https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90422
Bug ID: 90422
Summary: DW_AT_main_subprogram not added to CU DIE
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90419
--- Comment #3 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #2)
> I talked to Palmer. Apparently what you want to do is build multilibs for
> lp64 and lp64d, to test the linux multilib support. That isn't currently
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90326
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 10 07:39:46 2019
New Revision: 271055
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271055=gcc=rev
Log:
PR pch/90326
cp/
* config-lang.in (gtfiles): Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90387
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 10 May 2019, JunMa at linux dot alibaba.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90387
>
> JunMa changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90380
--- Comment #24 from Melven.Roehrig-Zoellner at DLR dot de ---
Created attachment 46335
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46335=edit
Testcase: Fortran coverage .gcda and .gcno files
Hi Martin
here is coverage test data for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90421
Bug ID: 90421
Summary: Invalid memory write in allocate on assignment to a
class(*) variable
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87847
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> Or maybe just
>
> @@ -1879,6 +1888,9 @@ iterative_hash_template_arg (tree arg, hashval_t val)
> return val;
>}
>
> +case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90420
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
> Line #5 is marked as not executed. I understand that this function might be
> optimized as an inline function. However, since Line #7 and Line #8 is
> marked as executed and Line #5 is marked as not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90420
--- Comment #6 from Yibiao Yang ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > $ gcc -O3 -g --coverage small.c; ./a.out; gcov small.c; cat small.c.gcov
> > File 'small.c'
> > Lines executed:78.57% of 14
> > Creating 'small.c.gcov'
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90420
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90340
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri May 10 06:32:31 2019
New Revision: 271053
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271053=gcc=rev
Log:
Add params for jump-table expansion params (PR middle-end/90340).
2019-05-10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90420
--- Comment #4 from Yibiao Yang ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> > >
> > Sorry. It should be Line #23
>
> Which is fine in what I see.
I was wondering this line should executed only once as it is not nested in a
loop. ;-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90420
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
> >
> Sorry. It should be Line #23
Which is fine in what I see.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90420
--- Comment #2 from Yibiao Yang ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > $ gcc -O3 -g --coverage small.c; ./a.out; gcov small.c; cat small.c.gcov
> > File 'small.c'
> > Lines executed:78.57% of 14
> > Creating 'small.c.gcov'
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90420
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90380
--- Comment #23 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Melven.Roehrig-Zoellner from comment #21)
> Hi,
>
> for me the patch seems to solve the problem only for some of the Fortran
> files.
>
> I applied the patch in my GCC 9.1.0 build and I still
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
