[Bug target/88070] [8/9 Regression] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88070 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/88071] [8/9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: dead STMT in EH table)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88071 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/88069] [9 Regression] ICE in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:709

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88069 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/81519] Enhancement: Add --help=target-distcc or similar to dump clean, optimal CFLAGS without using -march=native

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81519 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška

[Bug target/88083] ICE in find_constant_pool_ref_1, at config/s390/s390.c:8231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88083 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug target/88082] ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88082 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug target/88083] New: ICE in find_constant_pool_ref_1, at config/s390/s390.c:8231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88083 Bug ID: 88083 Summary: ICE in find_constant_pool_ref_1, at config/s390/s390.c:8231 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/88082] New: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88082 Bug ID: 88082 Summary: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug lto/88081] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto/lto-symtab.c:109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88081 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-11-19 Known to work|

[Bug lto/88081] New: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto/lto-symtab.c:109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88081 Bug ID: 88081 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in lto_varpool_replace_node, at lto/lto-symtab.c:109 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug lto/41528] LTO needs better internal and user documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41528 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/87928] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in ix86_compute_frame_layout, at config/i386/i386.c:11161 since r228607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87928 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Santos --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9) > Fixed everywhere. Thank you Uros, great work! It's an easy mistake to assume that you're "on one system/ABI or another" and forget about function-level

[Bug tree-optimization/88074] g++ hangs on math expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/40498] no_instrument_function attribute not documented to prevent -pg instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40498 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/40498] no_instrument_function attribute not documented to prevent -pg instrumentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40498 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Mon Nov 19 01:04:04 2018 New Revision: 266260 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266260=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-18 Sandra Loosemore PR other/40498 gcc/

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening f2008 constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to harper from comment #5) > The error I found is not just violating a constraint in f2008 or above. > The same constraint with different wording is in f2003, f95 and f90. > If you want to allow

[Bug fortran/88080] New: Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88080 Bug ID: 88080 Summary: Add warning if IMPLICIT NONE is missing Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/88079] New: warn about procedure arguments without INTENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88079 Bug ID: 88079 Summary: warn about procedure arguments without INTENT Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/87836] ICE in cc1 for gcc-6.5.0 with SPARC hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening f2008 constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to harper from comment #5) > The error I found is not just violating a constraint in f2008 or above. > The same constraint with different wording is in f2003, f95 and f90. > If you want

[Bug target/87928] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in ix86_compute_frame_layout, at config/i386/i386.c:11161 since r228607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87928 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87928] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in ix86_compute_frame_layout, at config/i386/i386.c:11161 since r228607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87928 --- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Nov 18 21:36:30 2018 New Revision: 266254 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266254=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-11-11 Uros Bizjak

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening f2008 constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 --- Comment #5 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz --- The error I found is not just violating a constraint in f2008 or above. The same constraint with different wording is in f2003, f95 and f90. If you want to allow any constraint violations I

[Bug other/38801] libgcc exception handling routines need documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38801 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/87928] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in ix86_compute_frame_layout, at config/i386/i386.c:11161 since r228607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87928 --- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Nov 18 20:41:32 2018 New Revision: 266253 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266253=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-11-11 Uros Bizjak

[Bug c++/88078] New: error: '__float128' was not declared in this scope on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88078 Bug ID: 88078 Summary: error: '__float128' was not declared in this scope on PowerPC Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/87836] ICE in cc1 for gcc-6.5.0 with SPARC hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836 --- Comment #12 from Gary Mills --- Just in case it was the C++ compiler that was mis-compiling the intermediate gcc compiler, I did a build with both CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS set to '-g -O0'. Again, I got the same ICE. With that, I suppose we can

[Bug fortran/87881] gfortran.dg/inquiry_type_ref_(1.f08|3.f90) fail on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87881 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Hi Paul, > I am getting nowhere with this. ... Did you try to run gfortran under valgrind? I think there is a latent bug in gfortran that triggers the ==82437==ERROR: AddressSanitizer:

[Bug lto/88077] [8/9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘declaration’ (var_decl) in lto_symtab_merge, at lto/lto-symtab.c:378 since r256989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88077 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/88077] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘declaration’ (var_decl) in lto_symtab_merge, at lto/lto-symtab.c:378 since r256989

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88077 Bug ID: 88077 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘declaration’ (var_decl) in lto_symtab_merge, at lto/lto-symtab.c:378 since

[Bug fortran/87994] ICE in match_data_constant, at fortran/decl.c:399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87994 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I have instrumented gfortran with the patch in comment 5 and all the tests fail as with pr87881: = ==67715==ERROR: AddressSanitizer:

[Bug c++/87229] [8/9 Regression] ICE: tree code 'call_expr' is not supported in LTO streams

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87229 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/88076] Shared Memory implementation for Coarrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076 --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas --- > I have opened this bug to track the progress and provide a forum for > discussion :) Nicolas, Once you are done on this, you might consider implementing a -parallel as in ifort. This could conveniently

[Bug libstdc++/83566] cyl_bessel_j returns wrong result for x>1000 for high orders.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83566 --- Comment #3 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: emsr Date: Sun Nov 18 18:32:26 2018 New Revision: 266252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266252=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-16 Michele Pezzutti Edward Smith-Rowland

[Bug fortran/88073] [7/8 Regression] Internal compiler error compiling WHERE construct with -O or -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88073 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4 Summary|Internal

[Bug target/88070] [8/9 Regression] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:438

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88070 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88073] Internal compiler error compiling WHERE construct with -O or -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88073 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Nov 18 17:40:23 2018 New Revision: 266251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266251=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-18 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/88073 * frontend-passes.c

[Bug fortran/88076] Shared Memory implementation for Coarrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076 Nicolas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88076] New: Shared Memory implementation for Coarrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88076 Bug ID: 88076 Summary: Shared Memory implementation for Coarrays Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/86806] SPARC port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86806 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Summary|sparc port needs

[Bug target/86806] sparc port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86806 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/87807] passing float/double vectors as variadic args fails on-64bit SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87807 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/87807] passing float/double vectors as variadic args fails on-64bit SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87807 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|sparc-sun-solaris2.*|sparc64-*-*

[Bug c++/88075] New: [feature-request] allow "concept" instead of "concept bool" with -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88075 Bug ID: 88075 Summary: [feature-request] allow "concept" instead of "concept bool" with -fconcepts Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug driver/83243] -fuse-ld=lld

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83243 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88073] Internal compiler error compiling WHERE construct with -O or -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88073 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/87807] Passing float, double vectors as variadic args fails on sparcv9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87807 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug preprocessor/37549] gcc -E -dD prints predefined macros, contrary to docs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37549 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/36062] -mpc32,-mpc64, and -mpc80 are not documented properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36062 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/87771] My first 3d printer, and I messed up trying to update the .ini file. So, I'm trying to put the original software back in it, and I get this internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87771 --- Comment #10 from Donna Ory --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Please provide a testcase - usually preprocessed source, commandline-options > with -v appended. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html > > Note that GCC 5 and 6 are

[Bug other/87695] Fehler beim Kompilieren für das Board Arduino/Genuino Mega or Mega 2560.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87695 --- Comment #3 from Donna Ory --- Sooo...what does that mean? Do I still have a 3D printer that won't print because the problem lies with the so called original program that I'm just trying to put back in it?

[Bug fortran/87969] -fcheck does not raise signal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87969 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug fortran/87233] Constraint C1279 still followed after f2008 standard revision (?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/70260] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70260 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70260] ICE: gimplification failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70260 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Nov 18 09:16:19 2018 New Revision: 266248 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266248=gcc=rev Log: 2018-11-18 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/70260 * expr.c