[Bug c/85310] optimization ignoring strlen() results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85310 --- Comment #6 from Dmitry Vyukov --- It seems to me that compiler is fine here and we just have a bug in kernel code. Result of strlen called on char[16] can't possibly by >15 (without causing undefined behavior -- reading past the end of the

[Bug c/85310] optimization ignoring strlen() results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85310 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Kees Cook from comment #4) > But it's optimizing away the check. That what undefined means. > If strlen() were suddenly acting like > strnlen(), that'd be one thing, but the return value from

[Bug c/85310] optimization ignoring strlen() results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85310 --- Comment #4 from Kees Cook --- But it's optimizing away the check. If strlen() were suddenly acting like strnlen(), that'd be one thing, but the return value from strlen() is being used by the memcpy() without the actual test in between.

[Bug target/54412] minimal 32-byte stack alignment with -mavx on 64-bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54412 --- Comment #19 from Royi --- This comment could be important: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30928265/mingw64-is-incapable-of-32-byte-stack-alignment-required-for-avx-on-windows-x64?noredirect=1#comment86499640_30928265. Hopefully you'll

[Bug c/78352] GCC lacks support for the Apple "blocks" extension to the C family of languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to René J.V. Bertin from comment #4) > Any news on this front? Last I heard from Iain he was still having to deal with water damage to his office...

[Bug preprocessor/39533] [6/7/8 Regression] -MM may list a header file twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39533 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/45174] Make fails in zlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45174 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/85310] optimization ignoring strlen() results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85310 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/85310] optimization ignoring strlen() results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85310 Kees Cook changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/84221] [6/7 Regression] spurious -Wunused warning on a variable of a template type declared unused

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84221 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- As per subsequent discussion (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-04/msg00203.html and follow-ups), the warning in the original test case is expected and desirable. The patch in r259098 doesn't change

[Bug c/85310] optimization ignoring strlen() results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85310 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/85310] New: optimization ignoring strlen() results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85310 Bug ID: 85310 Summary: optimization ignoring strlen() results Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug demangler/85309] New: demangler failed with signal 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85309 Bug ID: 85309 Summary: demangler failed with signal 11 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug libstdc++/85222] [7/8 Regression] ABI breakage of __throw_ios_failure by r244498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85222 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #20 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/85227] [7 Regression] ICE with structured binding of a forward declared variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85227 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with

[Bug c++/85227] [7/8 Regression] ICE with structured binding of a forward declared variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85227 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Apr 9 22:33:35 2018 New Revision: 259259 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259259=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-04-09 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug tree-optimization/85259] [8 Regression] Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target

[Bug c++/85308] Stringstream constructor fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85308 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85301] bitfield check causes maybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85301 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/83064] DO CONCURRENT and auto-parallelization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |missed-optimization Target

[Bug libgcc/66809] stage 1 build failure in libgcc on sparc-sun-solaris2.10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66809 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- > Or build them in-tree, which automatically builds them that way. That avoids > the need to install them separately at all. You may need to control which version you build on specific platforms though so I

[Bug fortran/83064] [8 Regression] DO CONCURRENT inconsistent results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83064 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Apr 9 21:52:05 2018 New Revision: 259258 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259258=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-09 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/83064

[Bug debug/65821] [6/7/8 regression] incorrect debug line # info for main

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/51260] PARAMETER array with constructor initializer: Compile-time simplify single element access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85308] New: Stringstream constructor fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85308 Bug ID: 85308 Summary: Stringstream constructor fails Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/85279] [6/7/8 Regression] Broken diagnostic for decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85279 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 9 21:16:05 2018 New Revision: 259257 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259257=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85279 - dump_expr doesn't understand decltype. * error.c

[Bug fortran/85307] New: Consistent handling of out-of-bounds access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85307 Bug ID: 85307 Summary: Consistent handling of out-of-bounds access Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libgcc/66809] stage 1 build failure in libgcc on sparc-sun-solaris2.10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66809 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4) > I personally build the GMP/MPFR/MPC libraries with --disable-shared. Or build them in-tree, which automatically builds them that way. That avoids the need to

