[Bug sanitizer/80659] [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=address evokes ICE in in gimplify_switch_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80659 --- Comment #5 from jim at meyering dot net --- FYI, for a little more context around how I found it, here's the thread on emacs-devel: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-05/msg00182.html

[Bug sanitizer/80659] [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=address evokes ICE in in gimplify_switch_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80659 --- Comment #4 from jim at meyering dot net --- Created attachment 41351 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41351=edit process.i.xz Thanks for the quick work. Here's the original process.i file. Had to compress it, because it

[Bug fortran/80442] Rejects DATA statement with array slice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80442 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Koenig --- Author: koenigni Date: Sat May 13 23:38:36 2017 New Revision: 248012 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248012=gcc=rev Log: 2017-05-09 Nicolas Koenig PR

[Bug ada/80590] [8 regression] non-bootstrap build failure of Ada runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80737] variant as class member resulting to compile errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80737 --- Comment #4 from Tim Shen --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #3) > (In reply to TC from comment #1) > > Looks like the constraint on the convert-everything constructor needs to > > check for is_same, variant> first and short

[Bug libstdc++/80737] variant as class member resulting to compile errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80737 --- Comment #3 from Tim Shen --- (In reply to TC from comment #1) > Looks like the constraint on the convert-everything constructor needs to > check for is_same, variant> first and short circuit if that's > true. I'm not quite sure

[Bug libstdc++/80737] variant as class member resulting to compile errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80737 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/80737] variant as class member resulting to compile errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80737 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from TC

[Bug fortran/80674] trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c:2578]: (style) Redundant condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80674 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/80722] gfortran can not compile omp clause with default(none) when there is a type bind method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80722 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/80737] New: variant as class member resulting to compile errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80737 Bug ID: 80737 Summary: variant as class member resulting to compile errors Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug ipa/80597] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in compute_inline_parameters, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:3126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80597 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #7) > (In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #6) > > > > I just ran into the same ICE and the proposed patch fixes the problem. > > Unfortunately the patch introduces the

[Bug middle-end/80222] may_alias folded away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80222 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug c++/80736] New: Wrong overload picked with uniform initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80736 Bug ID: 80736 Summary: Wrong overload picked with uniform initialization Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/80666] character length parameter fails if declaration order incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80666 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The change in behavior is likely due to revision r238904 (pr71730). Note that compiling the first test in comment 0 with -std=f95 before this revision gives % /opt/gcc/gcc7p-238848p2/bin/gfortran

[Bug tree-optimization/79920] [6 Regression] Incorrect floating point results when compiling with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79920 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/80734] GCC 6.3.1 errors compiling GCC 4.8.5 - error: ‘const char* libc_name_p(const char*, unsigned int)’ redeclared inline with ‘gnu_inline’ attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80734 --- Comment #2 from Eric Parker --- Okay, that works for me. Thanks Jakub.

[Bug c/80734] GCC 6.3.1 errors compiling GCC 4.8.5 - error: ‘const char* libc_name_p(const char*, unsigned int)’ redeclared inline with ‘gnu_inline’ attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/80735] New: IPA: SRA inhibits constant propagation of structs across multiple function calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80735 Bug ID: 80735 Summary: IPA: SRA inhibits constant propagation of structs across multiple function calls Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED