[Bug target/80210] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 on ppc64 for with __builtin_pow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:26:57PM +, bergner at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210 > > --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- > So it seems

[Bug libfortran/67540] string_intrinsics_inc.c sanitizer detects null pointer passed to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67540 --- Comment #13 from Vittorio Zecca --- In C strings are pointers, in Fortran they are not. So ptr="string" is wrong. As in the following: character, pointer :: cptr cptr="qwerty" end Running it I get a SIGSEGV.

[Bug tree-optimization/62173] [5/6 Regression] 64bit Arch can't ivopt while 32bit Arch can

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173 Bug 62173 depends on bug 66612, which changed state. Bug 66612 Summary: [6/7/8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c scan-assembler bdn https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/66612] [6/7/8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c scan-assembler bdn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/66612] [6/7/8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c scan-assembler bdn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612 --- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Sat Apr 15 04:11:35 2017 New Revision: 246939 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246939=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Testcase 20050830-1.c no longer fails (PR66612) Bin's commit

[Bug driver/53883] GCC 4.7.1 doesn't build on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger/PowerPC (32-bit), at least with MacPorts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53883 M Travis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||travism1 at g dot ucla.edu --- Comment #12

[Bug gcov-profile/80435] New: Expose __gcov_flush to allow developers to dump coverage numbers on demand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80435 Bug ID: 80435 Summary: Expose __gcov_flush to allow developers to dump coverage numbers on demand Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/80346] pessimistic stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80346 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I was looking pretty hard for something the compiler could use to avoid the problematical paths. That's always my first approach since doing so removes the warning and generates better code. I just

[Bug middle-end/80346] pessimistic stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80346 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Bonzini --- And also treat it as undefined behavior and go straight to the else... kidding, but not entirely!). The main issue is that here we _are_ testing the overflow behavior of the function, so we cannot pass sz

[Bug middle-end/80346] pessimistic stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80346 --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Given an unknown object size and a byte count of -1 we ought to be warning IMHO.

[Bug middle-end/80346] pessimistic stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80346 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Bonzini --- > So AFAICT, the warning for the first testcase is valid as well. True, but isn't the maximum object size (2^63-1 aka PTRDIFF_MAX) as bogus as 2^64-1? We are using -1 which is a bit ugly but SIZE_MAX

[Bug other/80434] internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80434 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- How much memory do you have on this machine?

[Bug other/80434] New: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80434 Bug ID: 80434 Summary: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus) Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/80346] pessimistic stringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80346 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79964] Cortex A53 codegen still not optimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79964 PeteVine changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/80433] [CRIS] ICE at -O2: unrecognized insn (post_inc on acr) building glibc sha512.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80433 --- Comment #1 from David B. Robins --- Created attachment 41203 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41203=edit Pass register context for post_inc reload; allow GENNONACR_REGS as preferred. I am attaching a potential fix in

[Bug target/78994] -Ofast makes aarch64 C++ benchmark slower for A53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78994 --- Comment #9 from PeteVine --- Well, yes, that fixes the -Ofast issue for me: -mcpu=cortex-a53 -frename-registers iir:65952 ns per loop iir_2: 63098 ns per loop -mcpu=cortex-a57 (-frename-registers) iir:62839 ns per loop iir_2:

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 --- Comment #21 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Fri Apr 14 21:17:52 2017 New Revision: 246934 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246934=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-14 Janus Weil PR fortran/80361

[Bug rtl-optimization/80429] -fcompare-debug failure on ppc64le with LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80429 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80433] New: [CRIS] ICE at -O2: unrecognized insn (post_inc on acr) building glibc sha512.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80433 Bug ID: 80433 Summary: [CRIS] ICE at -O2: unrecognized insn (post_inc on acr) building glibc sha512.c Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/79929] [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset': specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size 2147483647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- At -O2 the memset is removed very early in the optimization pipeline. Thus there's no warning at O2, but there is a warning at O1. Reality is some warnings are going to give false positives when

[Bug target/80098] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3816 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80098 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80098] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:3816 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80098 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Apr 14 20:27:18 2017 New Revision: 246930 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246930=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-04-14 Michael Meissner PR

[Bug libstdc++/80432] std::pow gives wrong results for long double arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80432 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/80432] std::pow gives wrong results for long double arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80432 --- Comment #3 from Hao Zhang --- (In reply to Hao Zhang from comment #2) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > Can't reproduce, can you please provide options you use to build the > > executable? > > I didn't use any extra options

[Bug libstdc++/80432] std::pow gives wrong results for long double arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80432 --- Comment #2 from Hao Zhang --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Can't reproduce, can you please provide options you use to build the > executable? I didn't use any extra options besides g++ pow.cpp, and both my CFLAGS and

[Bug target/80210] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 on ppc64 for with __builtin_pow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- So it seems rs6000_pragma_target_parse() ends up calling rs6000_option_override_internal(), which is modifying the options via global variables. All other arches pass in the option variables to their

[Bug libstdc++/80432] std::pow gives wrong results for long double arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80432 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/80421] [5 Regression] Case dispatch is scrambled in switch-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80421 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/80426] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80426 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/80392] [5/6/7 Regression] [OOP] ICE with allocatable polymorphic function result in a procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80392 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known

[Bug target/80210] ICE in in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 on ppc64 for with __builtin_pow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- A more direct test case: bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS/PR80210> cat sqrt.i double foo (double a) { return __builtin_sqrt (a); } #pragma GCC target "no-powerpc-gpopt" bergner@bns:~/gcc/BUGS/PR80210>

[Bug middle-end/80421] [5 Regression] Case dispatch is scrambled in switch-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80421 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > Confirmed, only GCC 5.x is affected. Started to be fixed on trunk by > r227307. adding Jeff to CC. That might be covering up a latent bug depending on where the

[Bug middle-end/80421] [5 Regression] Case dispatch is scrambled in switch-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80421 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5

[Bug libstdc++/80432] New: std::pow gives wrong results for long double arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80432 Bug ID: 80432 Summary: std::pow gives wrong results for long double arguments Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 --- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt --- Looks like r246854 is very relevant. Thanks, Vlad!