[Bug fortran/51260] PARAMETER array with constructor initializer: Compile-time simplify single element access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Apr 9 21:05:13 2018 New Revision: 259256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259256=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-09 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/51260

[Bug libgcc/66809] stage 1 build failure in libgcc on sparc-sun-solaris2.10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66809 --- Comment #7 from Michael Teske --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #6) > > Why not add the directory to the RPATH of the created binaries? ... > > Are there any reasons against > > doing it? > > Yes, I don't think that we want to

[Bug ipa/85103] [8 Regression] Performance regressions on SPEC with r257582

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103 --- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1) > Pat, can you try to figure out what value of min-speedup is neeed to recover > from this regression? Using r257582, either of the following options restores the

[Bug other/44209] [meta-bug] Some warnings are not linked to diagnostics options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209 Will Hawkins changed: What|Removed |Added CC||whh8b at virginia dot edu --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/85285] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with flexible array in union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85285 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/85279] [6/7/8 Regression] Broken diagnostic for decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85279 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85262] [6/7/8 Regression] Trouble with constructor and -fpermissive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85262 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 9 20:53:31 2018 New Revision: 259255 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259255=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85262 - ICE with redundant qualification on constructor. *

[Bug bootstrap/85280] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure with Objective C and Objective C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85277] [8 Regression] Broken diagnostic for offsetof with static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85277 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85301] bitfield check causes maybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85301 --- Comment #6 from Arnd Bergmann --- I found that older versions (gcc-5 and before) did not warn when the type gets changed to bitfield of '_Bool' rather than 'unsigned int'. It seems that this was only because they tested each bit separately

[Bug c++/85277] [8 Regression] Broken diagnostic for offsetof with static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85277 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 9 20:40:06 2018 New Revision: 259254 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259254=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85277 - ICE with invalid offsetof. * semantics.c

[Bug c++/85194] ICE with structured binding in broken for-loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85194 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85264] [7/8 Regression] ICE with extraneous template parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85264 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 9 19:50:03 2018 New Revision: 259253 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259253=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85264 - ICE with excess template-parameter-list. * parser.c

[Bug c++/85194] ICE with structured binding in broken for-loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85194 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Apr 9 19:48:48 2018 New Revision: 259252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259252=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85194 * parser.c (cp_parser_simple_declaration): For

[Bug testsuite/85306] New: [8 regression] The test cases gcc.dg/pr80463.c, g++.dg/pr80463.C, and gcc.dg/pr83972.c all fail in r259231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85306 Bug ID: 85306 Summary: [8 regression] The test cases gcc.dg/pr80463.c, g++.dg/pr80463.C, and gcc.dg/pr83972.c all fail in r259231 Product: gcc Version: 8.0

[Bug c++/85305] Parameter pack expression in lambda capture list fails as part of a fold expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85305 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug preprocessor/85211] -isystem automatically adds extern "C" to includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation

[Bug libstdc++/85222] [7/8 Regression] ABI breakage of __throw_ios_failure by r244498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85222 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/47226] [C++0x] GCC doesn't expand template parameter pack that appears in a lambda-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47226 --- Comment #19 from Vittorio Romeo --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #18) > (In reply to Vittorio Romeo from comment #17) > > Was the patch merged in trunk? > > It was committed to trunk: r251433 > > > The following still fails to

[Bug c++/85305] New: Parameter pack expression in lambda capture list fails as part of a fold expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85305 Bug ID: 85305 Summary: Parameter pack expression in lambda capture list fails as part of a fold expression Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/85280] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure with Objective C and Objective C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- I will go back and re-bootstrap with a revision that failed earlier.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85300] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in exact_int_to_float_conversion_p, at simplify-rtx.c:895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- There also is /* We don't have to handle SIGN_EXTEND here, because even in the case of replacing something with a modeless CONST_INT, a CONST_INT is already (supposed to be) a valid sign

[Bug rtl-optimization/85300] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in exact_int_to_float_conversion_p, at simplify-rtx.c:895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- I suppose the only way in which they are different is that those are the only cases that anyone ran into so far.

[Bug preprocessor/85211] -isystem automatically adds extern "C" to includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211 --- Comment #7 from blastrock at free dot fr --- You are right, my bad. I managed to build it by adding the definition in gcc/config/arm/arm.h . My initial suggestion was to mention that behavior in the documentation, but if you think it is not

[Bug libgcc/66809] stage 1 build failure in libgcc on sparc-sun-solaris2.10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66809 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > Why not add the directory to the RPATH of the created binaries? I ended up > doing it manually afterwards by using the rpath utility from >

[Bug rtl-optimization/80463] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -fselective-scheduling2 and -fvar-tracking-assignments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80463 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Apr 9 18:21:03 2018 New Revision: 259249 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259249=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/80463 * g++.dg/pr80463.C: Add -w to

[Bug c++/85262] [6/7/8 Regression] Trouble with constructor and -fpermissive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85262 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/85280] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure with Objective C and Objective C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Are you sure you e.g. haven't svn/git updated the tree while bootstrap was pending? Can you reproduce it again, or was it just one-off? If you still have the tree around, what are the differences in the

[Bug c++/85269] warn for referenced standard symbols that aren't guaranteed to be declared in a header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85269 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/85280] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure with Objective C and Objective C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Not reproduced on gcc110.fsffrance.org again with r259240: ../configure --enable-languages=all --prefix=/home/jakub/GCC Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs warning:

[Bug c++/47226] [C++0x] GCC doesn't expand template parameter pack that appears in a lambda-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47226 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Vittorio Romeo from comment #17) > Was the patch merged in trunk? It was committed to trunk: r251433 > The following still fails to compile on 20180407 Could you create a new bug for that

[Bug rtl-optimization/85300] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in exact_int_to_float_conversion_p, at simplify-rtx.c:895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- --- gcc/combine.c.jj2018-03-15 08:36:28.756776703 +0100 +++ gcc/combine.c 2018-04-09 19:33:40.782844115 +0200 @@ -5574,12 +5574,13 @@ subst (rtx x, rtx from, rtx to, int in_d if

[Bug demangler/85304] New: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85304 Bug ID: 85304 Summary: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug rtl-optimization/85300] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in exact_int_to_float_conversion_p, at simplify-rtx.c:895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/85300] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in exact_int_to_float_conversion_p, at simplify-rtx.c:895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/85264] [7/8 Regression] ICE with extraneous template parameter list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85264 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/85301] bitfield check causes maybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85301 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- FWIW, there's another similar bug where DOM doesn't do a particularly good job at tracking the state of objects implied the results of logical operations which in turn causes missed optimizations. I've

[Bug tree-optimization/85301] bitfield check causes maybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85301 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, r142464 still doesn't warn, r142514 does, probably r142484 enabled the (premature) BIT_FIELD_REF comparison optimization in fold-const.c.

[Bug tree-optimization/85301] bitfield check causes maybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85301 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug libgcc/66809] stage 1 build failure in libgcc on sparc-sun-solaris2.10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66809 Michael Teske changed: What|Removed |Added CC||subscribe at teskor dot de --- Comment

[Bug c++/85277] [8 Regression] Broken diagnostic for offsetof with static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85277 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/84058] RTl partitioning fixup should drag very small blocks back to hot partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84058 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |9.0 Summary|[8 Regression] RTl

[Bug rtl-optimization/85302] [8 Regression] ICE in size_of_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:1771 on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85302 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- That said, -gsplit-dwarf is pretty much unmaintained for more than 3 years now already.

