[Bug target/72749] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com,

[Bug c/79055] New: gcc should not warn about the assignment-allocation character 'm' of scanf when POSIX is enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79055 Bug ID: 79055 Summary: gcc should not warn about the assignment-allocation character 'm' of scanf when POSIX is enabled Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/79041] aarch64 backend emits R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 relocation despite -mpc-relative-literal-loads option being used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79041 --- Comment #3 from Robert Schiele --- If you point me to the specific patch that you have in mind I can in parallel already test whether besides the test case I provided it also fixes the original problem this was detected with.

[Bug target/71847] powerpc64le: Potential rlwinm optimisation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71847 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78142] Commit r241590 is more registers to be used for on gcc.target/aarch64/vector_initialization_nostack.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78142 --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt --- What's the status of this? Can it be closed?

[Bug c/71199] Support overloadable attribute in GNU C front-end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71199 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- After some experiments, we've found that a better approach is to continue using the current poor-man's overloading scheme, and do more folding of built-in calls following gimplification. David, should we

[Bug libstdc++/77528] std::queue default constructor unnecessarily creates temporary of underlying Container

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77528 --- Comment #10 from TC --- C'ing the relevant parts of my email to the lists here for the record: The new default member initializers use {}, and it's not too hard to find test cases where {} and value-initialization do different things,

[Bug target/77346] [7 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- Shall we close this for now? We can always reopen if it resurfaces.

[Bug tree-optimization/79054] missing range information with INT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79054 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target||poerpc64*-*-* Host|

[Bug tree-optimization/79054] New: missing range information with INT_MAX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79054 Bug ID: 79054 Summary: missing range information with INT_MAX Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/70831] [6/7 Regression] FTBFS: Build fails with bootstrap-lto and profiledbootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70831 --- Comment #12 from JD --- My CPU is Intel Core i7-4800MQ, but I realized my report was misleading. I get that same error with LDFLAGS=-flto CXXFLAGS=-flto CFLAGS=-flto which results in "CFLAGS=-g -O2 -flto" "CXXFLAGS=-g -O2 -flto

[Bug fortran/79053] New: Memory leak from array constructor + array index off by one the array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79053 Bug ID: 79053 Summary: Memory leak from array constructor + array index off by one the array Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/79052] bootstrap-ubsan failures due to warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79052 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug bootstrap/79052] New: bootstrap-ubsan failures due to warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79052 Bug ID: 79052 Summary: bootstrap-ubsan failures due to warnings Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug testsuite/79051] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for warnings, line 140)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79051 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target||poerpc64*-*-*

[Bug tree-optimization/78775] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_alloc_args_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks for the heads up, Bill. I opened bug 79051 for the failure. Can you paste the excess error(s) you see into that bug please? (I don't see any in my builds.)

[Bug testsuite/79051] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for warnings, line 140)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79051 Bug ID: 79051 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-4.c (test for warnings, line 140) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/78775] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_alloc_args_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/78606] [7 Regression] -Wformat-length/-fprintf-return-value incorrect for %+.0i and %.0o with zero value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78606 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/78959] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr78622.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78959 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|middle-end

[Bug testsuite/78960] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78960 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|middle-end

[Bug testsuite/78133] Commit r241489 adds printf specifiers not supported by newlib.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78133 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/78133] Commit r241489 adds printf specifiers not supported by newlib.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78133 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jan 10 22:45:52 2017 New Revision: 244298 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244298=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/78960 - FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c execution test PR

[Bug middle-end/78960] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78960 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jan 10 22:45:52 2017 New Revision: 244298 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244298=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/78960 - FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c execution test PR

[Bug middle-end/78959] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr78622.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78959 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jan 10 22:45:52 2017 New Revision: 244298 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244298=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/78960 - FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf.c execution test PR

[Bug target/73350] AVX512: GCC optimizes away rounding flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73350 --- Comment #4 from Wenzel Jakob --- This bug is still present in the latest GCC -- are there any plans to fix it?

[Bug target/76731] [AVX512] _mm512_i32gather_epi32 and other scatter/gather routines have incorrect signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731 --- Comment #9 from Wenzel Jakob --- Hi -- just a ping regarding this issue. Thanks, Wenzel

[Bug middle-end/78138] missing warnings on buffer overflow with non-constant source length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78138 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jan 10 22:35:22 2017 New Revision: 244297 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244297=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78138 - missing warnings on buffer overflow with non-constant source

[Bug middle-end/78138] missing warnings on buffer overflow with non-constant source length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78138 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77598] constexpr compilation failure on reference type casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77598 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/77528] std::queue default constructor unnecessarily creates temporary of underlying Container

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77528 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/77598] constexpr compilation failure on reference type casting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77598 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 10 22:33:09 2017 New Revision: 244296 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244296=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77598 * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-ref11.C: New. Added:

