[Bug libfortran/83811] New: fortran 'e' format broken for single digit exponents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83811 Bug ID: 83811 Summary: fortran 'e' format broken for single digit exponents Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/83810] New: sh: s-scaval.adb:103:07: warning: "IV_Ilf" overlays smaller object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83810 Bug ID: 83810 Summary: sh: s-scaval.adb:103:07: warning: "IV_Ilf" overlays smaller object Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/83809] New: epiphany: a-direct.ads:478:09: alignment for "Search_Typeb119s" must be at least 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83809 Bug ID: 83809 Summary: epiphany: a-direct.ads:478:09: alignment for "Search_Typeb119s" must be at least 8 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug regression/39508] gcc libdecnumber 4.3.4 & 4.3.3 x86_64 linux : /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.3.4//libgcc.a(bid_decimal_globals.o): TLS transition from R_X86_64_TLSGD to R_

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39508 Roel Van de Paar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roel at vandepaar dot com ---

[Bug bootstrap/81926] [7 regression] go/parse.o differs between stage2 and stage3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926 --- Comment #40 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Fri Jan 12 05:32:31 2018 New Revision: 256562 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256562=gcc=rev Log: Avoid Solaris/SPARC comparison failures with Solaris as (PR bootstrap/81926)

[Bug libquadmath/83800] [libquadmath] M_SQRT2q & sqrtq(2.0Q) off by one ULP ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83800 --- Comment #2 from sisyphus1 at optusnet dot com.au --- The issue with sqrtq() is more widespread than I expected. Checking the square roots of the integer values from 2 to 300, I found that sqrtq differs from mpfr for 2, 6, 8, 13, 15, 19, 24,

[Bug c++/83778] [8 regression] g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-2.C fails starting with r256448

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83778 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- I still haven't been able to reproduce this; sorry.

[Bug c++/83779] Trivial bounds error not detected with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83779 --- Comment #5 from Walter Spector --- Thanks for mentioning that, Martin. A couple of us in the project I work on were reviewing the options we specify in our debug builds to try to smoke out problems. We already use options like -Wall,

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Correction, the patch is here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00935.html

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Incremental patch for the testsuite: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00962.html Unfortunately it sounds like it might be too late to enable the option in GCC 8.

[Bug preprocessor/83773] Warning for redefined macro does not have its own -Wsomething switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83773 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/83799] [8 Regression] bogus "no matching function for call to" error when building llvm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83799 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00984.html

[Bug middle-end/79220] missing -Wstringop-overflow= on a memcpy overflow with a small power-of-2 size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79220 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/83779] Trivial bounds error not detected with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83779 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/83797] Inconsistent error messages for main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83797 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, easyhack

[Bug c++/83808] New: "internal compiler error" for invalid input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83808 Bug ID: 83808 Summary: "internal compiler error" for invalid input Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/83203] [8 Regression] Inefficient int to avx2 vector conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Matthew Wilcox from comment #14) > Confirmed this fixes the problem. I'll send it to Tony and see if he likes > it. May I add your Signed-off-by to the patch? Sure. Feel free to reformat it

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 --- Comment #14 from Matthew Wilcox --- Confirmed this fixes the problem. I'll send it to Tony and see if he likes it. May I add your Signed-off-by to the patch?

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/83803] Using -fc-prototypes on modules with empty dummy arg lists does not close paren.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83803 --- Comment #3 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 43110 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43110=edit patchlet (untested)

[Bug target/83735] [8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack with vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83735 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/29651] Subroutine: Kind convertion of intent(out) value: signal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29651 --- Comment #12 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9) > An easy fix to this would be to disallow kind=2 integer as an argument > during checking. Since SIGNAL is a GNU extension, we are at liberty what to allow.

[Bug target/83203] [8 Regression] Inefficient int to avx2 vector conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 11 20:49:40 2018 New Revision: 256556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256556=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83203 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/83330] [7/8 Regression] generating unaligned store to stack for SSE register with -mno-push-args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83330 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Jan 11 20:44:46 2018 New Revision: 256555 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256555=gcc=rev Log: i386: Align stack frame if argument is passed on stack When a function call

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 --- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Matthew Wilcox from comment #9) > Maybe I'm a little slow, but I don't see what the path is that sets 'nr' to > 0. It's 1UL << compound_order. Typically, compound_order is 0, although it >

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Wilcox --- I'm sorry, I still don't get it. What I think you're saying is that GCC performs this optimisation: nr = 1UL << compound_order(page); atomic_sub_return(x, nr); into: if (PageHead(page))

[Bug fortran/79383] USE statement error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79383 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/79383] USE statement error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79383 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jan 11 20:24:36 2018 New Revision: 256554 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256554=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-11 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/79383

[Bug go/83794] misc/cgo/test uses gigabytes of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83794 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Ian

[Bug go/83794] misc/cgo/test uses gigabytes of memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83794 --- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Thu Jan 11 19:58:55 2018 New Revision: 256553 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256553=gcc=rev Log: PR go/83794 misc/cgo/test: avoid endless loop when we can't

