[Bug target/82005] [8 regression] early lto debug creates invalid assembly on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005 --- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > However I have restore my testing of the gfortran test suite with -g -flto > and I see the following new failures: > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/namelist_14.f90 -g -flto (internal compiler error) >

[Bug c++/84618] New: internal compiler error: in build_capture_proxy, at cp/lambda.c:460

/home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:27584 0xf19ac5 cp_parser_class_specifier_1 /home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:22731 xgcc --version xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180228 (experimental) This looks potentially similar to bug #84160, but I'm running a more recent version where that bug should

[Bug testsuite/84617] [8 Regression] new test cases g++.dg/ext/attr-const.C and g++.dg/ext/attr-pure.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84617 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC bisection reveals that this started misbehaving with r249105 when -freorder-blocks-and-partition has been turned on by default, and with explicit -freorder-blocks-and-partition it started failing with

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 --- Comment #4 from Pedro Alves --- infrun: stepped into subroutine #1 infrun: inserting step-resume breakpoint at 0x5b88b8 #2 infrun: resume (step=0, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_0), trap_expected=0, current thread [process 25164] at

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/84613] [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/84617] New: new test cases g++.dg/ext/attr-const.C and g++.dg/ext/attr-pure.C fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84617 Bug ID: 84617 Summary: new test cases g++.dg/ext/attr-const.C and g++.dg/ext/attr-pure.C fail Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84607] [6/7 Regression] Side effects discarded in address computation inside 'if'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607 --- Comment #4 from Stephen Dolan --- Thanks for the quick fix!

[Bug tree-optimization/57534] [6/7/8 Regression]: Performance regression versus 4.7.3, 4.8.1 is ~15% slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534 --- Comment #26 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note the testcase: void timer_stop(); volatile long keepgoing = 0; double hand_benchmark_cache_ronly( double *x, long limit, long *oloops, double *ous) { long index = 0, loops = 0;

[Bug rtl-optimization/84614] [8 Regression] wrong code with u16->u128 extension at aarch64 -fno-split-wide-types -g3 --param=max-combine-insns=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84614 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/84534] [8 regression] several powerpc test cases fail starting with r257915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84534 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code | URL|

[Bug target/83399] Power8 ICE During LRA with 2-op rtl pattern for lvx instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83399 --- Comment #18 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Wed Feb 28 15:43:41 2018 New Revision: 258071 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258071=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83399 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr83399.c: Only run on

[Bug debug/84550] [8 Regression] stepping through gcc does not work with gdb 8.0.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/84584] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in dominated_by_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84584 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 28 15:33:33 2018 New Revision: 258070 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258070=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-28 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/84584] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in dominated_by_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84584 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/84517] [8 Regression] "string literal"__FILE__ no longer accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84517 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/84517] [8 Regression] "string literal"__FILE__ no longer accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84517 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Feb 28 15:27:17 2018 New Revision: 258069 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258069=gcc=rev Log: PR preprocessor/84517 allow double-underscore macros after string literals

[Bug c++/84590] [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined internal compiler error: tree check: expected constructor, have target_expr in split_nonconstant_init_1, at cp/typeck2.c:629

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84590 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Could we just move init = cp_fully_fold (init); a few lines above, before the checks?

[Bug fortran/84594] Warning: Use of the NUMERIC_STORAGE_SIZE named constant from intrinsic module ISO_FORTRAN_ENV at (1) is incompatible with option -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:01:38PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594 > > --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > This is expected. > >

[Bug middle-end/84603] -finline-limit not accepted in attribute and #pragma optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/84616] New: funsafe-math-optimizations leads to incorrect results for 4x4 matrix inversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84616 Bug ID: 84616 Summary: funsafe-math-optimizations leads to incorrect results for 4x4 matrix inversion Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84590] [7/8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined internal compiler error: tree check: expected constructor, have target_expr in split_nonconstant_init_1, at cp/typeck2.c:629

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84590 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/82411] const is not always read-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82411 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Segher

[Bug fortran/84615] [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for tests compiled with -fdefault-integer-8 and -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||32770 --- Comment #2 from

[Bug fortran/84615] [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for tests compiled with -fdefault-integer-8 and -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c/84607] [6/7 Regression] Side effects discarded in address computation inside 'if'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/84615] New: [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for tests compiled with -fdefault-integer-8 and -m32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84615 Bug ID: 84615 Summary: [8 Regression] Executable Segfault for tests compiled with -fdefault-integer-8 and -m32 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/84592] [openacc,openmp] lto1: ICE in input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:1424: for CSWTCH symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- So it's equivalent to: $ cat ~/Programming/testcases/pr84592-3.c #include int main (void) { int n[1]; n[0] = 4; #pragma omp target { static const int test[] = {1,2,3,4}; n[1] += test[n[0]];

[Bug testsuite/84597] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/timevar2.C fails starting with r258029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/84609] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960 (cp_parser_member_declaration())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug other/84613] [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Use bug 26163. This is a dup of that one.

[Bug lto/84592] [openacc] lto1: ICE in input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:1424: for CSWTCH symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška

[Bug testsuite/84597] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/timevar2.C fails starting with r258029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Feb 28 13:45:59 2018 New Revision: 258063 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258063=gcc=rev Log: Fix timevar format and fix tests (PR testsuite/84597). 2018-02-28 Martin Liska

[Bug c/84607] [6/7/8 Regression] Side effects discarded in address computation inside 'if'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Feb 28 13:40:41 2018 New Revision: 258061 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258061=gcc=rev Log: 2018-02-28 Richard Biener PR middle-end/84607

[Bug libstdc++/66146] call_once not C++11-compliant on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Anthony Williams from comment #16) > Would it be worth ignoring pthread_once and using an implementation of > call_once based on Mike Burrows' algorithm? > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/84614] New: [8 Regression] wrong code with u16->u128 extension at aarch64 -fno-split-wide-types -g3 --param=max-combine-insns=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84614 Bug ID: 84614 Summary: [8 Regression] wrong code with u16->u128 extension at aarch64 -fno-split-wide-types -g3 --param=max-combine-insns=3 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug lto/84592] [openacc] lto1: ICE in input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c:1424: for CSWTCH symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84592 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries

[Bug libstdc++/81670] include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/splay_fn_imps.hpp:253: suspicious assignment ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81670 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84602] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in search_anon_aggr, at cp/name-lookup.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84602 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84602] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in search_anon_aggr, at cp/name-lookup.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84602 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Wed Feb 28 12:32:10 2018 New Revision: 258060 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258060=gcc=rev Log: [PR c++/84602] ICE with anon-struct

[Bug fortran/84381] replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran testsuite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- There are also a few tests that are scanning tree-dump for not "abort". I have spotted: gfortran.dg/bound_simplification_3.f90 gfortran.dg/bound_simplification_4.f90

[Bug fortran/84594] Warning: Use of the NUMERIC_STORAGE_SIZE named constant from intrinsic module ISO_FORTRAN_ENV at (1) is incompatible with option -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84594 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > This is expected. Indeed! I have found it in module.c. > This PR should be closed as INVALID. (1) AFAICT this not documented. Is NUMERIC_STORAGE_SIZE the only parameter in ISO_FORTRAN_ENV

[Bug c++/52792] this pointer and return pointer are passed in wrong order when ms_abi is used (x86_64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52792 --- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz --- For the c++ sample: typedef struct agg { long a; long b; long c; } agg; class abc { long m; public: agg foo(long a, long b, long c); agg boo(void); }; agg abc::foo(long a, long b, long c) { agg r =

[Bug c/84595] Add __builtin_break() built-in for a breakpointing mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Gutson --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > I frequently use raise(SIGSTOP) ... (or x86 specific you can do asm ("int > 3"); > or whatever that break thing was... > > Note I think that a

[Bug tree-optimization/84562] -faggressive-loop-optimizations makes decisions based on weak data structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3) > It's not just -faggressive-loop-optimizations, it seems that constructors of > weak globals are available for folding, and I really doubt that's actually >

[Bug c++/84612] Overload resolution of operator* fails for valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84612 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/84562] -faggressive-loop-optimizations makes decisions based on weak data structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84562 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84609] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960 (cp_parser_member_declaration())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/51434] ICE with scalar init of an array parameter, used in DT default init with transfer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Should not it be > > > > abcde > > a > > No. ... OK! Sorry for my limited understanding of TRANSFER.

[Bug tree-optimization/57534] [6/7/8 Regression]: Performance regression versus 4.7.3, 4.8.1 is ~15% slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534 --- Comment #25 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #23) > (In reply to amker from comment #22) > > > > So my suggestion would be to see if you can make SLSR generate > > > TARGET_MEM_REFs > > > based on

[Bug target/46666] gcc.target/i386/funcspec-3.c ICEs in count_reg_usage (cse.c:6596) with -fno-early-inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/57534] [6/7/8 Regression]: Performance regression versus 4.7.3, 4.8.1 is ~15% slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534 --- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534 > > --- Comment #22 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/57534] [6/7/8 Regression]: Performance regression versus 4.7.3, 4.8.1 is ~15% slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534 --- Comment #23 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to amker from comment #22) > > So my suggestion would be to see if you can make SLSR generate > > TARGET_MEM_REFs > > based on some common infrastructure with IVOPTs. > Yes, I also believe

