https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |powerpc64*-*-*, s390x-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88070
Bug ID: 88070
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in create_pre_exit, at
mode-switching.c:438
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869
--- Comment #11 from Umesh Kalappa ---
Thank you Jason and Marek for all your support .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> Confirmed since a bug that this blocks is confirmed.
That bug (bug 79997) is closed now btw.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88069
Bug ID: 88069
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:709
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01558.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86823
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87012
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01545.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86747
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01546.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71666
Bug 71666 depends on bug 23197, which changed state.
Bug 23197 Summary: Improve documentation on -fprofile-generate, -fprofile-use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23197
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23197
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23197
--- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Sat Nov 17 00:53:17 2018
New Revision: 266231
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266231=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-16 Sandra Loosemore
PR middle-end/23197
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88066
--- Comment #2 from Michael Hansen ---
Unfortunately we are specifically using -I- for the problematic behavior in a
codebase that has depended on it for years, so -iquote doesn't help in this
case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #11 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jozefl
Date: Sat Nov 17 00:45:43 2018
New Revision: 266230
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266230=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-17 Jozef Lawrynowicz
PR middle-end/87854
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87025
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch kit:
"[PATCH 1/2] Eliminate global state from -fsave-optimization-record"
* https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01552.html
"[PATCH 2/2] Fix -fsave-optimization-record ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87706
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > > Assigning to Honza after we discussed that.
> >
> > So, this is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87927
--- Comment #5 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jozefl
Date: Fri Nov 16 23:53:30 2018
New Revision: 266226
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266226=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-11-16 Jozef Lawrynowicz
PR target/87927
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88068
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87269
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 16 23:18:13 2018
New Revision: 266225
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266225=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/87269
* g++.dg/lookup/pr87269.C (std::size_t): New typedef.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Nov 16 21:55:00 2018
New Revision: 266224
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266224=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/52869
DR 1207
* parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060
--- Comment #7 from martin ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #6)
> Which version of glibc are you running on your system? Which Linux kernel
> version?
I'm running the kernel 2.6.17.14.
ldd --version
ldd (GNU libc) 2.3.2
uname -a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78444
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
So i've tested this on Darwin
- and doing x86_64-linux now;
along with the change, I removed 'profile_flag' hack and added
+ /* If we're profiling, we don't have a leaf. */
+ gcc_assert (!crtl->is_leaf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88068
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
This bug seems to have appeared between revision 265683 and 265907.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
I do not see any wholesale fail of asan when building/testing on darwin16 for
minversion darwin14 (using the darwin14 SDK).
Here, the symbol shows as dynamically looked-up.
(this _is_ a problem in fact
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88068
Bug ID: 88068
Summary: asan: heap-use-after-free in simplify_ref_chain
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88067
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88066
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The -I- option is deprecated. Can you use -iquote instead, or are you using
because you want that problematic behaviour?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Well until now we were permitting this as an extension. We could choose to
allow it only under -std=legacy or throw a runtime error. Usually we don't like
to throw runtime errors for things if not absolutely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87708
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The testcases are XFAILed; closing this PR now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87708
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Which version of glibc are you running on your system? Which Linux kernel
version?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87945
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (revision 266192)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c (working copy)
@@ -278,6 +278,14 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88033
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner ---
So this is a problem when we have a simple copy from a reg to itself, like so:
(insn (set (reg:DI XXX) (reg:DI XXX)))
By definition, a register does not conflict with itself, but a copy of this
type is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88062
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87506
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I wonder if adjust_temp_type really needs to adjust type from one variant to
another one (in this case the type of temp is A, but the type we want is const
A).
If it does for some reason, then perhaps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88067
Bug ID: 88067
Summary: Internal Compuler Error, Segmentation Fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88059
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #8)
> So just want to make sure that it is ok that this assumption can no longer
> be made.
Yes. The string is just too large for the target.
> I'll then add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88066
Bug ID: 88066
Summary: Relative includes in bits/locale_conv.h should be
prefixed
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485
--- Comment #9 from Alexander Monakov ---
Martin, Jakub: if I add -fstack-protector-strong, the problem is reproducible
for me - can you try that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88062
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
This is not a GCC bug. tgmath.h is provided by glibc, not GCC, and glibc
indeed does not yet include the type-generic macros for functions rounding
to a narrower type (nor does glibc yet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87025
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
David, I know it's off-topic here, but may I also ask you to look at the PR in
the See Also section? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
AT_FDCWD was added in glibc 2.4, released 2006-03-06.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
--- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yup, looks like you got it. Thanks!
update from 266192 to 266207:
New passes:
FAIL: crypto/dsa
FAIL: crypto/ecdsa
FAIL: crypto/elliptic
FAIL: crypto/rsa
FAIL: crypto/tls
FAIL: crypto/x509
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 16 16:43:49 2018
New Revision: 266219
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266219=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/87475
* cfgrtl.c (patch_jump_insn): Allow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88051
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Nov 16 16:42:16 2018
New Revision: 266218
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266218=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/88051
* config/i386/i386.md (floatunsdidf2):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 16 16:41:54 2018
New Revision: 266217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266217=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/87854
* c-common.c (fix_string_type): Reject string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88032
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 16 16:40:53 2018
New Revision: 266216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266216=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/88032
* optabs.c (expand_binop): For op0_mode use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88065
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88065
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88065
Bug ID: 88065
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess on an
invalid strncpy
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88041
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88064
Bug ID: 88064
Summary: [9 Regression] Incorrect vectorizer over_widening
pattern handling
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88040
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
I don't suppose this could make use of the existing -fmodule-file= option,
which translates a module name to a different file path?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88057
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Interesting, what tool have you used to detect that?
cppcheck, available from sourceforge.
I find compile time warnings are usually preferred to runtime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87025
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88063
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0)
> However, the allocation and deallocation is done in a loop over units, so if
> find_address_ranges succeeds for the first unit, but fails for the second,
> then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88063
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 45027
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45027=edit
Detection patch
Output:
...
$ ./btest 2>&1 | sed 's%/.*/%%'
alloc at state.c:66: addr: 0x7f9addf62000, size: 72,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87546
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45026
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45026=edit
gcc9-pr87546.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88063
Bug ID: 88063
Summary: Libbacktrace leak on dwarf read failure
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060
--- Comment #4 from martin ---
Created attachment 45025
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45025=edit
/usr/include/linux/fcntl.h
I found the AT_FDCWD in the file /usr/include/linux/fcntl.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060
--- Comment #3 from martin ---
Created attachment 45024
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45024=edit
/usr/include/bits/fcntl.h
I found also:
/usr/include/asm-sparc/fcntl.h
/usr/include/asm/fcntl.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88062
Bug ID: 88062
Summary: tgmath with fadd vs faddl done wrong
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060
martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mfe at live dot de
--- Comment #2 from martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86747
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87546
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I think the bug is in vect_look_through_possible_promotion, which doesn't
do what it claims to do is that what it returns can be cast to unprom->type and
then promoted to final precision and that it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88061
Bug ID: 88061
Summary: section attributes of variable templates are ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Can you attach the contents of sparc-unknown-linux-gnu/libgo/gen-sysinfo.go
from your build directory?
Does the C header file on your system define AT_FDCWD? (It normally
comes from .) If not, why
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88060
Bug ID: 88060
Summary: ../../../gcc-8.2.0/libgo/go/syscall/libcall_linux_utim
esnano.go:17:18: error: reference to undefined name
‘_AT_FDCWD’
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87269
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87269
--- Comment #8 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Nov 16 15:01:55 2018
New Revision: 266210
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266210=gcc=rev
Log:
[PR c++/87269] Mark string operator overload in template defn.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87855
--- Comment #6 from fiesh at zefix dot tv ---
Again, fixes the issue for me with clang!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88059
Bug ID: 88059
Summary: Spurious stringop-overflow warning with strlen, malloc
and strncpy
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88058
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83215
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias, missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Sergio Losilla from comment #3)
> I see, thanks. Well then, I guess I'll stick to the workaround. Good to know
> it is already fixed in version 9.
Thanks. Next GCC 8.3 will have a workaround, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045
--- Comment #3 from Sergio Losilla ---
I see, thanks. Well then, I guess I'll stick to the workaround. Good to know it
is already fixed in version 9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83941
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88057
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84044
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 9.0.0 20181110 (experimental) [trunk revision 266003] (Debian
> 20181110-2)
>
> Regards,
> Arnaud Giersch
The warning appeared again on trunk in r265875
Author: hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87618
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I forgot to close it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87618
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485
--- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #7)
> It appears you are building via portage and thus have Gentoo patches applied?
Yes, I build weekly snapshots via Portage for convenience. But I use modified
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87706
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > Assigning to Honza after we discussed that.
>
> So, this is kind of off-topic, but I've been wondering for a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88046
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88046
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87706
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88033
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87485
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Known to fail|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88004
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Nov 16 12:49:32 2018
New Revision: 266207
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266207=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix ICE in lto_symtab_merge_symbols_1 (PR lto/88004).
2018-11-16 Martin Liska
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
