[Bug target/84547] New: Suboptimal code for masked shifts (ARM64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84547 Bug ID: 84547 Summary: Suboptimal code for masked shifts (ARM64) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/84531] c/c++: bogus warning for functions with different argument lengths but compatible arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84531 --- Comment #2 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- There's also a PyCFunctionWithoutArgs that takes just one parameter so it'll have to be one arg onwards but I don't know the impact on it's API. I'm going to test that when I get back home tonight and

[Bug target/84530] -mfunction-return=thunk does not work for simple_return_pop_internal insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84530 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43494|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/83633] gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape array with non-constant bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:13:09AM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > Patched to mailing list. > > Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-01/msg00192.html which seems to > have never been

[Bug fortran/69420] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5618

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69420 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/83633] gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape array with non-constant bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Patched to mailing list. Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-01/msg00192.html which seems to have never been applied. What is the problem?

[Bug fortran/84546] New: [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546 Bug ID: 84546 Summary: [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/84545] New: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/pr44182.C -gdwarf-2 -O2 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84545 Bug ID: 84545 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/pr44182.C -gdwarf-2 -O2 (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/84540] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with alignas in variadic template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84540 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84544] New: Missing warning when returning a reference to internal variable inside a lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84544 Bug ID: 84544 Summary: Missing warning when returning a reference to internal variable inside a lambda Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/33056] [Meta-bug] Data - statement related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056 Bug 33056 depends on bug 30792, which changed state. Bug 30792 Summary: DATA implied-do substring allowed with -std=f95/f2003 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30792 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30792] DATA implied-do substring allowed with -std=f95/f2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30792 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/30792] DATA implied-do substring allowed with -std=f95/f2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30792 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Feb 24 20:24:27 2018 New Revision: 257964 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257964=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-24 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/30792

[Bug target/84431] Suboptimal code for masked shifts (x86/x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84431 --- Comment #6 from Ruslan Nikolaev --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5) > (In reply to Ruslan Nikolaev from comment #4) > > Thanks! I was wondering if the patch also fixes the same thing for x86-64 > > (i.e., -m64); in which case we

[Bug fortran/84539] ICE and segfault with assignment to CLASS(*) array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84539 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Confirmed, present since at least r245582. Forgot to say that the ICE requires a compiler configured with --enable-checking=yes.

[Bug fortran/84519] STOP and ERROR STOP statements with QUIET specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84519 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84539] ICE and segfault with assignment to CLASS(*) array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84539 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks, I can reproduce it with that test case. Checking for the basic block being null fixes the SEGV for me. Let me retest this and post an update for review. Index: gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c

[Bug fortran/84523] [8 Regression] Runtime crash deallocating allocatable array within derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/84432] [F08] Detect illegal component initialization in pdt_27.f03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84432 --- Comment #6 from Neil Carlson --- ... and this would also be invalid type t(a) integer, len :: a = 3 character(len=a) :: c = 'foo' end type

[Bug fortran/84432] [F08] Detect illegal component initialization in pdt_27.f03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84432 --- Comment #5 from Neil Carlson --- No, both of those are valid. The constraint is on component initialization, and type parameters are *not* components. So something like this would be invalid by F08:C458 type t(a) integer, len :: a

[Bug fortran/30792] DATA implied-do substring allowed with -std=f95/f2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30792 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Feb 24 17:51:09 2018 New Revision: 257963 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257963=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-24 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/30792

[Bug fortran/84432] [F08] Detect illegal component initialization in pdt_27.f03

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84432 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug sanitizer/84508] Load of misaligned address using _mm_load_sd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #0) > According to Intel > (https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide), there are no > alignment requirements for _mm_load_sd, _mm_store_sd and

[Bug fortran/30792] DATA implied-do substring allowed with -std=f95/f2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30792 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat Feb 24 17:22:10 2018 New Revision: 257962 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257962=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-24 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/30792

[Bug fortran/84509] STOP and ERROR STOP statements with -fdefault-integer-8 and large stop code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84509 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84543] undefined reference to __copy_INTEGER_4_.3788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84543 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #9 from Romain Geissler --- Ok I was able to strip down the ICE to this very simple reproducer: < static char keyword[4]; static void f (void) { strncpy(keyword, "if ", 4); } EOF

[Bug fortran/51652] Allocate with type-spec and source-expr: check whether length type-parameter is the same is lacking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51652 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78238] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: verify_gimple failed, with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/78238] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: verify_gimple failed, with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/84543] New: undefined reference to __copy_INTEGER_4_.3788

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84543 Bug ID: 84543 Summary: undefined reference to __copy_INTEGER_4_.3788 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/84538] [8 Regression] Array of derived type elements incorrectly accessed in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Benson --- Hi Paul, Thanks for the select type workaround suggestion - I'll do that for now.

[Bug c++/84542] missing -Wdeprecated-declarations on a redeclared function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84542 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Martin

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #8 from Romain Geissler --- I am currently testing a little variant of your patch (check that "nextbb" if not NULL before trying to use it): Index: gcc/tree-ssa-strlen.c

[Bug c++/84542] New: missing -Wdeprecated-declarations on a redeclared function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84542 Bug ID: 84542 Summary: missing -Wdeprecated-declarations on a redeclared function template Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks for the early heads up! Can you please attach the translation unit for the kernel file that GCC faults on?

[Bug fortran/84143] Intrinsic output of PDT incorrectly includes type parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84143 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- The patch fixes the first part of the problem so the write will ignore the kind and len parameters. The component n is simply not being initialized at all. I am searching code for where this ought to

[Bug c++/84541] New: [8 Regression] ICE with auto in function parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84541 Bug ID: 84541 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE with auto in function parameter Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #6 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, Tried to apply this patch on top of current trunk. During my build process, I bootstrap a complete Linux/binutils/glibc/gcc toolchain following the Linux From Scratch guidelines. Without the patch,

[Bug target/84530] -mfunction-return=thunk does not work for simple_return_pop_internal insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84530 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 43494 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43494=edit A patch I am testing this patch.

[Bug target/84530] -mfunction-return=thunk does not work for simple_return_pop_internal insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84530 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84537] [8 Regression] ICE in get_string, at spellcheck-tree.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84537 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- I think just --- a/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c +++ b/gcc/cp/name-lookup.c @@ -5541,6 +5541,10 @@ bool suggest_alternative_in_explicit_scope (location_t location, tree name, tree scope) {

[Bug c++/84537] [8 Regression] ICE in get_string, at spellcheck-tree.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84537 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84523] [8 Regression] Runtime crash deallocating allocatable array within derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Comparing the outputs of -fDump-tree-original for r257064 and r257065 shows: --- pr84523.f90.003t.original_652018-02-24 14:45:17.0 +0100 +++ pr84523.f90.003t.original_64

[Bug fortran/84538] [8 Regression] Array of derived type elements incorrectly accessed in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/83692] Rejects valid constexpr with unrelated code fixing problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83692 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83692] Rejects valid constexpr with unrelated code fixing problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83692 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Feb 24 13:10:44 2018 New Revision: 257961 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257961=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83692 * constexpr.c (maybe_constant_init_1): New

[Bug fortran/84523] [8 Regression] Runtime crash deallocating allocatable array within derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/84540] New: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with alignas in variadic template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84540 Bug ID: 84540 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with alignas in variadic template Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/84538] [8 Regression] Array of derived type elements incorrectly accessed in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84538 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84531] c/c++: bogus warning for functions with different argument lengths but compatible arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84531 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---