[Bug fortran/83705] [8 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/84156] [8 Regression] valgrind error with print *,1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84156 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/83705] [8 Regression] ICE/wrong code with large values of REPEAT after revision r256284

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83705 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Thu Feb 1 07:41:03 2018 New Revision: 257281 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257281=gcc=rev Log: PR 83705 Repeat with large values This patch fixes the regression by increasing the

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84160] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code: in build_capture_proxy, at cp/lambda.c:446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84160 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84088] [8 Regression][nvptx] libgomp.oacc-fortran/declare-*.f90 execution fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84088 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|NEW

[Bug c++/84160] [8 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code: in build_capture_proxy, at cp/lambda.c:446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84160 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug c++/84160] New: ICE on valid C++11 code: in build_capture_proxy, at cp/lambda.c:446

/gcc/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.1/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/home/su/software/tmp/gcc/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 8.0.1 20180131 (experimental) [trunk

[Bug libstdc++/84159] New: filesystem::path::operator/= with has root directory path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84159 Bug ID: 84159 Summary: filesystem::path::operator/= with has root directory path Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/84155] [8 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug bootstrap/84153] Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83503] [8 Regression] bogus -Wattributes for const and pure on function template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503 --- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4) Jason, I'm only starting to look into it but if I understand your suggestion correctly, I don't think the bug can be fixed by relying on attribute exclusions.

[Bug c++/83503] [8 Regression] bogus -Wattributes for const and pure on function template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/84158] [6/7/8 Regression] missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Known to work|

[Bug c++/84158] New: missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84158 Bug ID: 84158 Summary: missing -Wreturn-type due to incorrect handling of attributes for template specializations Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/84153] Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153 Brett Neumeier changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #15 from Douglas Mencken --- another question: what is so special with "darwin" (besides that long story when apple ditched gcc due to gpl v3 and created llvm'n'stuff which is still unavail for powerpc) to have all these

[Bug fortran/84155] [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Also caused by r257065 as pr84141.

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I get the ICE with r257065. r257064 is OK.

[Bug fortran/84155] [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 43315 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43315=edit lrand48.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Regression caused by r257270.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84157] New: [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84157 Bug ID: 84157 Summary: [8 Regression] [nvptx] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'lshiftrt' Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/83993] [7 Regression] ICE: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE: |[7 Regression] ICE:

[Bug fortran/84116] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_omp_clauses, at fortran/openmp.c:1354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84116 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug libfortran/84156] [8 Regression] valgrind error with print *,1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84156 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c/81779] [6/7 Regression] bool define from stdbool.h suppresses -Wdeclaration-after-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81779 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] bool |[6/7 Regression] bool

[Bug libfortran/84156] New: [8 Regression] valgrind error with print *,1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84156 Bug ID: 84156 Summary: [8 Regression] valgrind error with print *,1 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/81779] [6/7/8 Regression] bool define from stdbool.h suppresses -Wdeclaration-after-statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81779 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 31 22:12:46 2018 New Revision: 257271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257271=gcc=rev Log: PR c/81779 * c-parser.c (c_parser_compound_statement_nostart):

[Bug fortran/84155] [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter --- Maybe also look at the PR84155 with a similar (possibly the same?) problem, and a workaround, or a direct case for the culprit in a single line.

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig --- This is strange. Looking at the small reproducer and grepping for the settings to dtype with diff -b -u repro.f90.old repro.f90.new |grep 'dtype.*=' where repro.f90.old is the output of

[Bug rtl-optimization/84123] internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:908, alpha linux.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84123 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Jan 31 21:37:54 2018 New Revision: 257270 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257270=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/84123 * combine.c (change_zero_ext):

[Bug bootstrap/80867] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867 kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/84116] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_omp_clauses, at fortran/openmp.c:1354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84116 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 31 20:47:48 2018 New Revision: 257266 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257266=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/84116 * openmp.c (gfc_match_omp_clauses): If all the

[Bug middle-end/84150] Wrong pointer size used in builtin setjmp/longjmp with -maddress-mode=long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84150 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 43314 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43314=edit A patch I am testing this.

