[Bug web/85917] New: GCC 8 Changes page fails to mention change of default mode for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85917 Bug ID: 85917 Summary: GCC 8 Changes page fails to mention change of default mode for C Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/changes.html

[Bug web/85916] New: GCC 8 Changes page has outdated mention of -mibt, -mcet and maybe -mshstk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85916 Bug ID: 85916 Summary: GCC 8 Changes page has outdated mention of -mibt, -mcet and maybe -mshstk Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 URL:

[Bug target/85915] New: -mfunction-return=thunk causes multiple definition of `__x86_return_thunk'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915 Bug ID: 85915 Summary: -mfunction-return=thunk causes multiple definition of `__x86_return_thunk' Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/85666] gcc-8.0.1 fails to build mmix target: gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:203:20: internal compiler error: in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666 --- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Created attachment 44180 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44180=edit patch to mmix.c Builds libgcc. More late this weekend, I hope.

[Bug target/85666] gcc-8.0.1 fails to build mmix target: gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:203:20: internal compiler error: in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #8) > I don't think that comment is accurate. Of course it isn't accurate *now*, but it explains why the code looks as it is. I see the "phase-computing" code in

[Bug fortran/85543] ICE in update_current_proc_array_outer_dependency, at fortran/resolve.c:3060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85543 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri May 25 00:39:23 2018 New Revision: 260704 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260704=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-24 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85543] ICE in update_current_proc_array_outer_dependency, at fortran/resolve.c:3060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85543 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/85780] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:12504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85780 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu May 24 23:28:35 2018 New Revision: 260698 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260698=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-24 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/85914] New: -Wreturn-type false positive with tautological ternery

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85914 Bug ID: 85914 Summary: -Wreturn-type false positive with tautological ternery Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug testsuite/85913] New: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c scan-tree-dump switchlower1 "Removing basic block"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85913 Bug ID: 85913 Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c scan-tree-dump switchlower1 "Removing basic block" Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/85779] ICE in gfc_typename, at fortran/misc.c:156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85779 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu May 24 22:31:11 2018 New Revision: 260697 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260697=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-24 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug fortran/85895] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85895 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu May 24 22:28:33 2018 New Revision: 260696 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260696=gcc=rev Log: 2018-05-24 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/85912] New: -fdump-lang-raw ICE on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85912 Bug ID: 85912 Summary: -fdump-lang-raw ICE on valid code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/66970] Add __has_builtin() macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970 H. Peter Anvin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hpa at zytor dot com --- Comment #9

[Bug testsuite/85911] [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug testsuite/85911] [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/85911] New: [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85911 Bug ID: 85911 Summary: [9 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/update-loopch.c fails starting with r260638 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/85903] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vcvtuqq2pd-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu May 24 21:25:49 2018 New Revision: 260692 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260692=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85903 * config/i386/sse.md (movdi_to_sse): Do not

[Bug bootstrap/85850] [9 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85478] ICE with single element vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85478 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #11

[Bug sanitizer/85835] libsanitizer includes unconditionally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85835 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu May 24 20:21:54 2018 New Revision: 260688 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260688=gcc=rev Log: libsanitizer: Use pre-computed size of struct ustat for Linux Cherry-pick

[Bug sanitizer/85835] libsanitizer includes unconditionally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85835 --- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu May 24 20:07:25 2018 New Revision: 260687 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260687=gcc=rev Log: libsanitizer: Use pre-computed size of struct ustat for Linux Cherry-pick

[Bug c++/85842] [8/9 Regression] Bogus -Wreturn-type with generic lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85842 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 24 20:03:56 2018 New Revision: 260686 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260686=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85842 - -Wreturn-type, constexpr if and generic lambda. *

[Bug c++/85842] [8/9 Regression] Bogus -Wreturn-type with generic lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85842 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 24 20:03:18 2018 New Revision: 260685 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260685=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85842 - -Wreturn-type, constexpr if and generic lambda. *

[Bug sanitizer/85835] libsanitizer includes unconditionally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85835 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/85835] libsanitizer includes unconditionally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85835 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu May 24 19:52:32 2018 New Revision: 260684 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260684=gcc=rev Log: libsanitizer: Use pre-computed size of struct ustat for Linux Cherry-pick

[Bug target/85900] [9 Regression] ICEs after revision r260547 on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu May 24 19:51:09 2018 New Revision: 260683 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260683=gcc=rev Log: Check ifunc_resolver only on FUNCTION_DECL Since ifunc_resolver is only

[Bug target/85345] Missing ENDBR in IFUNC resolver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85345 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu May 24 19:51:09 2018 New Revision: 260683 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260683=gcc=rev Log: Check ifunc_resolver only on FUNCTION_DECL Since ifunc_resolver is only

[Bug target/85894] PPC64LE alloca stack slot allocation allows memset to destroy the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85894 --- Comment #4 from Rogerio Alves --- (In reply to Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho from comment #2) > This is loading 0 because of glibc bug #21895, where the TOC pointer is not > restored in the stack frame for static programs. > That's why

[Bug target/85894] PPC64LE alloca stack slot allocation allows memset to destroy the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85894 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/85910] New: config/aarch64/aarch64.c:15653:12: warning: duplicated ‘if’ condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85910 Bug ID: 85910 Summary: config/aarch64/aarch64.c:15653:12: warning: duplicated ‘if’ condition Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/85909] New: [MIPS] Inconsistent operand constraints error with complex double inline asm operands and o32 ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85909 Bug ID: 85909 Summary: [MIPS] Inconsistent operand constraints error with complex double inline asm operands and o32 ABI Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/85850] [9 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850 --- Comment #6 from Jürgen Reuter --- This was indeed introduced in r260343 and was fixed in r260620. I tried out r260633 today, and it compiles and bootstraps again without any problem. So I think this can be closed.

[Bug fortran/85779] ICE in gfc_typename, at fortran/misc.c:156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85779 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/85780] ICE in resolve_fl_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:12504

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85780 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/85903] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vcvtuqq2pd-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903 --- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu May 24 18:16:29 2018 New Revision: 260681 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260681=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85903 * config/i386/sse.md (movdi_to_sse): Do not

[Bug libfortran/85906] Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/85904] [7/8/9 Regression] configure issue cross compiling on netbsd, with patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85904 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu May 24 17:31:13 2018 New Revision: 260678 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260678=gcc=rev Log: PR target/85904 check for aligned_alloc on netbsd cross-compilation 2018-05-24

[Bug c++/85807] [8/9 Regression] ICEs related to noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85807 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/85908] New: Internal error with concepts and polymorphic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85908 Bug ID: 85908 Summary: Internal error with concepts and polymorphic lambdas Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/85904] [7/8/9 Regression] configure issue cross compiling on netbsd, with patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85904 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/85886] std::atomic<> doesn't have value_type and difference_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85886 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69769] arithmetic operation on pointer to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69769] arithmetic operation on pointer to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu May 24 15:28:26 2018 New Revision: 260676 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260676=gcc=rev Log: Implement P0558R2 changes to std::atomic The restrictions forbidding arithmetic

[Bug libstdc++/85886] std::atomic<> doesn't have value_type and difference_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85886 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu May 24 15:28:26 2018 New Revision: 260676 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260676=gcc=rev Log: Implement P0558R2 changes to std::atomic The restrictions forbidding arithmetic

[Bug target/85904] [7/8/9 Regression] configure issue cross compiling on netbsd, with patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85904 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.4.0 Summary|configure

[Bug c++/85815] [7/8/9 Regression] incorrect "invalid use of incomplete type" in a lambda on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85815 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug testsuite/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |carll at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/85904] configure issue cross compiling on netbsd, with patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85904 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85907] New: AIX: static libstdc++ and exceptions causes abort

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85907 Bug ID: 85907 Summary: AIX: static libstdc++ and exceptions causes abort Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/85842] [8/9 Regression] Bogus -Wreturn-type with generic lambda and constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85842 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libfortran/85906] New: Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906 Bug ID: 85906 Summary: Conditional jump depends on uninitialized value in write_decimal / write_integer Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/85864] [8/9 Regression] template argument string literal operator with default argument doesnt work in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85864 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85864] [8/9 Regression] template argument string literal operator with default argument doesnt work in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85864 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 24 14:29:05 2018 New Revision: 260674 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260674=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85864 - literal template and default template arg. * pt.c

[Bug c++/81420] When a reference is bound to a member in the base of a temporary, lifetime of the temporary is not extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81420 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 24 14:28:59 2018 New Revision: 260673 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260673=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81420 - not extending temporary lifetime. * call.c

[Bug c++/85864] [8/9 Regression] template argument string literal operator with default argument doesnt work in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85864 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 24 14:27:10 2018 New Revision: 260672 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260672=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85864 - literal template and default template arg. * pt.c

[Bug other/85898] I receive a segmentation fault due to an "internal compiler error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85898 --- Comment #2 from Eve --- Hi Jakub - Thank you for this information. I will install the latest version of cygwin and try again. I appreciate your taking the time to reply. eve On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:41 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org <

[Bug c/85902] -Wstringop-truncation false-positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85902 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/85905] New: cannot build for netbsd/alpha (with patch)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85905 Bug ID: 85905 Summary: cannot build for netbsd/alpha (with patch) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/85847] [6/7/8 Regression] unexpected expression of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7/8/9 Regression]|[6/7/8 Regression]

[Bug c++/85847] [6/7/8/9 Regression] unexpected expression of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85847 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 24 13:36:21 2018 New Revision: 260671 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260671=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/85847 * init.c (build_new_1): Use

[Bug target/85894] PPC64LE alloca stack slot allocation allows memset to destroy the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85894 --- Comment #2 from Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho --- I don't think this is a bug. At least not an alloca() bug. Let me explain: (In reply to Rogerio Alves from comment #0) > 0x3fffb7fb0908 : stdur1,-128(r1) The stack

[Bug libstdc++/85904] New: configure issue cross compiling on netbsd, with patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85904 Bug ID: 85904 Summary: configure issue cross compiling on netbsd, with patch Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/85903] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vcvtuqq2pd-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3) > Please try this patch: > > --cut here-- > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md > index 8a80fa35067..9750708a80f 100644 > ---

[Bug target/85903] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vcvtuqq2pd-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- Please try this patch: --cut here-- diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md index 8a80fa35067..9750708a80f 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md +++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md @@ -1248,11

[Bug target/85903] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vcvtuqq2pd-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Need -mfpmath=sse: make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=slm\ -mfpmath=sse}' i386.exp=avx512dq-vcvtuqq2pd-2.c" unless GCC is configured with --with-fpmath=sse.

[Bug c++/77513] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant vs 0, nullptr, NULL and __null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77513 Fabio Alemagna changed: What|Removed |Added CC||falemagn at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/85903] [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vcvtuqq2pd-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Well, movdi2sse post-reload splitter won't have any chance with: else if (memory_operand (operands[1], DImode)) { rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (V2DImode); emit_insn (gen_vec_concatv2di (tmp,

[Bug target/85903] New: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vcvtuqq2pd-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85903 Bug ID: 85903 Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vcvtuqq2pd-2.c Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/85902] New: -Wstringop-truncation false-positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85902 Bug ID: 85902 Summary: -Wstringop-truncation false-positive Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/85891] [6 Regression] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 24 May 2018, jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 > > --- Comment #7 from Jason Vas Dias --- > Aha! > Yes, I was experimenting

