https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89981
Bug ID: 89981
Summary: [8/9 Regression] gfortran -pedantic rejects code in
8.3.1 that is accepted with 8.3.0
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89980
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89980
Bug ID: 89980
Summary: [9 Regression] bootstrap failed
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89948
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89966
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89948
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 5 02:52:23 2019
New Revision: 270161
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270161=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/89948 - ICE with break in statement-expr.
* constexpr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86932
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 5 02:50:52 2019
New Revision: 270160
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270160=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/89966 - error with non-type auto tparm.
My patch for PR 86932 broke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89966
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 5 02:50:52 2019
New Revision: 270160
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270160=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/89966 - error with non-type auto tparm.
My patch for PR 86932 broke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86986
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Apr 5 02:50:18 2019
New Revision: 270159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270159=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/86986 - ICE with TTP with parameter pack.
Three separate issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89914
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79842
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
Any progress on this one? To me it sounds like it were quite easy to fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84382
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89924
--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> The reason why we do not devirtualize is that only information about Aint is
> the type of function parameter
"Only"? :-)
> and we do not believe it implies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71487
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-06-26 00:00:00 |2019-4-4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89974
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89878
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47488
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89833
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89974
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Apr 4 23:10:23 2019
New Revision: 270155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270155=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/89974 - ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struct
object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47488
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Apr 4 23:10:23 2019
New Revision: 270155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270155=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/89974 - ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struct
object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89833
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Apr 4 23:10:23 2019
New Revision: 270155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270155=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/89974 - ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struct
object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89878
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Apr 4 23:10:23 2019
New Revision: 270155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270155=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/89974 - ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a struct
object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89974
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Apr 4 22:38:10 2019
New Revision: 270154
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270154=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/89957 - ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a known
range
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89911
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89911
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Apr 4 22:38:10 2019
New Revision: 270154
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270154=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/89957 - ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a known
range
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Apr 4 22:16:11 2019
New Revision: 270153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270153=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from 9.0.
PR middle-end/89934 - ICE on a call with fewer arguments to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55585
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9 Regression] ICE on a |[8 Regression] ICE on a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Apr 4 21:59:49 2019
New Revision: 270152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270152=gcc=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/89934 - ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declared
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89979
--- Comment #1 from Christoph Conrads ---
There is no attachment with the preprocessed code demonstrating the problem
because the this code is 1.2 MB large.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89979
Bug ID: 89979
Summary: subtract_with_carry_engine incorrect carry flag
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89582
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #10 from Nikolay Bogoychev ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> > Ok, let me first focus on the functional part of the patch.
> > If I'm correct feature_list in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84382
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from janus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41650
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89399
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE: RTL |[7/8 Regression] ICE: RTL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89399
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Apr 4 20:52:16 2019
New Revision: 270151
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270151=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89399
* ree.c (combine_set_extension): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904
--- Comment #21 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #20)
> Patch here:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-04/msg3.html
Patch applied to trunk so far.
Unfortunately, I had the wrong PR in the ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89978
Bug ID: 89978
Summary: Extraneous template keyword not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89004
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: anlauf
Date: Thu Apr 4 20:38:33 2019
New Revision: 270150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270150=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-04-04 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/89004
* check.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89967
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87366
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89877
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89905
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> Ok, let me first focus on the functional part of the patch.
