[Bug c++/90790] Using override on a private overridden destructor shall produce an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90790 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/90792] incorrect mangling for beginning with an

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90792 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Related to the upstream ABI issue: https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/38 related to PR 88413 and PR 89818 .

[Bug middle-end/90794] -O3 with "VLA type" in C++ leads to an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90794 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug inline-asm/90793] adding -fPIC leads to compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90793 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++

[Bug c++/90794] New: adding -O3 leads to crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90794 Bug ID: 90794 Summary: adding -O3 leads to crash Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/90793] New: adding -fPIC leads to compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90793 Bug ID: 90793 Summary: adding -fPIC leads to compilation error Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/41647] Early Loop Unrolling control

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41647 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grosser at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/90792] incorrect mangling for beginning with an

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90792 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There is a dup of this bug already and there is also a defect filed with the abi about this case too.

[Bug c++/90792] New: incorrect mangling for beginning with an

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90792 Bug ID: 90792 Summary: incorrect mangling for beginning with an Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug inline-asm/90791] optimization accepts invalid inline-asm (more operands than is specified) due to dead code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90791 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |inline-asm Summary|-Os

[Bug c++/90791] New: -Os accepts wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90791 Bug ID: 90791 Summary: -Os accepts wrong code Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/90790] New: Using override on a private overridden destructor shall produce an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90790 Bug ID: 90790 Summary: Using override on a private overridden destructor shall produce an error Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/79308] ICE on specialization of nested template classes (in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2963)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79308 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/78645] [7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid code (Segmentation fault, cxx_eval_call_expression)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78645 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69309] Implement CWG 1780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69309 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69060] Invalid 'cannot bind lvalue to rvalue' error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69060 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67533] internal compiler error: in build_call_a, at cp/call.c:372

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/67533] internal compiler error: in build_call_a, at cp/call.c:372

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67533 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/90770] Building with --enable-libstdcxx-debug and make profiledbootstrap fails with mv: cannot stat 'Makefile': No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90770 --- Comment #5 from Tadeus Prastowo --- Created attachment 46466 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46466=edit Complete terminal output during the non-parallel build after applying the patchset I confirm that your patchset

[Bug c++/66999] Missing comma in lambda capture causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66999 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/66999] Missing comma in lambda capture causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66999 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |diagnostic --- Comment #3 from Marek

[Bug c++/90789] gcc complains cannot capture 'f()()' by reference on valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90789 zhonghao at pku dot org.cn changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcc |gcc complains cannot

[Bug c++/90789] New: gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90789 Bug ID: 90789 Summary: gcc Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug c++/66256] noexcept evaluation done before end of class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/90788] ICE on allocating derived type containing class(*) pointer initialized to null()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90788 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/90788] New: ICE on allocating derived type containing class(*) pointer initialized to null()

ead model: posix gcc version 10.0.0 20190608 (experimental) (GCC) The ICE only occurs if there are two subroutines each with an "allocate(a)" statement - one such subroutine on its own does not trigger the ICE. The ICE also goes away if the class(*) pointer is not initialized to null().

[Bug libstdc++/90787] New: filesystem tests fail if file permissions are not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90787 Bug ID: 90787 Summary: filesystem tests fail if file permissions are not supported Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/62041] vector fneg codegen uses a subtract instead of an xor (x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62041 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization --- Comment #5 from

[Bug c++/66268] struct { volatile int x; } should not be trivially copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66268 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/66519] [C++14] ICE when using decltype to detect callable return type during SFINAE

#3 from Marek Polacek --- Still ICEs with gcc version 10.0.0 20190608 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/66564] ICE on explicit instantiation of nested template class

#3 from Marek Polacek --- Still ICEs with gcc version 10.0.0 20190608 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/65707] internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:18577

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65707 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Still ICEs with gcc version 10.0.0 20190608 (experimental) (GCC) $ xg++ -c 65707.C 65707.C:16:17: internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:22784 16 | template struct f

[Bug c++/65175] ICE forming a typedef with an alias template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/60366] ICE with self-invoking lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60366 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Jun 8 15:52:38 2019 New Revision: 272084 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272084=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-08 Paul Thomas PR fortran/90786 * trans-expr.c

[Bug c++/60615] bad location in error from initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60615 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/54080] [C++11] g++ crashes when compiling the following file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54080 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini --- I should spend again some time on this. I must say, my old idea still makes sense to me, at some point I will probably refresh it, rebase the patch and send it again to the mailing list: I don't think the

[Bug c++/60335] confused by earlier errors, bailing out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60335 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/59085] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59085 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/59131] Compiler segfaults while generating code to save local variables in transactional section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59403] [4.8.2] Segmentation fault in crash_signal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59403 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/59005] Having designated inits in C++ with -std=c++11 does not cause any errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59005 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/58836] [c++11] ICE with wrong usage of initializer list in non-type template argument

||2019-06-08 CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Confirmed with gcc version 10.0.0 20190608 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/57470] Wrong line number in diagnostic message

#1 from Marek Polacek --- Still the same with gcc version 10.0.0 20190608 (experimental) (GCC).

[Bug c++/56926] Crash (without ICE) while compiling Boost.Math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56926 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56723] wrong location in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56723 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56260] [C++11] GCC hangs/crashes on invalid source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56260 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/56189] Infinite recursion with noexcept when instantiating function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56189 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/55580] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault - with variadic template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55580 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/54080] [C++11] g++ crashes when compiling the following file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54080 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/90747] [8/9/10 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90747 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Possibly the same problem as in PR54080.

[Bug c++/90784] A loop inside a constexpr function in a constexpr context is not evaluated at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90784 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/52464] When I compile my source codes with -O3 option, the compiler fails. This does not occur if I use -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52464 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/52269] [C++11] Body of constexpr function templates instantiated too eagerly in unevaluated operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52269 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 8 14:10:42 2019 New Revision: 272083 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272083=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/52269 * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-decltype4.C: New test.

[Bug c++/52269] [C++11] Body of constexpr function templates instantiated too eagerly in unevaluated operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52269 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90608] Inline non-scalar minloc/maxloc calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #4) > LTO'ing libgfortran aside, how much work would it be to teach the scalarizer > to at least elide the temporary arrays in expressions like: > A(:) = minloc(...) ? > I

[Bug c++/52269] [C++11] Body of constexpr function templates instantiated too eagerly in unevaluated operands

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52269 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/90744] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Bogus length for character temporaries passed to external procedures since r268992

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90744 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Jun 8 13:50:42 2019 New Revision: 272082 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272082=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-08 Thomas Koenig Tomáš Trnka PR fortran/90744

[Bug c++/52094] ICE on definition of nested class in wrong namespace scope with wrong nested-name-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52094 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/77548] ICE on invalid C++ code with overloaded functions: in instantiate_type, at cp/class.c:8270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77548 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77548] ICE on invalid C++ code with overloaded functions: in instantiate_type, at cp/class.c:8270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77548 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 8 13:13:48 2019 New Revision: 272079 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272079=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77548 * g++.dg/other/pr77548.C: New test. Added:

[Bug c++/72845] gcc crashes (ICE) when compiling program with complex noexcept declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72845 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72845] gcc crashes (ICE) when compiling program with complex noexcept declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72845 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Sat Jun 8 12:51:07 2019 New Revision: 272078 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272078=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/72845 * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept41.C: New test. Added:

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/62055] missed optimization: recognize fnabs (FP negative absolute value) (x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62055 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- Created attachment 46464 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46464=edit for vectors A naive try to handle it for vectors (because it seems a bit easier), copying the existing pattern for neg

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Compiles here with version 5.5 and 6.5 Confirmed for 6.5 but % gfortran-fsf-5 pr86242.f90 pr86242.f90:29:0: end module test 1 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11 I also get an ICE

[Bug c++/90784] A loop inside a constexpr function in a constexpr context is not evaluated at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90784 --- Comment #2 from ensadc at mailnesia dot com --- But curiously, gcc does replace the loop with the constant if `#undef _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BUILTIN_IS_CONSTANT_EVALUATED` is added before `#include `: https://godbolt.org/z/mVdLVP . (Why) is

[Bug c++/90784] A loop inside a constexpr function in a constexpr context is not evaluated at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90784 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug fortran/90786] [7/8/9/10 Regression] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/90774] avoid doing vector splat arithmetic where possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90774 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Shawn Landden from comment #3) > -fwrapv is completely legal even if it is not passed, and generally I think > this optimization (if applicable) would outweigh some UB optimizations. There was

[Bug fortran/90786] ICE on procedure pointer assignment to function with class pointer result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90786 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90776] g++ -fms-extensions is inconsistent with Microsoft's compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90776 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---