https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85993
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85952
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 8.2+ so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85696
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85662
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85683
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85975
--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Stephan,
>
> I tried the simply patch suggested in your analysis and
> it does fix the problem. I need to extend the patch to
> fix the m4 files that utilize the macro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85952
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 30 07:36:49 2018
New Revision: 260919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260919=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-05-29 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85756
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 30 07:35:48 2018
New Revision: 260918
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260918=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-05-14 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85696
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 30 07:34:56 2018
New Revision: 260917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260917=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-05-11 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85993
Bug ID: 85993
Summary: config/sh/sh.c:10878: suspicious if .. else chain
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85992
Bug ID: 85992
Summary: Invalid optimization with atanf
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85662
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 30 07:20:58 2018
New Revision: 260916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260916=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-05-10 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85683
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 30 07:19:24 2018
New Revision: 260915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260915=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2018-05-08 Jakub Jelinek
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7)
> Not a regression since #pragma GCC unroll is new.
Note that https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964#c2 provides
test-case that does not use GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84168
--- Comment #3 from Frank Mehnert ---
Sorry for the late response and thanks for bringing this up on gcc-patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85957
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Monakov ---
Also note that both the original and the reduced testcase can be tweaked to
exhibit the surprising transformation even when -fexcess-precision=standard is
enabled. A "lazy" way is via -mpc64, but I
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo