[Bug c++/85689] if constexpr compiles false branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85689 W E Brown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||webrown.cpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/84923] [8/9 regression] gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c failed on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84923 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- About comment #3 and #4. I cannot reproduce a problem. Is it a cross compilation on x86 for aarch64 ? What need to do to reproduce the problem ?

[Bug c++/85646] [7/8/9 Regression] Incorrect lambda visibility with -fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85646 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 8 03:13:09 2018 New Revision: 260022 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260022=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85646 - lambda visibility. * decl2.c

[Bug middle-end/85619] Inconsistent descriptions for new warning options in GCC 8.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85619 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/85619] Inconsistent descriptions for new warning options in GCC 8.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85619 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/85623] strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/85623] strncmp() warns about attribute 'nonstring' incorrectly in -Wstringop-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85623 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/85643] attribute nonstring fails to squash -Wstringop-truncation warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85643 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/85643] attribute nonstring fails to squash -Wstringop-truncation warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85643 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/85650] Additional warnings when -fsanitize=undefined is used with -Wstringop-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85650 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/85650] Additional warnings when -fsanitize=undefined is used with -Wstringop-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85650 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #8) To clarify: it's not correct to directly include the header in a GCC source file. Instead, one is expected to define the INCLUDE_STRING macro before including

[Bug middle-end/85652] -Wformat-overflow warning silenced by -fpic/-fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85652 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/85691] New: Faulty Class Member Default Initialization - No Warning or Error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85691 Bug ID: 85691 Summary: Faulty Class Member Default Initialization - No Warning or Error Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/85687] ICE in gfc_sym_identifier, at fortran/trans-decl.c:351

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85687 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/85646] [7/8/9 Regression] Incorrect lambda visibility with -fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85646 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 7 23:50:16 2018 New Revision: 260017 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260017=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85646 - lambda visibility. * decl2.c

[Bug c++/85690] New: missing suggested header for std-qualified names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85690 Bug ID: 85690 Summary: missing suggested header for std-qualified names Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug jit/66812] jit code-generation example that unexpectedly required -fno-strict-aliasing to work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66812 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug c/84890] Overly verbose notes for missing headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84890 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug jit/66811] RFE: have jit dumps be compileable as C code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66811 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug jit/66627] [meta-bug] Tracker bug for jit bugs affecting ravi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66627 Bug 66627 depends on bug 66783, which changed state. Bug 66783 Summary: No error-checking for creating structs containing opaque structs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66783 What|Removed |Added

[Bug jit/66783] No error-checking for creating structs containing opaque structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66783 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug jit/66594] jitted code should use -mtune=native

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66594 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85651] Invalid -Warray-bounds warning with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85651 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/85651] Invalid -Warray-bounds warning with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85651 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85593] [6,7,8,9 Regression] GCC on ARM allocates R3 for local variable when calling naked function with O2 optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593 --- Comment #7 from Austin Morton --- I will certainly give writing a patch a try - but I will disclaim up front that because there is a viable workaround for the issue I was having (patch below [1]), this issue is "resolved" as far as my

[Bug fortran/85687] ICE in gfc_sym_identifier, at fortran/trans-decl.c:351

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85687 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/85686] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85686 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/85665] Multiple typos in diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85665 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/85316] [meta-bug] VRP range propagation missed cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85316 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78947] sub-optimal code for (bool)(int ? int : int)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78947 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/85559] [meta-bug] Improve conditional move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85559 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug jit/66627] [meta-bug] Tracker bug for jit bugs affecting ravi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66627 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85680] Missed optimization for value-init of variable-sized allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85680 --- Comment #3 from Mathias Stearn --- MSVC and ICC both also handle this poorly: https://godbolt.org/g/i4wMYa https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/problem/246786/poor-codegen-for-value-init-followed-by-explicit-i.html

[Bug target/58801] 4.7.2 alpha-dec-vms fails to link java front end due to language independent incpath.c:target_c_incpath referencing lanuage dependent vms.c:vms_c_register_includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58801 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/85683] [8/9 Regression] GCC 8 stopped using RMW (Read Modify Write) instructions on x86[_64]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85683 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- This seems to work. --- gcc/config/i386/i386.md.jj 2018-05-02 23:55:44.0 +0200 +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.md 2018-05-07 22:27:18.848705146 +0200 @@ -19285,6 +19285,40 @@

[Bug fortran/85675] parameters from other modules in openmp default(none) not specified in enclosing 'parallel'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85675 --- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf --- Running under the debugger (separate file 2 only): Breakpoint 1, gfc_omp_predetermined_sharing (decl=0xb7c100fc) at ../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-openmp.c:152 152 if (VAR_P (decl) && TREE_READONLY

[Bug middle-end/54664] expand_gimple_cond warning for predictably small BRANCH_COST