[Bug c++/66476] Erroneous initializer_list lifetime extension from temporary initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476 Ed Catmur changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85891] [6 Regression] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 --- Comment #7 from Jason Vas Dias --- Aha! Yes, I was experimenting with the new '-march=haswell' and '-mtune=intel' options ( which seem to me to be the wrong way round - shouldn't 'haswell' be an '-mtune' option and 'intel' be an '-march'

[Bug c++/85901] New: Error message contains "#'offset_type' not supported by simple_type_specifier#)#'offset_type' not supported by direct_abstract_declarator#"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85901 Bug ID: 85901 Summary: Error message contains "#'offset_type' not supported by simple_type_specifier#)#'offset_type' not supported by direct_abstract_declarator#" Product:

[Bug target/85900] [9 Regression] ICEs after revision r260547 on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85891] [6 Regression] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- The log file shows the loop was already vectorized by loop vectorization. How did you configure gcc? It might be you configured a default -march/tune that doesn't match the testcase expectation (and the

[Bug tree-optimization/85891] [6 Regression] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 --- Comment #5 from Jason Vas Dias --- Could it be an issue to do with running on different hardware? The CPU on the machine is a rather old 4-core (8 with HyperThreading) Haswell : processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu

[Bug middle-end/85881] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/pr80481.C -std=gnu++11 scan-assembler-not vmovaps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85881 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Guskov --- Also affected: gcc.dg/guality/pr58791-4.c

[Bug tree-optimization/85891] [6 Regression] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 --- Comment #4 from Jason Vas Dias --- Same commands run by GCC 5.5.0 or GCC 7.3.1 succeed: $ g++5 slp-pr56812.cc -nostdinc++ -std=c++98 -O2 -ftree-vectorize -fno-vect-cost-model -msse2 -fdump-tree-slp-details=gcc5.out -O3 -funroll-loops

[Bug libstdc++/69769] arithmetic operation on pointer to a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69769 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/85886] std::atomic<> doesn't have value_type and difference_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85886 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/85891] [6 Regression] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 --- Comment #3 from Jason Vas Dias --- Created attachment 44174 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44174=edit slp1 log file Here is the slp1 log file produced by command: $

[Bug tree-optimization/85793] [8/9 Regression][AARCH64] ICE in verify_gimple during GIMPLE pass vect.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85793 --- Comment #4 from bin cheng --- Author: amker Date: Thu May 24 09:49:43 2018 New Revision: 260636 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260636=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-05-17 Bin Cheng

[Bug tree-optimization/85891] [6 Regression] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 --- Comment #2 from Jason Vas Dias --- Created attachment 44173 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44173=edit log file produced by 'make check-g++ 'RUNTESTFLAGS=vect.exp=slp-pr56812*' Log file showing test failures as

[Bug target/85900] New: [9 Regression] ICEs after revision r260547 on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900 Bug ID: 85900 Summary: [9 Regression] ICEs after revision r260547 on darwin. Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/66476] Erroneous initializer_list lifetime extension from temporary initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476 Ed Catmur changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/83009] gcc.target/aarch64/store_v2vec_lanes.c fails with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83009 --- Comment #8 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: avieira Date: Thu May 24 08:53:39 2018 New Revision: 260635 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260635=gcc=rev Log: PR target/83009: Relax strict address checking for store pair lanes

[Bug gcov-profile/84846] GCOV intermediate format improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84846 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Martin

[Bug tree-optimization/85891] [6 Regression] Simple loop is not SLP-vectorized after r196872

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85891 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug c++/85890] [7 Regression] cc1plus runs out of memory in recursive Fibonacci computation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85890 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/85893] gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c FAILs with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85893 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug fortran/85895] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_ref, at fortran/trans-array.c:3518

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85895 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug tree-optimization/85897] missing strncmp optimization for bound in known range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85897 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/84846] GCOV intermediate format improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84846 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug other/85898] I receive a segmentation fault due to an "internal compiler error"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85898 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|