[Bug middle-end/83764] internal compiler error: in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83764 --- Comment #2 from Leslie Zhai --- And GCC 8.x workaround just remove the assert: 6751 /* The virtual tables should always be born with constructors 6752 and we always should assume that they are avaialble for

[Bug middle-end/83764] internal compiler error: in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83764 --- Comment #1 from Leslie Zhai --- Typo: - I have no idea why `in_lto_p` is NULL? + I have no idea why `in_lto_p` is false?

[Bug middle-end/83764] New: internal compiler error: in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83764 Bug ID: 83764 Summary: internal compiler error: in gimple_get_virt_method_for_vtable Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83763] New: PDT variable sees content deallocated if variable is passed as an input to a function, and the function result is assigned to that same variable

/gfortran-bin/bin/gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 8.0.0 20180109 (experimental) [trunk revision 256361] Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR

[Bug libstdc++/81584] Pretty Printer for string* doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81584 --- Comment #2 from ghjghj530-bubu at yahoo dot de --- You are right. The original script from GCC 6.3.0 contains a check for new/old string implementation in the "init" function. This bugreport can be closed. Sorry for the inconvenience.

[Bug fortran/83762] New: ICE on variable declaration with undefined PDT parameter

8.0.0 20180109 (experimental) [trunk revision 256361] Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

[Bug target/83761] New: bfin: ICE: in require, at machmode.h:292

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83761 Bug ID: 83761 Summary: bfin: ICE: in require, at machmode.h:292 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug middle-end/83729] [8 Regression] AVR ICE on convert_memory_address_addr_space_1 at explow.c:300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83729 --- Comment #3 from gandalf at winds dot org --- Another regression test case (compile with -O): void code_to_ascii(char buf[1], unsigned int code) { __attribute__((used)) static const char __flash test[5]="ABCDE"; static const char

[Bug tree-optimization/81038] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/83093] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83093 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug rtl-optimization/78585] unaligned vmovaps memory operand generated for i686 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78585 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78585] unaligned vmovaps memory operand generated for i686 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78585 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Jan 9 23:15:40 2018 New Revision: 256402 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256402=gcc=rev Log: i386: Add a test for PR target/78585 PR target/78585 has been fixed for GCC

[Bug c/33167] Hex constant characters with \x escape not parsing correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33167 --- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- "longest sequence of characters that can constitute the escape sequence" resolves an ambiguity between alternative parses permitted by the syntax; it doesn't need to deal with anything

[Bug tree-optimization/83759] New test cases gcc.dg/torture/inf-compare-1.c (and -2, -3, and -4) in r256380 all fail on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83759 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/58684] powerpc uses only unordered floating-point compares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58684 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/78585] unaligned vmovaps memory operand generated for i686 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78585 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- It is fixed by r243018.

[Bug c/33167] Hex constant characters with \x escape not parsing correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33167 --- Comment #6 from Albert Chan --- if gcc hex escape AND octal is right, does it contradict comment #1 ? "octal or hexadecimal ... longest sequence that constitute escape sequence" I noticed OLD python (2.0) also use the C rule regarding hex

[Bug target/83743] -mcpu=native causes gcc to exit in error if cpu is not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83743 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Which is perfectly fine, except the error message is a bit confusing if you don't know what's going on.

[Bug target/83743] -mcpu=native causes gcc to exit in error if cpu is not recognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83743 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > The driver asks the kernel, and the kernel knows. It's just a string. Correct, the kernel passes a string to the driver and the driver blindly uses it as

[Bug testsuite/83737] FAIL: gcc.dg/stdint-width-1.c (test for excess errors) for with newlib stdint.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83737 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Most configurations (for which the libc used has a working stdint.h) should probably be using use_gcc_stdint=wrap, so that GCC's stdint.h includes libc's for hosted compilations but GCC's

[Bug testsuite/80946] [8 regression] test cases gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90 and gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 fail starting with r247544

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80946 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/33167] Hex constant characters with \x escape not parsing correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33167 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The standard syntax production for octal-escape-sequence (C11 6.4.4.4#1) only allows one, two or three digits.

[Bug libstdc++/80276] pretty printer for std::unique_ptr<T[]> shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/83740] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:7140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/83740] [8 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:7140

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/80276] pretty printer for std::unique_ptr<T[]> shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jan 9 21:46:13 2018 New Revision: 256400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256400=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/80276 fix pretty printers for array smart pointers PR

[Bug c++/83739] [8 Regression] error: range-based 'for' expression of type 'auto' has incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83739 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/83735] [8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack with vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83735 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00678.html

[Bug c++/83734] [8 Regression] ice in cxx_eval _statement_list, at cp/constexpr.c:3869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83734] [8 Regression] ice in cxx_eval _statement_list, at cp/constexpr.c:3869

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83734 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 9 21:21:03 2018 New Revision: 256397 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256397=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83734 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_statement_list): Ignore

[Bug libstdc++/83709] Inserting duplicates into an unordered associative containers causes the container to invalidate iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83709 --- Comment #2 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Tue Jan 9 21:05:10 2018 New Revision: 256396 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256396=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-09 François Dumont PR libstdc++/83709

[Bug target/83660] ICE with vec_extract inside expression statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83660 --- Comment #4 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Tue Jan 9 20:50:30 2018 New Revision: 256394 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256394=gcc=rev Log: Use this branch to reproduce and resolve PR 83660. Added:

[Bug target/83760] New: [8 Regression] [SH] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start building glibc tst-copy_file_range.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760 Bug ID: 83760 Summary: [8 Regression] [SH] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start building glibc tst-copy_file_range.c Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/83399] Power8 ICE During LRA with 2-op rtl pattern for lvx instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399 --- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #11) > It is not valid: (void *) - 32 does not point inside a (or just behind > it). > > Perhaps you can make it valid using uintptr_t. Either way: should

[Bug target/83399] Power8 ICE During LRA with 2-op rtl pattern for lvx instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment

[Bug target/83757] [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr82190.c fails starting with r256351

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83757 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/83754] Segmentation fault in regex_search

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83754 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/83742] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_is_simply_contiguous, at fortran/expr.c:5323

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83742 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/81933] [7/8 Regression] Invalid "constexpr call flows off the end of the function" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81933 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/83742] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_is_simply_contiguous, at fortran/expr.c:5323

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83742 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Jan 9 19:49:25 2018 New Revision: 256391 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256391=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-09 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug tree-optimization/83759] New: New test cases gcc.dg/torture/inf-compare-1.c (and -2, -3, and -4) all fail on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83759 Bug ID: 83759 Summary: New test cases gcc.dg/torture/inf-compare-1.c (and -2, -3, and -4) all fail on powerpc64 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/83695] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83695 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On January 9, 2018 6:39:39 PM GMT+01:00, "amker at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83695 > >--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/83758] New: ICE building gccgo on powerpc64le --with-cpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83758 Bug ID: 83758 Summary: ICE building gccgo on powerpc64le --with-cpu=power8 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/59253] Python pretty printer should be improved for unique_ptr, shared_ptr and map

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59253 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jan 9 18:49:57 2018 New Revision: 256390 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256390=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/59253 Improve pretty printers for smart pointers PR

[Bug target/83399] Power8 ICE During LRA with 2-op rtl pattern for lvx instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/83753] ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83753 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug tree-optimization/83695] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83695 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Given 3-level loop nest: , the ICE happens when estimate_numbers_of_iterations called for the outermost Loop_1. The function tries to infer niter information

[Bug target/83757] New: [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr82190.c fails starting with r256351

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83757 Bug ID: 83757 Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/pr82190.c fails starting with r256351 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/83756] gcc (mingw64) 7.2.0 ICE on boost::call_once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756 --- Comment #5 from Jacob Godserv --- Created attachment 43081 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43081=edit mingw-w64 7.2.0 TestClass.ii This is the intermediate output from a 7.2.0 run.