[Bug c++/83993] [7/8 Regression] ICE: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 31 20:46:36 2018 New Revision: 257265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257265=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83993 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr):

[Bug c++/83993] [7/8 Regression] ICE: constant not recomputed when ADDR_EXPR changed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83993 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 31 20:45:41 2018 New Revision: 257264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257264=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83993 * constexpr.c (diag_array_subscript): Emit different

[Bug fortran/84155] [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #2 from Jürgen Reuter --- This regression has been also introduced within revisions r256722 and r257131.

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 Andrew Jenner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 Andrew Jenner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/84155] [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 --- Comment #1 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 43313 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43313=edit Reproducer, 48 lines

[Bug target/81084] [8 Regression] powerpcspe port full of confusing configury / command-line options not related to SPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81084 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Jenner --- Created attachment 43312 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43312=edit Patch in progress so far

[Bug fortran/84155] New: [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84155 Bug ID: 84155 Summary: [8.0 Regression] program hangs on valid code Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #15 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 43311 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43311=edit Isolated file: small reproducer, 250 lines This should print 1: 2: INSIDE MCI_VAMP_WRITE VAMP integrator:

[Bug target/70589] PowerPC target attribute/pragma cannot set/disable -mfloat128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70589 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/79038] Improve PowerPC ISA 3.0 conversion between integers and hardware _Float128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79038 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/84088] [8 Regression][nvptx] libgomp.oacc-fortran/declare-*.f90 execution fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84088 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Jan 31 20:28:35 2018 New Revision: 257262 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257262=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-31 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84088 *

[Bug target/84154] PowerPC GCC 7 and 8 have regression in converting fp to short/char and returning it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84154 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 43310 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43310=edit Example code to show the problem.

[Bug target/84154] New: PowerPC GCC 7 and 8 have regression in converting fp to short/char and returning it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84154 Bug ID: 84154 Summary: PowerPC GCC 7 and 8 have regression in converting fp to short/char and returning it Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/83987] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with OpenMP, sanitizer and virtual bases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83987 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE with |[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with

[Bug tree-optimization/84152] [7 Regression] Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I get the ICE with r257065.

[Bug target/83926] ICE during RTL pass: ira, in elimination_costs_in_insn, at reload1.c:3633

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83926 --- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner --- So the problem is that the splitter for vsx_div_v2di unconditionally calls gen_divdi3() , which assumes we have a 64-bit integer HW div insn. If you do a scalar 64-bit div, we notice we don't have that HW

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #14 from Douglas Mencken --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13) > No, it means anybody can fix it, just the release will not be blocked if it > is not fixed. Well, nice. May I fix it? What happened between 6.4 and 7.1?

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- No, it means anybody can fix it, just the release will not be blocked if it is not fixed.

[Bug target/82641] Unable to enable crc32 for a certain function with target attribute on ARM (aarch32)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641 --- Comment #27 from Arnd Bergmann --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #26) > (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #25) > > > or to apply more force and add the ".arch" to each inline > > asm individually. > > No, that would not

[Bug bootstrap/84153] Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84013] wrong __restrict clique with inline asm operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84013 --- Comment #2 from Katsunori Kumatani --- I'm not familiar with tree-ssa-structalias, but it appears to me that the "fix" is quite simple? Or am I missing something? Here's the snippet from it, updated with my attempt: if (restrict_var)

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #12 from Douglas Mencken --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #11) > It will be fixed. But not many people have access to powerpc-darwin systems > to test on. I prefer “would” before “will”, and I may give an access to

[Bug bootstrap/84153] New: Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153 Bug ID: 84153 Summary: Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- It will be fixed. But not many people have access to powerpc-darwin systems to test on. Does this still happen on trunk as well?

[Bug target/82444] ICE in ira_init_register_move_cost, at ira.c:1581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82444 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Jan 31 19:03:11 2018 New Revision: 257254 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257254=gcc=rev Log: 2018-01-31 Vladimir Makarov PR target/82444

[Bug bootstrap/80867] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867 --- Comment #13 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Wed Jan 31 18:56:11 2018 New Revision: 257252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257252=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-01-31 Richard Biener

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #10 from Douglas Mencken --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Because powerpc*-darwin* is neither a primary nor secondary platform, see > http://gcc/gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html , and therefore bugs in such a port > are

[Bug rtl-optimization/84032] ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1064

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84032 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 43309 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43309=edit Dumpfile from sms pass (up to the assertion failure)

[Bug rtl-optimization/84032] ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1064

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84032 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig --- The abort comes from the I/O library. Here's a backtrace: #0 _gfortrani_internal_error (cmp=0x0, message=0x10117a80 "type_name(): Bad type") at ../../../trunk/libgfortran/runtime/error.c:410 #1

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Because powerpc*-darwin* is neither a primary nor secondary platform, see http://gcc/gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html , and therefore bugs in such a port are not release critical.

[Bug bootstrap/80867] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867 --- Comment #12 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Wed Jan 31 18:22:19 2018 New Revision: 257248 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257248=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2018-01-31 Richard Biener

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 --- Comment #8 from Douglas Mencken --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > > You cut away the most interesting part: the insn pattern that does not > > exist. > > Could you show us?

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 Douglas Mencken changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.4.0 --- Comment #7 from Douglas

[Bug target/84113] [7/8 Regression] gcc-7.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:136:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84113 Douglas Mencken changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||7.1.0, 7.2.0 --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davydden at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/84127] pragmas to disable -Wexpansion-to-defined compiler warnings seems to be broken since 7.x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84127 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/84071] [7/8 regression] wrong elimination of zero-extension after sign-extended load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071 --- Comment #19 from Wilco --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #16) > > Also I wonder whether this means AArch64 should set it since targets like > > MIPS > > and Sparc already set it. > > There seems to be a good reason against

[Bug middle-end/84150] Wrong pointer size used in builtin setjmp/longjmp with -maddress-mode=long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84150 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- This test will fail on all ILP32 targets where Pmode == DImode and ptr_mode == SImode.

[Bug middle-end/84150] Wrong pointer size used in builtin setjmp/longjmp with -maddress-mode=long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84150 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug fortran/84143] Intrinsic output of PDT incorrectly includes type parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84143 --- Comment #2 from Neil Carlson --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > > gives 0. Should not it be 3? Yeah. I noticed the same thing myself. It is 3 if the type parameters are removed. I was intending to report it, but I

[Bug c++/84152] Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/84152] Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/84152] New: Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152 Bug ID: 84152 Summary: Internal compiler error when compiling a cxx file Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/84092] [8 Regression] ICE on C++14 code with variable template: in build_qualified_name, at cp/tree.c:2043

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84092 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84092] [8 Regression] ICE on C++14 code with variable template: in build_qualified_name, at cp/tree.c:2043

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84092 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Jan 31 16:07:06 2018 New Revision: 257242 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257242=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-01-31 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/84151] New: [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] g++ generates two identical loads in a volatile-qualified member function.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84151 Bug ID: 84151 Summary: [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] g++ generates two identical loads in a volatile-qualified member function. Product: gcc Version: 7.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/84116] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_omp_clauses, at fortran/openmp.c:1354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84116 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Indeed, started with r242037.

[Bug c++/67935] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67935 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/84136] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with goto to an && label in another function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Discussion/patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg02451.html

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #11 from Jürgen Reuter --- When you run the binary created (seg_prod), you'll get | | Running self-test: mci_vamp |

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #10 from Jürgen Reuter --- Created attachment 43307 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43307=edit Reproducer_2, a little smaller

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #9 from Jürgen Reuter --- Let me put a little smaller reproducer.

[Bug c++/84138] [8 Regression] ICE folding broken constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84138 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Pass with r257125.

[Bug c++/84138] [8 Regression] ICE folding broken constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84138 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 31 15:37:18 2018 New Revision: 257240 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257240=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84138 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold): Check if X is an error

[Bug fortran/84116] [7/8 Regression] ICE in gfc_match_omp_clauses, at fortran/openmp.c:1354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84116 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/82641] Unable to enable crc32 for a certain function with target attribute on ARM (aarch32)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641 --- Comment #26 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #25) > or to apply more force and add the ".arch" to each inline > asm individually. No, that would not be guaranteed to be supported: and you'd be lying to the

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 --- Comment #7 from Jürgen Reuter --- We reproduced this on Darwin 17.4.0 and OpenSuSe Leap 42.2 Linux and within a Docker Image running Ubuntu LTS. The two cases on Linux are the test example of which I extracted the smaller reproducer.

[Bug fortran/84141] [8.0.1 regression] Internal error: type_name(): Bad type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84141 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/84071] [7/8 regression] wrong elimination of zero-extension after sign-extended load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84071 --- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Jan 31 15:01:40 2018 New Revision: 257237 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257237=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/84071 * doc/tm.texi.in

  1   2   >