[Bug c++/80431] New: Use of "this" pointer in member initializer causes constructor not to be called (or ICE on gcc 7)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80431 Bug ID: 80431 Summary: Use of "this" pointer in member initializer causes constructor not to be called (or ICE on gcc 7) Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/80401] [7 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/dimode_off.c and gcc.target/powerpc/pr79038-1.c fail starting with r246764

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80401 --- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- This was fixed somewhere in the revisions 246851 through 246857.

[Bug middle-end/80422] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 in 32-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in operator[], at vec.h:732

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80422 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/80422] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 in 32-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in operator[], at vec.h:732

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80422 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- This is a latent bug in cross jumping AFAICT. Essentially a forwarder block becomes unreachable during cfg_cleanup. Later we're cross jumping an indirect (via more forwarders) successor of the now

[Bug tree-optimization/80430] Vectorizer undervalues cost of alias checking for versioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80430 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/80430] New: Vectorizer undervalues cost of alias checking for versioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80430 Bug ID: 80430 Summary: Vectorizer undervalues cost of alias checking for versioning Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/80429] New: -fcompare-debug failure on ppc64le with LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80429 Bug ID: 80429 Summary: -fcompare-debug failure on ppc64le with LRA Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/80428] New: Incorrect -Wunused-const-variable= instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80428 Bug ID: 80428 Summary: Incorrect -Wunused-const-variable= instance Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug sanitizer/80424] libasan uses tempnam tmpnam tmpnam_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80424 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/37336] [F03] Finish derived-type finalization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 67505, which changed state. Bug 67505 Summary: [F03] bogus runtime error with final subroutine and -fcheck=recursion https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67505 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/67505] [F03] bogus runtime error with final subroutine and -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67505 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7 Regression] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kergonath at me dot com ---

[Bug fortran/80388] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80388 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59910] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59910 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Glenn.Hyland at utas dot edu.au

[Bug fortran/59910] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59910 --- Comment #10 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Fri Apr 14 13:00:02 2017 New Revision: 246929 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246929=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-14 Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug fortran/80388] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4986

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80388 --- Comment #7 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Fri Apr 14 13:00:02 2017 New Revision: 246929 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246929=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-14 Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug middle-end/80423] [7 Regression] GC related -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80423 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug tree-optimization/80426] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80426 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug middle-end/80422] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 in 32-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in operator[], at vec.h:732

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80422 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug middle-end/80422] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 in 32-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in operator[], at vec.h:732

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80422 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/80426] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80426 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/80427] New: DR1658 is implemented in C++03 and C++14 mode, but not C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80427 Bug ID: 80427 Summary: DR1658 is implemented in C++03 and C++14 mode, but not C++11 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79430] [7 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 --- Comment #30 from Bijan Chokoufe --- > Could you maybe do the following: > > - Use your normal sources > > - Change the compilation options to add -fdump-tree-all to the relevant > file > > - Copy all the generated xxx.f90.whatever files

[Bug tree-optimization/80426] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80426 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/80423] [7 Regression] GC related -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80423 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/80425] Extra inter-unit register move with zero-extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80425 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/80424] libasan uses tempnam tmpnam tmpnam_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80424 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/80426] New: Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80426 Bug ID: 80426 Summary: Wrong constant folding Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug middle-end/80421] [5 Regression] Case dispatch is scrambled in switch-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80421 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug target/80419] rpmbuild with rpmrc file crashed httpd rebuild

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80419 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80419] rpmbuild with rpmrc file crashed httpd rebuild

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80419 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- We need more information than this. Can try to see where the illegal instruction happens and what it is?

[Bug rtl-optimization/80425] New: Extra inter-unit register move with zero-extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80425 Bug ID: 80425 Summary: Extra inter-unit register move with zero-extension Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug debug/80423] [7 Regression] GC related -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80423 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 41200 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41200=edit unreduced testcase On ppc64le: % /home/trippels/gcc_7/usr/local/bin/g++ -fcompare-debug --param

[Bug debug/80423] [7 Regression] GC related -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80423 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- MEM_KEEP_ALIAS_SET_P (x) In mem expressions, 1 if we should keep the alias set for this mem unchanged when we access a component. Set to 1, for example, when we are already in a non-addressable component of

[Bug debug/80423] [7 Regression] GC related -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80423 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/80423] [7 Regression] GC related -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80423 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||GC, wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug sanitizer/80424] New: libasan uses tempnam tmpnam tmpnam_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80424 Bug ID: 80424 Summary: libasan uses tempnam tmpnam tmpnam_r Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug debug/80423] New: [7 Regression] GC related -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80423 Bug ID: 80423 Summary: [7 Regression] GC related -fcompare-debug failure Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3