[Bug c++/82235] New: Copy ctor is not found for copying array of an object when it's marked explicit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82235 Bug ID: 82235 Summary: Copy ctor is not found for copying array of an object when it's marked explicit Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/81996] powerpc __builtin_return_address(0) fails with -fPIC -fstack-protector-all or -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81996 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Sep 18 02:25:10 2017 New Revision: 252901 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252901=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] PR81996, __builtin_return_address(0) fails rs6000_return_addr assumes that

[Bug libfortran/82233] [6/7/8 Regression] execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82233 --- Comment #3 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- Created attachment 42193 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42193=edit specifically even if cmdstat option present, must have cmdmsg or get failure, and man(1) page needs

[Bug c++/82209] Compile error "X causes a section type conflict with Y" should provide more information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82209 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #4) > This is kind of weird... When we tested with C++03 by adding -std=c++03, we > got 4 more of them. The check-in of interest is >

[Bug preprocessor/81794] "would be stringified in traditional C" warning should be controlled by -Wtraditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81794 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2) > > Please can you turn it into a patch that contains both the fix *and* the new > > testcase? (e.g.

[Bug c++/82209] Compile error "X causes a section type conflict with Y" should provide more information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82209 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton --- This is kind of weird... When we tested with C++03 by adding -std=c++03, we got 4 more of them. The check-in of interest is https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/commit/7097546cfcf742cf. Is there really no

[Bug target/79868] aarch64: diagnostic "malformed target %s value" not translateable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79868 --- Comment #8 from Roland Illig --- Yes, the patch looks good to me. (I didn't even catch the one instance that Frederic found.) Thanks for putting this much effort into this issue.

[Bug c++/61940] Wrong error location for error in initialization list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61940 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last

[Bug c++/80920] warnings get position wrong - very confusing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80920 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61940] Wrong error location for error in initialization list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61940 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/78301] noexcept() operator rejects sibling method call without object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78301 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/52869] [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2013-09-18 00:00:00 |2017-09-18 --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c++/52869] [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||TonyELewis at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug target/80863] [SH]: sh/sh.c:6772:1: internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80863 --- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- Problem still persists as of 2017-09-19 snapshot [1]. > [1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-snapshot=sh4=20170910-1=1505152481=0

[Bug target/82196] -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues stubs sometimes use wrong MOV instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82196 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82196] -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues stubs sometimes use wrong MOV instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82196 --- Comment #2 from dansan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dansan Date: Sun Sep 17 22:04:40 2017 New Revision: 252896 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252896=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82196 correct choice of avx/sse stubs for

[Bug c++/82003] [5 Regression] Segmentation fault building kmymoney git sources.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003 --- Comment #11 from José Pekkarinen --- Created attachment 42192 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42192=edit Backport of the patch to 5.X In case it helps, here is a patch that backports the revision that is supposed to fix

[Bug target/82166] gcc ICE at -Os on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "ix86_finalize_stack_frame_flags"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82166 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82166] gcc ICE at -Os on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "ix86_finalize_stack_frame_flags"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82166 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sun Sep 17 21:11:04 2017 New Revision: 252895 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252895=gcc=rev Log: i386: Update preferred stack boundary for leaf functions

[Bug libfortran/82233] [6/7/8 Regression] execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82233 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug driver/81519] Enhancement: Add --help=target-distcc or similar to dump clean, optimal CFLAGS without using -march=native

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81519 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager

[Bug driver/81829] [7 Regression] /usr/bin/gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib} segfault without arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug driver/61651] Cross compiler will use host as eroneously

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61651 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82143] add a -fdefault-real-16 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82143 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/82234] New: __builtin_shuffle is not in the keyword index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82234 Bug ID: 82234 Summary: __builtin_shuffle is not in the keyword index Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/82233] execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82233 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 82232 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/82232] execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82232 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/82233] New: execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82233 Bug ID: 82233 Summary: execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist) Product: gcc Version: 6.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/82232] execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82232 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82232] New: execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82232 Bug ID: 82232 Summary: execute_command_line causes program to stop when command fails (or does not exist) Product: gcc Version: 6.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/79868] aarch64: diagnostic "malformed target %s value" not translateable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79868 --- Comment #7 from Frederic Marchal --- I think there is an error here: @@ -9938,7 +9978,7 @@ aarch64_process_target_attr (tree args, const char* pragma_or_attr) if (len == 0) { - error ("malformed target %s value",

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 17 18:24:37 2017 New Revision: 252894 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252894=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-17 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82173 *

[Bug fortran/60483] [5/6/7/8 Regression] No IMPLICIT type error with: ASSOCIATE( X => derived_type() ) [i.e. w/ structure constructor]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60483 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 17 18:24:37 2017 New Revision: 252894 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252894=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-17 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82173 *

[Bug fortran/82143] add a -fdefault-real-16 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82143 --- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl --- On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 12:19:50PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82143 > > --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > For future reference:

[Bug fortran/82143] add a -fdefault-real-16 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82143 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 02:33:02PM +, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > I don't have access to ifort, so I have no idea what "-real-size 128" > > does. A google search does not find this. > > Maybe

[Bug target/81996] powerpc __builtin_return_address(0) fails with -fPIC -fstack-protector-all or -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81996 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug fortran/82143] add a -fdefault-real-16 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82143 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > For future reference: -fdefault-real-8 was added by Steve in r97221. This is not the actual implementation, but the renaming of -i8, -r8, ... to -fdefault-*

[Bug fortran/82143] add a -fdefault-real-16 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82143 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- For future reference: -fdefault-real-8 was added by Steve in r97221.