[Bug c/90296] New: C11 anonymous struct not liked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90296 Bug ID: 90296 Summary: C11 anonymous struct not liked Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/61761] [C++11] std::proj returns incorrect values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/61761] [C++11] std::proj returns incorrect values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed May 1 00:08:36 2019 New Revision: 270759 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270759=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/61761 fix std::proj for targets without C99 cproj The current

[Bug target/71390] PowerPC GCC should warn if use does -mcpu=, and an old assembler was used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71390 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/90281] utf-8 encoded std::filesystem::path can not be converted to utf-16.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90281 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/90295] Please define ~exception_ptr inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90295 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/90295] Please define ~exception_ptr inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90295 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/47618] Collecting multiple profiles and using all for PGO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47618 --- Comment #25 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #24) > > > How about the patch for the above 2? has it been committed? > > It has been there for a while, please take a look at: > > $ gcov-tool merge

[Bug target/90193] [8 Regression] asm goto with TLS "m" input operand generates incorrect assembler in O1 and O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:11:06 2019 New Revision: 270757 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270757=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-24 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug target/90187] [8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90187 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:09:20 2019 New Revision: 270756 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270756=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-24 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/90208] [7/8 Regression] error: EH landing pad label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90208 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:08:27 2019 New Revision: 270755 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270755=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-24 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/90108] ICE: Segmentation fault (in c_tree_chain_next)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90108 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:07:37 2019 New Revision: 270754 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270754=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-19 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/90082] [9 Regression] ICE in delete_unmarked_insns, at dce.c:653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90082 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:06:33 2019 New Revision: 270753 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270753=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-16 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/90090] [7/8 Regression] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3938 since r219202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90090 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:05:39 2019 New Revision: 270752 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270752=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-16 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c/89933] [7/8 Regression] ICE in merge_decls, at c/c-decl.c:2517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89933 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:05:00 2019 New Revision: 270751 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270751=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-12 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/89965] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=nano-x2 -fcaller-saves -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:03:56 2019 New Revision: 270750 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270750=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-12 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c/89946] [8 Regression] ICE in assemble_start_function, at varasm.c:1871

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89946 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:03:11 2019 New Revision: 270749 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270749=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-12 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/90026] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: missing barrier after block 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90026 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:02:08 2019 New Revision: 270748 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270748=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-12 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/89965] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=nano-x2 -fcaller-saves -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:01:23 2019 New Revision: 270747 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270747=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-11 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/90010] [8 Regression] valgrind error with snprintf and -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90010 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 21:00:42 2019 New Revision: 270746 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270746=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-10 Jakub Jelinek PR c++/90010 *

[Bug middle-end/89998] [7/8 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed in printf-return-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89998 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:58:00 2019 New Revision: 270745 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270745=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-04-09 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug sanitizer/89869] -fsanitize=undefined miscompilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89869 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:56:40 2019 New Revision: 270744 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270744=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-29 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c/89872] [7/8 Regression] GCC does not generate read access to volatile compound literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89872 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:55:58 2019 New Revision: 270743 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270743=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-29 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/89621] [7/8 Regression] ICE with allocatable character and openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89621 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:55:14 2019 New Revision: 270742 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270742=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-28 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/89796] Incorrect warning generated with OpenMP atomic capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:54:16 2019 New Revision: 270741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270741=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-26 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/60702] thread_local initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60702 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:53:29 2019 New Revision: 270740 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270740=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-25 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/60702] thread_local initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60702 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:52:54 2019 New Revision: 270739 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270739=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-22 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/89767] [8 Regression] ICE with tuple and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89767 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:51:42 2019 New Revision: 270738 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270738=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-21 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug target/89752] [8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89752 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:50:48 2019 New Revision: 270737 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270737=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-20 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/89768] [7/8 Regression] ICE in compare_and_jump_seq at loop-unroll.c:838

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89768 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:50:18 2019 New Revision: 270736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270736=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-19 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug target/89752] [8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89752 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:49:38 2019 New Revision: 270735 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270735=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-19 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug target/89726] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect inlined version of 'ceil' for 32bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89726 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:47:52 2019 New Revision: 270734 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270734=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-19 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c/89734] [7/8 Regression] const qualifier on return type not erased inside __typeof__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89734 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:46:59 2019 New Revision: 270733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270733=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-19 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug debug/89704] [7/8 Regression] ICE in add_const_value_attribute, at dwarf2out.c:19685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89704 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:46:09 2019 New Revision: 270732 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270732=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-15 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug ipa/89684] [8 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt, at gimple-iterator.c:613

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89684 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:45:28 2019 New Revision: 270731 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270731=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-14 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/89679] [7/8 Regression] wrong code with -Og -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89679 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:44:48 2019 New Revision: 270730 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270730=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-14 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/89703] [8 Regression] ICE in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:997

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89703 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:43:58 2019 New Revision: 270729 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270729=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-14 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/89512] [7/8 Regression] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:882

