[Bug c++/85600] CPU2006 471.omnetpp fails starting with r259771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85600 --- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Does adding -fno-lifetime-dse help? This could be a bug in the omnetpp > sources ... Nope, still fails. 471.omnetpp: copy 0 non-zero return code (exit code=1,

[Bug c++/85600] CPU2006 471.omnetpp fails starting with r259771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85600 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Does adding -fno-lifetime-dse help? This could be a bug in the omnetpp sources ...

[Bug c++/85600] New: CPU2006 471.omnetpp fails starting with r259771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85600 Bug ID: 85600 Summary: CPU2006 471.omnetpp fails starting with r259771 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/81420] When a reference is bound to a member in the base of a temporary, lifetime of the temporary is not extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81420 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- Created attachment 44050 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44050=edit untested hackish patch This seems to help a bit, but it doesn't feel like the right approach.

[Bug fortran/85599] invalid optimization: function not always evaluated in logical expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target

[Bug tree-optimization/85597] [6/7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85597 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5 Summary|internal

[Bug libgomp/83792] [openacc] Factor out async argument utility functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83792 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- pinged: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg00046.html

[Bug fortran/85599] New: invalid optimization: function not always evaluated in logical expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 Bug ID: 85599 Summary: invalid optimization: function not always evaluated in logical expression Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/85598] New: Incorrect warning only at -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85598 Bug ID: 85598 Summary: Incorrect warning only at -O2 and -O3 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/85597] internal compiler error: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85597 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code --- Comment #1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/85597] New: internal compiler error: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229

: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu gcc version 9.0.0 20180501 (experimental) (GCC) $ cat q.c extern double fma

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #21 from Hans Åberg --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #20) > (In reply to Hans Åberg from comment #18) > > (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #14) > > > I have a C++ test case for this: > > > > I get segmentation fault on the

[Bug c++/81420] When a reference is bound to a member in the base of a temporary, lifetime of the temporary is not extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81420 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-01-08 00:00:00 |2018-5-1 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse

[Bug target/85595] __atomic_is_lock_free(sizeof(unsigned long long), ) returns true on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85595 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Alexander Ivchenko from comment #0) > (long long is only 4-byte aligned on i686) Not when it's placed on the stack. GCC will always align the variable in your example to 8 bytes. But a better

[Bug target/85596] New: aarch64 --with-multilib-list documentation missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85596 Bug ID: 85596 Summary: aarch64 --with-multilib-list documentation missing Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug lto/85451] [offloading] Improve lto-wrapper error message when not finding mkoffload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85451 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #20 from Tim Shen --- (In reply to Hans Åberg from comment #18) > (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #14) > > I have a C++ test case for this: > > I get segmentation fault on the regex_match line with g++ 7.3.0. On Linux I set

[Bug target/85595] __atomic_is_lock_free(sizeof(unsigned long long), ) returns true on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85595 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- That does not mean the local variable is not aligned to 8 bytes ...

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #19 from Hans Åberg --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #16) > I set (kStart, kEnd) to be (1000, 2000), (1000, 3000), ..., (1000, 9000) to > see how the time grows. ... > Here are my numbers for end ranging 2000 to 9000, in ms: >

[Bug target/85595] New: __atomic_is_lock_free(sizeof(unsigned long long), ) returns true on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85595 Bug ID: 85595 Summary: __atomic_is_lock_free(sizeof(unsigned long long), ) returns true on i686 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #18 from Hans Åberg --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #14) > I have a C++ test case for this: I get segmentation fault on the regex_match line with g++ 7.3.0.

[Bug lto/85451] [offloading] Improve lto-wrapper error message when not finding mkoffload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85451 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Tue May 1 19:52:57 2018 New Revision: 259809 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259809=gcc=rev Log: [nvptx] Improve "offload compiler not found" message in mkoffload 2018-05-01 Tom

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #17 from Hans Åberg --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #16) > (In reply to Hans Åberg from comment #15) > > (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #14) > > > How fast does your prototype run on the following example? > > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/85594] New: ICE during expand when compiling with -fwrapv -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85594 Bug ID: 85594 Summary: ICE during expand when compiling with -fwrapv -fopenmp Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/85444] asm specifier on typedef silently ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85444 --- Comment #10 from Will Hawkins --- Thanks for the feedback! I tried ignored-attributes but Mr. Meyers said that was not an appropriate match. I think that I am going to have to go with adding a completely separate category. This will be good

[Bug target/85593] GCC on ARM allocates R3 for local variable when calling naked function with O2 optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593 --- Comment #2 from Austin Morton --- Where is this limitation documented? The GCC documentation on the naked function attribute makes no mention of such a caveat: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/ARM-Function-Attributes.html See here for

[Bug other/83786] Add VEC_ORDERED_REMOVE_IF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83786 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/83786] Add VEC_ORDERED_REMOVE_IF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83786 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Tue May 1 19:16:43 2018 New Revision: 259808 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259808=gcc=rev Log: Add VEC_ORDERED_REMOVE_IF 2018-05-01 Tom de Vries

[Bug target/85593] GCC on ARM allocates R3 for local variable when calling naked function with O2 optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't think naked function are supposed to be called directly.

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #16 from Tim Shen --- (In reply to Hans Åberg from comment #15) > (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #14) > > How fast does your prototype run on the following example? > > ((10)|(11)|(12)|...|(98)|(99))* matching

[Bug inline-asm/85593] New: GCC on ARM allocates R3 for local variable when calling naked function with O2 optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593 Bug ID: 85593 Summary: GCC on ARM allocates R3 for local variable when calling naked function with O2 optimizations enabled Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/84258] Bogus -Wformat warning "wide character string" for const unsigned char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84258 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84258] Bogus -Wformat warning "wide character string" for const unsigned char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84258 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Tue May 1 18:51:15 2018 New Revision: 259807 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259807=gcc=rev Log: -Wformat: fix nonsensical "wide character" message (PR c/84258)

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #15 from Hans Åberg --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #14) > How fast does your prototype run on the following example? > ((10)|(11)|(12)|...|(98)|(99))* matching "10111213141516...9899" > how about this: >

[Bug target/85592] __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports should be supported for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85592 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|__builtin_cpu_is does not |__builtin_cpu_is and

[Bug target/85592] __builtin_cpu_is does not exist on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85592 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/85592] New: __builtin_cpu_is does not exist on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85592 Bug ID: 85592 Summary: __builtin_cpu_is does not exist on aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c/85465] [og7, openacc] ICE in mark_vars_oacc_gangprivate, at c/c-parser.c:14213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85465 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/85465] [og7, openacc] ICE in mark_vars_oacc_gangprivate, at c/c-parser.c:14213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85465 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=b5146f735883031f6661dda1d3ee9a34ad557e52 [c, openacc] Handle non-var-decl in mark_vars_oacc_gangprivate 2018-05-01 Tom de Vries PR

[Bug libstdc++/80506] Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 --- Comment #3 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm now of the opinion that we should push these down. At least gcc-7. That's what I'm doing with the specfun bits.

[Bug tree-optimization/85588] [6/7/8/9 Regression] -fwrapv miscompilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85588 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r229484.

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #14 from Tim Shen --- How fast does your prototype run on the following example? ((10)|(11)|(12)|...|(98)|(99))* matching "10111213141516...9899" how about this: ((100)|(101)|(102)|...|(998)|(999))* matching "100101102...998999"

[Bug tree-optimization/82665] missing value range optimization for memchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82665 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/82665] missing value range optimization for memchr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82665 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Tue May 1 18:20:39 2018 New Revision: 259806 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259806=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82665 * vr-values.c

[Bug c++/85587] [8/9 Regression] bogus error: ‘F’ was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85587 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 1 18:11:53 2018 New Revision: 259805 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259805=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85587 - error with scoped enum in template. * semantics.c

[Bug libgcc/85591] New: __builtin_cpu_is() is not detecting bdver2 with Model = 0x02

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85591 Bug ID: 85591 Summary: __builtin_cpu_is() is not detecting bdver2 with Model = 0x02 Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 --- Comment #61 from Davin McCall --- (In reply to James Kuyper Jr. from comment #59) > (In reply to Davin McCall from comment #56) > > (In reply to James Kuyper Jr. from comment #55) > > > The problem is, you're using a statement that the

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 --- Comment #60 from Andrew Haley --- (In reply to James Kuyper Jr. from comment #51) > (In reply to Andrew Haley from comment #49) > > (In reply to James Kuyper Jr. from comment #46) > > > > The principle of type-based alias analysis is that

[Bug libstdc++/83140] assoc_legendre returns negated value when m is odd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83140 --- Comment #1 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 44047 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44047=edit This adds a defaulted arg to the underlying __assoc_legendre_p for phase. 2018-05-02 Edward Smith-Rowland

[Bug c++/85587] [8/9 Regression] bogus error: ‘F’ was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85587 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85444] asm specifier on typedef silently ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85444 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't see an appropriate one, so I'd add a new one. Maybe the closest is something like -Wignored-attributes but that's not quite right.

[Bug c++/83258] Rejecting function pointer non-type template parameter without linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83258 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Testcase from Bug 85589: template struct foo {}; int main() { static auto v = "str"; (void) foo {}; }

[Bug target/81805] Another libgomp.c/for-5.c failure on nvptx -- illegal memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target||nvptx Status|NEW

[Bug c++/85589] Non type template parameter should allow object with no linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85589 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/83258] Rejecting function pointer non-type template parameter without linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83258 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gufideg at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/85444] asm specifier on typedef silently ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85444 --- Comment #8 from Will Hawkins --- Help! Just wanted to let everyone know that I submitted a patch for this to gcc-patches and got feedback. However, I need some help! There's no consensus on the category that should contain this warning. I

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #13 from Hans Åberg --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #11) > If you think it's time and space efficiently doable, maybe you can develop a > prototype first. I put action number lists on the NFA transitions (no markup of the

[Bug c++/85279] [6 Regression] Broken diagnostic for decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85279 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/84871] libgomp examples-4/declare_target-[12].f90 fail with nvptx Titan V offloading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84871 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/85519] [nvptx, openacc, openmp, testsuite] Recursive tests may fail due to thread stack limit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85519 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/85590] New: [nvptx, libgomp, openacc] Use cuda runtime fns to determine launch configuration in nvptx plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85590 Bug ID: 85590 Summary: [nvptx, libgomp, openacc] Use cuda runtime fns to determine launch configuration in nvptx plugin Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 --- Comment #59 from James Kuyper Jr. --- (In reply to Davin McCall from comment #56) > (In reply to James Kuyper Jr. from comment #55) > > The problem is, you're using a statement that the access must occur via a > > union, with the

[Bug libstdc++/83140] assoc_legendre returns negated value when m is odd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83140 emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/85586] [8/9 Regression] Optimizer produces different result on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85586 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Testing a patch.

[Bug web/85578] broken links in gcc-8.0.1-RC-20180427/INSTALL/specific.html, and out of date prerequisites.html

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85578 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 1 15:29:05 2018 New Revision: 259801 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259801=gcc=rev Log: PR web/85578 * doc/install.texi2html: Replace _002d with - and

[Bug web/85578] broken links in gcc-8.0.1-RC-20180427/INSTALL/specific.html, and out of date prerequisites.html

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85578 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 1 15:26:36 2018 New Revision: 259799 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259799=gcc=rev Log: PR web/85578 * doc/install.texi2html: Replace _002d with - and

