[Bug target/80501] New: [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code w/ a signed char, a shift, and a conversion to int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80501 Bug ID: 80501 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code w/ a signed char, a shift, and a conversion to int Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug rtl-optimization/80500] New: [7/8 Regression] ICE: internal consistency failure (error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80500 Bug ID: 80500 Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE: internal consistency failure (error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/80499] New: gcc ICE on RTL code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "extract_insn"

de. The 64-bit mode works fine. $ gcc-trunk --version gcc-trunk (GCC) 8.0.0 20170423 (experimental) [trunk revision 247083] Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY

[Bug sanitizer/80498] New: Simple program with address sanitizer and regex hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80498 Bug ID: 80498 Summary: Simple program with address sanitizer and regex hangs Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/80265] __builtin_{memcmp,memchr,strlen} are not usable in constexpr functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80265 --- Comment #18 from Pedro Alves --- I sent a patch using the __builtin_constant_p idea: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00983.html

[Bug tree-optimization/80497] New: gcc ICE at -O1 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "tree_to_uhwi"

-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20170423 (experimental) [trunk revision 247083] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -O1 abc.c abc.c: In function ‘fn1’: abc.c:5:6: internal compiler error: in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.c:7346 void fn1() { ^~~ 0xe336c7 tr

[Bug target/79430] [7/8 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2 --- Comment #70 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/71729] -Wl,-z,noexecstack Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71729 Zaak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbeekman at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on trunk, will backport to 7 as soon as permitted.

[Bug fortran/80484] Three syntax errors involving derived-type I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80484 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Apr 23 15:49:16 2017 New Revision: 247084 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247084=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-23 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/80484

[Bug target/79430] [7/8 Regression] action of statement incorrectly optimised away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79430 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Component|fortran

[Bug fortran/80477] [OOP] Polymorphic function result generates memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80477 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/80496] New: missing diagnostic regarding noreturn mismatch in function pointer initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80496 Bug ID: 80496 Summary: missing diagnostic regarding noreturn mismatch in function pointer initialization Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/80495] New: attribute [[noreturn]] is accepted in function pointer declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80495 Bug ID: 80495 Summary: attribute [[noreturn]] is accepted in function pointer declarations Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/80494] [8 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80494 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug fortran/80121] Memory leak with derived-type intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #12 from

[Bug fortran/80121] Memory leak with derived-type intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.vandelst at noaa dot gov

[Bug fortran/68800] Fortran FE produces many memory leaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800 Bug 68800 depends on bug 63473, which changed state. Bug 63473 Summary: Memory leak with ALLOCATABLE, INTENT(OUT) dummy arguments. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63473 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/63473] Memory leak with ALLOCATABLE, INTENT(OUT) dummy arguments.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63473 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/80494] [8.0 regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80494 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8.0 regression] ICE on |[8.0 regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/80494] New: [8.0 regression] ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80494 Bug ID: 80494 Summary: [8.0 regression] ICE on valid code Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug libstdc++/80493] New: std::experimental::optional::swap is ill formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80493 Bug ID: 80493 Summary: std::experimental::optional::swap is ill formed Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/80121] Memory leak with derived-type intent(out) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80121 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Sun Apr 23 08:26:50 2017 New Revision: 247083 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247083=gcc=rev Log: 2017-04-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/80121

[Bug other/80492] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code when unrolling a loop with inline asm and local regs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wrong code when unrolling a |[5/6 Regression] Wrong code

[Bug target/70799] STV pass does not convert DImode shifts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70799 --- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Apr 23 07:25:30 2017 New Revision: 247082 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247082=gcc=rev Log: PR target/70799 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug other/80492] Wrong code when unrolling a loop with inline asm and local regs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- FYI, if the code is not executed in a loop but instead void do_syscalls_noloop (void) { syscall_7 (0, 8); syscall_7 (1, 9); syscall_7 (0, 8); syscall_7 (1, 9); } then the generated code

[Bug other/80492] Wrong code when unrolling a loop with inline asm and local regs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 41249 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41249=edit loopasm.s: Generated assembly Assembler output as generated with $ avr-gcc loopasm.c -O2 -dp -S -std=gnu99 The

[Bug c++/80469] Undefined symbol for abstract class impl with -fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80469 Ubikovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Ubikovich ---

[Bug other/80492] New: Wrong code when unrolling a loop with inline asm and local regs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80492 Bug ID: 80492 Summary: Wrong code when unrolling a loop with inline asm and local regs Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal