[Bug c++/83714] [8 Regression] ICE in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- s/Jakus/Jakub

[Bug c++/83667] ICE in dump_function_decl on a thunk with variadic arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83667 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- No plan. It's a p3 non-regression.

[Bug c++/83714] [8 Regression] ICE in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Can't reproduce that bisection, this doesn't ICE even in 7.x, my bisection > points to r253599 instead. Yes Jakus, I can confirm it started with the revision you

[Bug lto/83720] [8 Regression] ICE: in mangle_decl, at cp/mangle.c:3847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83720 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83732] wrong warning about non-POD field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83732 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I suppose since packed structs violate the ABI anyway, we don't need them to use the ABI-stable definition of POD for the purpose of layout.

[Bug c++/83732] wrong warning about non-POD field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83732 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- That doesn't change anything, the default is gnu++14 anyway. My point is not that the compiler is in C++98 mode, just that the condition for the warning uses the old definition. The code confirms it:

[Bug c++/83734] [8 Regression] ice in cxx_eval _statement_list, at cp/constexpr.c:3869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/83572] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 7 should be 15, not 13)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83572 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- The issue here is we have a non SESE-region to start with.

[Bug c++/83732] wrong warning about non-POD field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83732 --- Comment #2 from Stas Sergeev --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > The warning might be using the old C++98 definition of POD. Lets specify -std explicitly then: $ g++ -std=c++11 pod.cpp pod.cpp:11:16: warning: ignoring packe

[Bug target/81652] [meta-bug] -fcf-protection=full -mcet bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652 Bug 81652 depends on bug 83109, which changed state. Bug 83109 Summary: [CET] improper code generation for builtin_longjmp with -fcf-protection -mcet https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83109 What|Removed

[Bug target/83109] [CET] improper code generation for builtin_longjmp with -fcf-protection -mcet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83109 igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Res

[Bug target/83109] [CET] improper code generation for builtin_longjmp with -fcf-protection -mcet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83109 --- Comment #1 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com --- It's fixed in revision r255164, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2017-11/msg00881.html. The svn log is missing PR 83109 that's why the bug was not updated automatically.

[Bug target/83726] [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726 --- Comment #3 from Wilco --- This is related with PR82964/82974, looks like same underlying issue. I have a patch which changes the constraint, and that fixes this issue too. It's not obvious to me whether legitimate_constant_p should be a subse

[Bug fortran/78534] Use a larger integer type for character lengths on 64-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78534 --- Comment #24 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Mon Jan 8 12:12:05 2018 New Revision: 256337 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256337&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 78534 Regression on 32-bit targets By switching from int to size_t in

[Bug c++/83734] [8 Regression] ice in cxx_eval _statement_list, at cp/constexpr.c:3869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83730] Unnecessary generation of guard variables with -fno-threadsafe-statics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83730 --- Comment #5 from Wilhelm M --- Only for completeness: if you write the following, no guards are produced: struct A { A() = default; // if commented out, no guards are allocated void foo() {} }; template struct B { static void foo

[Bug target/82975] [6/7 Regression] ICE in baseness at rtlanal.c:6220

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug tree-optimization/83552] [7 Regression] ICE in error: invalid argument to gimple call in during GIMPLE pass: strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83552 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Version|unknown

[Bug rtl-optimization/83565] [7/8 regression] RTL combine pass breaks shift result (at least on ia64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ia64 Target Milestone|---

[Bug preprocessor/83722] [8 Regression] the ICE dumper doesn't comment-out some error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83722 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/83735] [8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack with vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83735 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c/83736] ICE triggered by improper use of VLA and scanf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83736 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/83730] Unnecessary generation of guard variables with -fno-threadsafe-statics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83730 Wilhelm M changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code | --- Comment #4 from Wilhelm M --- If you c

[Bug c/83736] New: ICE triggered by improper use of VLA and scanf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83736 Bug ID: 83736 Summary: ICE triggered by improper use of VLA and scanf Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ipa/83065] [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2017 523/623 compfail (ICE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83065 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/83126] [8 Regression] ICE in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt, at tree-parloops.c:1713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83126 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 Bug 82173 depends on bug 83611, which changed state. Bug 83611 Summary: [PDT] Assignment of parameterized types causes double free error in runtime https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83611 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 Bug 82173 depends on bug 83731, which changed state. Bug 83731 Summary: PDT length parameter incorrectly rejected at run-time with -fcheck=bounds https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83731 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/83611] [PDT] Assignment of parameterized types causes double free error in runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83611 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83731] PDT length parameter incorrectly rejected at run-time with -fcheck=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83731 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83731] PDT length parameter incorrectly rejected at run-time with -fcheck=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83731 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jan 8 11:20:33 2018 New Revision: 256335 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256335&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83611 * decl.c (gfc_ge

[Bug fortran/83611] [PDT] Assignment of parameterized types causes double free error in runtime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83611 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jan 8 11:20:33 2018 New Revision: 256335 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256335&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83611 * decl.c (gfc_ge

[Bug target/83735] New: [8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack with vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83735 Bug ID: 83735 Summary: [8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack with vmovaps Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug fortran/83731] PDT length parameter incorrectly rejected at run-time with -fcheck=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83731 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Hi Berke, The fix for this turns out to be so trivial that I will roll it in to the patch for pr83611. I know that this must be frustrating but please keep trying out PDTs. The bug reports that you are genera

[Bug c++/83734] [8 Regression] ice in cxx_eval _statement_list, at cp/constexpr.c:3869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83734 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|ice in cxx_eval

[Bug c++/83732] wrong warning about non-POD field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83732 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/83718] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in profile_count::apply_scale

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83718 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/83626] std::experimental::filesystem::remove_all throws exception instead of returning 0 if path doesn't exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #10) > In my testing, I have a new failure: > FAIL:: experimental/filesystem/operations/remove.cc execution test > on aarch64-linux-gnu and arm*linux* targets. >

[Bug tree-optimization/83733] -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on bounded integer when inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83733 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/83714] [8 Regression] ICE in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/83728] [8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr68037-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83728 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug preprocessor/83722] [8 Regression] the ICE dumper doesn't comment-out some error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83722 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/83723] [8 Regression] ICE: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1010

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug lto/83720] [8 Regression] ICE: in mangle_decl, at cp/mangle.c:3847

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83720 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug middle-end/83721] [8 Regression] ICE: in generic_overlap, at gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c:821

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83721 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c++/83730] Unnecessary generation of guard variables with -fno-threadsafe-statics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83730 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|avr

[Bug lto/83719] [8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in hash_table::elements()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83719 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686-linux-gnu, |i686-linux-gnu |x86_6

[Bug lto/83719] [8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in hash_table::elements()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83719 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug lto/83719] [8 Regression] ICE (segfault) in hash_table::elements()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83719 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i686-linux-gnu |i686-linux-gnu, |

[Bug testsuite/67905] running the libstdc++ testsuite as root removed /dev/null from my system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67905 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't see anything in the libstdc++ testsuite that would remove it anyway, so I'm going to blame DejaGnu or OS X.

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 --- Comment #27 from Jan Hubicka --- I would still suggest here going with Martin's patch: it is incorrect to attempt to change the partition after BB order has been fixed. We can incrementally deal with the missed optimization in this quite rar

[Bug ipa/65654] [8 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81420] When a reference is bound to a member in the base of a temporary, lifetime of the temporary is not extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81420 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/83734] New: ice in cxx_eval _statement_list, at cp/constexpr.c:3869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83734 Bug ID: 83734 Summary: ice in cxx_eval _statement_list, at cp/constexpr.c:3869 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug fortran/83731] PDT length parameter incorrectly rejected at run-time with -fcheck=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83731 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug rtl-optimization/83723] [8 Regression] ICE: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:1010

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/83565] [7/8 regression] RTL combine pass breaks shift result (at least on ia64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565 --- Comment #31 from Eric Botcazou --- > So it appears that we have 2 classes of RISC machines, the ones supporting a > strong version of WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS and the others only a weak one. However I'm not sure whether exposing the distinct

[Bug target/83726] [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/83716] tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘identifier_node’ in get_inner_reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83716 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/83718] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in profile_count::apply_scale

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83718 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mil

[Bug tree-optimization/83715] Missed optimization in math expression: optimize double comparing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83715 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- In theory DOM propagtes equivalences but appearantly not in this case.

[Bug c++/83714] [8 Regression] ICE in build_address, at cp/typeck.c:5733

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83714 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0 |8.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/83626] std::experimental::filesystem::remove_all throws exception instead of returning 0 if path doesn't exist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83626 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug testsuite/83706] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-2.c and gcc.dg/ipa/inline-3.c fail starting with r256279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ipa |testsuite --- Comment #3 from Richard B

[Bug fortran/83705] [8 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug target/83726] [8 Regression] ICE: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83518] [8 Regression] Missing optimization: useless instructions should be dropped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518 > > --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Before store-merging we have: > MEM[(int *)

[Bug tree-optimization/83518] [8 Regression] Missing optimization: useless instructions should be dropped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Before store-merging we have: MEM[(int *)&arr] = { 5, 4, 3, 2 }; t_2 = arr[0]; _65 = arr[1]; _69 = arr[2]; _73 = arr[3]; arr[0] = _69; arr[1] = _73; arr[2] = 1; arr[3] = t_2; vect__2.5_38

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #17 from Arnd Bergmann --- Created attachment 43057 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43057&action=edit linux/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c, preprocessed and compressed A possibly related warning I just saw this wee

[Bug tree-optimization/83733] New: -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on bounded integer when inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83733 Bug ID: 83733 Summary: -Wformat-overflow false positive for %d on bounded integer when inlining Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/83681] epiphany: config/epiphany/epiphany.h:883:8: error: unknown type name 'rtl_opt_pass'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83681 Sebastian Huber changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/83565] [7/8 regression] RTL combine pass breaks shift result (at least on ia64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83565 --- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou --- As pointed out by Segher in comment #14, the problem ultimately comes from the ambiguity of WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS. Quoting him: "WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS isn't well-defined. """ @defmac WORD_REGISTER_O

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #16 from Arnd Bergmann --- Created attachment 43056 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43056&action=edit linux/net/ipv6/route.c, preprocessed and compressed To test the patch, I reverted the workaround that was adde

[Bug target/83681] epiphany: config/epiphany/epiphany.h:883:8: error: unknown type name 'rtl_opt_pass'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83681 --- Comment #2 from sh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sh Date: Mon Jan 8 09:17:20 2018 New Revision: 256331 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256331&root=gcc&view=rev Log: epiphany: Enable Ada run-time build gcc/ PR target/83681

[Bug c++/83713] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in do_narrow at gcc/convert.c:474

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83713 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2018-01-06

[Bug ipa/83706] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-2.c and gcc.dg/ipa/inline-3.c fail starting with r256279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706 Andrey Guskov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com --- Co

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- The problem is in the: @@ -671,11 +669,9 @@ e = one_cd_chain[j]; guard_bb = e->src; gsi = gsi_last_bb (guard_bb); - if (gsi_end_p (gsi)) - { - has_

[Bug tree-optimization/79224] [7 Regression] Large C-Ray slowdown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/79224] [7 Regression] Large C-Ray slowdown

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||83665 --- Comment #21 from Richard Bien

[Bug tree-optimization/83518] [8 Regression] Missing optimization: useless instructions should be dropped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83518 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Yes, it's not really sth new but a known issue with late value-numbering. Note that FRE wouldn't know how to simplify this either, we'd need store-merging to effectively vectorize the earlier sets. BB vect

[Bug tree-optimization/65752] Too strong optimizations int -> pointer casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752 --- Comment #56 from Richard Biener --- Testcase from PR82177: #include #include void f(int*, int*); int main() { int a=0, y[1], x = 0; uintptr_t pi = (uintptr_t) &x; uintptr_t yi = (uintptr_t) (y+1); uintptr_t n = pi != yi; if (n

[Bug tree-optimization/82282] PRE cannot blindly fold integer-to-pointer/pointer-to-integer round-trips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82282 Bug 82282 depends on bug 82177, which changed state. Bug 82177 Summary: Alias analysis too aggressive with integer-to-pointer cast https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/65752] Too strong optimizations int -> pointer casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nunoplopes at sapo dot pt --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/82177] Alias analysis too aggressive with integer-to-pointer cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82177 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81897] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81897 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #14

[Bug tree-optimization/83580] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code caused by vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83580 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jan 8 08:24:51 2018 New Revision: 256329 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256329&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-08 Richard Biener PR middle-end/83580 * tr

[Bug tree-optimization/83580] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code caused by vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83580 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/83517] Missed optimization in math expression: (x+x)/x == 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83517 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Version|tree-ssa

[Bug tree-optimization/83517] Missed optimization in math expression: (x+x)/x == 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83517 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jan 8 08:16:19 2018 New Revision: 256328 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256328&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-01-08 Richard Biener PR middle-end/83517 * mat

[Bug c++/83667] ICE in dump_function_decl on a thunk with variadic arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83667 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Thanks Nathan. Are you planning to backport that?

<    1   2