https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> @@ -19021,6 +19021,13 @@
> case OPT_ASYNCJOBS:
>
> async_jobs = atoi(opt_arg());
> + if (async_jobs < 0) {
> +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79623
--- Comment #3 from Sumit ---
Hi Richard,
I think this could be the root cause.
checking for intptr_t... no
checking for uintptr_t... no
checking for ssize_t... no
checking for pid_t... no
Could you please help me understanding this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79621
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
What a cool little bug. AFAICT, the underlying issue has been latent since the
introduction of gimple-ssa-isolate-paths a few years back.
We have this PHI at the start of BB4:
e7_11 = PHI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79584
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79291
--- Comment #6 from Doug Gilmore ---
> It also looks like mips lacks implementation of any of the
> vectorizer cost hooks and thus defaults to
> default_builtin_vectorization_cost which means that unaligned
> loads/stores have double cost.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79570
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
> Alexandre, do you recall why debug insns at heads of basic blocks are special?
I'm afraid I don't remember, but if I had to guess, I'd say it's because debug
insns normally wouldn't be at the border of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79642
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79642
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 21 00:23:52 2017
New Revision: 245619
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245619=gcc=rev
Log:
PR go/79642
* lang.opt (-fgo-relative-import-path): Change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79482
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
int async_jobs = 0;
...
async_jobs = atoi(opt_arg());
loopargs_len = (async_jobs == 0 ? 1 : async_jobs);
loopargs =
app_malloc(loopargs_len * sizeof(loopargs_t), "array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79648
Bug ID: 79648
Summary: error on x in constant expression when
__builtin_constant_p(x) == true
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>The second warning is also bogus, the -Wno-parentheses-equality was accepted
before.
Well this error message about an unknown warning option only happens if there
was another error message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79647
Bug ID: 79647
Summary: bogus warning when building openssl
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79635
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
Thanks for that info. Could you add this as a comment to the params.def file,
just above the first appearance of the word "asan"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79602
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> We only ever download translations from the TP site and use them
> unmodified; we don't make any local changes to the translations in GCC.
Fine, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79584
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79646
Bug ID: 79646
Summary: Typos in vax.opt
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79645
Bug ID: 79645
Summary: missing period in microblaze.opt
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79644
Bug ID: 79644
Summary: Undocumented options in microblaze.opt
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79641
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79643
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79643
Bug ID: 79643
Summary: Please define the file format of *.opt files more
i18n-friendly
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79642
Bug ID: 79642
Summary: space instead of tab in lang.opt
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79641
Bug ID: 79641
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with const variable and
attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79640
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79140
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
--- Comment #4 from Segher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79640
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79640
Bug ID: 79640
Summary: ICE with generic lambda expression
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68739
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2017-02-19, at 4:47 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
>> Oh, (void*)1 works, it's only rejected with the LL suffix. That's not
>> conforming either (and Clang rejects it).
>
> I'll see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79639
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Created attachment 40785
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40785=edit
ivopts-details-scev dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa*-*-* (32-bit) |hppa*-*-* (32-bit)
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79639
Bug ID: 79639
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE with -O and constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79633
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79636
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> > (In reply to janus from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to janus from comment #0)
> > > > It seems like the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79140
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
This can be closed, I think?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79563
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And, penalties should be measured, on contemporary CPUs pure instruction count
says nothing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With -Ofast -m32 -mfpmath=i387 it changed with r244816.
Why do you care about 32-bit code performance (and especially x87)? That is
pure legacy, people who care about performance should be using -m64 or at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79602
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
We only ever download translations from the TP site and use them
unmodified; we don't make any local changes to the translations in GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77825
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77337
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78139
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 20 18:18:30 2017
New Revision: 245612
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245612=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/78139 - destructor needed by new-expression
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78139
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79332
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79638
Bug ID: 79638
Summary: Wrongly extracted source string "tid.y;"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79637
Bug ID: 79637
Summary: missing documentation for PARAM_MAX_FSM_THREAD_LENGTH
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79635
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
asan is short for address sanitizer; aka -fsantize=address option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79575
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79636
Bug ID: 79636
Summary: ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1457
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79635
Bug ID: 79635
Summary: Explain to translators what "asan" means
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634
Bug ID: 79634
Summary: ICE in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7490
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79631
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79633
Bug ID: 79633
Summary: ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3163
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79632
Bug ID: 79632
Summary: params.def should not contain redundant comments
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79631
Bug ID: 79631
Summary: ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have negate_expr
in decompose, at tree.h:5255
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79630
Bug ID: 79630
Summary: ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1311
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79587
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Created attachment 40783 [details]
> Untested patch
>
> Untested patch, can you please test building Python with the patch? Thanks
Works fine now, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79558
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79558
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Feb 20 17:38:57 2017
New Revision: 245611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245611=gcc=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/79558
* ubsan.c (ubsan_type_descriptor): Check if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79536
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Feb 20 17:37:20 2017
New Revision: 245610
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245610=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79537
* gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Handle unused
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79536
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Feb 20 17:35:21 2017
New Revision: 245609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245609=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79536
* fold-const.c (fold_negate_expr_1):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79151
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
A few more test cases with a relatively recent trunk.
POWER7:
[tkoenig@gcc1-power7 ~]$ gcc -mcpu=power7 -O3 foo.c && time ./a.out
41.987257
real0m3.688s
user0m3.685s
sys 0m0.002s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79608
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79603
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79613
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79615
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79616
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79617
Roland Illig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79151
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> The question is of course whether vector division has comparable latency /
> throughput as the scalar one.
Here's a test case on a rather old CPU, a Core 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056
--- Comment #21 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Mon Feb 20 16:43:03 2017
New Revision: 245607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245607=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-02-20 Kelvin Nilsen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79345
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40784
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40784=edit
gcc7-pr79345.patch
Untested fix. That said, I think (most likely just for GCC8) it would be very
much beneficial to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79581
--- Comment #4 from PeteVine ---
> Judging by your -mcpu option is this on a Cortex-A5?
Yes, if you look at the results on a Cortex A53 running armv7 code, it doesn't
reproduce either, and A5-codegen is king :) (hopefully due to in-order design
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79558
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE: |[5/6 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79558
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Feb 20 15:50:23 2017
New Revision: 245605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245605=gcc=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/79558
* ubsan.c (ubsan_type_descriptor): Check if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79345
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77333
--- Comment #19 from Tony Kelman ---
The patch also applies and fixes the problem on the gcc-5-branch. I haven't
tried with trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79537
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Feb 20 15:05:53 2017
New Revision: 245604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245604=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/79537
* gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Handle unused
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79587
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 40783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40783=edit
Untested patch
Untested patch, can you please test building Python with the patch? Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79494
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Michel Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mimomorin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79545
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79523
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79599
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79523
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 20 14:17:42 2017
New Revision: 245603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245603=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-02-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79599
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79599
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Feb 20 14:17:42 2017
New Revision: 245603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245603=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-02-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79599
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79494
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
--- Comment #4 from Katsunori Kumatani ---
I forgot to mention that in the particular above example, it is obvious the
"fstp" is useless.
If you remove the "fld st(0)" and then the 'p' from the fstp, you end up with
"fst st(0)" which is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79593
--- Comment #3 from Katsunori Kumatani ---
Hi, sorry I forgot to mention, I used Godbolt's Compiler Explorer to test it on
GCC 5 and 7 as I only have version 6 deployed on this machine.
On my end, it probably used march 'native' by default (?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79568
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79568
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 20 12:52:21 2017
New Revision: 245602
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245602=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/79568
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_builtin): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79587
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo