[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On February 21, 2018 2:13:22 PM GMT+01:00, "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 > >Eric Gallager changed: > >

[Bug fortran/84506] [6/7/8 Regression] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- Tentative patch. Testing now. The intent originally was to prevent unit numbers that don't fit into kind=4. It use to be we had no negative unit numbers. With newunit, now we do. I need to see if this

[Bug fortran/84506] [6/7/8 Regression] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug fortran/84506] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:30:01AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > if (D.3772 < -some-reasonable-value || D.3772 > 2147483647) > { > inquire_parm.3.common.unit = -3; > } >

[Bug fortran/84506] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/84506] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- The problem is not related to the newunit functions or neunit alloc stuff. In the call to st_inquire we are passing the correct value of -10 for the unit number. However, the dump-original we have: {

[Bug sanitizer/84508] Load of misaligned address using _mm_load_sd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton --- __m128d is a tad bit cleaner. It does not require the casts. $ cat test.c #include int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { unsigned char t[16+1]; __m128d x = _mm_load_sd((const double *)(t+1));

[Bug sanitizer/84508] New: Load of misaligned address using _mm_load_sd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508 Bug ID: 84508 Summary: Load of misaligned address using _mm_load_sd Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/84506] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84506] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:08:24AM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > program TestInquire >implicit none >integer(8) :: iUnit >integer(8) :: iPos >open(newunit=iunit,

[Bug fortran/84506] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- The problem is related to UNIT. program TestInquire implicit none integer(4) :: iUnit integer(8) :: iPos open(newunit=iunit, file='output.txt', access='stream', status='replace') write(iUnit)

[Bug c++/84507] stack corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84507 Justin Chen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84507] New: stack corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84507 Bug ID: 84507 Summary: stack corruption Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug middle-end/61118] [6/7/8 Regression] Indirect call generated for pthread_cleanup_push with constant cleanup function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118 --- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Note that if we fix the abnormal handler to target the block after the setjmp rather than the setjmp itself all the problems magically disappear. That's actually a more accurate CFG and arguably the right

[Bug fortran/84506] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- Upon closer inspection, gfortran's dump is correct for both INTEGER and INTEGER(8) for program TestInquire integer :: iUnit, iPos ! integer(8) :: iUnit, iPos open(newunit=iunit, file='output.txt',

[Bug c/66222] gcc error: invalid use of '__builtin_va_arg_pack ()' at -O2 and up & pass at noopt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66222 Justin Chen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||justinpopo6 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/14710] Warning about useless casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- I guess because nobody asked for it.

[Bug c++/84453] [8 Regression] ICE in build_type_attribute_qual_variant, at attribs.c:1166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84453 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- So fixed?

[Bug c++/84453] [8 Regression] ICE in build_type_attribute_qual_variant, at attribs.c:1166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84453 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/84502] [8 Regression] Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84502 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug fortran/84506] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/84505] [8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on i586 in xemacs package starting with r254391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84505 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Might very well be a dup of PR84503, let me finish up the patch. I hope so. According to description it looks very similar ;)

[Bug fortran/84506] INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/83983] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr83121 (test for LTO warnings, pr83121_0.C line 8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83983 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/84503] [7/8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on powerpc64 with -O3 since r241789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84503 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- In 7.x this exact problem doesn't really exist, so the issue must be different there. I'd think it might be something fixable by PR82916 - like patch, but haven't actually tried that yet.

[Bug c++/84314] [8 Regression] Another ICE in finish_member_declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 21 22:12:08 2018 New Revision: 257883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257883=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84314 - ICE with templates and fastcall attribute. *

[Bug fortran/84506] New: INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84506 Bug ID: 84506 Summary: INQUIRE(pos=) always sets pos=0 with -fdefault-integer-8 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/60083] Duplicate conversion warnings from negative integer to unsigned type (gcc-4.3 emits only one warning)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60083 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/84504] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 --- Comment #4 from Sriram Swaminarayan --- OK, I will admit that my knowledge here is pretty limited so if someone could point out what I'm missing, I'd appreciate it. On reading the other thread [PR45290] it appears it deals with pointers

[Bug c++/84502] [8 Regression] Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84502 --- Comment #6 from patrick.schlangen at bmw dot de --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Completely untested fix: I've applied the patch and it seems to resolve the issue. Thanks a lot!