> If I'm correct feature_list in get_builtin_code_for_version function should
> be basically aligned with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|89936 |
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89964
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
I suggested splitting the bugzillas into 2 in bug 29304 comment 4 but Andrew
seemed to think it was ok to keep them together
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89968
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
One problem is the order of the attributes applying here. vector_size applies
after all the others as that is the order in the program.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89966
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89964
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89937
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89948
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89977
Bug ID: 89977
Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow with an out-of-bounds
int128_t range
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89975
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The param is there to limit compile time after all.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89955
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #39 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Erik Schnetter from comment #38)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #36)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #35)
> > > The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89970
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89970
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Hits assert in i386.c, dispatch_function_versions:
/* At least one more version other than the default. */
num_versions = fndecls->length ();
gcc_assert (num_versions >= 2);
But... this just asserts
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89528
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 46089
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46089=edit
candidate patch
Here's what I'm testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89976
Bug ID: 89976
Summary: missing uninitialized warning: laundering via passing
object through a function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89975
Bug ID: 89975
Summary: Compile-time hog w/ large values of --param
uninlined-function-insns
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89923
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer ---
But the precedent with wchar_t is that the type of the format string determines
the type of the %s arguments. I'm not sure if that's a good precedent, but
it's what we have today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89923
--- Comment #2 from Tom Honermann ---
I think my preferred fix to this is to introduce new length modifiers for the
"%s" conversion specifier for all of char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89974
Bug ID: 89974
Summary: ICE on a definition of a non-type specialization on a
struct object with pointer to member function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89973
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #38 from Erik Schnetter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #36)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #35)
> > The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c. So yes, all
> > the files mentioned before have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #37 from Erik Schnetter ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #35)
> The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c. So yes, all
> the files mentioned before have to be modified, asan_mac.cc,
> sanitizer_mac.cc,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55591
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Testing the updated patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/options.c 2019-03-11 15:11:11.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/options.c 2019-04-04 18:55:50.0 +0200
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #36 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #35)
> The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c. So yes, all
> the files mentioned before have to be modified, asan_mac.cc,
> sanitizer_mac.cc,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87919
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
What is the status of this PR? Is it FIXED or not?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89973
Bug ID: 89973
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in
check_address_or_pointer_of_packed_member, at
c-family/c-warn.c:2769
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #35 from Jürgen Reuter ---
The latest fix doesn't work. It fails at the darwin-driver.c. So yes, all the
files mentioned before have to be modified, asan_mac.cc, sanitizer_mac.cc,
sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc, darwin-driver.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89844
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This PR seems also fixed by revision r270037.
Is a new test needed? If yes, would it help if I do the packaging?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89972
Bug ID: 89972
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4229
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89969
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89937
--- Comment #6 from Walt Karas ---
Yes, very sorry, I didn't realize inline was so different in C, and I also
didn't read the generated machine code carefully enough. It does seem
extremely surprising that, for C, the body of an inline function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89971
Bug ID: 89971
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE: unspellable token PADDING
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89970
Bug ID: 89970
Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in dispatch_function_versions, at
config/i386/i386.c:32347
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84382
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89893
--- Comment #21 from 康 珊 ---
All of the experiments were did in according to the build steps I just gave to
you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 65619, which changed state.
Bug 65619 Summary: friend declaration with template template parameter not
recognized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65619
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Apr 4 15:49:30 2019
New Revision: 270146
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270146=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-04-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/65619
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89961
--- Comment #3 from Cristian Morales Vega ---
I have just took a look inside one of the intermediate format .gcov files and
didn't see any "current_working_directory". There is a full path "file"
variable though.
Not sure if that's what you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89528
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89530
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
We'd need to add VTA notes to addressable objects, that currently only get
older var-tracking treatment. It's usually enough, because, being addressable,
they can't really change locations, and, because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89969
Bug ID: 89969
Summary: [OPENACC] private clause does not work with fortran
automatic array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 61327, which changed state.
Bug 61327 Summary: Problem with friend template object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61327
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61327
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61327
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Apr 4 15:38:05 2019
New Revision: 270145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270145=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-04-04 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/61327
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #34 from Erik Schnetter ---
Here is an updated version of the patch that fixincludes both
and , and does not need to touch any
sources files in GCC any more:
Index: fixincludes/inclhack.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89529
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Yeah, consumer issue, GDB can't deal with location views yet, so it can't tell
apart the views just before the return from that at the return proper. It's
actually a textbook situation of the kind that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89968
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI, diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89968
Bug ID: 89968
Summary: attribute packed fails to reduce char vector member
alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89961
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Note that the intermediate format provides 'current_working_directory' value
that should be easily used to distinguish among same files in different
folders?
Does it work for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864
--- Comment #33 from Erik Schnetter ---
Here is an updated version of the patch that fixincludes both
and , and does not need to touch any sources
files in GCC any more:
Index: fixincludes/inclhack.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56643
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