[Bug tree-optimization/84011] Optimize switch table with run-time relocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 --- Comment #13 from Peter Cordes --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > ?? That is the task for the linker SHF_MERGE|SHF_STRINGS handling. > Why should gcc duplicate that? Because gcc would benefit from knowing if merging makes

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 --- Comment #58 from Davin McCall --- (In reply to Andrew Haley from comment #57) > (In reply to Davin McCall from comment #52) > > (In reply to Andrew Haley from comment #45) > > > (In reply to Davin McCall from comment #44) > > > > The "one

[Bug c/65892] gcc fails to implement N685 aliasing of union members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892 --- Comment #57 from Andrew Haley --- (In reply to Davin McCall from comment #52) > (In reply to Andrew Haley from comment #45) > > (In reply to Davin McCall from comment #44) > > > The "one special guarantee" clause appears in the section

[Bug c++/85589] New: Non type template parameter should allow object with no linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85589 Bug ID: 85589 Summary: Non type template parameter should allow object with no linkage Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/85585] switch to select a string based on an enum can profitably optimize away the table of pointers/offsets into fixed-length char[] blocks. Or use byte offsets into a string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85585 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 1 May 2018, peter at cordes dot ca wrote: > The current strings + pointer-table implementation doesn't merge string > literals where one string is a suffix of another; this is

[Bug tree-optimization/84011] Optimize switch table with run-time relocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 --- Comment #12 from Peter Cordes --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #9) > > gcc already totally misses optimizations here where one string is a suffix > > of another. "mii" could just be a

[Bug tree-optimization/85588] -fwrapv miscompilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85588 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- This patch is not referring to the failures in Opencoarrays. The fix for #56 is in Opencoarray's pull request #528. The other one has nothing to do with this initial issue and is not of my current

[Bug tree-optimization/85588] New: -fwrapv miscompilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85588 Bug ID: 85588 Summary: -fwrapv miscompilation Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug middle-end/85586] [8/9 Regression] Optimizer produces different result on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85586 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/85587] [8/9 Regression] bogus error: ‘F’ was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85587 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.2 Summary|bogus error: ‘F’

[Bug c++/85587] New: bogus error: ‘F’ was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85587 Bug ID: 85587 Summary: bogus error: ‘F’ was not declared in this scope Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > It does with reverting the change in dependency.c with two failures in the > > test suite: > > > > 17 - alloc_comp_multidim_shape (Failed) > > 56 - get-put-allocatable-comp (Failed) >

[Bug go/85429] Several gotools tests FAIL with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85429 --- Comment #11 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue May 1 14:08:44 2018 New Revision: 259797 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259797=gcc=rev Log: PR go/85429 cmd/go: support more Solaris assembler syntaxes

[Bug c++/85580] [8 Regression] "conflicting C language linkage declaration" warning for variables with identical names in `extern "C"` functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85580 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #10 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > > Thanks for the proposed bugfix. Did you check that also OpenCoarrays 2.0 > > compiles again with this fix? > > It does with reverting the

[Bug middle-end/85586] [8/9 Regression] Optimizer produces different result on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85586 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug tree-optimization/84011] Optimize switch table with run-time relocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- > > ?? That is the task for the linker SHF_MERGE|SHF_STRINGS handling. > Why should gcc duplicate that? I suppose there would be small room for improvements where GCC could use the fact that one string's

[Bug tree-optimization/84011] Optimize switch table with run-time relocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84011 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #9) > gcc already totally misses optimizations here where one string is a suffix > of another. "mii" could just be a pointer to the 3rd byte of "sgmii", but > we

[Bug middle-end/85586] [8/9 Regression] Optimizer produces different result on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85586 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Thanks for the proposed bugfix. Did you check that also OpenCoarrays 2.0 > compiles again with this fix? It does with reverting the change in dependency.c with two failures in the test suite:

[Bug middle-end/84955] [7 Regression] Incorrect OpenACC tile expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84955 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >