https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88253
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr |avr-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88493
Bug ID: 88493
Summary: Inconsistent error messages for unknown types
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88311
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88491
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88491
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Dec 14 09:43:41 2018
New Revision: 267127
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267127=gcc=rev
Log:
[testsuite] Remove bashism from libbacktrace/allocfail.sh
Test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87871
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88013
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88462
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw ---
>> Trying to load 32 bits from a non-4 byte aligned pointer is a no-no on a
>> strict-alignment target like sparc...
>
> I saw that on HPPA as well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88492
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496
--- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Please feel free to close this one; I might open another PR if I trigger this
ICE again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88224
--- Comment #3 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: avieira
Date: Fri Dec 14 09:04:24 2018
New Revision: 267124
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267124=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/88224: Fix FPU configuration of Cortex-R7 and Cortex-R8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88311
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Dec 14 09:03:50 2018
New Revision: 267123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267123=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR88311, mlongcall indirections are optimised away
Masking CALL_LONG from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88481
Heinrich Seebauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88454
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65496
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
#c0 got fixed or made latent with r235905.
The #c4 testcase went latent with r249450 (though no idea why it hasn't been
filed separately).
In any case, not sure if it is worth keeping this open when it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88280
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed. g and h end up like this before RTL expansion (initial folding
> produces this):
>
> j_6 = i_4(D) & a_5(D);
> _1 = i_4(D) != 0;
> _2 = j_6 !=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Dec 14 08:29:34 2018
New Revision: 267122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267122=gcc=rev
Log:
match_asm_constraints: Use copy_rtx where needed (PR88001)
The new insn here
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
