[Bug rtl-optimization/78579] New: redundant instruction of the form cmp r0, r0 generated in assembly with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78579 Bug ID: 78579 Summary: redundant instruction of the form cmp r0, r0 generated in assembly with -O2 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/78546] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Nov 29 07:48:43 2016 New Revision: 242953 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242953=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-29 Richard Biener PR middle-end/78546

[Bug lto/78562] Wrong warning for built-in functions with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562 > > --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- > Maybe it is an option to be less strict?

[Bug rtl-optimization/78575] [7 Regression] ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55 with -O2 -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78575 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/78575] [7 Regression] ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55 with -O2 -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78575 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug fortran/78578] character(len=:),allocatable :: CStr(:)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78578 --- Comment #2 from zengxiaoqing --- Program Main implicit none integer :: ins type str character(len=:),allocatable :: CStr(:) end type type(str) ::tstr allocate(character(len=20)::tstr%CStr(20)) tstr%CStr(1) = "20"

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- Note this needs at least: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02837.html And a few more match.pd changes to fully replace conditional_replacement. I hope to be able to get a full patch for the

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Nov 29 05:29:47 2016 New Revision: 242949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242949=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Make deallocation of a large frame work (PR77687) If we use ABI_V4

[Bug fortran/78578] character(len=:),allocatable :: CStr(:)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78578 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/78578] New: character(len=:),allocatable :: CStr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78578 Bug ID: 78578 Summary: character(len=:),allocatable :: CStr Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug libfortran/78549] Very slow formatted internal file output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549 --- Comment #4 from mecej4 at operamail dot com --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3) > We cannot address the Windows(+Cygwin,Mingw,etc.) issues which have more to > do with the OS related layers I assume. > > I will see what I get on

[Bug rtl-optimization/78342] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2657 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78342 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Nov 29 02:02:45 2016 New Revision: 242947 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242947=gcc=rev Log: combine: Make code after a new trap unreachable (PR78342) Combine can turn a

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 40185 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40185=edit The start of the patch Note this is just a start of the rewrite. It needs improvement as it started out really part

[Bug target/78577] New: Fix define_insn operand types for vexturhlx, vexturhrx, vextuwlx, and vextuwrx patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78577 Bug ID: 78577 Summary: Fix define_insn operand types for vexturhlx, vexturhrx, vextuwlx, and vextuwrx patterns Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/78568] [4.5 Regression] Wtype-limits warning regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wtype-limits warning|[4.5 Regression]

[Bug c/78568] Wtype-limits warning regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/78572] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/78575] [7 Regression] ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55 with -O2 -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78575 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/78574] [7 Regression] ice on valid C code at -O2 and -O3 in both 32- and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78574 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug libgcc/62097] t-hardfp requires GNU sed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62097 Chris Johns changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chrisj at rtems dot org --- Comment #10

[Bug fortran/78573] ICE in resolve_component, at fortran/resolve.c:13405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78573 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/78576] [PPC] wrong long double to long int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- Why do you think this isn't a lack of accuracy? Floating to integer always truncates.

[Bug fortran/78570] ICE in free_expr0, at fortran/expr.c:494

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78570 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78571] ICE in create_character_initializer, at fortran/data.c:191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery,

[Bug libgcc/78576] [PPC] wrong long double to long int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libgcc/78576] [PPC] wrong long double to long int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- Why do you think 27 is wrong?

[Bug libgcc/78576] [PPC] wrong long double to long int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt --- The conversion is done by __fixtfdi in libgcc.

[Bug libgcc/78576] New: [PPC] wrong long double to long int conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78576 Bug ID: 78576 Summary: [PPC] wrong long double to long int conversion Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/67335] [6 Regression] ICE in compiling omp simd function with unused argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67335 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE in |[6 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/71331] target-tilegx: nested-function-4.c: r10 is conflict which is both in function frame and in parameter.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71331 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/78540] [6 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4062 with -O -march=core2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/78540] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4062 with -O -march=core2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 28 22:51:29 2016 New Revision: 242937 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242937=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78540 * rtl.h (remove_reg_equal_equiv_notes): Return

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Breno Leitao from comment #7) > Created attachment 40182 [details] > gcc dump with pre processed file Ok, this on I have recreated. I'll dig into it.

[Bug rtl-optimization/78575] New: [7 Regression] ICE: in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:55 with -O2 -g

h-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-242931-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-nographite-amd64 Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20161128 (experimental) (GCC) Tested revisions: trunk r242931 - FAIL 6-branch r242029 - OK

[Bug c/78574] New: ice on valid C code at -O2 and -O3 in both 32- and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1))

7.0.0 20161128 (experimental) [trunk revision 242906] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c gcc-trunk: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1) Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. $ $ cat s

[Bug middle-end/78520] missing warning for snprintf with size greater than INT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78520 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78521] [7 Regression] incorrect byte count in -Wformat-length warning with non-constant width or precision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78521 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78520] missing warning for snprintf with size greater than INT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78520 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Nov 28 21:41:41 2016 New Revision: 242935 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242935=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78521 - [7 Regression] incorrect byte count in -Wformat-length

[Bug middle-end/78521] [7 Regression] incorrect byte count in -Wformat-length warning with non-constant width or precision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78521 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Nov 28 21:41:41 2016 New Revision: 242935 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242935=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78521 - [7 Regression] incorrect byte count in -Wformat-length

[Bug libfortran/78549] Very slow formatted internal file output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/74748] libgcc_s.so.1 isn't created correctly for Blackfin FDPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74748 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/74748] libgcc_s.so.1 isn't created correctly for Blackfin FDPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74748 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Nov 28 21:30:40 2016 New Revision: 242934 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242934=gcc=rev Log: PR gcc/74748 * libgcc/config/bfin/libgcc-glibc.ver,

[Bug target/74748] libgcc_s.so.1 isn't created correctly for Blackfin FDPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74748 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Nov 28 21:27:47 2016 New Revision: 242933 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242933=gcc=rev Log: PR gcc/74748 * libgcc/mkmap-symver.awk: add support for

[Bug c++/77591] [6 Regression] decltype(auto) and ternary operator allow returning local reference without a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77591 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7 Regression]

[Bug rtl-optimization/78546] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7 Regression]

[Bug c++/72808] [6 Regression] ICE on valid c++ code in verify_type (gcc/tree.c:14047)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE on |[6 Regression] ICE on valid

[Bug c/78498] [7 Regression] valgrind conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in format_type_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/78498] [7 Regression] valgrind conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in format_type_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Seems to resemble: http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1019 "0001019: strndup shouldn't require source array to be null-terminated"

[Bug tree-optimization/78529] [7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 40183 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40183=edit revert part of r242745 for strcat, strcat_chk, strncat, strncat_chk Hi, Unfortunately I haven't

[Bug c/78498] [7 Regression] valgrind conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in format_type_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71293] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-2.c fails starting with r236514

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71293 --- Comment #2 from Bill Seurer --- From old logs it appears these started working back in June sometime Regressions on trunk (power8) at revision 237314 vs revision 237309 New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-2.c

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 --- Comment #7 from Breno Leitao --- Created attachment 40182 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40182=edit gcc dump with pre processed file

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 --- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Breno Leitao from comment #5) > I can reproduce this (or a very similar version of this) bug on my system. > > I am seeing this failure when compiling package yadifa-2.2.2 on Debian > testing

[Bug fortran/78573] New: ICE in resolve_component, at fortran/resolve.c:13405

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78573 Bug ID: 78573 Summary: ICE in resolve_component, at fortran/resolve.c:13405 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/78571] New: ICE in create_character_initializer, at fortran/data.c:191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78571 Bug ID: 78571 Summary: ICE in create_character_initializer, at fortran/data.c:191 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/78572] New: internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572 Bug ID: 78572 Summary: internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968 Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/78570] New: ICE in free_expr0, at fortran/expr.c:494

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78570 Bug ID: 78570 Summary: ICE in free_expr0, at fortran/expr.c:494 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 Breno Leitao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brenohl at br dot ibm.com --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/70070] ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.0

[Bug preprocessor/78569] "internal compiler error: in get_substring_ranges_for_loc" processing sprintf buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is also the same issue as PR 78498.

[Bug c++/72808] [6/7 Regression] ICE on valid c++ code in verify_type (gcc/tree.c:14047)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 28 19:20:02 2016 New Revision: 242930 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242930=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/72808 * decl.c (finish_enum_value_list): Call

[Bug rtl-optimization/78546] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 28 19:15:51 2016 New Revision: 242929 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242929=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78546 * simplify-rtx.c (neg_const_int): When

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose --- that was binutils 2.27.51.20161124, and the Debian GCC version (unstable), configured with Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 6.2.1-5ubuntu1'

[Bug tree-optimization/78512] [7 Regression] r242674 miscompiles Linux kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78512 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I wonder if we just need to bite the bullet and decide that %p is too system dependent, particularly when performing optimization.

[Bug lto/78562] Wrong warning for built-in functions with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Maybe it is an option to be less strict? In the test case, both function name and asm name (libname) are in the namespace of the implementation: both start with 2 underscores. The function name even

[Bug target/78556] config/rs6000/rs6000.c:6217:36: runtime error: left shift of negative value -12301

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78556 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78556] config/rs6000/rs6000.c:6217:36: runtime error: left shift of negative value -12301

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78556 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Author: trippels Date: Mon Nov 28 18:33:19 2016 New Revision: 242928 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242928=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR78556 - left shift of negative values Running bootstrap-ubsan on

[Bug rtl-optimization/78547] [7 Regression] ICE: in loc_cmp, at var-tracking.c:3417 with -Os -g -mstringop-strategy=libcall -freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78547 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/78298] ICE in lookup_decl_in_outer_ctx, bei omp-low.c:4115

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78298 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 28 17:31:37 2016 New Revision: 242926 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242926=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/78298 * tree-nested.c (convert_local_reference_stmt):

[Bug middle-end/78540] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4062 with -O -march=core2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- I cannot recreate this using r242827 of the FSF 6 branch. What configure options are you using? ...and in case it makes a difference (it can), what binutils version?