[Bug other/84613] New: [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 Bug ID: 84613 Summary: [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues Product: gcc Version: unknown URL: https://www.spec.org/benchmarks.html Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/57534] [6/7/8 Regression]: Performance regression versus 4.7.3, 4.8.1 is ~15% slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534 --- Comment #22 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #21) > One major flaw here is that IVOPTs does nothing on this loop because it > doesn't find any induction variables. So basically this is highlighting

[Bug c++/84612] New: Overload resolution of operator* fails for valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84612 Bug ID: 84612 Summary: Overload resolution of operator* fails for valarray Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/52792] this pointer and return pointer are passed in wrong order when ms_abi is used (x86_64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52792 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* --- Comment #4 from Kai

[Bug c++/84611] New: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:826 (local_class_index())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84611 Bug ID: 84611 Summary: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:826 (local_class_index()) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/71569] [6/7/8 regression] Crash: External definition of template member from template struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/57534] [6/7/8 Regression]: Performance regression versus 4.7.3, 4.8.1 is ~15% slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/84609] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960 (cp_parser_member_declaration())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/52792] this pointer and return pointer are passed in wrong order when ms_abi is used (x86_64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52792 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84610] New: internal compiler error: in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:38843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84610 Bug ID: 84610 Summary: internal compiler error: in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:38843 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status:

[Bug middle-end/84603] -finline-limit not accepted in attribute and #pragma optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/57534] [6/7/8 Regression]: Performance regression versus 4.7.3, 4.8.1 is ~15% slower

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57534 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i?86-*-*|i?86-*-*, x86-64 --- Comment #20 from

[Bug c++/84576] [6/7/8 Regression] g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84576 --- Comment #5 from Vegard Nossum --- I have another testcase which crashes in a similar way, but I'm not sure if it's the same underlying bug or not: void a() { enum * { [] (union {}) }; } The original crash was: (gdb) run Starting

[Bug c++/83871] wrong code for attribute const and pure on distinct template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83871 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 28 09:43:10 2018 New Revision: 258059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258059=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83871 PR c++/83503 * g++.dg/ext/attr-warning.C:

[Bug c++/83503] [8 Regression] bogus -Wattributes for const and pure on function template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83503 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 28 09:43:10 2018 New Revision: 258059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258059=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/83871 PR c++/83503 * g++.dg/ext/attr-warning.C:

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Santos --- You are AWESOME!! :)

[Bug target/84482] 437.leslie3d regresses on Haswell and SandyBridge at -O3 and -Ofast with generic march and tuning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84482 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/84456] [8 regression] gcc.dg/guality/pr49888.c fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/83917] [8 Regression] with -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues, stepping into x86 tail-call restore stub gives bad backtrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83917 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 28 08:59:15 2018 New Revision: 258057 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258057=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/83917 * configure.ac (AS_HIDDEN_DIRECTIVE):

[Bug middle-end/84603] -finline-limit not accepted in attribute and #pragma optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- -finline-limit is a deprecated way to affect inlining, please don't expose it further.

[Bug c++/84604] False positive "may be used uninitialized in this function" due to variable initialization eliminated as dead code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84604 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84606] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (enclosing_instantiation_of())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84606 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/84605] [7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in xref_basetypes, at cp/decl.c:13818

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84605 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/84607] [6/7/8 Regression] Side effects discarded in address computation inside 'if'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/84608] Hang in cxx_eval_constant_expression() with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84608 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog

[Bug c++/84609] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960 (cp_parser_member_declaration())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/84602] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: in search_anon_aggr, at cp/name-lookup.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84602 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug libstdc++/84601] [8 Regression] std::optional<std::pair<int, int>> is not assignment copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84601 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/84598] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (cp_default_conversion())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84598 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug c/84595] Add __builtin_break() built-in for a breakpointing mechanism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84595 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |c Severity|normal

[Bug testsuite/84597] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/timevar2.C fails starting with r258029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug c++/84596] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: unexpected expression '(bool)c' of kind implicit_conv_expr (cxx_eval_constant_expression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84596 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/84593] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (non_type_check())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84593 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug c++/84609] New: internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84609 Bug ID: 84609 Summary: internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c:28960 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/84597] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/timevar2.C fails starting with r258029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/84582] [8 Regression] Rejected valid C++ code since r257961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84582 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/84597] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/timevar2.C fails starting with r258029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84597 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84596] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: unexpected expression '(bool)c' of kind implicit_conv_expr (cxx_eval_constant_expression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84596 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

<    1   2