https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67412
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Bug 64054 depends on bug 40411, which changed state.
Bug 40411 Summary: -std=c99 does not enable c99 mode in Solaris C library
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|https://gcc.gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64054
--- Comment #19 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 12 09:52:53 2018
New Revision: 256568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Link with correct values-*.o files on Solaris (PR target/40411)
gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #34 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 12 09:52:53 2018
New Revision: 256568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Link with correct values-*.o files on Solaris (PR target/40411)
gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67412
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 12 09:52:53 2018
New Revision: 256568
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256568&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Link with correct values-*.o files on Solaris (PR target/40411)
gcc/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83800
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
So r224161 (hey Aldy!) caused this bogus DW_AT_abstract_origin and
Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c (revision 255167)
+++ g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
--- Comment #6 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
> We have been crossing fingers about that for some time. ;-) CCing the
> expert.
Calling me “expert” is a bit far fetched: I never worked with LTO, and I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83812
Bug ID: 83812
Summary: nvptx-run: error getting kernel result: operation not
supported on global/shared address space
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Jan 12 08:59:52 2018
New Revision: 256566
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256566&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Initialize type_warnings::dyn_count with a default value (PR ipa/83054).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796
Michael Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.4.0 |7.2.0
--- Comment #1 from Michael John
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> As I said earlier, the patch is IMHO wrong and instead ARM/AArch64 should
> implement efficient mempcpy in the library.
> If not, we should have a target hook whet
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo