[Bug libstdc++/82558] [8 Regression] V8 JavaScript engine segfaults since r249235

2017-10-15 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558 --- Comment #4 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Mon Oct 16 05:44:03 2017 New Revision: 253776 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253776=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-16 François Dumont PR libstdc++/82558

[Bug tree-optimization/59859] [meta-bug] GRAPHITE issues

2017-10-15 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859 Bug 59859 depends on bug 63602, which changed state. Bug 63602 Summary: [5 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-nest-optimize https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63602 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/63602] [5 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O2 -ftree-loop-nest-optimize

2017-10-15 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63602 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/82558] [8 Regression] V8 JavaScript engine segfaults since r249235

2017-10-15 Thread fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/82472] [8 Regression] ICE in generate_code_for_partition, at tree-loop-distribution.c:1145

2017-10-15 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82472 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- Can this PR be closed now?

[Bug c++/82560] New: Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed

2017-10-15 Thread gdutor at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82560 Bug ID: 82560 Summary: Temporary object created as a default argument not destructed Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/47346] access control for nested type is ignored in class template

2017-10-15 Thread aschepler at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47346 Andrew Schepler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aschepler at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

2017-10-15 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/82554] uniform_real_distribution can generate the upper endpoint

2017-10-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82554 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Ben Longbons from comment #0) > This is related to #64351 and #63176, for which a totally-bogus fix was > applied. See PR 80137 > There is actually a defect in the standard: Then shouldn't

[Bug libstdc++/82558] [8 Regression] V8 JavaScript engine segfaults since r249235

2017-10-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_bvector.h +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_bvector.h @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_CONTAINER if (__last._M_offset != 0)

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking failure

2017-10-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to eric-bugs from comment #9) > This does not seem like correct behavior to me either. The warning should be > based on the maximum declared enum value, not the maximum possible value > held by

[Bug c++/60105] [C++11] ICE on enable_if explicit cast operator

2017-10-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60105 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/54090] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:15731

2017-10-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54090 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/54090] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:15731

2017-10-15 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54090 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Oct 15 22:29:59 2017 New Revision: 253772 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253772=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-15 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/53574] ICE with -fstack-usage

2017-10-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53574 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini --- Jakub, is this still an issue?

[Bug c++/50943] asm goto in templated code causes internal compiler segfaults

2017-10-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50943 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

2017-10-15 Thread ikozhukhov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #20 from Igor Kozhukhov --- i can provide access to DilOS (illumos based platform) build zones on SPARC64 and Intel if needed - just send me email igor at dilos dot org

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

2017-10-15 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou --- > it's a pity to no see some efforts to native SPARC64 support on illumos > based platform. GCC is a volunteer project, you are free to contribute or to pay someone to work on a particular issue. Note

[Bug fortran/81758] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] Broken vtab

2017-10-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug c/82542] -fdump-lang-raw (formerly -fdump-translation-unit) no longer available for C

2017-10-15 Thread b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82542 --- Comment #7 from Ben Longbons --- I saw that mailing list post, but it only explains *what*, not *why*. I never really gave consideration to DWARF, since in my little experience it is very unportable for a "standard". I suppose I could

[Bug go/82559] [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on at least alpha, s390x

2017-10-15 Thread ian at airs dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82559 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/82559] [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on at least alpha, s390x

2017-10-15 Thread ian at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82559 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Sun Oct 15 19:45:33 2017 New Revision: 253770 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253770=gcc=rev Log: PR go/82559 Backport from mainline: https://golang.org/cl/46712

[Bug fortran/81758] [OOP] Broken vtab

2017-10-15 Thread liakhdi at ornl dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758 --- Comment #6 from DIL --- It is not that I am not willing to, I just do not see an easy way to reduce the relevant code. For now, I have attached a debugger screenshot (jpg above) to show you the details of the problem. The segfault occurs

[Bug fortran/81758] [OOP] Broken vtab

2017-10-15 Thread liakhdi at ornl dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758 --- Comment #7 from DIL --- P.S. I do not have GCC-8.0 installed anywhere.

[Bug fortran/81758] [OOP] Broken vtab

2017-10-15 Thread liakhdi at ornl dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81758 --- Comment #5 from DIL --- Created attachment 42373 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42373=edit Debugger screenshot

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

2017-10-15 Thread ikozhukhov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #18 from Igor Kozhukhov --- i didn't try 5.5.0 because switched to use 6.4.0 for my userland builds on sparc64

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

2017-10-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > this bug not fixed for 5.x while 5.x was not closed. Did you try 5.5.0? When a problem disappear there are two possibilities: (1) It has been fixed. (2) It had been made latent. The only way

[Bug fortran/79446] Passing internal procedure as argument causes segfault at runtime

2017-10-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79446 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/39030] Support -fexcess-precision={standard,fast} also for Fortran

2017-10-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39030 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- More than eight years later is there any point to keep this PR opened?

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

2017-10-15 Thread ikozhukhov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 Igor Kozhukhov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX --- Comment #16 from Igor

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

2017-10-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

2017-10-15 Thread ikozhukhov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #14 from Igor Kozhukhov --- it is working with 6.4.0, we can close this issue and will wait when 6.x will be closed to and close others issues without fixes :)

[Bug fortran/79157] gfortran crashed on sparc with openmpi build

2017-10-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79157 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The gcc-5 branch has been closed. Is the problem still present with more recent versions?

[Bug fortran/53977] CPP: Support __func__/__FUNCTION__

2017-10-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53977 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78278] ICE in gfc_wide_memset, at fortran/scanner.c:153

2017-10-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78278 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The ICE seems fixed on 7.2.0 and trunk (8.0), probably r243647. Note that compiling the code in comment 0 with -std=f95 does not trigger the error Error: GNU Extension: re-initialization of 'x' at

[Bug translation/80188] calls.c: reason argument to maybe_complain_about_tail_call must be marked for translation

2017-10-15 Thread xerofoify at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80188 --- Comment #3 from nik --- Created attachment 42372 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42372=edit Proposed Fix Send to the GCC-Patches List

[Bug go/82559] [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on at least alpha, s390x

2017-10-15 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82559 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #0) > see https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-7 > > seen on the gcc-7-branch 20171013, didn't check trunk yet. > this is at least broken on alpha and

[Bug libstdc++/82558] [8 Regression] V8 JavaScript engine segfaults since r249235

2017-10-15 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/82559] New: [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on at least alpha, s390x

2017-10-15 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82559 Bug ID: 82559 Summary: [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on at least alpha, s390x Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79795] [6/7/8 Regression] Fortran ICE in resolve_symbol starting with r163221

2017-10-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79795 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/82558] [8 Regression] V8 JavaScript engine segfaults since r249235

2017-10-15 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 42371 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42371=edit -fsanitize=undefined output I have attached the -fsanitize=undefined output prior to the crash. As you can see

[Bug fortran/70070] ICE on initializing character data beyond min/max bound

2017-10-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70070 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug libstdc++/82558] New: [8 Regression] V8 JavaScript engine segfaults since r249235

2017-10-15 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82558 Bug ID: 82558 Summary: [8 Regression] V8 JavaScript engine segfaults since r249235 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79863] Assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array variable leads to access of unallocated memory

2017-10-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79863 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/79864] Implicit type conversion on assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array variable segfaults.

2017-10-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79864 Bug 79864 depends on bug 79863, which changed state. Bug 79863 Summary: Assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array variable leads to access of unallocated memory https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79863 What

[Bug fortran/82372] Rejects valid parenthesis

2017-10-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82372 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82372] Rejects valid parenthesis

2017-10-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82372 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Oct 15 12:00:29 2017 New Revision: 253768 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253768=gcc=rev Log: 2017-10-15 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/82372

[Bug tree-optimization/70455] spurious "assuming signed overflow does not occur when simplifying conditional to constant [-Wstrict-overflow]"

2017-10-15 Thread vindrg at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70455 --- Comment #7 from Vincas Dargis --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Can you file a separate bug with the preprocessed source, I suspect the > issue there is different from the original issue listed here. Done:

[Bug c++/82557] New: Spurious -Wstrict-overflow warning with 32bit GCC

2017-10-15 Thread vindrg at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82557 Bug ID: 82557 Summary: Spurious -Wstrict-overflow warning with 32bit GCC Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/78387] OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

2017-10-15 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78387 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libfortran/82555] SPECcpu201 Wrf_s deadlock

2017-10-15 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82555 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/82556] [8 Regression] internal compiler error in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4307

2017-10-15 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/82556] [8 Regression] internal compiler error in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4307

2017-10-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c/82556] New: internal compiler error in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4307

2017-10-15 Thread bugzilla.gnu at coelho dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82556 Bug ID: 82556 Summary: internal compiler error in curr_insn_transform, at lra-constraints.c:4307 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal