[Bug go/82348] make[4]: Circular runtime.lo <- bytes.gox dependency dropped.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82348 --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor --- The bug is that something is requiring internal/cpu.gox. Nothing should require it. There is only one mention of internal/cpu in the math package, in the floor_asm.go file, but that file has a build tag

[Bug sanitizer/82379] [7/8 Regression] internal_sigreturn not defined in libasan.so or libubsan.so with -mx32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82379 --- Comment #5 from Steven Noonan --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > (In reply to Steven Noonan from comment #3) > > Are you sure that patch is sufficient? __x86_64__ is defined on both the > > normal x86_64 ABI and on the x32 ABI. The

[Bug sanitizer/82379] [7/8 Regression] internal_sigreturn not defined in libasan.so or libubsan.so with -mx32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82379 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Steven Noonan from comment #3) > Are you sure that patch is sufficient? __x86_64__ is defined on both the > normal x86_64 ABI and on the x32 ABI. The combination most often used to > identify x32 is

[Bug c++/82380] New: [concepts] Error when using requires constraint with attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82380 Bug ID: 82380 Summary: [concepts] Error when using requires constraint with attributes Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/82379] [7/8 Regression] internal_sigreturn not defined in libasan.so or libubsan.so with -mx32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82379 --- Comment #3 from Steven Noonan --- Are you sure that patch is sufficient? __x86_64__ is defined on both the normal x86_64 ABI and on the x32 ABI. The combination most often used to identify x32 is 'defined(__x86_64__) && defined(__ILP32__)'

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 53480, which changed state. Bug 53480 Summary: warning "may be used uninitialized" issued with -m32 but not with -m64 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53480 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/53480] warning "may be used uninitialized" issued with -m32 but not with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53480 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 51544, which changed state. Bug 51544 Summary: uninitialized variable false positive prevents bootstrap with -fipa-cp-clone https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/51544] uninitialized variable false positive prevents bootstrap with -fipa-cp-clone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51544 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/70246] Spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70246 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 70246, which changed state. Bug 70246 Summary: Spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings with -O1 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70246 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 79768, which changed state. Bug 79768 Summary: `-Wmaybe-uninitialized' false positive with optimisation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79768 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/79768] `-Wmaybe-uninitialized' false positive with optimisation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79768 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80147] missing maybe-uninitialized warning on variable with no side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80147 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/82379] [7/8 Regression] internal_sigreturn not defined in libasan.so or libubsan.so with -mx32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82379 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug sanitizer/82379] [7/8 Regression] internal_sigreturn not defined in libasan.so or libubsan.so with -mx32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82379 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/77732] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipcp-cstagg-7.c scan-ipa-dump-times cp "Discovered an indirect call to a known target" 3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77732 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/54072] BOZ with -std=f2008: wrongly accepted to TRANSFER/ABS/...; two BOZ not rejected for IOR/IEOR/IAND

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54072 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to/duplicate of pr81509.

[Bug fortran/45513] BOZ kinds differently handled, F2008: BOZ in bit intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45513 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Related to/duplicate of pr81509.

[Bug middle-end/82365] stack locations are consolidated if noreturn function is on the path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82365 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Basically someone needs to look into add_scope_conflicts (in gimplecfg.c) to see the scope conflict is being added.

[Bug middle-end/82365] stack locations are consolidated if noreturn function is on the path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82365 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug sanitizer/82379] New: internal_sigreturn not defined in libasan.so or libubsan.so with -mx32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82379 Bug ID: 82379 Summary: internal_sigreturn not defined in libasan.so or libubsan.so with -mx32 Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/59949] lambda expression as default argument of function template causes "already defined" messages in assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59949 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kirit.saelensminde at gmail dot co

