[Bug bootstrap/79567] New: Compiler-warning "unknown escape sequence '\x'" about genmatch-generated C-files on mingw-host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79567 Bug ID: 79567 Summary: Compiler-warning "unknown escape sequence '\x'" about genmatch-generated C-files on mingw-host Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/79503] [7 Regression] [new inheriting ctors] spurious bad candidate from same or derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79503 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/29455] Issues with -Wchar-subscripts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29455 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/29445] Add attribute for 'experimental'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29445 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/79510] #pragma GCC diagnostic pop/push/ignored doesn't work as expected in template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79510 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/79566] New: [6/7 Regression] elaborated-type-specifier incorrectly rejected in range-based for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566 Bug ID: 79566 Summary: [6/7 Regression] elaborated-type-specifier incorrectly rejected in range-based for Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/79520] Spurious caching for constexpr arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79520 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/79564] [missed optimization][x86] relaxed atomic counting compiled the same as seq_cst

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79564 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/79531] bad location when trying to define undeclared method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79531 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79551] Better caret position for not declared errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79551 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/79554] Zero length format string passed to fprintf under if statement causes error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79554 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/71943] Wreturn-type when combining destructor + return + __noreturn__ function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71943 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/61379] __attribute__((noreturn)) ignored on pure virtual member functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61379 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/60364] [[noreturn]] specified for second declaration but not first doesn't result in a diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60364 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug demangler/79099] Memory leak in cplus-dem.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79099 Kostya Serebryany changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kcc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/79286] [7 Regression] ira and lra wrong code at -O2 and -Os on i686-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/79286] [7 Regression] ira and lra wrong code at -O2 and -Os on i686-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79286 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Feb 16 22:56:51 2017 New Revision: 245521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245521=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-16 Alan Modra PR rtl-optimization/79286

[Bug target/79565] New: ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79565 Bug ID: 79565 Summary: ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:612 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/67150] [c++-concepts] Expression constraint fails with dependent types used as a deduction constraint target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67150 Casey Carter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 67150, which changed state. Bug 67150 Summary: [c++-concepts] Expression constraint fails with dependent types used as a deduction constraint target https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67150 What

[Bug c++/67384] [concepts] More fun with deduction constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67384 Casey Carter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 67384, which changed state. Bug 67384 Summary: [concepts] More fun with deduction constraints https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67384 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/79556] [7 Regression] [C++1z] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:18928

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79556 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/26749] too few arguments to function va_start is caught too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Okay, I've now read the discussion in bug 24222 that this one blocks. I think I understand the design issue though I don't see how to trigger it in a test case. $ cat t.c && /build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B

[Bug c++/79564] New: [missed optimization][x86] relaxed atomic counting compiled the same as seq_cst

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79564 Bug ID: 79564 Summary: [missed optimization][x86] relaxed atomic counting compiled the same as seq_cst Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/79562] sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:26:12PM +, andreast at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #7 from Andreas Tobler --- > Fixed on trunk. > Thanks!

[Bug c++/78940] [missed optimization] Useless guard variable in thread_local defaulted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78940 Marc Mutz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.mutz at kdab dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c/26749] too few arguments to function va_start is caught too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > Yes, I see the error there. There are 53 calls to error() or error_at() in > the file. I'm trying to understand why you think this particular one is a > problem

[Bug c/26749] too few arguments to function va_start is caught too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Yes, I see the error there. There are 53 calls to error() or error_at() in the file. I'm trying to understand why you think this particular one is a problem (and the others aren't) and how that problem

[Bug c/26749] too few arguments to function va_start is caught too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug target/26980] g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26980 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/26749] too few arguments to function va_start is caught too late

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26749 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/79562] sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 Andreas Tobler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/79562] sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Tobler --- Author: andreast Date: Thu Feb 16 21:23:51 2017 New Revision: 245520 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245520=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-16 Andreas Tobler PR sanitizer/79562

[Bug c++/79549] [7 Regression] [c++1z] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:13474 with partial specialization of auto... template parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79549 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/79512] [6 Regression] ICE: Segfault in gimple_build_call_1, at gimple.c:218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE: |[6 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c++/79561] Missed optimization: useless guards for zero-initialized POD statics at function scope.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79561 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think this is a dup of PR 78940

[Bug c++/79533] [7 Regression] ICE in build_over_call under -std=c++17 in 'S s(static_cast(f()));'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79533 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug ada/79542] [7 regression] GNAT bug box

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79563] New: Same-name labels in lambdas considered duplicate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79563 Bug ID: 79563 Summary: Same-name labels in lambdas considered duplicate Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/79545] gcc[5/6]: RS6000, xvcvuxdsp and xvcvsxdsp RTL defines have wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79545 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love --- Author: carll Date: Thu Feb 16 20:59:20 2017 New Revision: 245518 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245518=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2017-02-16 Carl Love Backport from mainline