[Bug c++/77914] Wrong lambda definition accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77914 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Adam Butcher from comment #4) > (In reply to Michele Caini from comment #3) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > > > Shall we remove that altogether, or just pedwarn on it? > > > >

[Bug c/78768] -Walloca-larger-than and -Wformat-length warnings disabled by -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Patch to add LTO to the set of languages these options are enabled for posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg00658.html

[Bug c++/78274] [DR 374] Rejected specialization in different namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78274 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/56480] Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/77949] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid code in internal compiler error: in linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset, at libcpp/line-map.c:907

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77949 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77597] GCC 6.2 / LLVM 3.9 name mangling discrepancy for function with instantiated template in signature whose template argument involves an ABI tag.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77597 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78245] missing -Wformat-length on an overflow of a dynamically allocated buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78245 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78245] missing -Wformat-length on an overflow of a dynamically allocated buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78245 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jan 10 21:56:44 2017 New Revision: 244294 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244294=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78245 - missing -Wformat-length on an overflow of a dynamically

[Bug middle-end/78245] missing -Wformat-length on an overflow of a dynamically allocated buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78245 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jan 10 21:54:15 2017 New Revision: 244293 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244293=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/78245 - missing -Wformat-length on an overflow of a dynamically

[Bug c++/77949] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid code in internal compiler error: in linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset, at libcpp/line-map.c:907

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77949 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue Jan 10 21:54:09 2017 New Revision: 244292 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244292=gcc=rev Log: Fix issues with unrepresentable column numbers (PR c++/77949) PR c++/77949

[Bug middle-end/68336] False positive Wreturn-type warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68336 Stephan Beyer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||s-beyer at gmx dot net --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/70182] c++filt fails to demangle _ZNSt17_Function_handlerIFSt4pairImjEjEZN5folly12addBenchmarkI3$_0EENSt9enable_ifIXeqsr5boost14function_types14function_arityIDTadsrT_onclEEE5valueLi2EEvE4typ

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70182 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > Looks like: > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/mangle.c b/gcc/cp/mangle.c > index 5d38373765bb..9d04c35d1f62 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/mangle.c > +++ b/gcc/cp/mangle.c

[Bug c++/79050] internal compiler error: tree code 'template_type_parm' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050 --- Comment #1 from Stefan --- Maybe dupe of #77754

[Bug c++/79050] New: internal compiler error: tree code 'template_type_parm' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050 Bug ID: 79050 Summary: internal compiler error: tree code 'template_type_parm' is not supported in LTO streams Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/77489] Invalid mangling of static local variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77489 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2) > Untested patch: This looks good, except that the mangling change needs to depend on -fabi-version, and in the demangling change open braces go on a new

[Bug tree-optimization/78775] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_alloc_args_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78775] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_alloc_args_overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78775 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Jan 10 21:02:07 2017 New Revision: 244290 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244290=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/78775 - [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_warn_alloc_args_overflow

[Bug tree-optimization/78856] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78856 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Tue Jan 10 20:55:59 2017 New Revision: 244287 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244287=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/77766 PR tree-optimization/78856 *

[Bug middle-end/77766] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu (executable hangs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77766 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Tue Jan 10 20:55:59 2017 New Revision: 244287 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244287=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/77766 PR tree-optimization/78856 *

[Bug target/79044] ICE in insn_is_swappable_p, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:41191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79044 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- Patches submitted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg00651.html

[Bug go/79037] gccgo: Binaries crash with parforsetup: pos is not aligned on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79037 --- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #1) > I'll report back tomorrow. Problem persists: root@mama:~# ./hello-world fatal error: parforsetup: pos is not aligned runtime stack:

[Bug c/79049] New: Unknown escape sequence not correctly pointed out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79049 Bug ID: 79049 Summary: Unknown escape sequence not correctly pointed out Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/78900] ICE in gcc.target/powerpc/signbit-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78900 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Tue Jan 10 20:03:00 2017 New Revision: 244285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244285=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-10 Michael Meissner Backport

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #25 from Peter

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #24 from Peter Bergner --- Closing as fixed.

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #22 from Bill Seurer --- This is now resolved in gcc 5, 6, and trunk

[Bug driver/78877] Missing suggestion for -fsanitize=addres

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg00646.html

[Bug c++/68604] typeid does not allow an id-expression that denotes a non-static data member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68604 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Hmm. The problem here is that the operand of typeid may or may not be an unevaluated operand, so we don't know which it is while we're parsing. This can be worked around by writing typeid(decltype((A::i)))

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 --- Comment #21 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: seurer Date: Tue Jan 10 19:11:55 2017 New Revision: 244284 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244284=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-10 Bill Seurer Backport

[Bug rtl-optimization/79048] New: Unnecessary reload for flags setting insn when operands die

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79048 Bug ID: 79048 Summary: Unnecessary reload for flags setting insn when operands die Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/79045] bool expanded as 2 jumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79045 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2) > Also note that for f1 reload fails to figure out that both regs die in (insn > 10): -> PR79048.

[Bug rtl-optimization/79048] Unnecessary reload for flags setting insn when operands die

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79048 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71357] [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block follows the use for SSA_NAME) w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71357 --- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > Probably changing iteration space in the test-case would re-trigger > the issue. Well, trying this suggestion didn't work for me. I still fail to reproduce it

[Bug libstdc++/77528] std::queue default constructor unnecessarily creates temporary of underlying Container

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77528 --- Comment #8 from jerryct --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > That introduces a different problem though. This won't compile with libc++: > > #include > struct D : std::deque { D(int) { } }; > template class std::stack

[Bug other/79046] g++ -print-file-name=plugin uses full version number in path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79046 --- Comment #3 from Dave Johansen --- What are the chances that either of those changes will make it into the 7 release?

[Bug middle-end/79045] bool expanded as 2 jumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79045 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- Same situation with: extern void g(); void f1(char a,char b){ if(a|b)g(); } void f2(bool a,bool b){ if(a|b)g(); } f1: movl%esi, %eax orb %dil, %al jne .L4 f2:

[Bug target/79039] builtins-3-p9.c fails with -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79039 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love --- On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 14:29 +, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79039 > > Bill Schmidt changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/79040] vec_cntlz redefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79040 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/78856] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78856 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/77766] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu (executable hangs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77766 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/79045] bool expanded as 2 jumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79045 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79047] loop annotation ignored in templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79047 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/79047] New: loop annotation ignored in templated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79047 Bug ID: 79047 Summary: loop annotation ignored in templated function Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/70568] [5/6/7 regression] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71977] powerpc64: Use VSR when operating on float and integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71977 Bug 71977 depends on bug 70568, which changed state. Bug 70568 Summary: [5/6/7 regression] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 What|Removed

[Bug target/71977] powerpc64: Use VSR when operating on float and integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71977 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71977] powerpc64: Use VSR when operating on float and integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71977 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #40494|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/79040] vec_cntlz redefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79040 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/77766] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu (executable hangs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77766 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'll take a look. Given the source, it could well have been another instance of the cached iteration information.

[Bug other/79046] g++ -print-file-name=plugin uses full version number in path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79046 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/78823] Poor code on PowerPC when moving SFmode values between GPRs and vector registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78823 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Tue Jan 10 17:44:17 2017 New Revision: 244279 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244279=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-01-10 Michael Meissner

[Bug target/70568] [5/6/7 regression] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 --- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Tue Jan 10 17:44:17 2017 New Revision: 244279 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244279=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-01-10 Michael Meissner

[Bug target/71977] powerpc64: Use VSR when operating on float and integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71977 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Tue Jan 10 17:44:17 2017 New Revision: 244279 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244279=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-01-10 Michael Meissner

[Bug target/72749] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong amount of branch edges after conditional jump in bb 5) w/ -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72749 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/71977] powerpc64: Use VSR when operating on float and integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71977 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 40494 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40494=edit Back port of patch to fix problem on GCC 6 branch While it has been decided not to apply this improvement to the

[Bug libstdc++/77528] std::queue default constructor unnecessarily creates temporary of underlying Container

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77528 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/77528] std::queue default constructor unnecessarily creates temporary of underlying Container

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77528 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jan 10 17:30:20 2017 New Revision: 244278 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244278=gcc=rev Log: PR77528 add default constructors for container adaptors PR

[Bug other/79046] g++ -print-file-name=plugin uses full version number in path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79046 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2017-01/msg00033.html

[Bug other/79046] New: g++ -print-file-name=plugin uses full version number in path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79046 Bug ID: 79046 Summary: g++ -print-file-name=plugin uses full version number in path Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/79044] ICE in insn_is_swappable_p, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:41191

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79044 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/78304] [7 Regression] -Wformat doesn't warn anymore for inttypes.h format string argument type mismatches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/79041] aarch64 backend emits R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 relocation despite -mpc-relative-literal-loads option being used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79041 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/61729] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/scoped1.C -std=gnu++11 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61729 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/78877] Missing suggestion for -fsanitize=addres

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2016-12-21

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor --- As Jason explained it works as designed. But the warning is certainly confusing. It doesn't help that not all attributes enjoy this special treatment or that the manual doesn't explain it. At a minimum, I

[Bug tree-optimization/71307] Poor code quality with lane extraction arm_neon.h intrinsics on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71307 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |--- Summary|[7 Regression]

[Bug sanitizer/78992] Incorrect sigaction definition on 32-bit sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78992 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 10 15:22:56 2017 New Revision: 244275 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244275=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/78992 *

  1   2   >