[Bug preprocessor/78169] internal compiler error: in get_substring_ranges_for_loc, at input.c:1379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78169 --- Comment #5 from Arnd Bergmann --- I just tried reproducing the earlier bug with my gcc build and failed to get the ICE, so I assume this is a different problem despite also getting "internal compiler error: in get_substring_ranges_for_loc,

[Bug lto/78562] Wrong warning for built-in functions with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > Yes, using aliases would be a good workaround. hmmm, for libgcc functions written in asm this is easy enough, like .global func1_alias .global func1

[Bug c++/78313] [7 Regression] Misleading spelling suggestion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78313 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/78504] Bad fixit hint: '_Pragma' does not name a type; did you mean '_Pragma'?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78504 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug preprocessor/78569] New: "internal compiler error: in get_substring_ranges_for_loc" processing sprintf buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569 Bug ID: 78569 Summary: "internal compiler error: in get_substring_ranges_for_loc" processing sprintf buffer overflow Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug middle-end/78540] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c:4062 with -O -march=core2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78540 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/78568] New: Wtype-limits warning regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78568 Bug ID: 78568 Summary: Wtype-limits warning regression Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/77591] [6/7 Regression] decltype(auto) and ternary operator allow returning local reference without a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77591 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Nov 28 15:21:53 2016 New Revision: 242924 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242924=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77591 * typeck.c

[Bug c++/78551] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with constexpr initialization of union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/78567] GCC trunk fails to compile all-stage2-gcc in i386.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78567 --- Comment #1 from Marc Mutz --- Also happens on a fresh configure.

[Bug tree-optimization/78542] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Og results in endless loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |6.3 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/78542] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Og results in endless loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78542 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Nov 28 15:03:55 2016 New Revision: 242920 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242920=gcc=rev Log: 2016-11-28 Richard Biener PR

[Bug libstdc++/68838] AIX 32 bit wchar_t testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68838 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn --- oss_01 is "good" with zero size until the string is emitted. .good: 1 .fail: 0 size: 0 oss_01 << str_01; .good: 0 .fail: 1 size: 33554432

[Bug c++/78567] New: GCC trunk fails to compile all-stage2-gcc in i386.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78567 Bug ID: 78567 Summary: GCC trunk fails to compile all-stage2-gcc in i386.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/78551] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with constexpr initialization of union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/71848] [7 Regression] libstdc++ testsuite error on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71848 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/78562] Wrong warning for built-in functions with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562 > > --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- > Thanks for looking into it. > > IIUC it's

[Bug target/78543] [6 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1349 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/78562] Wrong warning for built-in functions with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Thanks for looking into it. IIUC it's a backend issue. config/avr/builtins.def sets library names for some built-ins, and some libnames are the same because the libgcc asm code is exactly the same, even

[Bug rtl-optimization/78546] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 28 Nov 2016, zsojka at seznam dot cz wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 > > --- Comment #14 from Zdenek Sojka --- > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment

[Bug middle-end/78566] [7 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_[abc].c regressions on Arm and m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug lto/78562] Wrong warning for built-in functions with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78562 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/78298] ICE in lookup_decl_in_outer_ctx, bei omp-low.c:4115

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78298 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/60145] [AVR] Suboptimal code for byte order shuffling using shift and or

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60145 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |tree-optimization --- Comment #4

[Bug libfortran/78549] Very slow formatted internal file output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78549 --- Comment #2 from mecej4 at operamail dot com --- Thanks, Martin. After posting, I found that I could add more add more attachments, but I was a bit worried that, as in other forums, the initial post could not be edited or modified. I presume

[Bug rtl-optimization/78546] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78546 --- Comment #14 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > Therefore the comment should be > /* CST1 - (CST2 - A) -> (CST1 - CST2) - A */ > rather than > /* CST - (CST - A) -> CST - A */ How comes it is not "CST1 -

[Bug middle-end/78566] [7 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_[abc].c regressions on Arm and m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78566] New: [7 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_[abc].c regressions on Arm and m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78566 Bug ID: 78566 Summary: [7 regression] gcc.dg/uninit-pred-6_[abc].c regressions on Arm and m68k Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78557] [7 Regression] [OOP] ICE in trans-expr.c with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78557 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

  1   2   >