https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88020
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87907
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80438
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87817
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88008
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88009
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88022
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Isn't it possible to just add yet another range (like we already have Low and
High and sometimes Medium memory and their corresponding shadows and gaps) if
asan runtime determines some region clash?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33491
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88022
Bug ID: 88022
Summary: Support dynamic shadow offset in ASan
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80016
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-03-13 00:00:00 |2018-11-14
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88020
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
--- Comment #3 from Paul Smith ---
Unfortunately not because I never had time to do more than the patch attached
here: in particular I didn't hook it up to any command-line arguments, nor did
I add regression tests for it. I didn't think it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-03-17 00:00:00 |2018-11-14
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88021
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 14 13:07:03 2018
New Revision: 266143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266143=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-14 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/88021
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87817
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
While the testcase doesn't FAIL with the above commit, it isn't really fixed
yet, a 0 could propagate to the insn already during RTL optimizations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71026
--- Comment #11 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Wed Nov 14 12:45:29 2018
New Revision: 266142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266142=gcc=rev
Log:
Simplify floating point comparisons
This patch implements some of the optimizations
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 14 12:38:20 2018
New Revision: 266141
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266141=gcc=rev
Log:
PR other/88007
* c-common.c (parse_optimize_options): Allocate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87817
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 14 12:36:59 2018
New Revision: 266140
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266140=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/87817
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_fold_builtin):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80260
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Can the bug be marked as resolved?
I still get an ICE with gcc 7 and 8. Any plan to do the back port (I can do it
if it helps)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80260
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88020
--- Comment #1 from toe-ger at web dot de ---
The godbolt link is a bit confusing because the output window is in the wrong
place. https://godbolt.org/z/OvlkUA is better.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80016
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88021
--- Comment #2 from Matthew Malcomson ---
Hi Richard,
Applying that on top of r265914 does fix the problem.
Thanks for the quick reply!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85968
--- Comment #2 from claziss at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: claziss
Date: Wed Nov 14 11:31:12 2018
New Revision: 266107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266107=gcc=rev
Log:
[ARC] Backport form mainline
PR target/85968
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85968
Claudiu Zissulescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||claziss at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88021
Bug ID: 88021
Summary: aarch64 Busy hang running testcase pr60183.c since
revision 265914
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88019
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88019
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 14 11:11:05 2018
New Revision: 266105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266105=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88019
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87927
--- Comment #4 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Submitted patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01192.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88020
Bug ID: 88020
Summary: Template argument deduction fails inside sizeof
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried current trunk (future GCC 9)
GCC 9 learned to avoid excessive widening during vectorisation, which is what
accounts for the large number of instructions you see.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
--- Comment #6 from krux ---
-mfloat-abi=hard was missing indeed. It's a pity there's no warning like when
trying to use the intrinsics.
Still I see a lot more instructions, maybe that got fixed after v7.2?
https://godbolt.org/z/OWzgXi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Yep, GCC considers attributes to be part of the definition of a function for
> IPA passes. We are not consitent here (i.e. warning attributes on aliases
> counts), so it makes sense to support this (and is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87974
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 14 09:19:28 2018
New Revision: 266099
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266099=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87974
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88019
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 67026, which changed state.
Bug 67026 Summary: GCC incorrectly rejects well-formed constexpr function
definition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67026
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
--- Comment #4 from krux ---
On x64 indeed both compilers generate a huge amount of code.
https://godbolt.org/z/TH7mqn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67026
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86678
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88016
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87977
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 14 09:01:47 2018
New Revision: 266098
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266098=gcc=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/87977
* tree-ssa-math-opts.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
--- Comment #3 from krux ---
A few NEON instructions are sufficient:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170227190422/http://hilbert-space.de/?p=22
clang seems to generate similar code, see the godbolt links.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88016
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Dup of PR88007?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88018
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88009
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87610
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mcccs at gmx dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88014
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49774
Bug 49774 depends on bug 88014, which changed state.
Bug 88014 Summary: Restrict/C2X/N2260 Restricted function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88014
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88019
Bug ID: 88019
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in gimplify_modify_expr, at
gimplify.c:5779
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88019
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88018
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-11-14
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88018
Bug ID: 88018
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in insert_insn_on_edge at
cfgrtl.c:1952 since r255066
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88017
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88017
Bug ID: 88017
Summary: ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4220
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88016
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88016
Bug ID: 88016
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in gt_ggc_m_S, at ggc-page.c:1474
since r262375
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88007
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015
Bug ID: 88015
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in dump_printf_loc, at
dumpfile.c:1287
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2018-11-14
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88014
Bug ID: 88014
Summary: Restrict/C2X/N2260 Restricted function argument
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
101 - 172 of 172 matches
Mail list logo