https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80362
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0.1
Summary|[5/6/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80291
--- Comment #7 from snowfed ---
In the slightly reduced version of the test case cell is not allocated when
reaching associate structure. Maybe, allocate(cell) is worth being added. For
example, when I compile the example with ifort and run it I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80381
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80382
Bug ID: 80382
Summary: ICE with error: unrecognizable insn
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80357
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80375
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Patch attached to the other PR. Note this is an ABI change, basically undoing
the ABI change for 32-bit targets made by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1999-07/msg00031.html
(at that point the ABI was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79788
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 41166
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41166=edit
gcc7-pr79788.patch
Untested patch that caps the widest literal type at long long on ILP32 targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80375
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle ---
[...]
> Can you try this patch. From what I read there can be issues with char pointer
> sizes between these architectures.
>
> diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80224
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Known to fail|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80277
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80224
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Apr 10 11:37:14 2017
New Revision: 246804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246804=gcc=rev
Log:
Support multiple files w/ -i option in gcov (PR gcov-profile/80224).
2017-04-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79905
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80304
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 10 11:27:05 2017
New Revision: 246803
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246803=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-04-10 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80304
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79905
--- Comment #12 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Apr 10 11:25:44 2017
New Revision: 246802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246802=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/79905
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_vector_type):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80370
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 41165
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41165=edit
gcc7-pr80370.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48361
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80370
--- Comment #4 from Vittorio Romeo ---
Even shorter:
template struct tuple_size { static constexpr int value = 1; };
template struct tuple_element { typedef int type; };
template struct tuple {};
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80370
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80381
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Did someone check the places pointed by -Wconversion -Wsystem-headers? Some are
clearly false positive, but some seem suspicious (at least with an older
snapshot, maybe they have been fixed already).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80370
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Guess at least get should return int or int & rather than void:
template struct tuple_size;
template struct tuple_element;
template struct tuple {};
template struct tuple_size {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80381
Bug ID: 80381
Summary: AVX512: -O3, _mm512_srai_epi32, the last argument must
be an 8-bit immediate
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80344
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80344
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 10 08:58:02 2017
New Revision: 246800
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246800=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-04-10 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/80344
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80362
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
10205 /* Convert -A / -B to A / B when the type is signed and overflow
is
10206undefined. */
10207 if ((!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (type))
10208
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80370
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80304
--- Comment #22 from Chinoune ---
Created attachment 41163
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41163=edit
the test program in c
This is an equivalent program written in c.
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80327
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80322
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80325
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80324
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80380
Bug ID: 80380
Summary: misleading behavior with designated initializers for
std::vector
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80350
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0.1
Known to fail|7.0.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80350
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Apr 10 07:29:29 2017
New Revision: 246799
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246799=gcc=rev
Log:
Evaluate a SAVE_EXPR before an UBSAN check (PR sanitizer/80350).
2017-04-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80365
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80370
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80354
--- Comment #2 from Stephan Bergmann ---
But that makes this warning extremely hard to use. Is it really useful for
-Wall in that case?
I came across this with a real-world use-case in the LibreOffice code base,
where some code deliberately
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80375
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Dup of PR79788 ? I'll have a look in any case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80374
Sylvestre Ledru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sylvestre at debian dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80367
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80377
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80324
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 10 06:53:28 2017
New Revision: 246798
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246798=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/80324
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h
101 - 144 of 144 matches
Mail list logo