[Bug c++/81976] bad is_standard_layout/has_unique_object_representations results with a chain of empty bases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81976 --- Comment #4 from Pádraig Brady --- According to the previous comment this depends on PR 82764 and the target milestone is 7.4

[Bug c/85623] New: strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623 Bug ID: 85623 Summary: strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/85622] New: gcc-8.1.0/NEWS says it's not released yet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85622 Bug ID: 85622 Summary: gcc-8.1.0/NEWS says it's not released yet Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c++/59655] incorrect diagnostic on templatized function with lambda parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59655 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last

[Bug c++/60277] Bogus "inline function virtual ..." used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60277 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/85621] savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85621 Daniel Santos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.santos at pobox dot com ---

[Bug libgcc/85621] savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85621 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com,

[Bug middle-end/85620] Missing ENDBR after swapcontext

direct branch. <<<<<<<<<<< Need ENDBR here. movl%eax, res(%rip) addq$8, %rsp .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8 ret .cfi_endproc .LFE0: .size foo, .-foo .ident "GCC: (GNU) 8.1.1 20180502&q

[Bug target/85582] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85582 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85582] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85582 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed May 2 21:56:17 2018 New Revision: 259862 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259862=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85582 * config/i386/i386.md (*ashl3_doubleword_mask,

[Bug libstdc++/85472] Regex match bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85472 --- Comment #22 from Hans Åberg --- (In reply to Tim Shen from comment #16) > ...I meant to observe whether the example triggers a O(k^2) behavior. It > should be less than quadratic. ... > Here is the updated example, to re-arrange the

[Bug libgcc/85621] savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85621 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Created attachment 44053 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44053=edit 0001-i386-savms-resms-mark-stack-non-executable-PR85621.patch

[Bug libgcc/85621] New: savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85621 Bug ID: 85621 Summary: savms/resms have executable stack (lack GNU-stack marking) Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85613] [8/9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85613 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/85579] [9 regression] SIGSEV in fortran test case gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 starting with r259754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ipa/85607] [9 Regression] ice in add_type, at ipa-icf.c:1583

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85607 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Summary|ice in add_type,

[Bug middle-end/85620] swapcontext isn't marked return twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > Technically, swapcontext only returns once, but not when it is called. > In that sense, it returns twice. Huh? For the purpose of ECF_RETURNS_TWICE, swapcontext does

[Bug fortran/85579] [9 regression] SIGSEV in fortran test case gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 starting with r259754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #6

[Bug middle-end/85620] getcontext is wrongly marked return twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug middle-end/85620] getcontext is wrongly marked return twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/getcontext.html If the ucp argument was created with getcontext(), program execution continues as if the corresponding call of getcontext() had just

[Bug middle-end/85620] getcontext is wrongly marked return twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85620] New: getcontext is wrongly marked return twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 Bug ID: 85620 Summary: getcontext is wrongly marked return twice Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/85617] Wunused-but-set-variable does not analyze variables passed to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85617 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Gutson --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I doubt we want to make this warning to be flow sensitive at all. There are > many other warnings which are flow sensitive and they change behavior > between

[Bug ipa/85617] Wunused-but-set-variable does not analyze variables passed to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85617 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug middle-end/85619] New: Inconsistent descriptions for new warning options in GCC 8.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85619 Bug ID: 85619 Summary: Inconsistent descriptions for new warning options in GCC 8.1.0 Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/85618] New: Zero initialized non constant stack array causes internal compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85618 Bug ID: 85618 Summary: Zero initialized non constant stack array causes internal compile error Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/68197] negative index to ios_base::iword lead to unpredictable result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68197 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/68197] negative index to ios_base::iword lead to unpredictable result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68197 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 2 19:04:55 2018 New Revision: 259854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259854=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/68197 fail on negative iword/pword indices The suggested resolution

[Bug ipa/85617] New: Wunused-but-set-variable does not analyze variables passed to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85617 Bug ID: 85617 Summary: Wunused-but-set-variable does not analyze variables passed to functions Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85616] New: ARM target using -O2 may cause unaligned access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85616 Bug ID: 85616 Summary: ARM target using -O2 may cause unaligned access Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/85615] [8/9 Regression] ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1197

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85615 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- r247578

[Bug tree-optimization/85615] [8/9 Regression] ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1197

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85615 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85615] New: ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1197

9.0.0 20180502 (experimental) [trunk revision 259838] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -O2 abc.c during GIMPLE pass: vrp abc.c: In function ‘fn1’: abc.c:3:6: internal compiler error: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1197 void fn1() { ^~~ 0x5fc743 dfs_enumerate_from(basic_block_def*, int, bool

[Bug c++/68374] G++ -Wshadow doesn't warn about static member shadowing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68374 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68374] G++ -Wshadow doesn't warn about static member shadowing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68374 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed May 2 18:15:56 2018 New Revision: 259853 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259853=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-05-02 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c/82695] gnu gcc (4.8 - 7.1) cannot parse some system headers in macOS (10.12)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82695 --- Comment #3 from Ev Drikos --- gcc 8.1 on macos 10.13.4 successfully passes this test. Thanks, Ev. Drikos

[Bug libgomp/82428] Builtins for openacc gang/worker/vector id/size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82428 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/83791] Move tests to libgomp.c-c++-common

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83791 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/85411] [openacc] Move GOMP_OPENACC_DIM parsing out of nvptx plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85411 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/83791] Move tests to libgomp.c-c++-common

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83791 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 2 17:53:43 2018 New Revision: 259851 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259851=gcc=rev Log: [libgomp, testsuite] Move tests to libgomp.c-c++-common 2018-05-02 Tom de Vries

[Bug libgomp/85411] [openacc] Move GOMP_OPENACC_DIM parsing out of nvptx plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85411 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 2 17:53:56 2018 New Revision: 259852 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259852=gcc=rev Log: [openacc] Move GOMP_OPENACC_DIM parsing out of nvptx plugin 2018-05-02 Tom de

[Bug libgomp/82428] Builtins for openacc gang/worker/vector id/size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82428 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 2 17:53:29 2018 New Revision: 259850 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259850=gcc=rev Log: [openacc] Add __builtin_goacc_parlevel_{id,size} 2018-05-02 Tom de Vries

[Bug c/30552] gcc crashes when compiling examples with GNU statement expressions in VLAs (also involved: nested functions declared K)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30552 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed May 2 17:22:26 2018 New Revision: 259849 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259849=gcc=rev Log: PR c/30552 * c-decl.c (old_style_parameter_scope): New function.

[Bug other/85614] New: Documentation: -fdump-tree should mention "original"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85614 Bug ID: 85614 Summary: Documentation: -fdump-tree should mention "original" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/85507] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_dep_resolver, at fortran/dependency.c:2258

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507 --- Comment #14 from Zaak --- Damn, it would have been nice if this patch made it in.

[Bug libstdc++/83860] valarray replacement type breaks with auto and more than one operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83860 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/57997] Segmentation fault after returning valarray expression from an auto function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57997 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/83860] valarray replacement type breaks with auto and more than one operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83860 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 2 16:41:46 2018 New Revision: 259844 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259844=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83860 avoid dangling references in valarray closure types Store

[Bug libstdc++/57997] Segmentation fault after returning valarray expression from an auto function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57997 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 2 16:41:46 2018 New Revision: 259844 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259844=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/83860 avoid dangling references in valarray closure types Store

[Bug libstdc++/70080] gslice_array's copy constructor doesn't work correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70080 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/69608] strsteambuf copy ctor and assignment inaccessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69608 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85605] Potentially missing optimization under x64 and ARM: seemingly unnecessary branch in codegen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85605 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*, arm |x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*, arm,

[Bug libstdc++/69608] strsteambuf copy ctor and assignment inaccessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69608 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 2 16:25:44 2018 New Revision: 259842 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259842=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/69608 Move semantics for strstreambuf In libstdc++ the deprecated

[Bug target/85613] New: [8/9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85613 Bug ID: 85613 Summary: [8/9 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 -O1 execution test Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug c/79586] missing -Wdeprecated depending on position of attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79586 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/80187] C++ variant should be trivially copy constructible if possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug libstdc++/80187] C++ variant should be trivially copy constructible if possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78798] [cleanup] some int-valued functions should be bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78798 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/85593] GCC on ARM allocates R3 for local variable when calling naked function with O2 optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/85612] New: ADL lookup with parameter pack and defaulted argument not considered ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85612 Bug ID: 85612 Summary: ADL lookup with parameter pack and defaulted argument not considered ambiguous Product: gcc Version: 7.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/85599] invalid optimization: function not always evaluated in logical expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 08:53:27AM +, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 > > --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to kargl from

[Bug tree-optimization/85611] New: Suboptimal code generation for (potentially) redundant atomic loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85611 Bug ID: 85611 Summary: Suboptimal code generation for (potentially) redundant atomic loads Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/85610] New: Unable to optimize away mov followed by compare into a cmpb in case of atomic_load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85610 Bug ID: 85610 Summary: Unable to optimize away mov followed by compare into a cmpb in case of atomic_load Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/85597] [6/7/8 Regression] internal compiler error: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85597 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 Summary|[6/7/8/9

[Bug tree-optimization/85597] [6/7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85597 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed May 2 14:19:51 2018 New Revision: 259840 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259840=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-02 Richard Biener PR

[Bug lto/85609] lto_check_version should print file name when linking a static lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85609 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/85599] invalid optimization: function not always evaluated in logical expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I also asked for advice on c.l.f.: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/fXP1c0u57So

[Bug lto/85609] New: lto_check_version should print file name when linking a static lib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85609 Bug ID: 85609 Summary: lto_check_version should print file name when linking a static lib Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/69388] Allow functexcept.cc definitions to be replaced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69388 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |---

[Bug testsuite/85106] Add scan-ltrans-tree-dump and scan-wpa-ipa-dump

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85106 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69608] strsteambuf copy ctor and assignment inaccessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69608 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/85106] Add scan-ltrans-tree-dump and scan-wpa-ipa-dump

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85106 --- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 2 12:16:32 2018 New Revision: 259838 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259838=gcc=rev Log: [testsuite] Add scan-ltrans-tree-dump 2018-05-02 Tom de Vries

[Bug testsuite/85106] Add scan-ltrans-tree-dump and scan-wpa-ipa-dump

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85106 --- Comment #10 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 2 12:16:15 2018 New Revision: 259837 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259837=gcc=rev Log: [testsuite] Add scan-wpa-ipa-dump 2018-05-02 Tom de Vries

[Bug fortran/84640] gcc/fortran/simplify.c:2587:9: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x0000090de160 overflowed to 0xffffffffc0632960

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84640 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/85586] [8/9 Regression] Optimizer produces different result on -O2 and -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85586 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/80676] [DR 2995] basic_stringbuf does not use initial capacity of SSO string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80676 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |---

[Bug fortran/85599] invalid optimization: function not always evaluated in logical expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #4) > What worries me most is that other compilers choose different > implementations. Can this kind of code really be processor-dependent? Most other compilers

[Bug c++/85604] Default template arguments in friend class template declarations should not be allowed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85604 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug fortran/85599] invalid optimization: function not always evaluated in logical expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another variant, this time with the (non-std) intrinsic function AND: program lazy logical :: flag flag = .false. flag = AND(check(), flag) flag = AND(flag, check()) contains

[Bug libstdc++/80187] C++ variant should be trivially copy constructible if possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-b

[Bug libstdc++/80165] Constexpr tuple of variant doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80165 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from

[Bug libstdc++/80187] C++ variant should be trivially copy constructible if possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80187 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Tim, can this be closed as fixed in GCC 8.1? Is there more to do?

[Bug fortran/85579] [9 regression] SIGSEV in fortran test case gfortran.dg/pr51434.f90 starting with r259754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85579 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/80165] Constexpr tuple of variant doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80165 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|NEW

[Bug c/85608] ubsan in cse.c:2194

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Problem seems to occur sometime before revision 258870.

[Bug c/85608] New: ubsan in cse.c:2194

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608 Bug ID: 85608 Summary: ubsan in cse.c:2194 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug target/85519] [nvptx, openacc, openmp, testsuite] Recursive tests may fail due to thread stack limit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85519 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85519] [nvptx, openacc, openmp, testsuite] Recursive tests may fail due to thread stack limit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85519 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Wed May 2 10:55:07 2018 New Revision: 259834 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=259834=gcc=rev Log: backport "[nvptx, libgomp, testsuite] Reduce recursion depth in

[Bug libstdc++/69365] LWG DR2367 (constrained pair default constructor)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69365 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/71660] [6/7/8/9 regression] alignment of std::atomic<8 byte primitive type> (long long, double) is wrong on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85607] ice in add_type, at ipa-icf.c:1583

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85607 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Bug seems to occur between revisions 259747 and 259789. Code is only a few lines already, so no reduction required.

[Bug c++/85607] New: ice in add_type, at ipa-icf.c:1583

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85607 Bug ID: 85607 Summary: ice in add_type, at ipa-icf.c:1583 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/85606] New: Assembly file generated for ARM Cortex-M0 should not specify `.arch armv6-m` at all or use `.arch armv6s-m`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85606 Bug ID: 85606 Summary: Assembly file generated for ARM Cortex-M0 should not specify `.arch armv6-m` at all or use `.arch armv6s-m` Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status:

[Bug c++/85587] [8/9 Regression] bogus error: ‘F’ was not declared in this scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85587 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |8.2 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/79422] Use ACX_BUGURL for error in snprintf_lite.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79422 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |---

[Bug libstdc++/77866] Add SystemTap probe points to libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77866 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |---

[Bug c++/84974] [8/9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (ovl_first()/location_of())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84974 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |8.2 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/66366] [OOP] ICE on invalid with non-allocatable CLASS variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66366 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |8.2 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/80291] [OOP] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:6662

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80291 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |8.2 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/83999] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.0 |8.2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

  1   2   3   >