[Bug sanitizer/78204] ‘no_sanitize’ attribute directive ignored [-Wattributes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78204 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > As I'm reading the source code, there's no option to do that. > Apart from 'no_sanitize' attribute, GCC supports 'no_sanitize_undefined' > attribute (clang does

[Bug c++/70265] ICE on code with constexpr on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected statement_list, have nop_expr in tsi_start, at tree-iterator.h:42

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70265 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70265] ICE on code with constexpr on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected statement_list, have nop_expr in tsi_start, at tree-iterator.h:42

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70265 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sun May 21 22:20:05 2017 New Revision: 248313 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248313=gcc=rev Log: 2017-05-21 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/70265] ICE on code with constexpr on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected statement_list, have nop_expr in tsi_start, at tree-iterator.h:42

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70265 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- This is fixed in 7.1.0. I'm adding testcases and closing the bug.

[Bug libfortran/80850] New: Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850 Bug ID: 80850 Summary: Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/55922] brace initializing parent cause bogus virtual base constructor calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922 --- Comment #11 from DB --- This still occurs in 6.3.0 In the duplicate https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849 I showed that whether or not this occurs can sometimes (I say because my results don't seem consistent with everyone

[Bug c++/55922] brace initializing parent cause bogus virtual base constructor calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922 --- Comment #10 from DB --- *** Bug 80849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/80849] Brace-init causes multiple runs of virtual base constructor if any ctor in the hierarchy has >1 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849 DB changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80849] Brace-init causes multiple runs of virtual base constructor if any ctor in the hierarchy has >1 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849 DB changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/55922] brace initializing parent cause bogus virtual base constructor calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922 DB changed: What|Removed |Added CC||db0451 at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 from DB

[Bug c++/80849] Brace-init causes multiple runs of virtual base constructor if any ctor in the hierarchy has >1 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849 DB changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/80849] Brace-init causes multiple runs of virtual base ctor if its signature differs from its derived classes' ctors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849 --- Comment #1 from DB --- (In reply to DB from comment #0) > With additional testing, on 6.3.0, I determined that - much like that other > old bug - this problem only occurs if the virtual base constructor and the > constructors of the

[Bug c++/80849] New: Brace-init causes multiple runs of virtual base ctor if its signature differs from its derived classes' ctors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849 Bug ID: 80849 Summary: Brace-init causes multiple runs of virtual base ctor if its signature differs from its derived classes' ctors Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0

[Bug sanitizer/80847] UBSAN: yet another false positive (part2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80847 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/66313] Unsafe factorization of a*b+a*c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||babokin at gmail dot com --- Comment #14

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9) > (In reply to janus from comment #8) > > This shows one ICE in the testsuite: > > > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_proc_32.f90 -O (internal compiler

[Bug fortran/80766] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE with type-bound procedure returning an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Santos --- Created attachment 41398 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41398=edit proposed fix v2 part 2 Formatting, comments and other aesthetic changes.

[Bug fortran/80256] Cygwin test fail: bind_c_array_params_2.f90 scan-assembler-times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80256 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41396|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41386|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/80848] New: /crtend.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80848 Bug ID: 80848 Summary: /crtend.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/80847] UBSAN: yet another false positive (part2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80847 Dmitry Babokin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||babokin at gmail dot com,

[Bug sanitizer/80847] New: UBSAN: yet another false positive (part2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80847 Bug ID: 80847 Summary: UBSAN: yet another false positive (part2) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/80597] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in compute_inline_parameters, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:3126

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80597 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41375|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/80830] [8 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:14569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80830 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Reduced test-case: template class a; class b { friend int operator>> (int, b); }; template int >> (int &, a &); template class a { friend int >><> (int &, a &); a<> d () { } };

[Bug fortran/80610] Compiler crashes ungraciously when large static array is initialized with anything other than zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Results on a Corei7 2.8Ghz with 16Gb of RAM for 512^3 % time gfc pr80610_db.f90 -finit-real=nan 329.364u 16.328s 5:58.24 96.4% 0+0k 3+1197io 599275pf+0w % ll ./a.out -rwxr-xr-x 1 dominiq staff

[Bug tree-optimization/80842] [7/8 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in "set_lattice_value"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80842 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/80840] [7/8 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument reference to double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80840 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80830] [8 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:14569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80830 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80831] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -fsyntax-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80831 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/80831] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -fsyntax-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80831 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2017-5-21 CC|

[Bug fortran/52473] CSHIFT slow - inline it?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/80838] PGO/LTO bootstrapped compiler 5% slower than pure PGO bootstrapped one

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80838 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1) > If it is easy to do, can you attach profiles please? > i will try to reproduce this... Thanks. (There is still some tooling missing (perf, etc.) on the

[Bug middle-end/80743] [8 Regression] ICE in estimate_node_size_and_time, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:3385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80743 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/80845] nvptx backend generates cvt.u32.u32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80845 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41393 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41393=edit tentative patch

[Bug target/80845] nvptx backend generates cvt.u32.u32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80845 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Likewise, a split reg example in gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/nvptx/abi-vararg-2.c: ... //(insn 29 27 30 4 // (set (reg:DI 40) // (subreg:DI (reg:TI 23) 0)) 5 {*movdi_insn} // (nil))