[Bug ada/84142] Implicit_Dereference with Generic Formal Incomplete Types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84142 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon at pushface dot org

[Bug target/84144] SSE-style intrinsics for loongson?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84144 --- Comment #1 from Mingye Wang --- Oh, the commit's modification on line 31 also fixes a tiny bug in gcc's error message. TARGET_LOONGSON_VECTORS -- and __mips_loongson_vector_rev -- is now defined for 2e/2f/3a in git mirror's HEAD (r257218 as

[Bug target/84144] New: SSE-style intrinsics for loongson?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84144 Bug ID: 84144 Summary: SSE-style intrinsics for loongson? Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/84112] [8 Regression] powerpc64le ICE in LRA on openjdk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84112 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/84143] New: Intrinsic output of PDT incorrectly includes type parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84143 Bug ID: 84143 Summary: Intrinsic output of PDT incorrectly includes type parameters Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/84064] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue related to -fstack-clash-protection and memcpy on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84064 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- WRT c#3, yea, that code is totally broken and probably has been since the day it was introduced. The good news is its fixable.

[Bug target/84064] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue related to -fstack-clash-protection and memcpy on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84064 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84064] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue related to -fstack-clash-protection and memcpy on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84064 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 31 05:02:30 2018 New Revision: 257217 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257217=gcc=rev Log: PR target/84064 * i386.c (ix86_adjust_stack_and_probe_stack_clash):

[Bug tree-optimization/84005] [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-1.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84005 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/84095] [8 Regression] false-positive -Wrestrict warnings for memcpy within array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84095 --- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #8) I have manually reproduced a similar false positive in the small test case below it's not quite the same issue but I have a fix for both. They're both caused by

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter --- The reproducer will build an executable ./seg_prod which generates the run time error in the 7. unit test.

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 43304 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43304=edit Corrected reproducer, please ignore the first one.

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter --- (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #1) > Created attachment 43303 [details] > Reproducer for the RT error Ooops, one correction in the makefile, system_dependencies.f90 must come before diagnostics.f90

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---

[Bug ada/84142] Implicit_Dereference with Generic Formal Incomplete Types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84142 --- Comment #1 from Jere --- Created attachment 43302 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43302=edit zip archive containing 3 separate causes

[Bug ada/84142] New: Implicit_Dereference with Generic Formal Incomplete Types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84142 Bug ID: 84142 Summary: Implicit_Dereference with Generic Formal Incomplete Types Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/84141] New: [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Bug ID: 84141 Summary: [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/68746] FAIL: gfortran.dg/read_dir.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-01-26 8:57 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746 > > --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- > On 2018-01-26 8:29 PM,

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/84095] [8 Regression] false-positive -Wrestrict warnings for memcpy within array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84095 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/84140] New: Inline friends are not constrained by concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84140 Bug ID: 84140 Summary: Inline friends are not constrained by concepts Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug debug/84131] [8 regression] Fortran dynamical array debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84131 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84139] C++17 Filesystem/Filesystem TS + cmcstl2 = GCC ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84139 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Di Bella --- An observation by Casey Carter (maintainer for cmcstl2) was made over at cpplang.slack.org#concepts: > Presumably a concepts bug being triggered in the > `std::iterator_traits`-hooking code at >

[Bug debug/84131] [8 regression] Fortran dynamical array debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84131 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 30 22:57:51 2018 New Revision: 257212 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257212=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/84131 * trans-array.c

[Bug c++/84136] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with goto to an && label in another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/84139] C++17 Filesystem/Filesystem TS + cmcstl2 = GCC ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84139 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Di Bella --- Created attachment 43300 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43300=edit example.ii as produced by -save-temps (compressed)

[Bug c++/84139] New: C++17 Filesystem/Filesystem TS + cmcstl2 = GCC ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84139 Bug ID: 84139 Summary: C++17 Filesystem/Filesystem TS + cmcstl2 = GCC ICE Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/84138] [8 Regression] ICE folding broken constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84138 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- --- a/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c @@ -2356,6 +2356,7 @@ cp_fold (tree x) /* A COND_EXPR might have incompatible types in branches if one or both arms are bitfields. If

[Bug fortran/84134] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84134 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/84095] [8 Regression] false-positive -Wrestrict warnings for memcpy within array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84095 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 43299 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43299=edit Patch under test. I think that false positive is already being tracked in bug 83456. Let me add the test case to it.

[Bug fortran/84134] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84134 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Jan 30 22:35:34 2018 New Revision: 257211 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257211=gcc=rev Log: 2017-01-30 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84134

[Bug middle-end/84089] [8 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-x.C -std=gnu++14 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84089 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez

[Bug c++/84138] [8 Regression] ICE folding broken constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84138 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84138] New: [8 Regression] ICE folding broken constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84138 Bug ID: 84138 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE folding broken constant Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code Severity:

[Bug c++/84127] pragmas to disable -Wexpansion-to-defined compiler warnings seems to be broken since 7.x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84127 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/82658] Suboptimal codegen on AVR when right-shifting 8-bit unsigned integers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82658 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |c++ --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > You cut away the most interesting part: the insn pattern that does not exist. > Could you show us? It is in the #c0 attachment: (jump_insn/f 178 177 179 14

[Bug rtl-optimization/84068] [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed: qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1 with -fno-sched-critical-path-heuristic --param=max-sched-extend-regions-iters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84068 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- > Yes it's latent and the fix is trivial. Testing to see whether it affects > codequality. Thanks Wilco, I appreciate it. Errr, we all do :).

