[Bug tree-optimization/77485] Missed dead store elimination of aggregate store followed by partial stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, law at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485 > > --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- > So my patches for 33562 will detect the

[Bug rtl-optimization/78671] [7 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213 with -Og -march=skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78671 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78731] Possible bug with switch when optimization is turned on.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78731 --- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson --- The compiler is failing in jump threading as called by dom2. Jeff's 2015-09-30 patch is triggering in dom1, and changing the CFG just enough to prevent the jump threading bug from triggering. So it isn't a

[Bug middle-end/50481] builtin to reverse the bit order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481 Matthijs van Duin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matthijsvanduin at gmail dot com

[Bug c/77531] __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))) could also warn on multiplication overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77531 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/77531] __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))) could also warn on multiplication overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77531 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Dec 8 23:50:40 2016 New Revision: 243470 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243470=gcc=rev Log: PR c/77531 - __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))) could also warn on multiplication

[Bug c/78284] warn on malloc with very large arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78284 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Dec 8 23:50:40 2016 New Revision: 243470 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243470=gcc=rev Log: PR c/77531 - __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))) could also warn on multiplication

[Bug c/78284] warn on malloc with very large arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78284 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78737] linking error with deferred, undefined user-defined derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- I am not sure what you are expecting. The module has an empty main program and nothing allocated to link to.. Since the interface is abstract it creates nothing until it is used I think. $ gfc pr78737.f03

[Bug tree-optimization/78742] New: internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:10782

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78742 Bug ID: 78742 Summary: internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:10782 Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78737] linking error with deferred, undefined user-defined derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737 --- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson --- Upon further investigation, the workaround mentioned in the final line of the original report appears not to work. The only workaround I have come up with is to make the "object" type non-abstract, which

[Bug tree-optimization/77485] Missed dead store elimination of aggregate store followed by partial stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77485 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So my patches for 33562 will detect the partial dead store in "foo", but I never wrote the bits to narrow partial dead stores. The difficulty in optimizing this particular case will be rewriting the

[Bug fortran/78737] linking error with deferred, undefined user-defined derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737 --- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle --- I cc'ed Paul on this one. Not sure what is going on here, but I will be looking at it.

[Bug fortran/78350] ICE in gfc_code2string(): Bad code, at fortran/misc.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78350 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/65173] ICE while compiling wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/69064] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1062 when LEN is set to a variable with no explicit type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/69859] Non-deterministic ICEs on incomplete character declaration statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69859 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/65173] ICE while compiling wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173 --- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Dec 8 21:26:11 2016 New Revision: 243463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243463=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-07 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/69064] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1062 when LEN is set to a variable with no explicit type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69064 --- Comment #54 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Dec 8 21:26:11 2016 New Revision: 243463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243463=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-07 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/78350] ICE in gfc_code2string(): Bad code, at fortran/misc.c:193

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78350 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Dec 8 21:26:11 2016 New Revision: 243463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243463=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-07 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/69859] Non-deterministic ICEs on incomplete character declaration statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69859 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Dec 8 21:26:11 2016 New Revision: 243463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243463=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-07 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/78671] [7 Regression] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213 with -Og -march=skylake-avx512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78671 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Thu Dec 8 21:14:42 2016 New Revision: 243462 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243462=gcc=rev Log: 2016-12-08 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug c/78165] avoid printing type suffix for constants in %E output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78165 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78165] avoid printing type suffix for constants in %E output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78165 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Dec 8 21:08:06 2016 New Revision: 243461 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243461=gcc=rev Log: PR c/78165 - avoid printing type suffix for constants in %E output

[Bug middle-end/78738] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/64380] Missed optimization: smarter dead store elimination in dtors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64380 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/66544] [F03] ICE on function with procedure-pointer result in combination with implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66544 --- Comment #9 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Frankly speaking, it's difficile. Smells more invalid than valid. As a side note, I do not have any production code using a contruct similar to that in comment 0

[Bug rtl-optimization/54421] Extra movdqa when accessing quadwords in a 128-bit SSE register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54421 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/35302] Missing partial dead store elimination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35302 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/78551] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with constexpr initialization of union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78551] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with constexpr initialization of union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551 --- Comment #14 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Thu Dec 8 19:27:32 2016 New Revision: 243457 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243457=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78551 * constexpr.c (extract_string_elt): New. Broken

[Bug target/78733] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/78733] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733 --- Comment #10 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wilco Date: Thu Dec 8 19:18:33 2016 New Revision: 243456 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243456=gcc=rev Log: This patch fixes an issue in aarch64_classify_address. TImode and