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54664 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build CC|

[Bug fortran/85685] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status, at fortran/trans.c:1598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85685 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/55143] vms-c.o:(.toc+0x0): undefined reference to `c_default_pointer_mode' (building cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55143 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/47093] [meta-bug]: broken configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093 Bug 47093 depends on bug 55143, which changed state. Bug 55143 Summary: vms-c.o:(.toc+0x0): undefined reference to `c_default_pointer_mode' (building cc1plus) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55143 What|Removed

[Bug target/47093] [meta-bug]: broken configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093 Bug 47093 depends on bug 48904, which changed state. Bug 48904 Summary: x86_64-knetbsd-gnu fails to build https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48904 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/48904] x86_64-knetbsd-gnu fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48904 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/25914] strsignal.c:558: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25914 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2018-05-07 4:05 PM, egallager at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Did this proposal ever happen? Yes: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/psignal.html

[Bug target/47098] i686-openbsd3.0: OBSD_LIB_SPEC missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47098 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/85675] parameters from other modules in openmp default(none) not specified in enclosing 'parallel'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85675 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #1

[Bug target/47093] [meta-bug]: broken configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093 Bug 47093 depends on bug 47098, which changed state. Bug 47098 Summary: i686-openbsd3.0: OBSD_LIB_SPEC missing https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47098 What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/44756] [meta-bug] --enable-werror-always issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/49656] internal compiler error on Mac OS 10.7.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49656 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/37759] powerpc option -mabi=no-spe still generates SPE instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37759 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug other/25914] strsignal.c:558: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25914 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/32815] crtstuff.c,warning, will always evaluate as 'true'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32815 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/85689] New: if constexpr compiles false branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85689 Bug ID: 85689 Summary: if constexpr compiles false branch Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/85683] [8/9 Regression] GCC 8 stopped using RMW (Read Modify Write) instructions on x86[_64]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85683 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/85688] Unhelpful fix-it hint for __float128 when using -mno-float128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85688 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- If this is accepted as a bug then I'll create a similar one for the C front end: gcc -c -x c - -mno-float128 <<< 'void f() { __float128 f = 0.0; }' : In function ‘f’: :1:12: error: unknown type name

[Bug c++/85688] New: Unhelpful fix-it hint for __float128 when using -mno-float128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85688 Bug ID: 85688 Summary: Unhelpful fix-it hint for __float128 when using -mno-float128 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug target/85683] [8/9 Regression] GCC 8 stopped using RMW (Read Modify Write) instructions on x86[_64]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85683 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/85593] [6,7,8,9 Regression] GCC on ARM allocates R3 for local variable when calling naked function with O2 optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Known

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david at westcontrol dot com ---

[Bug c/85676] Obsolete function declarations should have warnings by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85676 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug libstdc++/85672] [9 Regression] error: redefinition of 'constexpr long double std::abs(long double)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 44083 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44083=edit Restore previous behaviour of #undef _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128 based on configure checks. This still follows the same

[Bug c++/85618] [8/9 Regression] Zero initialized non constant stack array causes internal compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85618 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85618] [8/9 Regression] Zero initialized non constant stack array causes internal compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85618 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 7 19:34:59 2018 New Revision: 260013 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260013=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85618 - ICE with initialized VLA. * tree.c (vla_type_p):

[Bug tree-optimization/71769] Invalid warning from -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations for a finite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71769 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/85618] [8/9 Regression] Zero initialized non constant stack array causes internal compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85618 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 7 19:22:35 2018 New Revision: 260012 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260012=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85618 - ICE with initialized VLA. * tree.c (vla_type_p):

[Bug libstdc++/80506] Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 --- Comment #12 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, all other stuff is rolled back except for this patch.

[Bug libstdc++/80506] Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 --- Comment #11 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, I had an ugly morning with svn. Hopefully the bits are rolled back. That chunk is 83140. Ed.

[Bug libstdc++/85672] [9 Regression] error: redefinition of 'constexpr long double std::abs(long double)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > The new logic [...] comes before the automatically added parts. And obviously you can't #undef something that hasn't been defined yet.

[Bug libstdc++/85672] [9 Regression] error: redefinition of 'constexpr long double std::abs(long double)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/85672] [9 Regression] error: redefinition of 'constexpr long double std::abs(long double)'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #7) > Yes, or maybe don't generate #define _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128 0 but instead /* > #undef _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128 */ as we used to do and as the rest of the >

[Bug target/85323] SSE/AVX/AVX512 shift by 0 not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/85680] Missed optimization for value-init of variable-sized allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85680 --- Comment #2 from Mathias Stearn --- FYI, I don't think this is a signed/unsigned thing since it also repros with unsigned long https://godbolt.org/g/LTmrpi My initial repo actually used size_t, but I (incorrectly) changed it to long rather

[Bug libstdc++/85671] Lack of `std::move()` inside `operator/` for `std::filesystem::path`.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85671 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85687] New: ICE in gfc_sym_identifier, at fortran/trans-decl.c:351

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85687 Bug ID: 85687 Summary: ICE in gfc_sym_identifier, at fortran/trans-decl.c:351 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/85686] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3385

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85686 Bug ID: 85686 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3385 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/85685] New: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status, at fortran/trans.c:1598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85685 Bug ID: 85685 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_deallocate_scalar_with_status, at fortran/trans.c:1598 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/80506] Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to emsr from comment #5) > Author: emsr > Date: Mon May 7 15:55:11 2018 > New Revision: 260001 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260001=gcc=rev > Log: > 2018-05-07 Edward Smith-Rowland

[Bug libstdc++/85671] Lack of `std::move()` inside `operator/` for `std::filesystem::path`.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85671 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon May 7 17:26:28 2018 New Revision: 260009 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260009=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/85671 allow copy elision in path concatenation By performing the /=

[Bug c++/85680] Missed optimization for value-init of variable-sized allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85680 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Quite impressive how we do the test in multiple ways, which are not quite equivalent because of the wrapping semantics of unsigned. Maybe if we asserted that the argument of operator new must be less than the

[Bug bootstrap/85681] r259995 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85681 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/85681] r259995 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85681 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 05:01:59PM +, luis.machado at linaro dot org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85681 > > --- Comment #6 from Luis Machado --- > Would you please confirm the

[Bug bootstrap/85681] r259995 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85681 --- Comment #6 from Luis Machado --- Would you please confirm the bootstrap is back to normal and declare it resolved? I don't have permission to change its state.

[Bug libstdc++/80506] Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 --- Comment #9 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Mon May 7 16:59:08 2018 New Revision: 260008 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260008=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-07 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> Moar PR

[Bug target/85616] ARM target using -O2 may cause unaligned access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85616 --- Comment #4 from Denis Roux --- I agree that the given example code is breaking the C strict aliasing rule. However, I do not believe that the issue I'm reporting is related to aliasing. Further more, adding -fno-strict-aliasing option do not

[Bug target/85683] [8 Regression] GCC 8 stopped using RMW (Read Modify Write) instructions on x86[_64]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85683 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c++/85646] [7/8/9 Regression] Incorrect lambda visibility with -fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85646 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/85684] New: output of instrinsic _xgetbv is wrongly overwritten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85684 Bug ID: 85684 Summary: output of instrinsic _xgetbv is wrongly overwritten Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/80506] Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 --- Comment #8 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Mon May 7 16:23:29 2018 New Revision: 260006 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260006=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-07 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/80506] Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 --- Comment #7 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Mon May 7 16:19:34 2018 New Revision: 260005 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260005=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-07 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> Backport

[Bug libstdc++/80506] Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 --- Comment #6 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Mon May 7 16:17:32 2018 New Revision: 260004 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260004=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-07 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> Moar PR

[Bug c++/85618] [8/9 Regression] Zero initialized non constant stack array causes internal compile error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85618 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/85683] New: [8 Regression] GCC 8 stopped using RMW (Read Modify Write) instructions on x86[_64]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85683 Bug ID: 85683 Summary: [8 Regression] GCC 8 stopped using RMW (Read Modify Write) instructions on x86[_64] Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/80506] Wrong magic number in std::gamma_distribution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80506 --- Comment #5 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Mon May 7 15:55:11 2018 New Revision: 260001 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260001=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-07 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net> Moar PR

[Bug middle-end/85682] Regression: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c at r259995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85682 --- Comment #1 from Luis Machado --- Will do. I've temporarily reverted the prefetcher changes since it caused x86 bootstrap issues. I'll investigate this alongside it.

[Bug bootstrap/85681] r259995 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85681 --- Comment #5 from luisgpm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: luisgpm Date: Mon May 7 15:47:14 2018 New Revision: 26 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=26=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-07 Luis Machado PR

[Bug bootstrap/85681] r259995 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85681 --- Comment #4 from Luis Machado --- Reverted the offending changes for now.

[Bug middle-end/85682] New: Regression: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c at r259995

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85682 Bug ID: 85682 Summary: Regression: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-5.c at r259995 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/85681] r259995 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85681 --- Comment #3 from Luis Machado --- There are a couple fixups needed in there. The second error you ran into was already caught by gcc in the first comment.

[Bug bootstrap/85681] r259995 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85681 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #0) > ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c: In function 'bool > should_issue_prefetch_p(mem_ref*)': > ../../gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c:1010:54: error:

[Bug bootstrap/85681] r259995 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-*-freebsd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85681 --- Comment #1 from Luis Machado --- Working on it.

  1   2   >