[Bug sanitizer/79562] sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:19:18PM +, andreast at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Andreas Tobler changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug sanitizer/79562] sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 Andreas Tobler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/79562] sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 Andreas Tobler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/79561] Missed optimization: useless guards for zero-initialized POD statics at function scope.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79561 --- Comment #1 from Marc Mutz --- For a moment, I thought it was about std::atomic, but a simple template container { T t; } instead of std::atomic produces the same result. So it seems like the = default ctor is the problem. If I remove

[Bug sanitizer/79562] sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- The problem was introduced within the last 8 days. My last bootstrap was % gfc7 --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 7.0.1 20170207 (experimental)

[Bug sanitizer/79562] sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Configure command was $HOME/gcc/gcc7/configure \ --prefix=$HOME/work/7 --with-isl=/usr/local \ --enable-languages=c,fortran,c++ --enable-libsanitizer \ --disable-libmudflap --disable-nls \

[Bug sanitizer/79562] sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug sanitizer/79562] New: sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79562 Bug ID: 79562 Summary: sanitizer breaks bootstrap of x86_64-*-freebsd Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/79561] New: Missed optimization: useless guards for zero-initialized POD statics at function scope.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79561 Bug ID: 79561 Summary: Missed optimization: useless guards for zero-initialized POD statics at function scope. Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/79553] Infinite gfortran loop on invalid code with procedures parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79553 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Known to fail|

[Bug target/79559] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in ix86_print_operand, at config/i386/i386.c:18189

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79559 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/79557] ICE in ipa_modify_formal_parameters, at ipa-prop.c:3979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79557 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/79464] [7 Regression] ICE in ipa_modify_formal_ parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79464 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug c++/79502] [c++1z] [[nodiscard]] attribute ignored for class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79502 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Feb 16 19:49:19 2017 New Revision: 245516 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245516=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79502 - lost nodiscard attribute * pt.c

[Bug c++/79502] [c++1z] [[nodiscard]] attribute ignored for class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79502 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78127] [5/6/7 Regression] AArch64 internal compiler error: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78127 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Thu Feb 16 19:47:15 2017 New Revision: 245514 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245514=gcc=rev Log: 2017-02-16 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug c++/79555] Warning 'base class should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor' issued in wrong case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79555 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes sorry, I messed up my test using GCC 6!

[Bug fortran/78854] [F03] DTIO namelist output not working on internal unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78854 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to janus from comment #1) > This essentially blocks PR 78661, for which it is very hard to write a > proper test case as long as this bug is unfixed. Janus, you could open a file with status

[Bug c++/79555] Warning 'base class should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor' issued in wrong case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79555 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|6.3.1 | Summary|[7 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/26388] Variable sized storage allocation should be promoted to stack allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26388 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #10) > The implementation challenges aside, I think the transformation suggested > here could break some valid (if rare) C++ programs. std::vector is > specified to

[Bug target/79560] New: libgccjit is broken on generic mips targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79560 Bug ID: 79560 Summary: libgccjit is broken on generic mips targets Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/79541] lra reads uninitialized memory (with invalid input)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79541 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- The bug is not severe. It occurs only when wrong asm occurs. This asm is transformed into an USE and all its data is invalidated. If an insn is inserted before the USE we take a garbage as the offset

[Bug c/79558] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Segfault in ubsan_type_descriptor, at ubsan.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79558 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- An ICE started with r211859, but it was a different ICE: /home/brq/mpolacek/u.c: In function ‘fn1’: /home/brq/mpolacek/u.c:7:11: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault x[i][j] = 5; ^

[Bug c/79558] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Segfault in ubsan_type_descriptor, at ubsan.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79558 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target

[Bug c/79558] ICE: Segfault in ubsan_type_descriptor, at ubsan.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79558 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/79559] New: ICE in ix86_print_operand, at config/i386/i386.c:18189

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79559 Bug ID: 79559 Summary: ICE in ix86_print_operand, at config/i386/i386.c:18189 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/45397] [5/6/7 Regression] Issues with integer narrowing conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397 --- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law --- The model of shortening as much as possible for gimple, then widening to word mode at the gimple/RTL boundary is probably too simplistic. We really need the ability to widen when doing so allows for

[Bug c/79558] New: ICE: Segfault in ubsan_type_descriptor, at ubsan.c:412

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79558 Bug ID: 79558 Summary: ICE: Segfault in ubsan_type_descriptor, at ubsan.c:412 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/79557] New: ICE in ipa_modify_formal_parameters, at ipa-prop.c:3979

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79557 Bug ID: 79557 Summary: ICE in ipa_modify_formal_parameters, at ipa-prop.c:3979 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/78838] msp430 option -mcode-region=either, -ffunction-sections, and interrupt function attributes cause incorrect section to be created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78838 --- Comment #2 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- Proposed patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01054.html

[Bug c++/79502] [c++1z] [[nodiscard]] attribute ignored for class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79502 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Latest untested patch at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01051.html The earlier one caused bootstrap failures (this one includes testcases from that as well as adjusted testcases from that,

[Bug tree-optimization/26388] Variable sized storage allocation should be promoted to stack allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26388 --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #10) > The implementation challenges aside, I think the transformation suggested > here could break some valid (if rare) C++ programs. std::vector is > specified to use

[Bug tree-optimization/26388] Variable sized storage allocation should be promoted to stack allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26388 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79553] Infinite gfortran loop on invalid code with procedures parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79553 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With trunk (7.0, r244467) I get pr79553.f90:7:30: subroutine procname(a) 1 Error: Symbol 'procname' at (1) already has an explicit interface pr79553.f90:8:25:

[Bug c/26367] multiple levels of __builtin_expect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26367 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79050] [5/6 Regression] ICE: tree code 'template_type_parm' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE: |[5/6 Regression] ICE: tree

[Bug c++/78572] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] internal |[6 Regression] internal

[Bug c++/78572] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4968

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78572 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Feb 16 16:42:06 2017 New Revision: 245511 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245511=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78572 - ICE with self-modifying array initializer *

[Bug c++/79050] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: tree code 'template_type_parm' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Feb 16 16:42:00 2017 New Revision: 245510 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245510=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/79050 - ICE with undeduced auto and LTO * decl.c

[Bug target/76731] [AVX512] _mm512_i32gather_epi32 and other scatter/gather routines have incorrect signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731 --- Comment #16 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 16 16:41:36 2017 New Revision: 245509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245509=gcc=rev Log: PR target/76731 * config/i386/avx512fintrin.h

[Bug fortran/79553] Infinite gfortran loop on invalid code with procedures parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79553 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug inline-asm/79552] [6 Regression] Wrong code generation due to -fschedule-insns, with __restrict__ and inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79552 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Katsunori Kumatani from comment #3) > In my case, I explicitly told GCC what memory I was going to clobber (with > the "=m"(*m) output operand). In fact, without telling it I was going to >

[Bug bootstrap/25790] make clean fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25790 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/78870] Support std::filesystem on Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870 --- Comment #8 from Jan Niklas Hasse --- I'm not interested in doing all this work again from scratch, especially since working with the Windows API is a pain.

[Bug inline-asm/79552] [6 Regression] Wrong code generation due to -fschedule-insns, with __restrict__ and inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79552 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- So your patch is effectively revesal of PR48885. But then we need some other fix for it.

[Bug inline-asm/79552] [6 Regression] Wrong code generation due to -fschedule-insns, with __restrict__ and inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79552 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug rtl-optimization/79541] lra reads uninitialized memory (with invalid input)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79541 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov --- Thank you, Bernd. I've reproduced the bug and started to work on it.

[Bug c++/79556] [7 Regression] [C++1z] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:18928

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79556 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target

[Bug c++/79556] [C++1z] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:18928

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79556 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/79554] Zero length format string passed to fprintf under if statement causes error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79554 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug inline-asm/79552] [6 Regression] Wrong code generation due to -fschedule-insns, with __restrict__ and inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79552 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Ah... FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT (use_stmt, ui, ptr) { /* ??? Calls and asms. */ if (!gimple_assign_single_p (use_stmt)) continue; and at PTA

[Bug c++/79556] New: [C++1z] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:18928

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79556 Bug ID: 79556 Summary: [C++1z] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:18928 Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug inline-asm/79552] [6 Regression] Wrong code generation due to -fschedule-insns, with __restrict__ and inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79552 --- Comment #3 from Katsunori Kumatani --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #1) > (In reply to Katsunori Kumatani from comment #0) > > > Things to note: > > > > This happens on GCC 6 and up to 7 only, GCC 5.4 generates correct output. > >

[Bug c++/79555] [7 Regression] Warning 'base class should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor' issued in wrong case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79555 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79519] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE deleting template friend function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79519 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/79537] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:12009

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug inline-asm/79552] [6 Regression] Wrong code generation due to -fschedule-insns, with __restrict__ and inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79552 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/79555] New: Warning 'base class should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor' issued in wrong case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79555 Bug ID: 79555 Summary: Warning 'base class should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor' issued in wrong case Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   >