[Bug c++/77772] Segmentation fault when running an application with gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/79968] diagnostics: merge similar diagnostics containing -fdec-structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79968 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- SUBROUTINE DRPAUL(SMAT,TMAT,EPS,EPT,SIJ,TIJ,WRK,VEC,ARRAY,FMO, * XMKVIR,TMJ,XMI,YMI,ZMI,ZQQ,L1,L1EF,LNA,LNA2, * NAEF,L2,NLOC,NVIR,PROVEC,FOCKMA,MXBF,MXMO2)

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6 and #7) > > The testcase shows hardly profitable PRE which the patches should > disable (I didn't verify the patches fix the testcase!) The patch does

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- #1 0x019a81e7 in all_phi_incrs_profitable (c=0x2c907b0, phi=0x76684400) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-7-branch/gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c:3298 3298 ||

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/80012] FIXME in diagnostic "%s procedure at %L is already declared as %s procedure" from symbol.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80012 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 > > --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug tree-optimization/80158] New: [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158 Bug ID: 80158 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in all_phi_incrs_profitable Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > Can you benchmark the 2nd candidate (most appropriate at this stage I think, > would also fix 77498). > > It will cause pessimizations for code that

[Bug target/79871] i18n: document placeholders for translators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79871 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug ipa/79776] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Patch doesn't help. Note IPA PTA is a simple IPA pass running after inlining decisions are committed to the IL so there shouldn't be any inlining clones around? Oh, and it does try to handle them: /*

[Bug ipa/79776] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Well, PTA simply assumes that cgraph_for_symbol_thunks_and_aliases will call the callback for nodes with different decls. If it's not easy to arrange for that a "simple" fix would be sth like Index:

[Bug testsuite/79418] ERROR: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-2.c -O0 : syntax error in targe t selector "target arm_hf_eabi || avr-*-* || riscv*-*-*" for "

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79418 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/79480] -O3 and -mfpu=neon produces crashing code on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79480 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/79126] [7 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr77445-2.c scan-tree-dump thread1 "Jumps threaded: 16"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79126 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80088] ICE: declaration and definition of function with __attribute__((target("thumb"))) and inlined assembler, with debug symbols enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80088 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- I can confirm that Ubuntu's gcc is based on the Linaro one. And we did backport patches to support target attributes, so it's indeed likely that it is a Linaro-only issue. I've noticed you have a reported

[Bug ipa/79776] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code in insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/79971] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1554 on ARM target with saturated integers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79971 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 79898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/79898] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1554 on ARM target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79898 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78735] profiledbootstrap with --enable-checking=yes,rtl fails on trunk due to -Werror=strict-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78735 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/63155] [5/6/7 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- The plan is to re-write coalescings conflict graph by using SSA-based liveness queries according to https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00192219 Well, at least I'd like to experiment with that as it might be

[Bug rtl-optimization/78735] profiledbootstrap with --enable-checking=yes,rtl fails on trunk due to -Werror=strict-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78735 --- Comment #1 from Franz Sirl --- Can be worked around by bootstrapping with --disable-werror. Last reconfirmed with trunk r246380. Trunk is at 7.0.1, so --disable-werror is the default right now. I guess the only real question is if the

[Bug testsuite/79126] [7 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr77445-2.c scan-tree-dump thread1 "Jumps threaded: 16"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79126 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |trivial

[Bug testsuite/79126] [7 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr77445-2.c scan-tree-dump thread1 "Jumps threaded: 16"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79126 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

asdasdasd

index.html -- View this message in context: http://gcc.1065356.n8.nabble.com/asdasdasd-tp1361259.html Sent from the gcc - bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Bug tree-optimization/80153] ivopt generate wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80153 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- The reason for the tree-affine oddity is that IVO calls #0 tree_to_aff_combination (expr=, type=, comb=0x7fffd310) that is, tree_to_aff_combination with a mismatched expr/type. For example from

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 --- Comment #17 from James Greenhalgh --- I've also successfully bootstrapped and regression tested this patch native on aarch64-none-linux-gnu with no issues.

[Bug tree-optimization/79898] ICE in const_binop, at fold-const.c:1554 on ARM target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79898 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/79995] Messages for iWMMXt builtins could use some cleanup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79995 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80088] ICE: declaration and definition of function with __attribute__((target("thumb"))) and inlined assembler, with debug symbols enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80088 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/80156] [7 Regression] Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80156 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/63155] [5/6/7 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/80133] [bootstrap] ICE during build on PPC64-linux.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80133 --- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin --- Caused by r241649.

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 41031 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41031=edit second patch candidate Second candidate, instead of inhibiting PHI insertions this limits use of them during

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 41030 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41030=edit first patch candidate First variant of an aggressive approach - never add IVs / loop carried dependencies in PRE.

[Bug sanitizer/79572] [6/7 Regression] reference binding to null pointer not reported with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 41029 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41029=edit gcc7-pr79572.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/80155] [7 regression] Performance regression with code hoisting enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80155 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80156] [7 Regression] Generic DTIO interface reported missing if public statement preceeds the interface block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80156 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/80032] [6 Regression] C++ excessive stack usage (no stack reuse)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80032 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Mar 23 08:33:41 2017 New Revision: 246414 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246414=gcc=rev Log: 2017-03-23 Richard Biener PR

[Bug lto/78529] [7 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c failed with lto/O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529 > > --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek --- > It is actually the *-lib.c files that

[Bug sanitizer/79572] [6/7 Regression] reference binding to null pointer not reported with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79572 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r230365, difference in *.original is: - foo ((const int &) (UBSAN_NULL (0B, 2B, 4);, 0B)) >; + foo (0) >;

[Bug ipa/78644] [7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in is_gimple_reg_type with -Og -fipa-cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78644 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Richard, could you please have a look at this?

[Bug tree-optimization/80136] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5627

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80136 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #15) > Jakub, thanks for the confirmation that force_gimple_operand is unnecessary. > Christophe, thanks for testing. Thus I am now regstrapping: > Would appreciate

[Bug rtl-optimization/63191] [5/6 Regression] 32-bit gcc uses excessive memory during dead store elimination with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.5 |7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/63191] [5/6 Regression] 32-bit gcc uses excessive memory during dead store elimination with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63191 __vic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.v.a at ngs dot ru --- Comment #18 from __vic

<    1   2