[Bug rtl-optimization/84058] [8 Regression] RTl partitioning fixup should drag very small blocks back to hot partition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84058 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Apr 9 16:33:51 2018 New Revision: 259244 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259244=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl/84058 * cfgcleanup.c (try_forward_edges): Do not give up on

[Bug rtl-optimization/85302] [8 Regression] ICE in size_of_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:1771 on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85302 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug bootstrap/85280] [8 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure with Objective C and Objective C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/85256] [8 Regression] ICE with capturing pointer to VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85256 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70555] lambda capture of multi-dimensional VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70555 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/70555] lambda capture of multi-dimensional VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70555 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Bug 79627 is a case where we would need to do some capture in unevaluated context, just as in C VLAs make sizeof non-constant.

[Bug c++/85277] [8 Regression] Broken diagnostic for offsetof with static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85277 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70555] lambda capture of multi-dimensional VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70555 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 43886 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43886=edit work in progress Here's the beginning of work for more general variably-modified type capture, based on the approach

[Bug c++/70555] lambda capture of multi-dimensional VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70555 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/85256] [8 Regression] ICE with capturing pointer to VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85256 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 9 15:32:05 2018 New Revision: 259240 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259240=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85256 - ICE capturing pointer to VLA. * lambda.c

[Bug testsuite/85303] [testsuite, libgomp] dg-message not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85303 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/85303] New: [testsuite, libgomp] dg-message not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85303 Bug ID: 85303 Summary: [testsuite, libgomp] dg-message not supported Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/85291] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85291 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/85103] [8 Regression] Performance regressions on SPEC with r257582

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103 --- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #0) > > Very initial look at profile of bzip2 shows degradation is contained to > mainSort(), which showed a 54% increase in run cycles. Appears one of the > calls to

[Bug target/85216] Performance issue with PHP on ppc64 systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85216 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- (In reply to Timothy Pearson from comment #10) > > It's even slow compared to P8 with mitigations applied. Do you have a link > to the hostboot commit that may have enabled the P9 mitigation, or to the >

[Bug rtl-optimization/85302] New: [8 Regression] ICE in size_of_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:1771 on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85302 Bug ID: 85302 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in size_of_loc_descr, at dwarf2out.c:1771 on i686-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/84732] false-positive -Wstringop-truncation warning with -fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84732 --- Comment #9 from Arnd Bergmann --- One more instance got added to the kernel today: In file included from /git/arm-soc/include/trace/perf.h:90, from /git/arm-soc/include/trace/define_trace.h:97, from

[Bug target/85281] [8 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: operand size mismatch for `vpbroadcastb' with -mavx512bw -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85281 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 43885 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43885=edit gcc8-pr85281-assorted-fixes.patch Other issues I've run into. These two patches together with with

[Bug middle-end/84955] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect OpenACC tile expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/85300] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in exact_int_to_float_conversion_p, at simplify-rtx.c:895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85284] [7 Regression] Loop miscompilation starting with r238367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85284 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Summary|[7/8

[Bug tree-optimization/85284] [7 Regression] Loop miscompilation starting with r238367

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85284 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 9 13:27:33 2018 New Revision: 259234 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259234=gcc=rev Log: 2018-04-09 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/85286] [8 Regression] ICE in exact_div, at poly-int.h:2139

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85286 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/84041] [nvptx] Hang in for-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84041 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Mon Apr 9 13:22:00 2018 New Revision: 259233 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259233=gcc=rev Log: [nvptx] Add memory_barrier insn 2018-04-09 Tom de Vries

[Bug target/85293] ICE in output_1257, at config/rs6000/vsx.md:3252

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85293 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ppc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc64*-*-* --- Comment #1 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/85300] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in exact_int_to_float_conversion_p, at simplify-rtx.c:895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85300 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Version|unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/85301] bitfield check causes maybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85301 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/85301] bitfield check causes maybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85301 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/85295] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2205

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85295 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

  1   2   >