[Bug c/81100] New: ICE from x86 __asm__() statck manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81100 Bug ID: 81100 Summary: ICE from x86 __asm__() statck manipulation Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/81099] New: A single `decltype(this)` at top level triggers 2 identical error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81099 Bug ID: 81099 Summary: A single `decltype(this)` at top level triggers 2 identical error messages Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/81033] [8 Regression] Revision r249019 breaks bootstrap on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth --- Jan, can you *please* have a look at this bug? Darwin bootstrap is broken for almost a week with no signs of activity to fix this! Thanks. Rainer

[Bug other/81098] New: backtrace_pcinfo initialization not thread safe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81098 Bug ID: 81098 Summary: backtrace_pcinfo initialization not thread safe Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/79799] Improve vec_insert of float on Power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79799 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/81097] New: UBSAN: false positive for not existing negation operator and a bogus message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81097 Bug ID: 81097 Summary: UBSAN: false positive for not existing negation operator and a bogus message Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/81096] [8 regression] test case ttest in libbacktrace fail starting with r249111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- 10001510 : 10001510: 03 10 40 3c lis r2,4099 10001514: 00 7f 42 38 addir2,r2,32512 10001518: a6 02 08 7c mflrr0 1000151c: 10 00 01 f8

[Bug other/81096] [8 regression] test case ttest in libbacktrace fail starting with r249111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug other/81096] New: [8 regression] test case ttest in libbacktrace fail starting with r249111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096 Bug ID: 81096 Summary: [8 regression] test case ttest in libbacktrace fail starting with r249111 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/81095] New: fcheck=bounds and empty forall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81095 Bug ID: 81095 Summary: fcheck=bounds and empty forall Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug sanitizer/81094] -fsanitize=object-size does not instrument aggregate call arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81094 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/81094] New: -fsanitize=object-size does not instrument aggregate call arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81094 Bug ID: 81094 Summary: -fsanitize=object-size does not instrument aggregate call arguments Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/81093] New: Accessing ranges of values in derived types leads to wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81093 Bug ID: 81093 Summary: Accessing ranges of values in derived types leads to wrong result Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81090] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in loop_preheader_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/81083] [7 Regression] ICE: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 4 and 13 which are marked as MUST COALESCE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81083 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 14 11:43:31 2017 New Revision: 249193 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249193=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-14 Richard Biener PR

[Bug middle-end/81088] UBSAN: false positive as a result of reassosiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/81088] UBSAN: false positive as a result of reassosiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 14 11:40:20 2017 New Revision: 249192 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249192=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-14 Richard Biener PR middle-end/81088

[Bug libstdc++/81092] Missing symbols for new std::wstring constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.2 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/15272] lookup, dependent base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15272 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/81069] nvptx offloading: "-O1" execution test of "libgomp.oacc-fortran/nested-function-1.f90" timeout/FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81069 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to me from comment #1) > With trunk r239357, the problem disappears when disabling the "Neuter whole > SESE regions" optimization: > > --- gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c > +++

[Bug libstdc++/81092] Missing symbols for new std::wstring constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/81092] New: Missing symbols for new std::wstring constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092 Bug ID: 81092 Summary: Missing symbols for new std::wstring constructors Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: link-failure Severity: normal

[Bug target/71663] aarch64 Vector initialization can be improved slightly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71663 --- Comment #1 from naveenh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: naveenh Date: Wed Jun 14 10:20:07 2017 New Revision: 249187 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249187=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71663 gcc * config/aarch64/aarch64.c

[Bug tree-optimization/81089] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in register_edge_assert_for_2, at tree-vrp.c:5023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Gribov --- Created attachment 41551 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41551=edit Draft patch Here's a draft patch. It fixes the repro but bootstrapping will take some time on my notebook.

[Bug tree-optimization/81090] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in loop_preheader_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Ah, it is CFG cleanup removing a loop exit edge but not updating loop info it seems. So when remove_edge calls rescan_loop_exit it doesn't adjust bounds. So either we are not supposed to keep those "live"

[Bug sanitizer/81040] asan false negative if parameter of a global function passed by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81040 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/google/s

[Bug tree-optimization/81090] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in loop_preheader_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80829] [7/8 Regression] Use of constexpr constructors with base type instantiation fails compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80829 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/80829] [7/8 Regression] Use of constexpr constructors with base type instantiation fails compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80829 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/58541] [c++11] Bogus "error: redeclaration ... differs in ‘constexpr’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58541 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/81091] New: libstdc++ not built with large file support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81091 Bug ID: 81091 Summary: libstdc++ not built with large file support Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 58541, which changed state. Bug 58541 Summary: [c++11] Bogus "error: redeclaration ... differs in ‘constexpr’" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58541 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/58541] [c++11] Bogus "error: redeclaration ... differs in ‘constexpr’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58541 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Jun 14 09:18:57 2017 New Revision: 249186 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249186=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-14 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/58541] [c++11] Bogus "error: redeclaration ... differs in ‘constexpr’"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58541 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- This is fixed in 7.1.0. I'm adding a testcase and closing the bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/81090] New: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in loop_preheader_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090 Bug ID: 81090 Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in loop_preheader_edge Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/81088] UBSAN: false positive as a result of reassosiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- And the issue is that associate: ... /* Only do something if we found more than two objects. Otherwise, nothing has changed and we risk infinite recursion. */ if (ok

[Bug sanitizer/80998] Implement -fsanitize=pointer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41524|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/81089] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in register_edge_assert_for_2, at tree-vrp.c:5023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089 --- Comment #3 from Yuri Gribov --- Mine.

[Bug middle-end/81088] UBSAN: false positive as a result of reassosiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|sanitizer

[Bug sanitizer/81088] UBSAN: false positive as a result of reassosiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug target/81085] inefficient union with long double argument on 32-bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81085 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug sanitizer/80998] Implement -fsanitize=pointer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Having some experience with the sanopt code, I can help with that. Ok, if you want, I'll leave that part out for now.

[Bug c++/81086] [8 Regression] ICE with structured binding of initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81086 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81089] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in register_edge_assert_for_2, at tree-vrp.c:5023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Priority|P3

[Bug sanitizer/80998] Implement -fsanitize=pointer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Then what we need and this patch doesn't implement is a sanopt optimization > similer to the UBSAN_NULL opts, if we have checked already ptr + i doesn't >

[Bug bootstrap/81089] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in register_edge_assert_for_2, at tree-vrp.c:5023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81083] [7 Regression] ICE: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 4 and 13 which are marked as MUST COALESCE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81083 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Summary|[7/8

[Bug tree-optimization/81083] [7 Regression] ICE: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 4 and 13 which are marked as MUST COALESCE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81083 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 14 07:22:32 2017 New Revision: 249182 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249182=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-14 Richard Biener PR

[Bug c++/81086] [8 Regression] ICE with structured binding of initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81086 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug ada/81087] array index out of range in gnatlink, making test always false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81087 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81089] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in register_edge_assert_for_2, at tree-vrp.c:5023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- enum rtx_code { CONST_DOUBLE, CONST_VECTOR, CONST_STRING, CONST, PC, REG, SUBREG, STRICT_LOW_PART, CONCAT, CONCATN, MEM }; int fn1(); int a; rtx_code b; int fn2() { int c =

[Bug bootstrap/81089] New: [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in register_edge_assert_for_2, at tree-vrp.c:5023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089 Bug ID: 81089 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in register_edge_assert_for_2, at tree-vrp.c:5023 Product: gcc

[Bug target/80986] auto keyword variable lost its attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80986 --- Comment #3 from linzj --- Hi Pinskia, This bug can be fix easily. Can you commit the fix patch? -- Lin Zuojian 2017-06-07 9:45 GMT+08:00 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org : >