[Bug c/84531] c/c++: bogus warning for functions with different argument lengths but compatible arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84531 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81589] Possible False-Positive with decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81589 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/84015] [7 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84015 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84015] [7 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84015 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 26 06:09:01 2018 New Revision: 257980 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257980=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84015 - ICE with class deduction and auto template parm. *

[Bug c++/81589] Possible False-Positive with decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81589 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 26 06:09:07 2018 New Revision: 257981 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257981=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81589 - error with is_trivially_constructible. * method.c

[Bug target/70490] __atomic_load_n(const __int128 *, ...) generates CMPXCHG16B with no warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70490 Ruslan Nikolaev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com ---

[Bug c++/84461] [8 regression] openjdk-10 fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/84563] New: GCC interpretation of C11 atomics (DR 459)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84563 Bug ID: 84563 Summary: GCC interpretation of C11 atomics (DR 459) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/84015] [7/8 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84015 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 26 05:05:15 2018 New Revision: 257979 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257979=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/84015 - ICE with class deduction and auto template parm. *

[Bug fortran/51434] ICE with scalar init of an array parameter, used in DT default init with transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/84015] [7/8 Regression] ICE with class template argument deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84015 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #13 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, It looks like that the code in #comment 11 works when you build just with -O2, but not when you add debug symbols: -O2 -g. Do we have a way to ignore debug statements when looking for the next

[Bug c/84562] New: -faggressive-loop-optimizations makes decisions based on weak data structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562 Bug ID: 84562 Summary: -faggressive-loop-optimizations makes decisions based on weak data structures Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/83496] [7/8 regression] wrong code generated with -Os -mbranch-cost=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 --- Comment #30 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Just a note. I'm tracking a separate problem with delay slot filling that looks like it's related to handling of debug insns. I doubt it's the same problem, but if you stumble over it, be aware I'm

[Bug tree-optimization/84561] -Wstrinop-truncation with -O2 depends on strncpy's size type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84561 --- Comment #1 from Romain Geissler --- Note: I am testing with gcc snapshot from 24th February + patch from PR 84468 manually applied (at least I think I did).

[Bug c++/55881] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/84555] middle-end warnings are not ignorable with pragmas when inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84555 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84561] New: -Wstrinop-truncation with -O2 depends on strncpy's size type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84561 Bug ID: 84561 Summary: -Wstrinop-truncation with -O2 depends on strncpy's size type Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/84555] middle-end warnings are not ignorable with pragmas when inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84555 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/84560] Internal error in std::function with std::memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84560 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/84559] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with constexpr and variable-sized array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84559 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84558] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84558 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #12 from Martin Sebor --- Yes, all the relevant tests pass with the patch. There is no warning for either the test case in comment #0 or the one in comment #11. The change from v1 of the patch is just the addition of test for null

[Bug c++/84560] Internal error in std::function with std::memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84560 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Zaitsev --- On GCC 7.3.1 for this code I have: internal compiler error: в expand_expr_real_1, в expr.c:9908 memset(d[n - 1], 0, sizeof(int)); ^ Please submit a full bug report, with

[Bug c++/84560] New: Internal error in std::function with std::memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84560 Bug ID: 84560 Summary: Internal error in std::function with std::memset Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/84559] New: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with constexpr and variable-sized array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84559 Bug ID: 84559 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with constexpr and variable-sized array Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/84558] New: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84558 Bug ID: 84558 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid constexpr constructor Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/84557] New: ICE with invalid firstprivate variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84557 Bug ID: 84557 Summary: ICE with invalid firstprivate variable Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, openmp Severity: normal

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Santos --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Patch posted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg01294.html My apologies on dropping the ball here and thanks for picking it up! :)

[Bug c++/84556] New: C++17, lambda, OpenMP simd: sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84556 Bug ID: 84556 Summary: C++17, lambda, OpenMP simd: sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/32770] [Meta-bug] -fdefault-integer-8 issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32770 --- Comment #37 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 43500 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43500=edit Failures with -fdefault-integer-8 at revision r257969

[Bug libfortran/32770] [Meta-bug] -fdefault-integer-8 issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32770 --- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres --- New summaries of failures with -fdefault-integer-8 at revision r257969 === gfortran Summary for unix/-m32/-fdefault-integer-8 === # of expected passes41549 # of

[Bug tree-optimization/84555] strncpy warnings (and friends) are not ignorable with pragmas when inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84555 --- Comment #1 from Romain Geissler --- This example emits: error: ‘char* __builtin_strncpy(char*, const char*, long unsigned int)’ output truncated before terminating nul copying 3 bytes from a string of the same length

[Bug tree-optimization/84555] New: strncpy warnings (and friends) are not ignorable with pragmas when inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84555 Bug ID: 84555 Summary: strncpy warnings (and friends) are not ignorable with pragmas when inlined Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/84554] New: make check: FAIL: tversion: ERROR! The versions of gmp.h (5.0.5) and libgmp (4.3.1) do not match.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84554 Bug ID: 84554 Summary: make check: FAIL: tversion: ERROR! The versions of gmp.h (5.0.5) and libgmp (4.3.1) do not match. Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/84553] New: -rdynamic generates TEXTREL relocations on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84553 Bug ID: 84553 Summary: -rdynamic generates TEXTREL relocations on ia64 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/84468] [8 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation despite assignment after conditional strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468 --- Comment #11 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, Indeed this version of the patch doesn't have any segv. However it seems that it doesn't fix anymore the initial bug report. Does it actually passes the new tests you introduced in your patch ?

[Bug target/83496] [7/8 regression] wrong code generated with -Os -mbranch-cost=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 --- Comment #29 from Eric Botcazou --- > Never mind, it seems that gcc 5.5 is doing that as hazard_nowell. I will run > some more tests. Yes, the nops are preexisting and counter-measures for pipeline hazards, but I don't know the MIPS port

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- From pr64273: Tobias Burnus 2014-12-11 16:29:56 UTC Follow up to PR44054 and PR53552. See also related bugs PR28662, PR62226, PR53934. There are two possibilities, either to use a real #pragma

[Bug fortran/64273] Add support for "#pragma warning" or "!GCC$ warning directive"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64273 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68289] Missing diagnostic pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68289 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug gcov-profile/84548] [8 regression] gcov ICE in process_file, at gcov.c:1154

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/84546] [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > > This is a rather old regression, r247548 already has it. > > The change occurred between revisions r241509 (2016-10-25,OK) and r241635 > (2016-10-27,

[Bug target/83496] [7/8 regression] wrong code generated with -Os -mbranch-cost=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 --- Comment #28 from Felix Fietkau --- Never mind, it seems that gcc 5.5 is doing that as well. I will run some more tests.

[Bug target/83496] [7/8 regression] wrong code generated with -Os -mbranch-cost=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 --- Comment #27 from Felix Fietkau --- On the original test case, it generates this code: 00400690 : 400690: 8c830008lw v1,8(a0) 400694: 24020001li v0,1 400698: 10620011beq

[Bug c++/84461] [8 regression] openjdk-10 fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84461 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/84522] GCC does not generate cmpxchg16b when mcx16 is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84522 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/80878] -mcx16 (enable 128 bit CAS) on x86_64 seems not to work on 7.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nruslan_devel at yahoo dot com ---

[Bug target/83496] [7/8 regression] wrong code generated with -Os -mbranch-cost=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #43497|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/84547] Suboptimal code for masked shifts (ARM64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84547 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/84552] [8 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84552 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/45996] -falign-functions=X does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Most targets check if -falign-* is already set before messing with it at -Os.

[Bug target/83496] [7/8 regression] wrong code generated with -Os -mbranch-cost=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 --- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou --- > /var/nbd/lede/build_dir/toolchain-mipsel_24kc_gcc-7.3.0_musl/gcc-7.3.0/gcc/ > reorg.c:3895 > > Line 1787 in reorg.c is this piece of code: > if (REG_NOTE_KIND (link) != REG_DEAD > || !REG_P

[Bug tree-optimization/84552] New: [8 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84552 Bug ID: 84552 Summary: [8 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-loop-ivcanon Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/83496] [7/8 regression] wrong code generated with -Os -mbranch-cost=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 --- Comment #24 from Felix Fietkau --- Created attachment 43498 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43498=edit Test case for internal compiler error (musl source file)´ When I test it with a patched gcc 7.3.x, I get this error

[Bug fortran/83633] gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape array with non-constant bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/83633] gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape array with non-constant bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633 --- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11) > > *** Bug 69420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > > Yes, but what about pr69419? What about it? It is unrelated.

[Bug fortran/83633] gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape array with non-constant bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633 --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Feb 25 17:32:36 2018 New Revision: 257974 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257974=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-25 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/83633] gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape array with non-constant bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > *** Bug 69420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Yes, but what about pr69419?

[Bug fortran/69420] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5618

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69420 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/83633] gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape array with non-constant bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t

[Bug fortran/83633] gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape array with non-constant bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Feb 25 17:08:51 2018 New Revision: 257972 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257972=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-25 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug target/83496] [7/8 regression] wrong code generated with -Os -mbranch-cost=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83496 --- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 43497 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43497=edit Tentative fix To be tested.

[Bug fortran/83633] gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape array with non-constant bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sun Feb 25 16:50:50 2018 New Revision: 257971 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257971=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-25 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/84434] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected var_decl or field_decl or function_decl or type_decl or template_decl, have using_decl in build_deduction_guide, at cp/pt.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84434 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/84523] [8 Regression] Runtime crash deallocating allocatable array within derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- For the record: > Caused by revision r257065. > Quite why this testcase worked before revision r257065 I cannot for the life > of me understand. Actually I think this was exposed by r257065 but

[Bug target/70713] msp430 interrupt attribute prevents overriding weak symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70713 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84546] [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug gcov-profile/84548] [8 regression] gcov ICE in process_file, at gcov.c:1154

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r257859 build w/o --enable-checking=extra FAIL too

[Bug testsuite/70516] Regtesting acats hangs on x86_64-apple-darwin15.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70516 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84551] New: [8 Regression] [concepts] Compiler options "-O -g" cause valid code to be rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84551 Bug ID: 84551 Summary: [8 Regression] [concepts] Compiler options "-O -g" cause valid code to be rejected Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/84523] [8 Regression] Runtime crash deallocating allocatable array within derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84523] [8 Regression] Runtime crash deallocating allocatable array within derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84523 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 25 12:41:26 2018 New Revision: 257970 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257970=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-25 Paul Thomas PR fortran/84523 *

[Bug gcov-profile/28564] gcov fails to store the absolute path to the source files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28564 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > The request sound eligible for me. > What others think about it? Nice to have for me

[Bug c/84531] c/c++: bogus warning for functions with different argument lengths but compatible arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84531 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- Also these look like more like invalid casts than bogus warnings: ../Python-3.6.1/Objects/frameobject.c:586:5: Warnung: cast between incompatible function types from »void (*)(PyFrameObject *)« {alias

[Bug target/70713] msp430 interrupt attribute prevents overriding weak symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70713 --- Comment #5 from Joe Seymour --- Thanks for chasing. >From my point of view, yes the committed patch makes all the changes required for this bug to be considered resolved, however I don't have permission to make those changes myself.

[Bug fortran/84546] [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- This is a rather old regression, r247548 already has it.

[Bug fortran/84546] [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug debug/84550] New: [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 Bug ID: 84550 Summary: [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78238] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: verify_gimple failed, with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78238] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: verify_gimple failed, with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Feb 25 09:30:04 2018 New Revision: 257969 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257969=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-25 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/78238

[Bug fortran/84546] [7/8 Regression] Bad sourced allocation of CLASS(*) with source with CLASS(*) component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84546 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78238] [7/8 Regression] [OOP] ICE: verify_gimple failed, with -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Feb 25 09:02:32 2018 New Revision: 257968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257968=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-25 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/78238

[Bug gcov-profile/84548] New: [8 regression] gcov ICE in process_file, at gcov.c:1154

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84548 Bug ID: 84548 Summary: [8 regression] gcov ICE in process_file, at gcov.c:1154 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/84531] c/c++: bogus warning for functions with different argument lengths but compatible arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84531 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- Actually the warning on PyCFunctionWithoutArgs is _not_ a false positive: I am looking at Python-3.6.1 right now. What I see is that functions with no arguments have the signature "PyObject * (*)(PyObject