[Bug c++/82882] [8 regression] ICE Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #2 from Markus

[Bug middle-end/82958] New: uninitialized used warning missed when variable is both in function argument and return value within a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82958 Bug ID: 82958 Summary: uninitialized used warning missed when variable is both in function argument and return value within a loop Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/82946] member pointer defeats strlen optimization involving a string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82946 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Sat, 11 Nov 2017, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > other string literal) cannot be a valid representation of a pointer. (The > only > way for a conforming program to obtain a valid

[Bug ipa/82957] New: internal compiler error: in to_cgraph_frequency, at profile-count.c:251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82957 Bug ID: 82957 Summary: internal compiler error: in to_cgraph_frequency, at profile-count.c:251 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >> I've now submitted the patch upstream: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39888. > > This patch allowed to bootstrap gcc on darwin10, but

[Bug sanitizer/82824] [8 regression] libsanitizer fails to build: VM_MEMORY_OS_ALLOC_ONCE undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I've now submitted the patch upstream: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39888. This patch allowed to bootstrap gcc on darwin10, but running the test suite gave me ~2500 asan failures (gcc/g++, -m32/-m64)

[Bug fortran/77517] ICE in conv_intrinsic_move_alloc, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:9517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77517 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The ICEs have been replaced with the error Error: 'from' argument of 'move_alloc' intrinsic at (1) must be the same type and kind as 'to' between revisions r254498 and r254660, except for the test

[Bug fortran/53298] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Paul, is this something that could be fixed with the new descriptor you introduced?

[Bug tree-optimization/82956] New: Incorrect relocation emitted (symbol considered external) due to inlining and hidden visibility.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82956 Bug ID: 82956 Summary: Incorrect relocation emitted (symbol considered external) due to inlining and hidden visibility. Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap on i586-linux-gnu after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka --- > I cannot reproduce at r254648. How do you configure? I think it went away with the finish of counts conversion - the scenario trigerring the issue is very specific. I know what happens, but I am on a road

[Bug fortran/82937] [F03] associate non-standard bounds are lost for associating entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82937 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap on i586-linux-gnu after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #13 from Eric

[Bug tree-optimization/82955] New: ICE when using -fdump-passes -fdisable-tree-einline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82955 Bug ID: 82955 Summary: ICE when using -fdump-passes -fdisable-tree-einline Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/82954] [8 regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9061

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82954 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 42589 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42589=edit gcc8-pr82954.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/82954] [8 regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9061

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82954 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53478] gfortran segfaults when module name clashes with C binding name of procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

[Bug tree-optimization/82954] New: [8 regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9061

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82954 Bug ID: 82954 Summary: [8 regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9061 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/82953] ICE in tree_check() ../../gcc/gcc/tree.h:3087

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82953 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich --- gdb backtrace: (gdb) bt #0 any_dependent_bases_p (type=type@entry=0x7003f7e0) at ../../gcc/gcc/cp/search.c:2617 #1 0x0083ee53 in finish_class_member_access_expr (object=..., name=,

[Bug c++/82953] New: ICE in tree_check() ../../gcc/gcc/tree.h:3087

cc-native-quick-installed Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20171112 (experimental) (GCC)