 lines Mark

[Bug ipa/78281] New: [7 regression] spec2006 test case 471.omnetpp fails to compile (ICE) starting with r241990

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78281 Bug ID: 78281 Summary: [7 regression] spec2006 test case 471.omnetpp fails to compile (ICE) starting with r241990 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > As mentioned by Harald, the patch in comment 1 works well and is close to > obvious. > > Mikael, are you going to commit this, or do you want me to do it? Please do, I

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Nov 9 19:21:11 2016 New Revision: 242013 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242013=gcc=rev Log: PR target/78262 * config/i386/i386.md (*3_doubleword): Mark

[Bug fortran/78277] ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78277 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78278] ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69499] [F03] ICE-on-invalid on combining select type with wrong statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69499 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- With gcc version 7.0.0 20161109 (experimental) [trunk revision 242009] (GCC) the ICE is gone for all three cases in comment 0. However, it persists for some of the cases in comment 1

[Bug c++/78280] GCC incorrectly accepts assignment in bitfield width

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78280 Nathan Ridge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Attaching untested fix. > Dominique, could you try it? Now breaks with libtool: compile: /opt/gcc/build_w/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/opt/gcc/build_w/./gcc -nostdinc++

[Bug c++/78280] New: GCC incorrectly accepts assignment in bitfield width

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78280 Bug ID: 78280 Summary: GCC incorrectly accepts assignment in bitfield width Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/78279] ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 40008 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40008=edit Very lightly tested patch. The attached (only superficially tested) patch changes fold_bultin_memcmp to fold the

[Bug fortran/78279] New: ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78279 Bug ID: 78279 Summary: ICE in identical_array_ref, at fortran/dependency.c:104 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78278] ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Whereas, for example with "real" : $ cat z2.f90 program p real, pointer :: x => null() data x /null()/ print *, associated(x) end $ gfortran-7-20161106

[Bug fortran/78278] New: ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 Bug ID: 78278 Summary: ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/78277] New: ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78277 Bug ID: 78277 Summary: ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/77518] [5/6/7 Regression] [Coarray] [OOP] ICE in gfc_advance_chain, at fortran/trans.c:58

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77518 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- New backtrace : $ gfortran-7-20161106 -fcoarray=single z1.f90 z1.f90:5:0: print *, sizeof(z) internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xc3a64f

[Bug fortran/66544] [F03] ICE on function with procedure-pointer result in combination with implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66544 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.1.1

[Bug target/78255] [5/6/7 regression] Indirect sibling call causing wrong code generation for ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255 --- Comment #1 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK I think I assigned the blame to the wrong function, I think it is the responsibility of 'is_indirect_tailcall_p' to catch this. Though I believe the last time it is called during the

[Bug fortran/78259] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78259 foreese at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 60777, which changed state. Bug 60777 Summary: [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 What|Removed |Added

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #6) > Created attachment 40007 [details] > Untested fix. > > Attaching untested fix. > Dominique, could you try it? The change fixes the bootstrap of current gcc

[Bug fortran/78259] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78259 --- Comment #3 from foreese at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: foreese Date: Wed Nov 9 17:31:27 2016 New Revision: 242010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242010=gcc=rev Log: Fix ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign due to NULL components.

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Nov 9 17:22:02 2016 New Revision: 242009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242009=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Steve Kargl Janus Weil

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #8 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #7) > > Attaching untested fix. > > Dominique, could you try it? > > Allow for ~2 hours. Or better Jakub's fix, it looks cleaner.

[Bug fortran/60500] [5/6/7 Regression] Spurious warning on derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Well, the change introduced by r241885 is quite complicated. > It may cause major regressions. I don't recommend backporting it. Agreed.

[Bug c++/78274] Rejected specialization in different namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78274 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/60500] [5/6/7 Regression] Spurious warning on derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500 --- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, the change introduced by r241885 is quite complicated. It may cause major regressions. I don't recommend backporting it.

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/78273] The transparent version of {map,set}::count should call _M_count_tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78273 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Created attachment 40007 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40007=edit Untested fix. Attaching untested fix. Dominique, could you try it?

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- extern char **environ; #endif -#if defined(__has_include) && __has_include() +#if defined(__has_include) && __has_include() && defined(__clang__) #define SANITIZER_OS_TRACE 1 #include #else is

[Bug fortran/77680] [5/6/7 Regression] [F03] ICE in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:419

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77680 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1) > > Eh, mine. > > > > typedef void (^os_trace_payload_t)(xpc_object_t xdict) looks very strange, > > it seems that

[Bug fortran/65173] ICE while compiling wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that the tests z1.f90 and z8.f90 fail in a different way: pr65173_3.f90:3:39: character(:), allocatable :: x(n) 1 Error: Allocatable component of

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1) > Eh, mine. > > typedef void (^os_trace_payload_t)(xpc_object_t xdict) looks very strange, > it seems that it's an Objective-C declaration, right? It's declaring

[Bug fortran/65173] ICE while compiling wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Compiling the test in comment 0 with and instrumented gfortran I get pr65173.f90:7:45: real*8, dimension(256), allocatable :: x 1 Error:

[Bug debug/78265] Excess emission of debug info for ODR used global variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78265 --- Comment #2 from David Blaikie --- A side note/commentary: Producing debug info for global variable declarations at all is an interesting choice. If the whole program is built with debug info*, the global variable's definition will have

[Bug middle-end/77718] [7 Regression] expand_builtin_memcmp swaps args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/77718] [7 Regression] expand_builtin_memcmp swaps args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 9 16:21:45 2016 New Revision: 242007 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242007=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77718 * builtins.c (expand_builtin_memcmp): Formatting

[Bug middle-end/71762] [5/6/7 Regression] ~X & Y to X < Y doesn't work for uninitialized values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- Hi, could you try https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00775.html ? And sorry for the breakage.

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 --- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer --- Looks good on power, too. Thanks!

[Bug libstdc++/78276] New: regex_search is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78276 Bug ID: 78276 Summary: regex_search is slow Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug middle-end/71762] [5/6/7 Regression] ~X & Y to X < Y doesn't work for uninitialized values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think the patch in comment 1 actually does not work as expected (due to a spurious semicolon). However, this variant seems to work well and regtests cleanly: Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c

[Bug tree-optimization/77719] [7 Regression] ICE in pp_string, at pretty-print.c:955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77719 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- 'f0' function is optimized out as of r242000

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- When I compare GCC 6 (r241818) against trunk (r241997) with -Ofast -march=native (on Haswell) I get 429.mcf 9120230 39.7 S9120240 38.0 * 429.mcf 9120

[Bug ipa/78258] [7 Regression] ICE in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78258 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/78259] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78259 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Btw, I see with -mavx2 addq(%r9), %rax jns .L90 .L90: je .L92 cmpl$2, 24(%rdx) je .L91 thus there is no extra cmpq $0, %rdi in the

[Bug target/78275] [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78275 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3

[Bug target/78275] New: [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78275 Bug ID: 78275 Summary: [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/78263] Compile failure with AltiVec library on PPC64le and -std=c++11 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78263 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #11 from Venkataramanan --- Hi Richard On haswell machine original run time for -O3 -max2 -mprefer-avx2 real2m35.325s user2m35.257s sys 0m0.070s Changing the assembly from .L98: jle .L97 cmpl

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- OTOH we _do_ have initial RTL (insn 167 166 168 20 (set (reg:CCGOC 17 flags) (compare:CCGOC (reg/v:DI 217 [ red_cost ]) (const_int 0 [0]))) "pbeampp.c":42 -1 (nil)) (jump_insn 168

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- So RTL expansion ends up in /* If jumps are cheap and the target does not support conditional compare, turn some more codes into jumpy sequences. */ else if (BRANCH_COST

[Bug sanitizer/61978] implement blacklist for sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61978 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/78274] New: Rejected specialization in different namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78274 Bug ID: 78274 Summary: Rejected specialization in different namespace Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/78273] New: The transparent version of {map,set}::count should call _M_count_tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78273 Bug ID: 78273 Summary: The transparent version of {map,set}::count should call _M_count_tr Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r241990

  1   2   >