[Bug c++/78919] Lambdas, default parameters and std::function cause assembly error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78919 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82375] PDT error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82375 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67370] Invalid "parameter packs not expanded" error in lambda capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67370 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82376] Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82376 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/65949] Compiler can not deduce auto type in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65949 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/65949] Compiler can not deduce auto type in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65949 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Sep 30 20:42:05 2017 New Revision: 253322 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253322=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-30 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/65870] Explicit function instantiation with default valued lambda causes duplicate symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65870 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59949] lambda expression as default argument of function template causes "already defined" messages in assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59949 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||w.shane.grant at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81958] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning in gcc-8, or with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81958 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/82378] Data race in libgfortran with OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82378 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/82362] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 436.cactusADM ~7% performance deviation with trunk@251713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82362 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug libfortran/82378] New: Data race in libgfortran with OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82378 Bug ID: 82378 Summary: Data race in libgfortran with OpenMP Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/68754] Explicitly defaulted constexpr assignment operator fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68754 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68754] Explicitly defaulted constexpr assignment operator fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68754 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Sep 30 17:00:32 2017 New Revision: 253321 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253321=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2017-09-30 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug tree-optimization/82377] New: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20170930 (experimental) [trunk revision 253320] (GCC) $ $ gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out 0 $ gcc

[Bug fortran/82376] New: Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82376 Bug ID: 82376 Summary: Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/41861] [DR 887][C++0x] does not use monotonic_clock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41861 --- Comment #15 from Mike Crowe --- (In reply to Mike Crowe from comment #14) > I submitted an RFC glibc patch last year: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/glibc/list/?submitter=66786 I submitted an updated version earlier this year:

[Bug middle-end/79220] missing -Wstringop-overflow= on a memcpy overflow with a small power-of-2 size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79220 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|missing |missing

[Bug fortran/82375] New: PDT error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82375 Bug ID: 82375 Summary: PDT error Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/82366] std::regex constructor called from shared library throws std::bad_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82366 --- Comment #4 from spamdrop at fodvo dot org --- One more comment to add before I forget, If I change the regex string to remove the []'s, while the program doesn't do the correct thing (obviously), it at least doesn't throw the exception. Not

[Bug libstdc++/82366] std::regex constructor called from shared library throws std::bad_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82366 --- Comment #3 from spamdrop at fodvo dot org --- Thanks, I'll look into, but due to a deadline I have right now, I need to fallback to 4.9.2 until I get my POC project running. But thanks for the quick reply.

[Bug fortran/82362] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 436.cactusADM ~7% performance deviation with trunk@251713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82362 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/47781] warnings from custom printf format specifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781 --- Comment #19 from Daniel Santos --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #18) > The Linux kernel also has a bunch of printf format extensions that GCC > doesn't know anything about: >

[Bug tree-optimization/82374] New: #pragma GCC optimize is not applied to openmp-generated functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82374 Bug ID: 82374 Summary: #pragma GCC optimize is not applied to openmp-generated functions Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/82373] New: syntax error in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82373 Bug ID: 82373 Summary: syntax error in error message Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/82372] Rejects valid parenthesis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82372 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/82340] volatile ignored in compound literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82340 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Sep 30 08:26:32 2017 New Revision: 253319 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253319=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-09-29 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/82159] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82159 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Sep 30 08:25:02 2017 New Revision: 253318 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253318=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2017-09-27 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/81314] [6/7/8 Regression] Undefined reference to a function with -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/82361] Useless "mov eax, eax" in generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82361 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Sep 30 08:10:15 2017 New Revision: 253317 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253317=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82361 * config/i386/i386.md (TARGET_USE_8BIT_IDIV

[Bug go/82348] make[4]: Circular runtime.lo <- bytes.gox dependency dropped.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82348 --- Comment #5 from martin --- Created attachment 42266 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42266=edit math.lo.dep I looked up the required cpu.gox file. It does neither exist in the source tree, or in the built folder (my

[Bug fortran/82372] Rejects valid parenthesis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82372 --- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle --- $ cat bug1.f90 program vincenty implicit none real, parameter :: f = .2345 real :: tmp tmp = 1.0 − f end program $ gfc49 bug1.f90 bug1.f90:7: tmp = 1.0 \xE2\x88\x92 f 1 Error: Unclassifiable statement