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89512 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:43:07 2019 New Revision: 270728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270728=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-14 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug debug/89498] [8 Regression] ICE in AT_loc_list, at dwarf2out.c:4871

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89498 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:42:20 2019 New Revision: 270727 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270727=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-13 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/88588] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1329

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88588 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:41:49 2019 New Revision: 270726 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270726=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-13 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/89663] [7/8 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_int_roundingfn_2, at builtins.c:2831

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89663 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:41:09 2019 New Revision: 270725 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270725=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-12 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug fortran/89651] OpenMP private array uninitialized warning with -O flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89651 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:40:17 2019 New Revision: 270724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270724=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-11 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c/88568] [7/8 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:39:17 2019 New Revision: 270723 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270723=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-09 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/82075] structured binding fails with empty base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82075 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:38:32 2019 New Revision: 270722 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270722=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-08 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/87148] [7/8 Regression] backward compatibility issue to take char [] as incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87148 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:38:01 2019 New Revision: 270721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270721=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-06 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug target/89587] gcc's rs6000 configuration unconditionally sets MULTIARCH_DIRNAME, even when multiarch is disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89587 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:37:12 2019 New Revision: 270720 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270720=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-05 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/89590] [7/8 Regression] ICE in maybe_emit_free_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89590 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:36:17 2019 New Revision: 270719 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270719=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-03-05 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c/89521] ICE in expand_builtin_int_roundingfn, at builtins.c:2697

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89521 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:34:49 2019 New Revision: 270718 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270718=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-28 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c/89520] [7/8 Regression] ICE tree check: accessed operand 4 of call_expr with 3 operands in convert_to_integer_1, at convert.c:668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89520 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:33:24 2019 New Revision: 270717 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270717=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-28 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/89403] [7/8 Regression] ICE in maybe_clone_body, at cp/optimize.c:693

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89403 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:32:14 2019 New Revision: 270716 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270716=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/89405] [8 Regression] ICE in import_export_decl, at cp/decl2.c:2959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89405 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:31:26 2019 New Revision: 270715 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270715=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/89412] [7/8 Regression] gcc ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6273 on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89412 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:30:27 2019 New Revision: 270714 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270714=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/89091] ICE: Segmentation fault (in tree_class_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:29:44 2019 New Revision: 270713 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270713=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/88074] [7/8 Regression] g++ hangs on math expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88074 --- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:28:56 2019 New Revision: 270712 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270712=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug middle-end/89415] [9 Regression] gcc.dg/sinatan-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89415 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 20:28:56 2019 New Revision: 270712 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270712=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/90291] [8/9/10 Regression] Inline namespace erroneously extends another namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90291 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- Igor, was this distilled from real code? what was the intent of such an organization?

[Bug fortran/90294] Compare with NaN failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 --- Comment #8 from Fred Krogh --- My apologies for posting this. In my original code the program just quit at the point of the test. I thought I had more or less reproduced this in a small program. Clearly that is not the case. My code has

[Bug web/90127] Disable bugzilla [[wiki_links]] and don't confuse r12 register names with r12345 svn revisions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90127 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90294] Compare with NaN failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:17:38AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > BTW, one is suppose to be able to control this behavior in the > code itself. > > stop, .false. > stop, quiet=.false. > > should inhibit the

[Bug fortran/90294] Compare with NaN failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:15:38AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 05:54:33PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 > > > >

[Bug fortran/90294] Compare with NaN failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 05:54:33PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 > > Dominique d'Humieres changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug fortran/90294] Compare with NaN failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/90290] -std=f2008 should reject non-constant stop and error stop codes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90290 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P5 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/90294] Compare with NaN failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 05:28:18PM +, siteg at mathalacarte dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 > > --- Comment #2 from Fred Krogh --- > Created attachment 46268 > -->

[Bug web/89770] move java-related mailing lists on lists.html to the "Historical lists" section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89770 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Fixed. So it is. Thanks!

[Bug fortran/90294] Compare with NaN failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 --- Comment #2 from Fred Krogh --- Created attachment 46268 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46268=edit gfortran -g -o testi testi.f90 gives the error below Look at r > 0 NaN Note: The following

[Bug libstdc++/90295] New: Please define ~exception_ptr inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90295 Bug ID: 90295 Summary: Please define ~exception_ptr inline Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug fortran/90294] Compare with NaN failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/90294] New: Compare with NaN failing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90294 Bug ID: 90294 Summary: Compare with NaN failing Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/90291] [8/9/10 Regression] Inline namespace erroneously extends another namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90291 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #4 from Nathan

[Bug tree-optimization/90292] GCC Fails to hoist loop invariant in nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90292 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov --- When changing iterators to 'int', you also need to change n to int as well, otherwise in 'n*(i) + (j)', i and j are promoted to unsigned anyway.

[Bug fortran/90290] -std=f2008 should reject non-constant stop and error stop codes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90290 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich --- The road to standards non-compliance hell is paved with very minor offenses... ;-)

[Bug tree-optimization/90292] GCC Fails to hoist loop invariant in nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90292 --- Comment #2 from Giuliano Belinassi --- Just for the sake of completeness, this issue is not addressed by just changing the iterators to 'int'. However, it is in fact solved by changing the iterators to 'unsigned long', 'long', or doing a

[Bug target/89093] [9 Regression] C++ exception handling clobbers d8 VFP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093 --- Comment #87 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 30 16:30:44 2019 New Revision: 270705 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270705=gcc=rev Log: PR target/89093 * gcc.target/aarch64/return_address_sign_3.c:

[Bug target/89093] [9 Regression] C++ exception handling clobbers d8 VFP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093 --- Comment #86 from Tamar Christina --- for aarch64-none-linux-gnu. I am still building the toolchain to take a look so not able to give more detail.

[Bug target/89093] [9 Regression] C++ exception handling clobbers d8 VFP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/82636] powerpc: Unnecessary copy of __ieee128 parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82636 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/90293] New function attribute: expect_return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90293 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libstdc++/61761] [C++11] std::proj returns incorrect values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jan van Dijk from comment #5) > Does the usage of numeric_limits<_Tp> in complex work well for user-defined > _Tp? We can assume it does. > For complex, at present MyType can be required to

[Bug libstdc++/61761] [C++11] std::proj returns incorrect values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761 --- Comment #5 from Jan van Dijk --- Does the usage of numeric_limits<_Tp> in complex work well for user-defined _Tp? For complex, at present MyType can be required to be constructible from INFINITY to make proj work. Wouldn't using

[Bug debug/90273] [9/10 Regression] GCC runs out of memory building Firefox

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90273 --- Comment #28 from Jan Hubicka --- > The recent regression is we no longer throw them away plentiful during CFG > cleanup and now they pile up during inlining. > > I agree full DCE with liveness will be expensive for usually little gain. Not

[Bug c/90293] New function attribute: expect_return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90293 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski --- One more case: sometimes it may be more handy to specify what will *not* be usually returned, e.g. special invalid value. For such cases another attribute would be needed:

[Bug c/90293] New: New function attribute: expect_return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90293 Bug ID: 90293 Summary: New function attribute: expect_return Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/87163] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87163 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- This doesn't fail for me using a native build. Martin, can you recheck to see if this is now fixed? There have been some changes in this area and I do see that pattern in my dump file with no ICE: (insn 6

[Bug c++/90291] [8/9/10 Regression] Inline namespace erroneously extends another namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90291 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- I think I'm going to have to consult core ...

[Bug libstdc++/61761] [C++11] std::proj returns incorrect values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think your patch as as good as anything else we'll come up with, apart from using numeric_limits::infinity() instead of INFINITY. Anybody who wants to use std::proj with types other than float, double

[Bug debug/90273] [9/10 Regression] GCC runs out of memory building Firefox

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90273 --- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On April 30, 2019 4:27:25 PM GMT+02:00, "aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90273 > >--- Comment #26 from Alexandre Oliva --- >I saw the #c11 patch

[Bug c/90289] an unnecessary relocation record

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90289 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90292] GCC Fails to hoist loop invariant in nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90292 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/90292] New: GCC Fails to hoist loop invariant in nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90292 Bug ID: 90292 Summary: GCC Fails to hoist loop invariant in nested loops Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/86538] GCC should define a macro to specify if LSE is enabled or not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538 --- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Author: ramana Date: Tue Apr 30 14:57:50 2019 New Revision: 270702 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270702=gcc=rev Log: [Patch AArch64] Add __ARM_FEATURE_ATOMICS This keeps coming up

[Bug libstdc++/61761] [C++11] std::proj returns incorrect values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/61761] [C++11] std::proj returns incorrect values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jan van Dijk from comment #2) > Is it not perfectly fine that your patch works only for _Tp equal to float, > double or long double? Anything else is unspecified per 24.5(2). Does > libstdc++

[Bug debug/90273] [9/10 Regression] GCC runs out of memory building Firefox

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90273 --- Comment #26 from Alexandre Oliva --- I saw the #c11 patch in gcc-patches, and it seemed to have been posted FTR and installed. It looked good, so I didn't comment on it. I agree about the effects of #c16, though I begin to get a feeling

[Bug debug/90279] DW_AT_location missing for struct-based Variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90279 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/90283] 519.lbm_r is 7%-10% slower with -Ofast -march=native and both LTO and PGO than with GCC 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90283 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > The perf comes from an Intel Skylake server machine. > > The number of fma is very similar: > grep fma bad.report.txt | wc -l > 126 > grep fma

[Bug libstdc++/61761] [C++11] std::proj returns incorrect values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61761 Jan van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j.v.dijk at tue dot nl --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/90284] -Wunused-value points to the wrong expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90284 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/90288] -g{no,}as-locview-support missing the leading dash in the documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90288 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/90288] -g{no,}as-locview-support missing the leading dash in the documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90288 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Apr 30 13:31:22 2019 New Revision: 270692 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270692=gcc=rev Log: Add missing dash for 2 options in documentation (PR debug/90288). 2019-04-30

  1   2   >