https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84855
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84833
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Feel free to suggest it to binutils folks. Unfortunately, it seems I is
> taken already.
Done that:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22967
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83770
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84833
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Feel free to suggest it to binutils folks. Unfortunately, it seems I is taken
already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84833
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
>
> nm is not really usable to determine if an IFUNC symbol is global or local,
> i is printed regardless if it is global or local.
Shouldn't nm distinguish there 2 variants to be more fine?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84862
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84861
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84855
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Because 'a' and 'b' are not local variables, they refer directly to subobjects
of the tuple-like object, not separate variables. So if you didn't make a copy
of the foobar then 'a' would refer to f.s and b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84862
Bug ID: 84862
Summary: collect2: fatal error: lto-wrapper returned 1 exit
status
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
--- Comment #31 from Jonathan Wakely ---
First let me try the metaprogramming way to detect when we convert to pointers,
and see if it can be done just in the library. I'm working on that ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84855
--- Comment #2 from Hannes Hauswedell ---
Thanks for your explanation, I went to through cppreferences again and the
behaviour is now clear to me, although I still wonder why in the case of an
lvalue as "input", the step through the intermediary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82989
--- Comment #20 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg00644.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82501
Franz Sirl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sirl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12849
Cassio Neri changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cassio.neri at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84861
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The problem is the top level asm does not go in the same partition as the
functions which use the functions defined in the inline asm. There might be
another bug about this already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84830
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84861
Bug ID: 84861
Summary: -flto with asm() optimizes too much
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78420
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess we'd need to add the full set, i.e. bool
__builtin_{less,less_equal,greater,greater_equal}, because e.g. floating point
comparisons are in some compilation modes sensitive to what exact operation it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84784
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The test gfortran.dg/team_change_1.f90 compiles and run if I replace the lines
integer, parameter :: standard_initial_value=-1
integer new_team
with
integer(4), parameter :: standard_initial_v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84789
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78090
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Patch has been reverted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83392
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83392
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 14 08:50:23 2018
New Revision: 258516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258516&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/83392
* sanopt.c (maybe_optimize_ubsan_ptr_if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84844
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 14 08:48:40 2018
New Revision: 258515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258515&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84844
Revert
2017-04-20 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78090
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 14 08:48:40 2018
New Revision: 258515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258515&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84844
Revert
2017-04-20 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, nickc at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847
>
> --- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton ---
> Created attachment 43643
> --> https://gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84830
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 14 08:07:45 2018
New Revision: 258514
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258514&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/84830
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82812
Julia Koval changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||julia.koval at intel dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82812
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84860
Bug ID: 84860
Summary: ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3717
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo