[Bug bootstrap/81216] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386 and powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Uuugh, sorry. I'm testing a fix. If it doesn't work out, I'll disable the warning temporarily.

[Bug libstdc++/81221] [7/8 Regression] stl_algo.h: error: ‘__sample’ is not a member of ‘std’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81221 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Hammond --- Thank you! Indeed, that fixes it, both when applied directly to the installed header and when integrated into a build of the latest version. $ g++-8 -std=gnu++17 -g -O3 -mtune=native -D_GLIBCXX_PARALLEL

[Bug bootstrap/81216] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386 and powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 Paul Hua changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug testsuite/80759] gcc.target/x86_64/abi/ms-sysv FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759 --- Comment #56 from Daniel Santos --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #55) > > --- Comment #54 from Daniel Santos --- > > Created attachment 41627 [details] > > -->

[Bug target/81193] PowerPC GCC __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports should warn about old libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- > Alternatively, we would need to do two passes. On the first pass resolve all > of the normal functions and data locations, setting the location of ifunc > functions in the TOC to be an error function. The

[Bug libstdc++/81221] [7/8 Regression] stl_algo.h: error: ‘__sample’ is not a member of ‘std’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81221 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/81221] [7/8 Regression] stl_algo.h: error: ‘__sample’ is not a member of ‘std’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81221 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81193] PowerPC GCC __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports should warn about old libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- Given Alan's comments, I think the best thing to do here is to just emit a warning when using those builtins when the compiler was configured to use an old glibc. If someone disagrees, let me know now, as

[Bug libstdc++/81221] New: stl_algo.h: error: ‘__sample’ is not a member of ‘std’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81221 Bug ID: 81221 Summary: stl_algo.h: error: ‘__sample’ is not a member of ‘std’ Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/81220] [8 regression] ICE during gcc build after r249643

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81220 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/81216] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386 and powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 81220 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/81216] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386 and powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/81220] New: [8 regression] ICE during gcc build after r249643

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81220 Bug ID: 81220 Summary: [8 regression] ICE during gcc build after r249643 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libfortran/81195] SPEC CPU2017 621.wrf_s failure with 40+ openmp threads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/81195] SPEC CPU2017 621.wrf_s failure with 40+ openmp threads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195 --- Comment #10 from Jim Wilson --- Author: wilson Date: Mon Jun 26 21:44:50 2017 New Revision: 249668 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249668=gcc=rev Log: Fix for SPEC CPu2017 621.wrf_s failure, add missing locking code.

[Bug libfortran/81195] SPEC CPU2017 621.wrf_s failure with 40+ openmp threads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195 --- Comment #9 from Jim Wilson --- Author: wilson Date: Mon Jun 26 21:40:47 2017 New Revision: 249667 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249667=gcc=rev Log: Fix for SPEC CPU2017 621.wrf_s failure, add missing locking code.

[Bug libgcc/81218] libgcc_s.so.1 call to __get_cpuid does not correctly code around 486 cpus lacking cpuid instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81218 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Whitehead --- Here is a better backtrace with more symbols added: #0 0xb750a142 in __get_cpuid (__edx=0xbf9be478, __ecx=0xbf9be474, __ebx=0xbf9be470, __eax=0xbf9be46c, __level=0) at

[Bug target/81158] [8 regression] Many test case failures starting with r249424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81158 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I tried 249423 and don't see those failures but do with 249424. For example: seurer@genoa:~/gcc/build/gcc-test$ updategcc 249423 seurer@genoa:~/gcc/build/gcc-test$ make -j50

[Bug bootstrap/81216] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/35307] Missing Simplication for div op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35307 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/81216] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #1) > Hm, are you sure about the revision? Folks have been testing broken > bootstrap on ppc64le with the same symptoms and narrowed it down to r249643. > > I will try to

[Bug target/68491] libgcc calls __get_cpuid with 0 level breaks on early 486

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68491 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tedheadster at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug libgcc/81218] libgcc_s.so.1 call to __get_cpuid does not correctly code around 486 cpus lacking cpuid instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81218 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/81205] Hybrid MPI and OpenMp: Blocking code in loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205 --- Comment #7 from Pasha --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #6) > (In reply to Pasha from comment #5) > > (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4) > > > (In reply to Pasha from comment #2) > > > > This is my main routine for example

[Bug bootstrap/81216] [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/81204] [7/8 Regression] Rejects boost headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81204 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/81219] [8 regression] SEGV in linemap_location_from_macro_expansion_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81219 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug bootstrap/81219] New: [8 regression] SEGV in linemap_location_from_macro_expansion_p

-solaris2.12 Between 20170625 (r249632) and 20170626 (r249656), bootstrap broke on several targets. E.g on i686-pc-linux-gnu and sparc-sun-solaris2.12, building stage2 libstdc++: In file included from /var/gcc/regression/trunk/12-gcc/build.bad/sparc-sun-solaris2.12/libstdc++-v3/include/bits

[Bug libgcc/81218] New: libgcc_s.so.1 call to __get_cpuid does not correctly code around 486 cpus lacking cpuid instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81218 Bug ID: 81218 Summary: libgcc_s.so.1 call to __get_cpuid does not correctly code around 486 cpus lacking cpuid instruction Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/81217] Makefile:22754: warning: overriding recipe for target 'profiledbootstrap'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81217 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed, I saw this over the weekend also.

[Bug bootstrap/81217] Makefile:22754: warning: overriding recipe for target 'profiledbootstrap'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81217 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81217] New: Makefile:22754: warning: overriding recipe for target 'profiledbootstrap'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81217 Bug ID: 81217 Summary: Makefile:22754: warning: overriding recipe for target 'profiledbootstrap' Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/81194] [8 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: expand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/81209] [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined ICE on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81209 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/81216] New: [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81216 Bug ID: 81216 Summary: [8 Regression] bootstrap failed on i386 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug fortran/81205] Hybrid MPI and OpenMp: Blocking code in loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205 --- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Pasha from comment #5) > (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4) > > (In reply to Pasha from comment #2) > > > This is my main routine for example > > > . > > > . > > > . > > > !!$OMP

[Bug c++/81215] [7/8 Regression] deduction failure with variadic template template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81215 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 26 18:49:25 2017 New Revision: 249665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249665=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81215 * pt.c (unify_bound_ttp_args): Restore old logic for

[Bug c++/81215] [7/8 Regression] deduction failure with variadic template template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81215 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 26 18:49:18 2017 New Revision: 249664 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249664=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81215 - deduction failure with variadic TTP. * pt.c

[Bug fortran/81205] Hybrid MPI and OpenMp: Blocking code in loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205 --- Comment #5 from Pasha --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4) > (In reply to Pasha from comment #2) > > This is my main routine for example > > . > > . > > . > > !!$OMP PARALLEL DO DEFAULT(SHARED) PRIVATE(K,jL) > > DO k=1,nG3 > >

[Bug c++/81215] [7/8 Regression] deduction failure with variadic template template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81215 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/81215] New: [7/8 Regression] deduction failure with variadic template template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81215 Bug ID: 81215 Summary: [7/8 Regression] deduction failure with variadic template template parameter Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/81194] [8 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: expand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194 --- Comment #6 from Marc Mutz --- Sorry. Here it comes: make[2]: Entering directory '/home/marc/Qt/qt5-build/qtdeclarative/src/qmldevtools' g++ -c -pipe -Wno-error=expansion-to-defined -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized

[Bug fortran/81205] Hybrid MPI and OpenMp: Blocking code in loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205 --- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Pasha from comment #2) > This is my main routine for example > . > . > . > !!$OMP PARALLEL DO DEFAULT(SHARED) PRIVATE(K,jL) > DO k=1,nG3 >DO jL=1,nL2 > j = idx2start + jL

[Bug c++/81211] Unhelpful error messages using template instance with non-copyable type argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81211 --- Comment #5 from Stephen Kell --- I take the point in general, and I see the specific difficulty in how result_of works. In this specific case, there still seems to be a more low-hanging solution. Perhaps having a lambda that is not callable

[Bug tree-optimization/81196] Number of iterations found for p!=q but not for p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81196 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to amker from comment #4) > Hmm, the function can only be vectorized with "-march=skylake"? Er, it also vectorizes without any -march on x86_64 (with shorter vectors).

[Bug c++/81211] Unhelpful error messages using template instance with non-copyable type argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81211 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- That's not really very practical. std::function uses std::result_of to check for a callable type, and it's not an error for std::result_of to decide the type isn't callable. The error happens when

[Bug c++/81169] [8 Regression] gcc 8.0dev -Wclass-memaccess illegitimate warning related to volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81169 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Jun 26 17:19:15 2017 New Revision: 249660 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249660=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81169 - -Wclass-memaccess illegitimate warning related to volatile

[Bug c++/81169] [8 Regression] gcc 8.0dev -Wclass-memaccess illegitimate warning related to volatile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81169 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/81194] [8 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: expand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > I don't see g++ options mentioned anywhere, the testcase compiles even with > latest trunk just fine with -O0 -std=c++17 or -O2 -std=c++17. ...and compiles fine

[Bug middle-end/80775] [8 Regression] -O3 produces ice in group_case_labels_stmt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80775 --- Comment #15 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #14) > I don't see this on powerpc64le-linux using -O3. What target are you using? > Any options other than -O3? Doesn't fail for me on x86_64 either, so I'll need

[Bug c++/81147] [avr] C++ for -mmcu=atmega2560 doesn't do NRVO or RVO when class inherits from empty base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/81207] [7/8 Regression] tree check fail in simplify_builtin_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81207 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/81210] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68037-*.c -O* execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81210 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The following reduced test segfault also on darwin #define IP 0x12345671 #define CS 0x12345672 #define FLAGS 0x12345673 #define SP 0x12345674 #define

[Bug ipa/81214] New: GCC target_clone support does not work for global functions with no references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81214 Bug ID: 81214 Summary: GCC target_clone support does not work for global functions with no references Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/80775] [8 Regression] -O3 produces ice in group_case_labels_stmt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80775 --- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner --- I don't see this on powerpc64le-linux using -O3. What target are you using? Any options other than -O3?

[Bug ipa/81213] New: GCC target_clone support does not work for static functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81213 Bug ID: 81213 Summary: GCC target_clone support does not work for static functions Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/81211] Unhelpful error messages using template instance with non-copyable type argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81211 --- Comment #3 from Stephen Kell --- I agree that this message is better (my bad for not trying a supported release). It'd be nice if I didn't have to guess that the reason it's not callable is that I omitted the copy constructor. The rules for

[Bug middle-end/81212] New: -Wreturn-type is disabled when used together with -fsanitize=return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81212 Bug ID: 81212 Summary: -Wreturn-type is disabled when used together with -fsanitize=return Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/70472] is_copy_constructible<vector<unique_ptr>>::value is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70472 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- That would only work for vector not vector , for the reasons given above.

[Bug c++/81211] Unhelpful error messages using template instance with non-copyable type argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81211 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > (In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #0) > > (It may also be a bug in libstdc++ that std::function should require this of > > its argument type, although

[Bug target/81210] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68037-*.c -O* execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81210 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) > > Is this a regression? > > AFAICT the tests have never passed. These tests try to emulate interrupt in user space. If the emulation doesn't work on darwin,

[Bug target/81193] PowerPC GCC __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports should warn about old libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/81208] 'uninitialized' warning is missed while self initializing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81208 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81211] Unhelpful error messages using template instance with non-copyable type argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81211 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #0) > (It may also be a bug in libstdc++ that std::function should require this of > its argument type, although that's not completely bonkers.) It's explicitly

[Bug target/81210] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68037-*.c -O* execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81210 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from

[Bug libstdc++/70472] is_copy_constructible<vector<unique_ptr>>::value is true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70472 --- Comment #8 from Askar Safin --- Recently I noticed this bug can be easily fixed simply by manually implementing is_copy_constructible. So, please, apply the fix. And same for other type traits (is_copy_assignable etc). #include #include

[Bug c++/81211] New: Unhelpful error messages using template instance with non-copyable type argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81211 Bug ID: 81211 Summary: Unhelpful error messages using template instance with non-copyable type argument Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/81210] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68037-*.c -O* execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81210 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81196] Number of iterations found for p!=q but not for p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81196 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, the function can only be vectorized with "-march=skylake"? So what requirement is needed to add a test case for this? Thanks.

[Bug testsuite/81058] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-vpmovu?swb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovu?swb.*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81058 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71815] SLSR misses several PHI candidate cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68037] x86 interrupt attribute doesn't work with DRAP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Some tests are failing on darwin: see pr81210.

[Bug tree-optimization/71815] SLSR misses several PHI candidate cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon Jun 26 14:19:33 2017 New Revision: 249649 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249649=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-06-26 Bill Schmidt PR

[Bug target/81210] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68037-*.c -O* execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81210 Bug ID: 81210 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68037-*.c -O* execution test Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/81209] New: [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined ICE on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81209 Bug ID: 81209 Summary: [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined ICE on darwin Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/81208] New: 'uninitialized' warning is missed while self initializing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81208 Bug ID: 81208 Summary: 'uninitialized' warning is missed while self initializing Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/81194] [8 Regression] ICE during RTL pass: expand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81194 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- Will do, but as Jakub said, we'll need the compiler options used.

[Bug libgomp/81177] Dump cubin module to file before offloading in nvptx libgomp plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81177 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries

[Bug fortran/81205] Hybrid MPI and OpenMp: Blocking code in loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205 --- Comment #3 from Pasha --- For example, in this case index variables are not the same in both subroutines but it blocks running.

[Bug c++/81147] [avr] C++ for -mmcu=atmega2560 doesn't do NRVO or RVO when class inherits from empty base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug c++/81147] [avr] C++ for -mmcu=atmega2560 doesn't do NRVO or RVO when class inherits from empty base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/81205] Hybrid MPI and OpenMp: Blocking code in loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205 --- Comment #2 from Pasha --- This is my main routine for example . . . !!$OMP PARALLEL DO DEFAULT(SHARED) PRIVATE(K,jL) DO k=1,nG3 DO jL=1,nL2 j = idx2start + jL IF(masque(j,k))THEN ! dudx

[Bug rtl-optimization/67483] combine.c sanitizer detects undefined negative left shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67483 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/81138] [DR 2983] std::money_put facet does not write '0' before decimal point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81138 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED

[Bug rtl-optimization/67856] callee-saved register saves should be shrink-wrapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #6 from Segher

[Bug c++/81204] [7/8 Regression] Rejects boost headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81204 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68690] PowerPC64: TOC save in PHP core loop results in load hit store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68690 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- This now compiles to main: .LCF1: 0: addis 2,12,.TOC.-.LCF1@ha addi 2,2,.TOC.-.LCF1@l .localentry main,.-main addis 9,2,.LC0@toc@ha # gpr load fusion, type

[Bug middle-end/81207] [7/8 Regression] tree check fail in simplify_builtin_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81207 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'll have a look.

[Bug target/70098] PowerPC64: eigen hits ICE following invalid register assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70098 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/70173] make distclean: leaves stage_final and libcc1/compiler-name.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70173 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81207] [7/8 Regression] tree check fail in simplify_builtin_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81207 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Apparently in the IR we have # VUSE <.MEM> _13 = __builtin_strchr (_12, 39); (gdb) p vuse $1 = and SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT crashes on that.

[Bug tree-optimization/81196] Number of iterations found for p!=q but not for p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81196 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Probably some more elaborate handling in number_of_iterations_cond is > required: > > /* We can handle the case when neither of the sides of the

[Bug middle-end/81207] [7/8 Regression] tree check fail in simplify_builtin_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81207 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/81207] tree check fail in simplify_builtin_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81207 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/81207] New: tree check fail in simplify_builtin_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81207 Bug ID: 81207 Summary: tree check fail in simplify_builtin_call Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/81196] Number of iterations found for p!=q but not for p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81196 --- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Probably some more elaborate handling in number_of_iterations_cond is > required: > > /* We can handle the case when neither of the sides of the

[Bug tree-optimization/81192] [8 Regression] gcc ICE at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81192 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tom at codesourcery dot com ---

[Bug c/80116] Warn about macros expanding to multiple statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80116 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81206] New: missed tail recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81206 Bug ID: 81206 Summary: missed tail recursion Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/66313] Unsafe factorization of a*b+a*c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313 Bug 66313 depends on bug 81203, which changed state. Bug 81203 Summary: [8 Regression] tail recursion: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81203 What|Removed

  1   2   >