[Bug c/80793] three signed conversion warnings for the same expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80793 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84489] [6/7/8 Regression] Non-type template parameter dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84489 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug fortran/84504] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:15:24PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > > This appears to be related to PR44290. > > Are you sure about the PR? > Argh, fat fingers! r169948

[Bug fortran/83149] [8 Regression] ICE on SELECT CASE: crash_signal in toplev.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83149 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/60018] Bogus conversion warning with optimization flag -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60018 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/53277] -Wconversion cannot handle compound expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/84480] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment with an inlined string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84480 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 80787, which changed state. Bug 80787 Summary: gcc -Wmaybe-uninitialized false negative when compiling Emacs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80787 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/80787] gcc -Wmaybe-uninitialized false negative when compiling Emacs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80787 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [6/7/8 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501 --- Comment #83 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- *** Bug 80787 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/84504] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84504] procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/84502] [8 Regression] Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84502 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/83543] strlen of a local array member not optimized on some targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) The cutoff between (a) and (b) also depends on whether or not a function is being optimized for speed or for size, so at -Os, the x86_64 target also uses (b) for

[Bug c++/14710] Warning about useless casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14710 Ben Elliston changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13

[Bug c/46921] Lost side effect when struct initializer expression uses comma operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46921 Dave Pagan changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Dropped side effect with|Lost side effect when

[Bug c++/43064] improve location and text of diagnostics in constructor initializer lists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43064 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- If I remember correctly, the problem here is constants and other non-expression nodes don't have a location, so diagnostics use input_location, which points to the end of the initializer. Something

[Bug tree-optimization/84505] [8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on i586 in xemacs package starting with r254391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84502] [8 Regression] Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84502 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Regressed with r255066

[Bug tree-optimization/84503] [7/8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on powerpc64 with -O3 since r241789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84503 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- *** Bug 84505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/69770] [ARM] -mlong-calls does not affect calls to __gnu_mcount_nc generated by -pg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Kuvyrkov --- Update from Charles: === When I tried to bootstrap the compiler with the patch, it failed because of issues with -fPIC. I'm not sure it's worth pursuing the amount of work required to resolve the -fPIC

[Bug middle-end/65041] Improve -Wclobbered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65041 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/84503] [7/8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on powerpc64 with -O3 since r241789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84503 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43485 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43485=edit gcc8-pr84503.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c/84229] A valid code rejected with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Feb 21 19:05:30 2018 New Revision: 257877 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257877=gcc=rev Log: PR c/84229 * ipa-cp.c (determine_versionability): Do not version

[Bug fortran/70913] ICE in gfc_encode_character, at fortran/target-memory.c:227

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70913 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- AFAICT the tests in comment 0 and 1 compile at revision r257865, but compiling the test z4.f90 still gives an ICE.

[Bug c/84500] diagnostic says "array of chars" for arrays of wchar_t, char16_t and char32_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84500 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77285] [5 Regression] extern thread_local linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77285 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhykzhykzhyk at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/83543] strlen of a local array member not optimized on some targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83543 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #4) Setting -march=armv7-a doesn't make a difference. The root cause is that initializers of locally defined aggregates such as struct { char a[N]; } S s =

[Bug fortran/83148] [8 regression] ICE: crash_signal from toplev.c:325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83148 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/61118] [6/7/8 Regression] Indirect call generated for pthread_cleanup_push with constant cleanup function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/83980] Various issues with character length in array constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83980 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The fix for pr83823 seems to have fixed the problems reported in > comment #0 and comment #2 for 8.0 trunk. The issues persist up to > 7.2 (haven't checked 7.3). Confirmed.

[Bug tree-optimization/84505] [8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on i586 in xemacs package starting with r254391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84505 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Might very well be a dup of PR84503, let me finish up the patch.

[Bug target/69770] [ARM] -mlong-calls does not affect calls to __gnu_mcount_nc generated by -pg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69770 Maxim Kuvyrkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug c++/66971] thread_local with external linkage and constructor cannot be compiled correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66971 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84505] New: [8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on i586 in xemacs package starting with r254391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84505 Bug ID: 84505 Summary: [8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on i586 in xemacs package starting with r254391 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/70186] RFE: better handling of misspelled attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70186 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See

[Bug tree-optimization/84480] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment with an inlined string literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84480 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/84480] Unexpected -Wstringop-truncation on strncpy with string literal at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84480 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/84503] [7/8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on powerpc64 with -O3 since r241789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84503 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- The bug is in the way we handle overlapping stores. The problem is that all we do if there is overlap is: if (IN_RANGE (info->bitpos, merged_store->start, merged_store->start +

[Bug c++/84502] [8 Regression] Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84502 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/45431] specify the field for initializer-string for array of chars is too long

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45431 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Because the C front end gets the location info right in recent versions of GCC it also marks the bad initializer with carets: bug.c:4:3: warning: initializer-string for array of chars is too long

[Bug c++/43064] improve location and text of diagnostics in constructor initializer lists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43064 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/84502] [8 Regression] Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84502 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84502] [8 Regression] Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84502 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84503] [7/8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on powerpc64 with -O3 since r241789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84503 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Can be reproduced also on x86_64-linux with -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize -fno-ivopts. For the latter, I wonder what's the point in using TARGET_MEM_REF in: MEM[(long int *)p_28] = 0; MEM[(long int *)p_28 +

[Bug c++/84491] Multiple inheritance and covariant return types causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84491 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84492] [8 Regression] ICE with statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84492 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- This assertion is failing, where rhs is a STMT_EXPR. 8000 /* There are only a few kinds of expressions that may have a type 8001 dependent on overload resolution. */ 8002 gcc_assert

[Bug c++/84492] [8 Regression] ICE with statement expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84492 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84495] Incorrect result for concatenation of Fortran allocatable string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84495 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:44:07AM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84495 > > Thomas Koenig changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug fortran/84504] New: procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84504 Bug ID: 84504 Summary: procedure pointer variables cannot be initialized with functions returning pointers Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #16 from Andreas Schwab --- Created attachment 43484 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43484=edit libgo support for riscv64 With this patch I can sucessfully build libgo for riscv64.

[Bug c++/84502] Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84502 --- Comment #1 from patrick.schlangen at bmw dot de --- Note: This problem does not happen with gcc 7.2.1. The problem can also be reproduced with -O3 when the empty struct object passed to the function is actually used in the function. (So it

[Bug tree-optimization/84503] [7/8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on powerpc64 with -O3 since r241789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84503 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/84503] New: [7/8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on powerpc64 with -O3 since r241789

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84503 Bug ID: 84503 Summary: [7/8 Regression] store-merging miscompilation on powerpc64 with -O3 since r241789 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84502] New: Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84502 Bug ID: 84502 Summary: Argument corruption when passing empty templated struct Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/83126] [8 Regression] ICE in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt, at tree-parloops.c:1713

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83126 --- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #8) > Created attachment 43476 [details] > Tentative patch > > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > > > This is the usual "you should not repeat analysis

[Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351 --- Comment #56 from Martin Sebor --- I'd say any warning option with more than just a handful of pr's against it would benefit from having a meta-bug.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #15 from Ian Lance Taylor --- > The first hunk is useless since this is a compile test. Understood, but I would prefer to test the exact options that the build is going to use.

[Bug target/84264] [8 Regression] ICE in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:10367 starting with r256656

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84264 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|kelvin at

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab --- See gcc/config/riscv/linux.h for why it does that.

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab --- The first hunk is useless since this is a compile test.

[Bug fortran/79072] ICE with class(*) pointer function result and character value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|patch | --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c++/84434] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected var_decl or field_decl or function_decl or type_decl or template_decl, have using_decl in build_deduction_guide, at cp/pt.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84434 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug c++/84447] [8 Regression] ICE with inherited deleted constructor and default argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84447 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug go/84484] libgo configure tests fail to find -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84484 --- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor --- How about this patch? diff --git a/libgo/configure b/libgo/configure index aba4dc39..dcfc524b 100755 --- a/libgo/configure +++ b/libgo/configure @@ -14209,7 +14209,7 @@ if test

[Bug c/16351] NULL dereference warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/82096] [6 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403 with arm-linux-gnueabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82096 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/84454] [8 Regression] ICE in invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p at gcc/cp/typeck.c:1882

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84454 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84454] [8 Regression] ICE in invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p at gcc/cp/typeck.c:1882

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84454 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >