[Bug c++/83627] New: -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor doesn't trigger when calling destructor by hand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83627 Bug ID: 83627 Summary: -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor doesn't trigger when calling destructor by hand Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/45555] Add warnings for changes to code with option "-fipa-sra"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70392] [openacc] inconsistent line numbers in uninitialised warnings for if clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70392 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/55496] False positive -Werror=uninitialized breaks profiledbootstrap and bootstrap-lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55496 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/21161] "clobbered by longjmp" warning ignores the data flow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21161 --- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager --- *** Bug 83162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/83162] [6/7/8 Regression] x86-64 -Wclobbered issuing more false alarms (regression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83162 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/21161] "clobbered by longjmp" warning ignores the data flow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21161 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/65041] Improve -Wclobbered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65041 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/21161] "clobbered by longjmp" warning ignores the data flow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21161 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tavianator at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/61118] [6/7/8 Regression] Indirect call generated for pthread_cleanup_push with constant cleanup function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/21161] "clobbered by longjmp" warning ignores the data flow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21161 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- *** Bug 54561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/54561] incorrect setjmp -Wclobber diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54561 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/21161] "clobbered by longjmp" warning ignores the data flow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21161 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- *** Bug 48968 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/48968] incorrect warning about longjmp/vfork clobbering a local (-W -O2, x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48968 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Dec 30 02:14:34 2017 New Revision: 256041 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256041=gcc=rev Log: 2017-12-29 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug target/71009] g++: ICE on modified gdb/valarith.c with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/83626] New: std::experimental::filesystem::remove_all throws exception instead of returning 0 if path doesn't exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626 Bug ID: 83626 Summary: std::experimental::filesystem::remove_all throws exception instead of returning 0 if path doesn't exist Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status:

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- I also have to commit to gcc7 as well, which has the same error in it. Thanks for the report Dominiq.

[Bug libstdc++/83625] New: std::experimental::filesystem::remove lstat()'s before remove() instead of checking errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83625 Bug ID: 83625 Summary: std::experimental::filesystem::remove lstat()'s before remove() instead of checking errno Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/81759] Improve data tracking for _pext_u64 and __builtin_ffsll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81759 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski --- Looks that __builtin_ffs does not check if input value is nonzero at all. Assembler code for following code also has unnecessary instructions: [code] unsigned int

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83622] [8 Regression] Wrong code with derived type and -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug c++/83624] Strong using deprecation warning in C++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83624 --- Comment #1 from andysem at mail dot ru --- Created attachment 42983 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42983=edit Test code to reproduce the warning I've attached a repro test case. Compile with: g++ -std=gnu++03 -o

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Dec 29 22:36:25 2017 New Revision: 256035 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256035=gcc=rev Log: 2017-12-29 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug c++/83624] New: Strong using deprecation warning in C++03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83624 Bug ID: 83624 Summary: Strong using deprecation warning in C++03 Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/83623] New: [8 Regression] ICE: in convert_move, at expr.c:248 with -march=knl and 16bit vector bswap/rotate

arget=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-256032-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-nographite-amd64 Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20171229 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/82133] [7/8 Regression] unroll-loops too aggressive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82133 --- Comment #4 from Nick --- It seems that this is simply a bug in the assembly code in OpenBLAS. I have attached the recent post that suggests this inconsistency: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/1292#issuecomment-354366612 I have

[Bug fortran/83622] New: [8 Regression] Wrong code with derived type and -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622 Bug ID: 83622 Summary: [8 Regression] Wrong code with derived type and -fopenmp Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83560] list-directed formatting of INTEGER is missing plus on output when output open with SIGN='PLUS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/52991] [6/7/8 Regression] attribute packed broken on mingw32?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991 --- Comment #26 from Benjamin Robin --- I try to work on this bug, by curiosity... And I did found 3 bug in the current layout of structure when ms_bitfield_layout_p = 1: ** 1) Basic packing (the failing test):

[Bug rtl-optimization/83565] RTL combine pass breaks shift result (at least on ia64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565 --- Comment #24 from Segher Boessenkool --- Binary size (of vmlinux) grows by 0.09%. I don't know about performance.

[Bug libfortran/83613] [8 Regression] Executing gfortran.dg/inquire_internal.f90 hangs on darwin after r255621

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83613 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Try this patch: diff --git a/libgfortran/io/unit.c b/libgfortran/io/unit.c index 2ca8525fbec..a655665aa8a 100644 --- a/libgfortran/io/unit.c +++ b/libgfortran/io/unit.c @@ -707,7 +707,9 @@ init_units (void)

[Bug rtl-optimization/83565] RTL combine pass breaks shift result (at least on ia64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83610] __builtin_expect sometimes is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83610 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target --- Comment #4 from Andrew

[Bug middle-end/83610] __builtin_expect sometimes is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83610 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Fruzynski --- Created attachment 42980 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42980=edit Benchmark Here is benchmark for this case. With unlikely() execution time

[Bug fortran/83560] list-directed formatting of INTEGER is missing plus on output when output open with SIGN='PLUS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Dec 29 19:25:31 2017 New Revision: 256034 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256034=gcc=rev Log: 2017-12-29 Jerry DeLisle PR

burculi.com

Hi! I noticed you have liburcu.org. Are you interested in burculi.com? If so please let me know and I will get back to you with the full details. Have a nice day! Allison Roberts

[Bug rtl-optimization/83621] New: [8 Regression] ICE: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6293 with -O -g

as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-256032-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-nographite-amd64 Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.0 20171229 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/81472] gcc.dg/torture/pr52028.c failed on armeb big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81472 --- Comment #1 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I see all execute tests failing with r256033 FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52028.c -O1 execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52028.c -O2 execution test FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52028.c -O3

[Bug c++/82882] [8 regression] ICE Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82882 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Still seems to be going wrong: /home/dcb/rpmbuild/BUILD/kactivitymanagerd-5.11.4/src/common/dbus/common.h:28:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault QStringLiteral("org.kde.ActivityManager")

[Bug target/82074] [aarch64] vmlsq_f32 compiled into 2 instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82074 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 Bug 82173 depends on bug 83567, which changed state. Bug 83567 Summary: Parametrized derived types: Segmentation fault when assigning a function return value https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83567 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/83567] Parametrized derived types: Segmentation fault when assigning a function return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83567 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83567] Parametrized derived types: Segmentation fault when assigning a function return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83567 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Fri Dec 29 14:27:59 2017 New Revision: 256033 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256033=gcc=rev Log: 2017-12-28 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83567 *

[Bug tree-optimization/83580] [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code caused by vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83580 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83581] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2397

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/83549] [7/8 Regression] error: generic thunk code fails for method ... which uses '...'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83549 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/83582] GCC is unable to fold the code of identical lambda-expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83582 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82439] Missing (x | y) == x simplifications

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82439 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/83620] [8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1470: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage --param=max-sched-ready-insns=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83620 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- It looks to me that LR shrinkage pass should not move (insn 7 22 18 2 (set (reg/v:SI 115 [ e ]) (reg:SI 2 cx [ e ])) "pr83620.c":7 86 {*movsi_internal} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 2 cx [ e ])

[Bug gcov-profile/83617] [GCOV] A goto statement in nested loop is wrongly marked as executed twice.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83617 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/83616] [GCOV] The goto statement in nested for loop leads the label is wrongly marked as not executed in gcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83616 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/83620] New: [8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1470: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage --param=max-sched-ready-insns=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83620 Bug ID: 83620 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1470: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage

[Bug fortran/83567] Parametrized derived types: Segmentation fault when assigning a function return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83567 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Janne, I found the problem - thanks for warning me of it. Cheers Paul On 29 December 2017 at 09:25, jb at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: >

[Bug tree-optimization/83438] [8 Regression] 435.gromacs miscompares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- > But there is something really wonky about this benchmark. There are times > when I fully expect it to pass and it fails and vice-versa. I'm really > starting to wonder if there's an uninit read in there

[Bug middle-end/83610] __builtin_expect sometimes is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83610 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83603] [8 Regression] ICE in builtin_memref at gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:238

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83603 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug ipa/83619] [8 Regression] ICE in inliner: caller edge count does not match BB count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83619 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Leaving to Honza. There's patch that fixes another issue (w/ -fdump-ipa-inline) + better diagnostics: diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.c b/gcc/cgraph.c index 69eb9bb2341..780769f07ee 100644 --- a/gcc/cgraph.c +++

[Bug fortran/83567] Parametrized derived types: Segmentation fault when assigning a function return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83567 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug ipa/83619] New: [8 Regression] ICE in inliner: caller edge count does not match BB count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83619 Bug ID: 83619 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in inliner: caller edge count does not match BB count Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: