[Bug c/87581] Misaligned 16-bit read trap on x86 platform should be either fixed or documented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87581 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug preprocessor/83773] Warning for redefined macro does not have its own -Wsomething switch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83773 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- Clang calls it -Wmacro-redefined: $ clang -fdiagnostics-show-option -Wall -c 83773.c 83773.c:2:9: warning: 'AAA' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined] #define AAA 2 ^ 83773.c:1:9: note: previous

[Bug middle-end/79220] missing -Wstringop-overflow= on a memcpy overflow with a small power-of-2 size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79220 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > As an aside, the -Wstringop-overflow for f() will disappear if/when the > patch submitted for bug 83508 is committed. > The patch for bug 83508 was committed as

[Bug c++/80733] -fstrict-enum ineffective, incorrect -Wtype-limits warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80733 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/87574] [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19226 since r264943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87574 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/87574] [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19226 since r264943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87574 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Oct 10 22:54:04 2018 New Revision: 265028 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265028=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/87574 * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_node::expand_thunk):

[Bug c++/87567] constexpr evaluation rejects call to non-constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87567 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87567] constexpr evaluation rejects call to non-constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87567 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Oct 10 21:11:18 2018 New Revision: 265027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265027=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/87567 - constexpr rejects call to non-constexpr function.

[Bug target/87579] new powerpc64 sse3 test cases in r264992 have compilation failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87579 pc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87579] new powerpc64 sse3 test cases in r264992 have compilation failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87579 --- Comment #3 from pc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: pc Date: Wed Oct 10 20:52:48 2018 New Revision: 265026 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265026=gcc=rev Log: Fat-fingered my recent patch adding the SSE3 testcases for powerpc, most likely

[Bug target/87579] new powerpc64 sse3 test cases in r264992 have compilation failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87579 --- Comment #2 from pc at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch for these changes was inadvertently applied twice before being committed, resulting in duplicated code in the new files. I will check in a patch shortly to remove the extra code.

[Bug target/87579] new powerpc64 sse3 test cases in r264992 have compilation failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87579 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc*-*-*

[Bug c++/87582] New: Returning a reference to a data member via structured bindings incorrectly reports dangling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87582 Bug ID: 87582 Summary: Returning a reference to a data member via structured bindings incorrectly reports dangling Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/87581] Misaligned 16-bit read trap on x86 platform should be either fixed or documented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87581 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Use -fsantizer=undefined to catch this at runtime even without sse or otherwise.

[Bug c/87581] New: Misaligned 16-bit read trap on x86 platform should be either fixed or documented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87581 Bug ID: 87581 Summary: Misaligned 16-bit read trap on x86 platform should be either fixed or documented. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/87580] New: Wrong bounds for sourced allocated array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87580 Bug ID: 87580 Summary: Wrong bounds for sourced allocated array Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug lto/87574] [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19226 since r264943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87574 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2) > Egad. Reducing the compile-only testcase... Not sure which one you mean, but I can duplicate the second test case with this reduced C++ code: class a {

[Bug tree-optimization/82073] internal compiler error: in pop_to_marker, at tree-ssa-scopedtables.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82073 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87579] New: new powerpc64 sse3 test cases in r264992 have compilation failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87579 Bug ID: 87579 Summary: new powerpc64 sse3 test cases in r264992 have compilation failures Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/87457] thread sanitizer false positive on virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87457 --- Comment #3 from SebastiansPublicAddress at googlemail dot com --- Is there something else, which libstdc++ depends on, that I need to build with ThreadSanitizer? libgcc or libatomic for example?

[Bug c++/87457] thread sanitizer false positive on virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87457 --- Comment #2 from SebastiansPublicAddress at googlemail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > I think the problem is that the std::thread code in libstdc++.so isn't built > with ThreadSanitizer. Wasn't easy to build

[Bug target/87511] [9 Regression][AArch64] UBFIZ instruction with invalid immediate emitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87511 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68510] [concepts] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1827

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68510 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c/54391] transparent_union typedef'ing inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54391 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/54391] transparent_union typedef'ing inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54391 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Oct 10 17:09:26 2018 New Revision: 265024 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265024=gcc=rev Log: PR c/54391 - transparent_union typedef'ing inconsistent gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

[Bug c/87578] New: attribute transparent_union silently accepted but ignored on typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87578 Bug ID: 87578 Summary: attribute transparent_union silently accepted but ignored on typedef Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 68510, which changed state. Bug 68510 Summary: [concepts] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1827 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68510 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/68510] [concepts] ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:1827

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68510 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/87544] alloc-size-larger-than incorrectly triggered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87544 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk so far.

[Bug lto/83375] partitioner partitions static arrays with label references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83375 --- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen --- This breaks Linux kernel LTO builds. I currently have a workaround (disabling LTO for that file), but I don't think your "is not common" argument is valid.

[Bug fortran/87577] New: [9 regression] hundreds of fortran test case failures starting with revision r264990

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87577 Bug ID: 87577 Summary: [9 regression] hundreds of fortran test case failures starting with revision r264990 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/87544] alloc-size-larger-than incorrectly triggered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87544 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Oct 10 15:39:33 2018 New Revision: 265021 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265021=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/87544 limit max_size() to PTRDIFF_MAX / sizeof(T) The C++17

[Bug target/87573] [9 Regression] error: could not split insn since r264877

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87573 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87573] [9 Regression] error: could not split insn since r264877

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87573 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Oct 10 15:02:47 2018 New Revision: 265019 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265019=gcc=rev Log: PR target/87573 * config/i386/mmx.md (const_vector 0 -> mem

[Bug target/86677] popcount builtin detection is breaking some kernel build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677 > > ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/86677] popcount builtin detection is breaking some kernel build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/86968] Unaligned big-endian (scalar_storage_order) access on armv7-a yields 4 ldrb instructions rather than ldr+rev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- > Forgive my naive question as I'm not too familiar with that part of the > compiler: why should the get_best_mem_extraction_insn be guarded with > reverse? I thought I'd just ad an if (reverse) if it

[Bug fortran/84487] [8/9 Regression] Large rodate section increase in 465.tonto with r254427

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487 --- Comment #11 from Wilco --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #10) > In my understanding, the problem is the following (of r254427): > Unconditionally generate a vtable for any module derived > type, as long as the standard

[Bug target/86677] popcount builtin detection is breaking some kernel build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86677 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/87576] Static analysis generating errors on branch never taken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87576 --- Comment #2 from Tom Mason --- Compiling and running the file works in clang, and the asserts pass.

[Bug c++/87576] Static analysis generating errors on branch never taken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87576 --- Comment #1 from Tom Mason --- Trying to compile the attached source file leads to gcc generating a memcpy out of the loop on line 134, then erroring because the generated memcpy overlaps. Indeed the regions do overlap, so if that is a

[Bug c++/87576] New: Static analysis generating errors on branch never taken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87576 Bug ID: 87576 Summary: Static analysis generating errors on branch never taken Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/83375] partitioner partitions static arrays with label references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83375 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |--- --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška

[Bug target/86968] Unaligned big-endian (scalar_storage_order) access on armv7-a yields 4 ldrb instructions rather than ldr+rev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Preud'homme --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #11) > > Therefore unaligned access are handled by extract_bit_field. This in turns > > call extract_bit_field_1 and later extract_integral_bit_field where

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 82807, which changed state. Bug 82807 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 473.astar ~6% performance deviation in between 6.3 and 7.2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82807 What|Removed

[Bug other/84613] [meta-bug] SPEC compiler performance issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84613 Bug 84613 depends on bug 82807, which changed state. Bug 82807 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 473.astar ~6% performance deviation in between 6.3 and 7.2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82807 What|Removed

[Bug target/82807] [7/8/9 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 473.astar ~6% performance deviation in between 6.3 and 7.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82807 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87575] [9 Regression] compilation error for 465.tonto SPEC benchmark since r264990

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87575 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/87575] [9 Regression] compilation error for 465.tonto SPEC benchmark since r264990

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87575 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-10-10 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/87575] New: [9 Regression] compilation error for 465.tonto SPEC benchmark since r264990

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87575 Bug ID: 87575 Summary: [9 Regression] compilation error for 465.tonto SPEC benchmark since r264990 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/87565] suboptimal memory-indirect tailcalls on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87565 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/87572] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87572 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 44823 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44823=edit A patch

[Bug target/82227] ARM thumb inefficient tailcall return sequence (multiple pops)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82227 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug lto/87574] [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19226 since r264943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87574 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug lto/87574] [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19226 since r264943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87574 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/87550] Intrinsics for rdpmc (__rdpmc, __builtin_ia32_rdpmc) are interpreted as pure functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87550 --- Comment #4 from Vlad --- Great! Thanks you very much.

[Bug sanitizer/86755] [ASAN] Libasan failed to be build for arm with -mthumb and -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86755 --- Comment #3 from Denis Khalikov --- The fix was accepted to llvm https://reviews.llvm.org/D50180. I hope the patch will be applied soon.

[Bug c++/87410] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87410 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 44822 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44822=edit Reduced test-case

[Bug bootstrap/84199] Error building gcc 7.3.0 on Odroid XU4 (ARM, Ubuntu): cannot load liblto_plugin.so

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84199 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/86755] [ASAN] Libasan failed to be build for arm with -mthumb and -fno-omit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86755 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 --- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > Unfortunately I can't reproduce that with cross compiler. Me neither today. Gianfranco , could you check if you are running out of memory on the machine

[Bug target/87550] Intrinsics for rdpmc (__rdpmc, __builtin_ia32_rdpmc) are interpreted as pure functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87550 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 10 09:28:26 2018 New Revision: 265007 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265007=gcc=rev Log: PR target/87550 * config/i386/i386-builtin.def

[Bug target/87573] [9 Regression] error: could not split insn since r264877

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87573 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug lto/87574] [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19226 since r264943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87574 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 44821 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44821=edit Different test-case One different test-case: $ g++ thread2.ii -O2 -g ... during IPA pass: inline thread.ii: In member

[Bug target/86968] Unaligned big-endian (scalar_storage_order) access on armv7-a yields 4 ldrb instructions rather than ldr+rev

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86968 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/87574] [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19226 since r264943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87574 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug lto/87574] New: [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19226 since r264943

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87574 Bug ID: 87574 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in add_data_member_location_attribute at gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:19226 since r264943 Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug c/87286] ICE on vectors of enums

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87286 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 10 09:03:40 2018 New Revision: 265006 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265006=gcc=rev Log: PR c/87286 * gcc.dg/pr87286.c: Add -Wno-psabi to dg-options.

[Bug target/87573] [9 Regression] error: could not split insn since r264877

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87573 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- Patch in testing: --cut here-- diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md b/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md index 539671ce4be5..e60b2296ab6b 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md +++ b/gcc/config/i386/mmx.md @@ -217,7 +217,14

[Bug middle-end/86815] [8/9 regression] ICE on valid code on armhf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/84940] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84940 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84940] [7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84940 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 10 08:16:37 2018 New Revision: 265005 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265005=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-10-10 Paolo Carlini PR c++/84940 *

[Bug c++/85114] [6/7 Regression] -fstack-check causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85114 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-reduction | --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---

[Bug c/87286] ICE on vectors of enums

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87286 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug gcov-profile/77698] Unrolled loop not considered hot after profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #7) > I also see the loop now being aligned when I apply your patch. > > srdi 10,10,2 > mtctr 10 > .p2align 4,,15 > .L6: > ld 9,0(11) >

[Bug gcov-profile/77698] Unrolled loop not considered hot after profiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug target/87573] [9 Regression] error: could not split insn since r264877

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87573 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/87573] [9 Regression] error: could not split insn since r264877

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87573 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/87573] New: [9 Regression] error: could not split insn since r264877

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87573 Bug ID: 87573 Summary: [9 Regression] error: could not split insn since r264877 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/87572] New: ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87572 Bug ID: 87572 Summary: ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3722 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/71283] Inconsistent location for C++ warning options in the manual

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71283 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug target/87561] [9 Regression] 416.gamess is slower by ~10% starting from r264866 with -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87561 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 44820 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44820=edit reduced testcase Reduced testcase.

[Bug c++/84191] [7 Regression] Compiler ICEs when trying to resolve impossible arithmetic operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84191 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 44819 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44819=edit reduced test-case

[Bug c++/87571] [8/9 Regression] ICE in friend_accessible_p, accessing protected member of template friend inside template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87571 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target