[Bug other/78252] C++ demangler crashes with infinite recursion with lambda (auto)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78252 Paul Brannan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||curlypaul924 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78738] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- Following patch fixes the failure: --cut here-- Index: toplev.c === --- toplev.c(revision 243444) +++ toplev.c(working copy) @@ -1691,6

[Bug rtl-optimization/78738] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/78666] conflicting attribute alloc_size accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > But what is specifying multiple declarations of the same function with > different sets of attributes supposed to mean? Is it

[Bug c++/78551] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with constexpr initialization of union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551 --- Comment #13 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Thu Dec 8 18:37:03 2016 New Revision: 243451 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243451=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78551 * constexpr.c (extract_string_elt): New. Broken

[Bug c++/78551] [5/6/7 Regression] Internal compiler error with constexpr initialization of union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78551 --- Comment #12 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Thu Dec 8 18:34:04 2016 New Revision: 243448 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243448=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78551 * constexpr.c (extract_string_elt): New. Broken

[Bug fortran/69398] [OOP] ICE on class with duplicate dimension attribute specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69398 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/78741] New: ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78741 Bug ID: 78741 Summary: ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1534 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69860] ICE on missing end apostrophe with character(kind=4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/78740] New: test case powerpc/pr78691-ppc.c fails starting with its introduction in r243335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78740 Bug ID: 78740 Summary: test case powerpc/pr78691-ppc.c fails starting with its introduction in r243335 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/78739] New: ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1477

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78739 Bug ID: 78739 Summary: ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1477 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/71913] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing copy elision with operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Pádraig Brady from comment #15) > So it would be good to set the "Target Milestone" to 5.5 But it was also fixed for 4.9.4, so that's what the target milestone says. You can't reliably use

[Bug c++/71913] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing copy elision with operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913 --- Comment #15 from Pádraig Brady --- Actually it is backported to 5. So it would be good to set the "Target Milestone" to 5.5 so this is obvious from this bug and from the list of bugs fixed in 5.5

[Bug c++/71913] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing copy elision with operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Pádraig Brady from comment #13) > It would be good to have this backported to the 5 branch. What do you mean? I applied the bug fix to the 5 branch back in July (comment #7), and the testcase

[Bug fortran/68225] ICE with -Wrealloc-lhs-all on structure constructor with allocatable scalar component(s)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68225 --- Comment #8 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Addendum : $ cat zzp.f90 program p type t integer :: a character(:), allocatable :: c end type type(t) :: x x = t(a=1) ; print

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 68439, which changed state. Bug 68439 Summary: ICE in alloc_scalar_allocatable_for_subcomponent_assignment, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6711 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68439 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/68225] ICE with -Wrealloc-lhs-all on structure constructor with allocatable scalar component(s)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68225 --- Comment #7 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- *** Bug 68439 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/68439] ICE in alloc_scalar_allocatable_for_subcomponent_assignment, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6711

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68439 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/69860] ICE on missing end apostrophe with character(kind=4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860 --- Comment #15 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Confirmed, this ICE is now completely gone on my environment.

[Bug c++/71913] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing copy elision with operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913 Pádraig Brady changed: What|Removed |Added CC||P at draigBrady dot com --- Comment #13

[Bug fortran/69398] [OOP] ICE on class with duplicate dimension attribute specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69398 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that we also have a rejects-valid problem with the following code: program p type t end type class(t), allocatable :: z target :: z(:) allocate (z(2)) end which is rejected

[Bug fortran/66544] [F03] ICE on function with procedure-pointer result in combination with implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66544 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #4) > Btw, I don't fully understand why "implicit none" should make any difference > here. The problem is that we simply do not know which typespec to give to 'z'

[Bug rtl-optimization/78738] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- Created attachment 40282 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40282=edit preprocessed source

[Bug rtl-optimization/78738] New: [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78738 Bug ID: 78738 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/42679] RTLD_DEEPBIND dlopen option for shared library that uses libstdc++ std::ostream crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42679 maemarcus at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maemarcus at gmail dot com

[Bug target/78695] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695 --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --- Excellent, thanks. I am out of the office today but will have a look at this tomorrow.

[Bug target/78695] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78695] [7 Regression] ICE (segfault) on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78695 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose --- still seen with r243430, but you need -fstack-protector or -fstack-protector-strong

[Bug libstdc++/78264] [7 regression] ICE in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78264] [7 regression] ICE in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Dec 8 15:52:11 2016 New Revision: 243443 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243443=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/78264 * include/bits/c++config

[Bug fortran/78737] New: linking error with deferred, undefined user-defined derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78737 Bug ID: 78737 Summary: linking error with deferred, undefined user-defined derived-type I/O Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/78666] conflicting attribute alloc_size accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- They sure are! (We should document it.) But what is specifying multiple declarations of the same function with different sets of attributes supposed to mean? Is it supposed to apply the union of all of

[Bug target/78733] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733 --- Comment #9 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg00653.html

[Bug middle-end/78726] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect unsigned arithmetic optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ipa/77674] [7 Regression] ICE in binds_to_current_def_p with -fkeep-inline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77674 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- I am testing the following: Index: symtab.c === --- symtab.c(revision 243291) +++ symtab.c(working copy) @@ -2214,6 +2214,8 @@

[Bug tree-optimization/78720] [7 Regression] Illegal instruction in generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug libstdc++/67807] [5/6/7 Regression] call to public member function catalog failed on Linux -std=c++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67807 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78666] conflicting attribute alloc_size accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Multiple format attributes for the same function, naming different arguments as a format string, are perfectly valid; they mean the function uses multiple format strings (each of which has

[Bug tree-optimization/78720] [7 Regression] Illegal instruction in generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/78720] [7 Regression] Illegal instruction in generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78720 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c/78736] enum warnings in GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- And it's included in -Wall

[Bug fortran/61767] [OOP] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper at fortran/class.c:1491

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61767 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #9) > Thus: The patch in comment #7 should be discarded, and comment #5 is the way > to go here. I just realized that also comment #5 is not fully correct. Instead

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/71856] [6/7 Regression] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG-mode breaks GNU parallel extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/71856] [6/7 Regression] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG-mode breaks GNU parallel extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Dec 8 12:41:07 2016 New Revision: 243436 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243436=gcc=rev Log: PR71856 try to fix Parallel Mode assertions again PR libstdc++/71856

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Dec 8 12:40:58 2016 New Revision: 243435 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243435=gcc=rev Log: PR77459 avoid snprintf for debug mode diagnostics Backport from mainline

[Bug c/78736] enum warnings in GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/78716] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at gimplify.c:12650 (i686-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78716 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/78736] New: enum warnings in GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736 Bug ID: 78736 Summary: enum warnings in GCC Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug libstdc++/71856] [6/7 Regression] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG-mode breaks GNU parallel extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71856 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Dec 8 12:08:14 2016 New Revision: 243434 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243434=gcc=rev Log: PR71856 try to fix Parallel Mode assertions again PR libstdc++/71856

[Bug target/78733] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78733 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78735] New: profiledbootstrap with --enable-checking=yes,rtl fails on trunk due to -Werror=strict-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78735 Bug ID: 78735 Summary: profiledbootstrap with --enable-checking=yes,rtl fails on trunk due to -Werror=strict-overflow Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/78264] [7 regression] ICE in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #19 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pmderodat Date: Thu Dec 8 11:04:11 2016 New Revision: 243433 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243433=gcc=rev Log: Add the missing ChangeLog entry for r243432 2016-12-08

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #18 from pmderodat at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pmderodat Date: Thu Dec 8 11:01:03 2016 New Revision: 243432 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243432=gcc=rev Log: [PR78112] Remove platform-dependent checks in g++.dg/pr78112.C

[Bug middle-end/78684] [7 Regression] ICE in create_intersect_range_checks_index, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:2074

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78684 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Dec 8 10:56:41 2016 New Revision: 243431 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243431=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78684 * tree-vect-loop-manip.c

[Bug target/78694] [ARM] ICE with -mthumb -ftls-model=local-exec -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78694 --- Comment #12 from Sebastian Huber --- Its strange that it is so hard to reproduce. Maybe it has something to do with the default architecture version. It fails with: -mthumb -O2 -ftls-model=local-exec

[Bug tree-optimization/78721] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78721 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78726] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect unsigned arithmetic optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78726 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Most likely one of the endless reassoc bugs not properly updating or invalidating range information. Before reassoc1 we have: # RANGE [4294967040, 4294967295] a_11 = (unsigned int) _3; c.1_4 = c; #

[Bug rtl-optimization/78727] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 78728 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/78727] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 78730 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/78727] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 78729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/78728] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78728 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78730] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78730 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78729] [7 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_bb_insns, at cfgrtl.c:2656 (error: flow control insn inside a basic block)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78729 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

  1   2   >