[Bug target/82682] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr50038.c scan-assembler-times movzbl 2 (found 3 times) since r253958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83799] [8 Regression] bogus "no matching function for call to" error when building llvm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83799 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 43109 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43109=edit Reduced test case for the first error Here's a reduced version of the first error seen in the original attachment (am

[Bug debug/81155] [8 Regression] Debug make check regressions in GCC 8.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155 --- Comment #8 from Jan Kratochvil --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Thanks. Is that something that can be fixed in GDB easily? Expecting a significant performance hit on initial scan of a file when .gdb_index/.debug_names is

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/43486] Preserve variable-use locations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43486 --- Comment #13 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Jan 11 19:38:52 2018 New Revision: 256552 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256552=gcc=rev Log: Add some reproducers for issues found developing the location-wrappers patch

[Bug target/82682] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr50038.c scan-assembler-times movzbl 2 (found 3 times) since r253958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 11 19:34:56 2018 New Revision: 256551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256551=gcc=rev Log: PR target/82682 * ree.c (combine_reaching_defs): Optimize also

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Wilcox --- Maybe I'm a little slow, but I don't see what the path is that sets 'nr' to 0. It's 1UL << compound_order. Typically, compound_order is 0, although it may be anything up to log2(number of pages in the

[Bug debug/81155] [8 Regression] Debug make check regressions in GCC 8.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thanks. Is that something that can be fixed in GDB easily? I mean, for -freorder-blocks-and-partition optimized main we can't pretend it is a single range when it is not.

[Bug middle-end/83653] [6/7/8 Regression] GCC fails to remove a can't-happen call on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83653 --- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez --- Ah, I see what the problem is. unsigned long i, nr = 1UL << compound_order(page); ... page_ref_sub(page, nr); // calls __builtin_constant_p(nr) eventually The problem is that there is a path to

[Bug debug/81155] [8 Regression] Debug make check regressions in GCC 8.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155 --- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > where gdb sees the difference and why doesn't it make the file > containing main the default? pr43051-1.exe.good <1><117>: Abbrev Number: 3

[Bug c++/83690] [8 regression] spurious unused variable warings for variables used only in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83690 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/82728] [8 regression] Incorrect -Wunused-but-set-variable warning with a const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82728 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83690] [8 regression] spurious unused variable warings for variables used only in static_assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83690 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 11 19:08:41 2018 New Revision: 256550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256550=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82728 - wrong -Wunused-but-set-variable PR c++/82799

[Bug c++/82799] [8 Regression] -Wunused-but-set-variable false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82799 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 11 19:08:41 2018 New Revision: 256550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256550=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82728 - wrong -Wunused-but-set-variable PR c++/82799

[Bug c++/82728] [8 regression] Incorrect -Wunused-but-set-variable warning with a const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82728 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 11 19:08:41 2018 New Revision: 256550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256550=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/82728 - wrong -Wunused-but-set-variable PR c++/82799

[Bug c++/83806] New: Spurious unused-but-set-parameter with nullptr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83806 Bug ID: 83806 Summary: Spurious unused-but-set-parameter with nullptr Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/83801] [8 Regression][avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 --- Comment #6 from gandalf at winds dot org --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #1) > Old v7.2 does it correctly: one string in flash, one in RAM. My more specific testcase (comment #3 in PR83729) references a 32-byte string in a

[Bug ipa/83532] [8 Regression] ICE in apply_scale, at profile-count.h:955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83532 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/83718] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in profile_count::apply_scale

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83718 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/81155] [8 Regression] Debug make check regressions in GCC 8.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com,

[Bug target/83785] sh: ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2344

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83785 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I suspect this has the same cause as bug 78459, bug 80863 and bug 83760, all of which involve ICEs in maybe_record_trace_start for SH and the first two of which mysteriously went away (but

[Bug tree-optimization/83189] [8 regression] internal compiler error: in probability_in, at profile-count.h:1050

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jan 11 17:47:20 2018 New Revision: 256545 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256545=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/83189 * gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c (isolate_path):

[Bug middle-end/83718] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in profile_count::apply_scale

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83718 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jan 11 17:46:01 2018 New Revision: 256544 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256544=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/83718 * tree-inline.c (copy_cfg_body): Adjust num for

[Bug c/83801] [8 Regression][avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/35513] Improve targetm.binds_local_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35513 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafael.espindola at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/83782] Inconsistent address for hidden ifunc in a shared library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83782 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/35513] Improve targetm.binds_local_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35513 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Hidden ifunc address has the similar issue, see the testcase in PR 83782. If targetm.binds_local_p needs to know if the symbol is used for read, write or branch, so that all function pointers, including hidden

[Bug debug/81155] [8 Regression] Debug make check regressions in GCC 8.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81155 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/83801] [8 Regression][avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- *** Bug 83805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/83801] [8 Regression][avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||addr-space Component|target

[Bug middle-end/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 --- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > I don't see any bug actually. You are just saying that the str1 variable is > __flash, during optimization (already in C FE) it optimizes str1[i] into >

[Bug c++/83798] Enhancement to Wmain warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83798 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug middle-end/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- I don't see any bug actually. You are just saying that the str1 variable is __flash, during optimization (already in C FE) it optimizes str1[i] into "0123456789"[i] and that is the string literal that is

[Bug ipa/60871] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:1510

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871 --- Comment #22 from Neil Kindlon --- I am so sorry. Please disregard my earlier comments. It seems I hadn't exported the path variables to the correct correct compiler. When actually compiled with 7.1.0, there is no problem. My apologies.

[Bug middle-end/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Well, you have 3 objects, str1, str2 and the string literal, if the compiler > thinks all 3 are needed, it emits all of them. Without > -fmerge-all-constants

[Bug middle-end/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Well, you have 3 objects, str1, str2 and the string literal, if the compiler thinks all 3 are needed, it emits all of them. Without -fmerge-all-constants str1 can't be merged with str2 nor with any other

[Bug middle-end/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > If so, avr should override the select_section and unique_section target > hooks and return something different for the __flash strings. Also tried

[Bug tree-optimization/83776] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds indexing past the end of a string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83776 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/83770] [8 Regression] ICE in create_preheader, at cfgloopmanip.c:1536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83770 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Well, 7.2 certainly doesn't have any special casing for address spaces in > categorize_decl_for_section etc., so before claiming it is a regression > you'd

[Bug tree-optimization/83695] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83695 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/83178] [8 regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Thu Jan 11 15:56:07 2018 New Revision: 256542 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256542=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/83178 * g++.dg/ipa/devirt-22.C: Adjust scan-dump-times count.

[Bug go/83787] [8 regression] Many 32-bit Solaris/SPARC Go tests FAIL after Go1.10beta1 update

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83787 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug middle-end/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Well, 7.2 certainly doesn't have any special casing for address spaces in categorize_decl_for_section etc., so before claiming it is a regression you'd better bisect what change actually changed it.

[Bug tree-optimization/83695] [8 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83695 --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Thu Jan 11 15:41:41 2018 New Revision: 256541 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256541=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83695 * gimple-loop-linterchange.cc

[Bug debug/68860] [6/7/8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c -flto -O3 -g line 16/7 arg1 == 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37097|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libquadmath/83800] [libquadmath] M_SQRT2q & sqrtq(2.0Q) off by one ULP ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83800 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/83803] Using -fc-prototypes on modules with empty dummy arg lists does not close paren.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83803 --- Comment #2 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> --- Forgot compiler info: ed@ed-VirtualBox:~$ ./bin/bin/gfortran -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=./bin/bin/gfortran

[Bug middle-end/83805] [8 Regression] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.2.1 Summary|Wrong

[Bug middle-end/83805] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > If so, avr should override the select_section and unique_section target > hooks and return something different for the __flash strings. I am just working on

[Bug target/83801] [8 Regression][avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 43107 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43107=edit proposed patch

[Bug target/81821] [RX] xchg_mem uses wrong memory operand size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81821 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/83805] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/83801] [8 Regression][avr] String constant in __flash not put into .progmem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.2.1 Summary|[avr]

[Bug target/81821] [RX] xchg_mem uses wrong memory operand size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81821 --- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Jan 11 15:18:38 2018 New Revision: 256538 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256538=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline 2018-01-11 Oleg Endo

[Bug other/83805] Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||addr-space, wrong-code

[Bug target/81821] [RX] xchg_mem uses wrong memory operand size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81821 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Thu Jan 11 15:16:21 2018 New Revision: 256536 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256536=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/81821 * config/rx/rx.md (BW): New mode attribute.

[Bug other/83805] New: Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805 Bug ID: 83805 Summary: Wrong constant merging for objects in different address spaces Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/83803] Using -fc-prototypes on modules with empty dummy arg lists does not close paren.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83803 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/79383] USE statement error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79383 --- Comment #3 from Walt Brainerd --- Yes, Sounds like you have it fixed. Thanks. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:06 PM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79383 > > kargl at

[Bug target/83203] [8 Regression] Inefficient int to avx2 vector conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug lto/83804] [meta] LTO memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- So comparing memory footprint of GCC 7 and GCC 8, I see small increase for WPA phase (~5%).

[Bug lto/83804] [meta] LTO memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43105 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43105=edit CPU & memory consumption for Inkscape with GCC 8

[Bug lto/83804] [meta] LTO memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43104 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43104=edit CPU & memory consumption for Inkscape with GCC 7

[Bug lto/83804] [meta] LTO memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43103 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43103=edit -fmem-report-wpa for Inkscape with -O2 for GCC 8

[Bug lto/83804] [meta] LTO memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83804 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 43102 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43102=edit -fmem-report-wpa for Inkscape with -O2 for GCC 7

  1   2   >