[Bug fortran/82009] [F08] ICE with block construct

2018-06-23 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82009 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/85983] ICE in check_dtio_interface1, at fortran/interface.c:4748

2018-06-23 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85983 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85983] ICE in check_dtio_interface1, at fortran/interface.c:4748

2018-06-23 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85983 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Jun 24 04:09:20 2018 New Revision: 261994 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261994=gcc=rev Log: 2018-06-23 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/85983 * interface.c

[Bug c++/86256] Lambda will not add ref count for class intelligent pointer member when capture 'this' or & as argument

2018-06-23 Thread kangchuanbo at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86256 --- Comment #2 from kangchuanbo at 126 dot com --- Once Lamdba capture this ( one class instance which have std::shared_ptr<> member), the std::shared_ptr member will not increase ref count inside Lambda body, this is dangerous, once this member

[Bug fortran/78718] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1427

2018-06-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78718 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/82009] [F08] ICE with block construct

2018-06-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82009 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #4 from kargl

[Bug fortran/82009] [F08] ICE with block construct

2018-06-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82009 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > (In reply to janus from comment #1) > > Confirmed. ICEs with every gfortran version I tried, from 4.7 up to trunk. > > > > Slight reduction: > > > > MODULE

[Bug fortran/82009] [F08] ICE with block construct

2018-06-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82009 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/82313] Rejects-valid for sum(minloc(...))) as array dimension

2018-06-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82313 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid | Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/82313] Rejects-valid for sum(minloc(...))) as array dimension

2018-06-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82313 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libitm/86294] New: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]

2018-06-23 Thread um at mutluit dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86294 Bug ID: 86294 Summary: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits] Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libitm/86293] New: unused variable left over (used in assert) when building with -g0 -DNDEBUG [-Werror=unused-variable]

2018-06-23 Thread um at mutluit dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86293 Bug ID: 86293 Summary: unused variable left over (used in assert) when building with -g0 -DNDEBUG [-Werror=unused-variable] Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/86292] New: Missing exception safety when constructing vector from input iterator pair

2018-06-23 Thread kristian.spangsege at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86292 Bug ID: 86292 Summary: Missing exception safety when constructing vector from input iterator pair Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/71565] INTENT(IN) polymorphic argument with pointer components - reject valid code

2018-06-23 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71565 --- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter --- Sorry, in ifort this got fixed in the meanwhile. Only gfortran rejects this code still.

[Bug fortran/71565] INTENT(IN) polymorphic argument with pointer components - reject valid code

2018-06-23 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71565 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---

[Bug tree-optimization/84841] [7 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in rewrite_expr_tree_parallel, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:4624

2018-06-23 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84841 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/85989] [6 Regression] Incorrect result for example involving unary minus in a loop

2018-06-23 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85989 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/85989] [6 Regression] Incorrect result for example involving unary minus in a loop

2018-06-23 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85989 --- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sat Jun 23 16:18:36 2018 New Revision: 261985 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261985=gcc=rev Log: Fix phi backedge detection in backprop (PR85989) Backport trunk

[Bug libgomp/86291] New: OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops

2018-06-23 Thread bonjour at matteodelabre dot me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86291 Bug ID: 86291 Summary: OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/86281] [9 regression] SEGV in fortran/resolve.c:resolve_function

2018-06-23 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86281 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug other/63630] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2122. unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_REGS'

2018-06-23 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63630 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5.0 Regression] ICE: in|ICE: in spill_failure, at

[Bug fortran/71412] [F03] iso_c_bindings and optimization interaction bug

2018-06-23 Thread relliott at umn dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412 --- Comment #14 from relliott at umn dot edu --- It is great to see some life on this bug report. This is still an important issue for our project! Is there any chance of reviving the discussion and coming to a resolution?

[Bug c/86287] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on bootstrap with -O3

2018-06-23 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86287 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Reduced C code is this: typedef struct { long a; long b; long c } d; typedef struct { int dtype; d dim[] } e; e f; g; h() { for (; g; ++g) f.dim[g].b = f.dim[g].c = f.dim[g].a = 1; }

[Bug c/86287] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on bootstrap with -O3

2018-06-23 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86287 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 44314 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44314=edit C source code The attached C code, when compiled with flag -O3, on a recent asan version of trunk seems to cause

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7/8/9 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

2018-06-23 Thread TonyELewis at hotmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 Tony E Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||TonyELewis at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/85989] [6/7 Regression] Incorrect result for example involving unary minus in a loop

2018-06-23 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85989 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sat Jun 23 12:21:18 2018 New Revision: 261984 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261984=gcc=rev Log: Fix phi backedge detection in backprop (PR85989) Backport trunk

[Bug middle-end/86284] Insert trap instruction in place of missing return statement on dodgy code

2018-06-23 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86284 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- -fsanitize=return ?

[Bug fortran/71412] [F03] iso_c_bindings and optimization interaction bug

2018-06-23 Thread juergen.reuter at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71412 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---

[Bug libgcc/86290] New: Go cross build fails, "with libgcc_s.so.1 [...] not found"

2018-06-23 Thread daniel.santos at pobox dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86290 Bug ID: 86290 Summary: Go cross build fails, "with libgcc_s.so.1 [...] not found" Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/85989] [6/7/8 Regression] Incorrect result for example involving unary minus in a loop

2018-06-23 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85989 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Sat Jun 23 08:07:31 2018 New Revision: 261983 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261983=gcc=rev Log: Fix phi backedge detection in backprop (PR85989) Backport trunk

[Bug go/86289] Cgo integer constant overflow for 64 bits (unsigned) int

2018-06-23 Thread stephen.kim at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86289 Stephen Kim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/86289] New: Cgo integer constant overflow for 64 bits (unsigned) int

2018-06-23 Thread stephen.kim at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86289 Bug ID: 86289 Summary: Cgo integer constant overflow for 64 bits (unsigned) int Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal