[Bug target/50928] m32c ICE building RTEMS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928 --- Comment #17 from Eric Gallager --- *** Bug 63683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/63683] m32c-rtems ICE unable to find spill register compiling libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63683 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/50928] m32c ICE building RTEMS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/34777] uClibc-0.9.29 compilation error for sh4 arch with gcc-4.x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34777 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/57054] Compilation with -O3 passes, with -O2 fails (ARM/NEON)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57054 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/15896] Strange behaviour for inline assembler input constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15896 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/84842] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1569

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 --- Comment #15 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #14) > Arseny, in the meantime if by chance you have another x86_64 variant of this > failure that doesn't require -funroll-all-loops, please post it as well.

[Bug middle-end/77357] strlen of constant strings not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77357 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/86190] [6/7/8/9 Regression] -Wsign-conversion ignores explicit conversion in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86190 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/39170] provide an option to silence -Wconversion warnings for bit-fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #20 from Eric

[Bug c++/86379] [8/9 Regression] Class member access of |using|'d field goes horribly awry in presence of templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86379 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/86379] New: Class member access of |using|'d field goes horribly awry in presence of templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86379 Bug ID: 86379 Summary: Class member access of |using|'d field goes horribly awry in presence of templates Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/86377] extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to U.Mutlu from comment #8) > It is possible to fix all the warnings and then use -Werror. But only today. Tomorrow's compilers will have different warnings. And yesterday's compilers too. I

[Bug c/86377] extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 --- Comment #8 from U.Mutlu --- If one activates -Werror then it won't build as it then treats the warnings as error. And there are many warnings currently suppressed. That means -Werror is deactivated by default, and IMO never activated by any

[Bug target/86285] We don't mangle __ieee128 correctly using -mlong-double-64 -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86285 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Mon Jul 2 21:25:10 2018 New Revision: 262320 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262320=gcc=rev Log: rs6000: Set up ieee128_float_type_node correctly (PR86285) We shouldn't init

[Bug target/85894] PPC64LE alloca stack slot allocation allows memset to destroy the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85894 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/86377] extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug other/85716] No easy way for end-user to tell what GCC is doing when compilation is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85716 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5) > I think I remember someone suggesting a progress bar at one point; it > involved hacking the pass manager... > > (confirmed) Right, I found the thread (I

[Bug c/86377] extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 --- Comment #6 from U.Mutlu --- The configure scripts in the subdirs/libs (like libiberty) do compile some test codes to populate the config.h of the subdir. And there the difference happens if -Wuninitialized is treated as error, ie. if user

[Bug c/86377] extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 --- Comment #5 from U.Mutlu --- The configure scripts in the subdirs/libs (like libiberty) do compile some test codes to populate the config.h of the subdir. And there the difference happens if -Wuninitialized is treated as error, ie. if user

[Bug c++/86368] an unknown [[attribute]] should not trigger a warning in C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- It might be reasonable for GCC to silently ignore attributes that use an unrecognized attribute-namespace. If somebody uses [[clang::foobar]] or [[acme::rocketboots]] they probably aren't expecting GCC to

[Bug fortran/45305] Array-valued calles to elementals are not simplified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45305 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jul 2 19:28:11 2018 New Revision: 262316 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262316=gcc=rev Log: 2018-07-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/45305 * expr.c : Add a

[Bug c++/86378] [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in noexcept-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/86378] [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in noexcept-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4

[Bug c++/86378] [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in noexcept-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86378] New: [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in noexcept-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378 Bug ID: 86378 Summary: [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in noexcept-qualifier Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/86354] Address comparison not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86354 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/86376] recent breakage in ubsan build ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > I'll take a look. Thanks. This configure line seems to work ok: ../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.262304.ubsan \

[Bug c/86377] extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- NEED_DECLARATION_ERRNO should not be defined for most targets/hosts. You need to figure out why it is being defined here. Look at config.log to figure that out.

[Bug c/86377] extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 --- Comment #3 from U.Mutlu --- As said in the Remarks, the bug originally was triggered in this file in the trunk: ../gcc_trunk/libiberty/pex-common.c:28 #include #ifdef NEED_DECLARATION_ERRNO extern int errno; #endif

[Bug c/86377] extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- In fact is required to define it as a macro in C, and a footnote says: "The macro errno need not be the identifier of an object. It might expand to a modifiable lvalue resulting from a function call (for

[Bug c/86377] extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/86377] New: extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86377 Bug ID: 86377 Summary: extern int errno; is treated as buggy function declaration [-Werror=strict-prototypes] Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/86331] the gccgo's "go" tool looks like failing to invoke any sub go command

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/86331] the gccgo's "go" tool looks like failing to invoke any sub go command

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331 --- Comment #13 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Mon Jul 2 16:29:24 2018 New Revision: 262315 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262315=gcc=rev Log: PR go/86331 os: check return value as well as error from waitid

[Bug go/86331] the gccgo's "go" tool looks like failing to invoke any sub go command

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331 --- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Mon Jul 2 16:28:58 2018 New Revision: 262314 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262314=gcc=rev Log: PR go/86331 os: check return value as well as error from waitid

[Bug go/86331] the gccgo's "go" tool looks like failing to invoke any sub go command

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86331 --- Comment #11 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Mon Jul 2 16:28:43 2018 New Revision: 262313 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262313=gcc=rev Log: PR go/86331 os: check return value as well as error from waitid

[Bug c/81577] -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 causes spurious “this ‘else’ clause does not guard” with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81577 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/86274] [7/8/9 Regression] SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/86274] [7/8/9 Regression] SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/86368] an unknown [[attribute]] should not trigger a warning in C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86243] unknown attribute before throw causes hard error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86243 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/86366] [9 regression] gcc.dg/profile-dir-3.c fails starting with r262251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86366 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/86376] recent breakage in ubsan build ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/86366] [9 regression] gcc.dg/profile-dir-3.c fails starting with r262251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86366 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Jul 2 14:54:07 2018 New Revision: 262311 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262311=gcc=rev Log: Fix GCOV scan pattern (PR testsuite/86366). 2018-07-02 Martin Liska PR

[Bug c/86376] New: recent breakage in ubsan build ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376 Bug ID: 86376 Summary: recent breakage in ubsan build ? Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/86363] [9 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_memset() at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86363 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jul 2 13:32:26 2018 New Revision: 262307 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262307=gcc=rev Log: 2018-07-02 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/86363 *

[Bug tree-optimization/86363] [9 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_memset() at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86363 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86375] New: Lambda call in template parameter causes compile time error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86375 Bug ID: 86375 Summary: Lambda call in template parameter causes compile time error Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86374] New: [8 regression] template member name lookup problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86374 Bug ID: 86374 Summary: [8 regression] template member name lookup problem Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug ipa/86274] [7/8/9 Regression] SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug driver/86030] specs file processing does not create response files for input directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86030 --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina --- Hmm according to 45749 with `HAVE_GNU_LD` on it should work for the ld call. I will give that a try. But the environment variable one is still an issue as far as I can tell.

[Bug driver/86030] specs file processing does not create response files for input directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86030 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83118] [7/8/9 Regression] Bad intrinsic assignment of class(*) array component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from janus

[Bug c++/86373] New: Destructor shall not be instantiated in C++17 mode for prvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86373 Bug ID: 86373 Summary: Destructor shall not be instantiated in C++17 mode for prvalue Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 --- Comment #14 from Fritz Reese --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #13) > > It seems the backport caused a caused quite a number on testsuite failures > on the gcc-7 branch: > ... I reverted the backport in r262260. Are you certain

[Bug debug/78685] -Og generates too many ""s

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78685 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #44333|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/86367] FRE1 tree pass deletes code in gcc.target/powerpc/nan128-1.c when long double is IEEE 128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86367 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/86366] [9 regression] gcc.dg/profile-dir-3.c fails starting with r262251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86366 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/86371] building compiler tries to look in $HOME/local/include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86371 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/86366] [9 regression] gcc.dg/profile-dir-3.c fails starting with r262251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86366 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/86363] [9 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_memset() at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86363 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 Bug 82173 depends on bug 82865, which changed state. Bug 82865 Summary: Option -fdec collides with PDT https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/85504] Bogus -Wrestrict warning with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85504 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) > I get the warning with gcc8 and trunk (9.0), but the output is the expected > one: > > **123* Oh,

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86363] [9 Regression] wrong code with __builtin_memset() at -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86363 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---

[Bug c++/86369] constexpr const char* comparison fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86369 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Clang trunk also rejects it for the same reason, icc accepts it.

[Bug fortran/56670] Allocatable-length character var causes bogus warning with -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Allocatable-length |Allocatable-length

[Bug fortran/86372] [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/86372] New: [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86372 Bug ID: 86372 Summary: [8/9 Regression] Segfault on ASSOCIATE statement with CHARACTER variable Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86369] constexpr const char* comparison fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86369 Nicolas Lesser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||blitzrakete at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/56670] Allocatable-length character var causes bogus warning with -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56670 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/86321] [9 Regression] ICE: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5693 for several Fortran tests with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86321 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jul 2 08:00:47 2018 New Revision: 262301 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262301=gcc=rev Log: 2018-07-02 Richard Biener PR lto/86321 * trans-types.c

[Bug lto/86321] [9 Regression] ICE: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5693 for several Fortran tests with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86321 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/86279] [9 Regression] ICE in malloc_candidate_p, at ipa-pure-const.c:927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86279 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/86323] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86323 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/45305] Array-valued calles to elementals are not simplified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45305 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jul 2 07:24:43 2018 New Revision: 262300 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262300=gcc=rev Log: 2018-07-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/45305 * expr.c : Add a

[Bug fortran/45305] Array-valued calles to elementals are not simplified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45305 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/45305] Array-valued calles to elementals are not simplified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45305 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jul 2 07:20:27 2018 New Revision: 262299 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262299=gcc=rev Log: 2018-07-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/45305 * expr.c : Add a

[Bug ipa/86279] [9 Regression] ICE in malloc_candidate_p, at ipa-pure-const.c:927

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86279 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Jul 2 07:04:20 2018 New Revision: 262298 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262298=gcc=rev Log: Revert 2 ::get to ::get_create for IPA summaries (PR ipa/86279). 2018-07-02

[Bug ipa/86323] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86323 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Jul 2 07:04:01 2018 New Revision: 262297 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262297=gcc=rev Log: Revert one ipa_call_summaries::get to get_create (PR ipa/86323). 2018-07-02

[Bug ipa/86274] [7/8/9 Regression] SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug lto/86366] [9 regression] gcc.dg/profile-dir-3.c fails starting with r262251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86366 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/77703] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE on assignment to pointer function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77703 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de ---

[Bug hsa/86371] New: building compiler tries to look in $HOME/local/include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86371 Bug ID: 86371 Summary: building compiler tries to look in $HOME/local/include Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3