[Bug c++/83756] gcc (mingw64) 7.2.0 ICE on boost::call_once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756 --- Comment #4 from Jacob Godserv --- Created attachment 43080 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43080=edit 7.2.0 test case output This is output from a 7.2.0 run. It produces the same crash.

[Bug preprocessor/83063] [8 Regression] ICE on an invalid preprocessor snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83063 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43070|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/83756] gcc (mingw64) 7.2.0 ICE on boost::call_once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756 --- Comment #3 from Jacob Godserv --- Created attachment 43078 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43078=edit mingw-w64 5.4.0 TestClass.ii I've attached gcc's intermediate output to make this even easier to reproduce. Compile

[Bug c++/83756] gcc (mingw64) 7.2.0 ICE on boost::call_once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756 --- Comment #2 from Jacob Godserv --- Created attachment 43077 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43077=edit Minimal test case With: x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -std=c++11 -I path/to/official/boost/1.57/includes/ -L

[Bug rtl-optimization/83628] [8 Regression] performance regression when accessing arrays on alpha

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628 --- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Jan 9 16:27:11 2018 New Revision: 256387 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256387=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83628 * combine.c (force_int_to_mode) : Use mode

[Bug c++/83756] gcc (mingw64) 7.2.0 ICE on boost::call_once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756 --- Comment #1 from Jacob Godserv --- Obviously you need a way to reproduce this bug. The original comment does not include that information. I'm going to attach a minimal test case, instructions on how to run it, and the .ii to make it even

[Bug c++/83756] New: gcc (mingw64) 7.2.0 ICE on boost::call_once

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756 Bug ID: 83756 Summary: gcc (mingw64) 7.2.0 ICE on boost::call_once Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/80276] pretty printer for std::unique_ptr<T[]> shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > We can prevent this by always casting the stored pointer to void* > > self.pointer = self.pointer.cast(gdb.lookup_type("void").pointer()) Oops,

[Bug libstdc++/83755] Pretty printers treat char* as NTBS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83755 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- We can prevent this by always casting the stored pointer to void* self.pointer = self.pointer.cast(gdb.lookup_type("void").pointer())

[Bug libstdc++/80276] pretty printer for std::unique_ptr<T[]> shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- We can prevent this by always casting the stored pointer to void* self.pointer = self.pointer.cast(gdb.lookup_type("void").pointer())

[Bug libstdc++/83755] Pretty printers treat char* as NTBS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83755 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/83755] New: Pretty printers treat char* as NTBS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83755 Bug ID: 83755 Summary: Pretty printers treat char* as NTBS Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/83663] [8 regression] aarch64_be regressions after r255946

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83663 --- Comment #3 from Vidya Praveen --- regressed tests passing now after the patch revert.

[Bug libstdc++/83754] New: Segmentation fault in regex_search

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83754 Bug ID: 83754 Summary: Segmentation fault in regex_search Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/81584] Pretty Printer for string* doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81584 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/80276] pretty printer for std::unique_ptr<T[]> shows type as std::unique_ptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80276 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83753] New: ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83753 Bug ID: 83753 Summary: ICE: in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/83718] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in profile_count::apply_scale

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83718 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/83399] Power8 ICE During LRA with 2-op rtl pattern for lvx instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399 --- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #8) > Created attachment 43064 [details] > Proposed fix > > I'm testing the attached patch. Thank you, Peter. I thought about resurrection of address mutations

[Bug rtl-optimization/83575] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: multiple hot/cold transitions found)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- Once BB order is finalized we should not move them across partitions. The problem seems to start with loop2_unroll which for some reason introduce blocks of count 0 that looks like a misupdate of profile,

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43074|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/83668] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fgraphite-identity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #53 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 > > --- Comment #47 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43073|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/83668] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fgraphite-identity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83668 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 9 13:35:43 2018 New Revision: 256381 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256381=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-09 Richard Biener PR

[Bug testsuite/83706] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-2.c and gcc.dg/ipa/inline-3.c fail starting with r256279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/64811] fold_inf_compare bogus for NaNs (given -ftrapping-math)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64811 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/64811] fold_inf_compare bogus for NaNs (given -ftrapping-math)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64811 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Jan 9 13:25:38 2018 New Revision: 256380 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256380=gcc=rev Log: Fix folding of Inf/NaN comparisons for -ftrapping-math (PR

[Bug lto/81968] [8 regression] early lto debug objects make Solaris ld SEGV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968 --- Comment #51 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 43073 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43073=edit Updated patch with SHT_GROUP and extended section index handling Tested on the big testcase, otherwise untested. I

[Bug target/83735] [8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack with vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83735 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- I am testing this patch: diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index 8696f931806..8558995e067 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -11259,7 +11259,8 @@

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 --- Comment #30 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #29) > Does the patch fix or make latent PR83575 ? Unfortunately it doesn't. I'll try to take a look at the PR83575.

[Bug target/82214] [AArch64] Incorrect checking of LDP/STP offsets in aarch64_print_operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82214 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/83752] New: gfortran.dg/common_align_2.f90 fails in execution for target with __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ < 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83752 Bug ID: 83752 Summary: gfortran.dg/common_align_2.f90 fails in execution for target with __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ < 8 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43072 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43072=edit IPA CP dump file after the revision

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43071 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43071=edit IPA CP dump file before the revision

[Bug preprocessor/83063] [8 Regression] ICE on an invalid preprocessor snippet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83063 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43070 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43070=edit gcc8-pr83063.patch WIP patch. It still doesn't handle #__VA_OPT__(whatever) or #__VA_OPT__() properly and there

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/82831] [8 Regression] Broken PGO bootstrap after r254379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831 --- Comment #28 from Martin Liška --- I've just sent patch to gcc-patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00604.html

[Bug c++/83749] Types with different language linkage are treated as equivalent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83749 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/2316] g++ fails to overload on language linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dan.cermak@cgc-instruments.

[Bug sanitizer/82517] use-after-scope for a variable with big alignment causes a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82517 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Known to fail|8.0

[Bug c++/83749] Types with different language linkage are treated as equivalent types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83749 --- Comment #2 from dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com --- Well I don't mind the current behavior at all and to be honest I find it more logical that way, so I would welcome a change in the standard. Should I then close this bugreport or keep it

[Bug sanitizer/82517] use-after-scope for a variable with big alignment causes a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82517 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Jan 9 11:47:26 2018 New Revision: 256378 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256378=gcc=rev Log: Add gcc_assert about stack alignment (PR sanitizer/82517). 2018-01-09 Martin

[Bug target/82975] [6 Regression] ICE in baseness at rtlanal.c:6220

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/82975] [6 Regression] ICE in baseness at rtlanal.c:6220

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82975 --- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Jan 9 11:38:04 2018 New Revision: 256377 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256377=gcc=rev Log: [arm] PR target/82975: Guard against reg_renumber being NULL in

[Bug target/79883] avr i18n: untranslated "interrupt" or "signal"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883 --- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Jan 9 11:27:34 2018 New Revision: 256376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256376=gcc=rev Log: PR target/79883 * gcc.target/avr/torture/pr57631.c (dg-warning):

[Bug tree-optimization/83750] CSE erf/erfc pair

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83750 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82641] Unable to enable crc32 for a certain function with target attribute on ARM (aarch32)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641 --- Comment #13 from Tamar Christina --- Author: tnfchris Date: Tue Jan 9 11:04:50 2018 New Revision: 256375 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256375=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-09 Tamar Christina

[Bug testsuite/83737] FAIL: gcc.dg/stdint-width-1.c (test for excess errors) for with newlib stdint.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83737 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #2) > Author: gjl > Date: Tue Jan 9 10:38:45 2018 > New Revision: 256373 Typo in the ChangeLog :-( This was intended for PR83738

  1   2   >