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #3 from Douglas Mencken --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > You cut away the most interesting part: the insn pattern that does not exist. > Could you show us? Sure, but how?

[Bug target/82641] Unable to enable crc32 for a certain function with target attribute on ARM (aarch32)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641 --- Comment #23 from Arnd Bergmann --- I've done some more testing with '#pragma GCC target("arch=armv5te")' in place, but ran into another problem: : note: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from

[Bug middle-end/84095] [8 Regression] false-positive -Wrestrict warnings for memcpy within array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84095 --- Comment #9 from Arnd Bergmann --- I found another false-positive -Wrestrict warning, did a manual reduction. Let me know if I should better open separate bugs for each test case, or you prefer to have them all here. $

[Bug c++/84127] pragmas to disable -Wexpansion-to-defined compiler warnings seems to be broken since 7.x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84127 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/84134] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84134 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/40411] -std=c99 does not enable c99 mode in Solaris C library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411 --- Comment #38 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Tue Jan 30 21:18:40 2018 New Revision: 257209 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257209=gcc=rev Log: Fix use of Solaris values-Xc.o (PR target/40411) PR target/40411 *

[Bug debug/84131] [8 regression] Fortran dynamical array debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84131 --- Comment #4 from Yao Qi --- (In reply to Yao Qi from comment #3) > Thanks for the quick fix, Jakub. It fixes 100 FAILs in gdb.fortran tests. > > === gdb Summary === > > -# of expected passes 388 > -# of

[Bug c++/84136] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE when woking with labels as values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84133] [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84133 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84133] [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84133 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Jan 30 20:49:49 2018 New Revision: 257206 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257206=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-30 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84133

[Bug debug/84131] [8 regression] Fortran dynamical array debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84131 --- Comment #3 from Yao Qi --- Thanks for the quick fix, Jakub. It fixes 100 FAILs in gdb.fortran tests. === gdb Summary === -# of expected passes 388 -# of unexpected failures 165 +# of expected passes

[Bug fortran/84133] [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84133 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/83583] ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:38794

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83583 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84112] [8 Regression] powerpc64le ICE in LRA on openjdk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84112 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Jan 30 20:28:59 2018 New Revision: 257204 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257204=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-30 Vladimir Makarov PR target/84112

[Bug fortran/84115] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'indirect_ref' in add_decl_as_local, at fortran/trans-decl.c:256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84125] [8 Regression] ICE in generic lambda when static_assert argument is implicitly converted to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84125 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Patch posted but I'm not sure about it: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg02377.html

[Bug target/84039] x86 retpolines and CFI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84039 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg02233.html

[Bug tree-optimization/84106] gcc is not able to vectorize code for 1D array, but does so for 2D array of the same size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84106 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Fruzynski --- Here are results of small benchmark executed on Xeon E5-2683 v3. Code was compiled using gcc 4.8.5. This gcc version also splits loops. Manually vectorized code is 3.5

[Bug fortran/84133] [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84133 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84117] [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5798

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84117 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/83986] [6/7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83986 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/83986] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83986 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 30 20:03:04 2018 New Revision: 257203 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257203=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/83986 * sched-deps.c (sched_analyze_insn): For

[Bug middle-end/78809] Inline strcmp with small constant strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809 --- Comment #33 from Qing Zhao --- with SPEC2017 on X86, I didn't see any run-time performance change as expected. due to the date I collected for code size change, looks like that n=3 or n=4 might be a reasonable default. n=3 might be safer.

[Bug c++/84091] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84091 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 30 20:01:36 2018 New Revision: 257202 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257202=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84091 - ICE with local class in lambda in template. *

[Bug c++/84126] [8 Regression] ICE in variadic generic lambda inside a template function calling a function with arguments by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84126 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- C++14 version: template void sink(Ts...); template int bar(T&); // ICE with reference, work with just T template void foo(T){ [](auto ... k){ sink (bar(k) ...); }(0); } int main() { foo(0);

[Bug c++/84091] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++ code: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84091 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84134] [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84134 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug middle-end/78809] Inline strcmp with small constant strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809 --- Comment #32 from Qing Zhao --- Created attachment 43298 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43298=edit code size impact from inlining str(n)cmp with different n on X86

[Bug fortran/84135] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_array_cobounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:6033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Segfault reading through a NULL value for ubound here: 6032 ubound = GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_UBOUND (type, dim); 6033 if (as->upper[dim] && !INTEGER_CST_P (ubound)) Program received signal

[Bug fortran/84135] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_array_cobounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:6033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/84120] Syntax for used for PDT constructors is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84120 --- Comment #1 from Neil Carlson --- This explains the problem underlying PR82205

[Bug rtl-optimization/83530] [8 Regression] ICE in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83530 --- Comment #7 from Pat Haugen --- Assuming this is a latent selective scheduling bug since I can reproduce with r243865 by adding -fsched-pressure --param sched-pressure-algorithm=2. Looking...

[Bug c++/84126] [8 Regression] ICE in variadic generic lambda inside a template function calling a function with arguments by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84126 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/84098] [8 Regression] ICE when using a lambda in a in-class static member initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84098 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug gcov-profile/84137] New: Typo in gcov online documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84137 Bug ID: 84137 Summary: Typo in gcov online documentation Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile

[Bug c++/84136] New: Compilation aborted when woking with labels as values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136 Bug ID: 84136 Summary: Compilation aborted when woking with labels as values Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/84098] [8 Regression] ICE when using a lambda in a in-class static member initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84098 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 30 19:05:12 2018 New Revision: 257199 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257199=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84098 - ICE with lambda in template NSDMI. * pt.c

[Bug debug/84131] [8 regression] Fortran dynamical array debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84131 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/84131] [8 regression] Fortran dynamical array debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84131 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/84088] [8 Regression][nvptx] libgomp.oacc-fortran/declare-*.f90 execution fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84088 --- Comment #9 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Ha! Thanks... In the main programme: struct array00_integer(kind=4) desc.3; desc.3.dtype = {.elem_len=8, .rank=0, .type=11}; desc.3.data = (void * restrict) foo ();

[Bug fortran/84135] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_array_cobounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:6033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- These analogous cases compile and work : $ cat z2.f90 program p integer :: i integer :: x(3)[2,*] data (x(i:i+2:i+1), i=1,2) /1,2,3/ print *, x end $ cat z3.f90 program p

[Bug fortran/84135] New: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_array_cobounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:6033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135 Bug ID: 84135 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_array_cobounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:6033 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/84134] New: [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84134 Bug ID: 84134 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 --- Comment #12 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- In the end I agree using range info in split_constant_offset is the right way to go -- sorry for the runaround. Testing a patch for that. I'll see if that triggers the same predcom problem

[Bug fortran/84133] New: [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84133 Bug ID: 84133 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2706 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84127] pragmas to disable -Wexpansion-to-defined compiler warnings seems to be broken since 7.x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84127 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Bug 56818 depends on bug 36825, which changed state. Bug 36825 Summary: [F08] Rank > 7 arrays [will break library ABI] libgfortran I/O+intrinsics: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36825 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/39627] [meta-bug] Fortran 2008 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627 Bug 39627 depends on bug 36825, which changed state. Bug 36825 Summary: [F08] Rank > 7 arrays [will break library ABI] libgfortran I/O+intrinsics: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36825 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/45424] [F08] Add IS_CONTIGUOUS intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424 Bug 45424 depends on bug 36825, which changed state. Bug 36825 Summary: [F08] Rank > 7 arrays [will break library ABI] libgfortran I/O+intrinsics: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36825 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/39178] Generate main() rather than using a main in libgfortran/fmain.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39178 Bug 39178 depends on bug 36825, which changed state. Bug 36825 Summary: [F08] Rank > 7 arrays [will break library ABI] libgfortran I/O+intrinsics: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36825 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/36825] [F08] Rank > 7 arrays [will break library ABI] libgfortran I/O+intrinsics:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36825 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/37577] [meta-bug] change internal array descriptor format for better syntax, C interop TR, rank 15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37577 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Jan 30 18:20:27 2018 New Revision: 257195 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257195=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-30 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/37577

[Bug c++/84076] [6/7/8 Regression] Warning about objects through POD mistakenly claims the object is a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84076 --- Comment #5 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com --- Ah, so it's allowed to send structs and classes, just not non-PODs. So that's why the conversion to a pointer happens.

[Bug middle-end/84095] [8 Regression] false-positive -Wrestrict warnings for memcpy within array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84095 --- Comment #8 from Arnd Bergmann --- Created attachment 43295 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43295=edit linux/drivers/isdn/isdnloop/isdnloop.c, preprocessed, compressed This is the preprocessed file that showed the funky

[Bug rtl-optimization/84071] [7/8 regression] wrong elimination of zero-extension after sign-extended load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization --- Comment #11 from

[Bug tree-optimization/81611] [8 Regression] gcc un-learned loop / post-increment optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611 --- Comment #21 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Tue Jan 30 17:40:50 2018 New Revision: 257194 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257194=gcc=rev Log: [PR81611] accept copies in simple_iv_increment_p If there are copies between

[Bug debug/83758] ICE building gccgo on powerpc64le --with-cpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83758 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/84132] [8 Regression] tree-data-ref.c:3938: poor coding ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84132 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/84132] [8 Regression] tree-data-ref.c:3938: poor coding ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84132 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug preprocessor/69869] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in call to skip_macro_block_comment when using '-traditional-cpp'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69869 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

  1   2   3   >