[Bug bootstrap/46981] multilib LD_LIBRARY_PATH prevents configuration of target libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46981 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug other/90827] [Aarch64]rev instruction can't oprate NEON registers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90827 --- Comment #2 from leimaohui --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > >"rev" is an alias of "rev64". > > It is the other way around. rev64 is an optional alias to rev (for > intereger registers). rev only takes integer registers.

[Bug c++/90854] New: Gcc fails to compile a code sample for some parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90854 Bug ID: 90854 Summary: Gcc fails to compile a code sample for some parameters Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

Re: Failed to build llvm 8.0.0 after upgrade gcc to 9.1.0

On 2019年06月12日 10:15, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:13 PM Yu, Mingli wrote: i Expert, I encounter a build error for llvm 8.0.0(git://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git) on ppc after upgrade gcc to 9.1.0 | collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation

[Bug c++/90853] -O3 complains already defined symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90853 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Dup of bug 8040. The conversion from gnats to bugzilla had issues when it > came to closing bugs as invalid. If a bug was closed as fixed and it was done

[Bug c++/90852] A recurring bug: Constant expressions support reinterpret_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90852 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Please read the previous bug reports fully and related messages on the GCC list before creating another related bug report.

[Bug c++/90852] A recurring bug: Constant expressions support reinterpret_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90852 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Failed to build llvm 8.0.0 after upgrade gcc to 9.1.0

Hi Expert, I encounter a build error for llvm 8.0.0(git://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git) on ppc after upgrade gcc to 9.1.0 | collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] The linker used here is powerpc-poky-linux-g++. # powerpc-poky-linux-g++ -v Using

Re: Failed to build llvm 8.0.0 after upgrade gcc to 9.1.0

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:13 PM Yu, Mingli wrote: > > i Expert, > > I encounter a build error for llvm > 8.0.0(git://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git) on ppc after upgrade gcc > to 9.1.0 > | collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] > > The linker used here is

Failed to build llvm 8.0.0 after upgrade gcc to 9.1.0

i Expert, I encounter a build error for llvm 8.0.0(git://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git) on ppc after upgrade gcc to 9.1.0 | collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] The linker used here is powerpc-poky-linux-g++. # powerpc-poky-linux-g++ -v Using built-in

[Bug c++/8040] g++ with -O3 produces duplicate symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8040 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn --- Comment

[Bug c++/90853] -O3 complains already defined symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90853 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug c++/8040] g++ with -O3 produces duplicate symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8040 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug c++/90853] -O3 complains already defined symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90853 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90853] New: -O3 complains already defined symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90853 Bug ID: 90853 Summary: -O3 complains already defined symbol Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/90837] Generate infinite loop when using -ftree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90837 --- Comment #3 from otcmaf --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The access auwMulRRUPeakUsrInfo[0][uwUserCountCell1] can be out of bounds. Thank you very much. Your point of view is correct.

[Bug tree-optimization/90837] Generate infinite loop when using -ftree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90837 otcmaf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xuemaosheng at huawei dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/90852] New: A recurring bug: Constant expressions support reinterpret_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90852 Bug ID: 90852 Summary: A recurring bug: Constant expressions support reinterpret_cast Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/90625] fold strcmp(a, b) == 0 to zero for strings of unequal but non-const lengths

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90625 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- It looks like it might be possible by querying an EVRP instance for the range of strinfo::nonzero_chars. I have a working prototype for snprintf that should be easily extensible to any other similar string

[Bug c++/90851] New: -O3 overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90851 Bug ID: 90851 Summary: -O3 overflow Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned

[Bug c++/90850] New: template parameters do not match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90850 Bug ID: 90850 Summary: template parameters do not match Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/90849] New: Gcc accepts invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90849 Bug ID: 90849 Summary: Gcc accepts invalid code Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug c++/90848] New: A recurring bug: Overeager application of conversion to function pointer during overload resolution of call to function object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90848 Bug ID: 90848 Summary: A recurring bug: Overeager application of conversion to function pointer during overload resolution of call to function object Product: gcc

[Bug c++/90847] New: requested alignment is not an integer constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90847 Bug ID: 90847 Summary: requested alignment is not an integer constant Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/90846] New: Concepts sometimes ignored for friend function templates of class templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90846 Bug ID: 90846 Summary: Concepts sometimes ignored for friend function templates of class templates Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/83431] -Wformat-truncation may incorrectly report truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83431 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor

[Bug c++/90845] New: A recurring hang: braces around scalar initializer - should be a warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90845 Bug ID: 90845 Summary: A recurring hang: braces around scalar initializer - should be a warning Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/90838] Detect table-based ctz implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90838 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com --- Comment #2 from

Re: [Bug target/90513] asm thunks do not work on PowerPC64/VxWorks (kernel mode)

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:25:58PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > We would like to know comments on the below proposed change ? As I said in the PR, this is not a proper patch. Also, like Eric says there, it does not do the right thing for many configurations. Fix the loader, instead? Segher

[Bug target/90513] asm thunks do not work on PowerPC64/VxWorks (kernel mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90513 --- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool --- Also, please post proper patches, to the gcc-patches mailing list, as detailed in , if you want those patches to be approved.

[Bug fortran/90744] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Bogus length for character temporaries passed to external procedures since r268992

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90744 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Jun 11 22:04:10 2019 New Revision: 272173 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272173=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-11 Thomas Koenig Tomáš Trnka Backport from trunk

[Bug libstdc++/90397] Incompatibility with clang-tidy on std::variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90397 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- G++ allowed it because the mismatch was in a system header. If you use -Wsystem-headers then GCC 9.1 gives a warning about it: /xhome/jwakely/gcc/9.1.0/include/c++/9.1.0/variant: In instantiation of

[Bug c/90844] New: Another case of missing use of uninitialized variable warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90844 Bug ID: 90844 Summary: Another case of missing use of uninitialized variable warning Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

Re: [PATCH] fixincludes breaks mingw64 build

On 5/31/19 6:35 AM, Jonas Jelten wrote: > This code snippet of mingw's stdio.h: > > > #ifdef _WIN64 > _CRTIMP FILE *__cdecl __iob_func(void); > #define _iob __iob_func() > #else > [.] > #if (!defined(NO_OLDNAMES) || defined(__GNUC__)) > __MINGW_EXTENSION typedef __int64 fpos_t; >

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- > does the existing availability hack work [below]? It won't: one major problem was the use of __OSX_AVAILABLE and __OSX_AVAILABLE_STARTING

[Bug c++/90810] [8/9/10 Regression] Different intrinsics behavior on G++ 7.4 and G++ 8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90810 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/90843] New: pragma diagnostic doesn't affect warnings controlled by extra_warnings and pedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90843 Bug ID: 90843 Summary: pragma diagnostic doesn't affect warnings controlled by extra_warnings and pedantic Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/90832] [9/10 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression at gcc/cp/constexpr.c:2314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90832 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Wonderfully, this is going to be fixed by my c++/90825 patch.

[Bug c++/88245] Wrong location for "explicitly defaulted here"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88245 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- The inform call already uses DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION but that's bogus: 9288 else if (DECL_DEFAULTED_FN (old_decl)) 9289 { 9290 error ("definition of explicitly-defaulted

[Bug middle-end/77433] warn about usage of object that outside of the scope of the object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77433 Konstantin Kharlamov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Hi-Angel at yandex dot ru ---

[Bug c++/88245] Wrong location for "explicitly defaulted here"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88245 Matthew Beliveau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/90842] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Seems to have started with r239268.

[Bug c++/90842] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/65364] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-19.c (test for warnings, line 22)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65364 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Tue Jun 11 18:22:58 2019 New Revision: 272167 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272167=gcc=rev Log: Darwin, testsuite - Fix PR 65364 (uninit-19.c). This test currently fails on Darwin,

[Bug c++/90842] New: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842 Bug ID: 90842 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/90841] New: ICE in get_atomic_generic_size, at c-family/c-common.c:6904

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90841 Bug ID: 90841 Summary: ICE in get_atomic_generic_size, at c-family/c-common.c:6904 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/90840] New: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6441

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90840 Bug ID: 90840 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6441 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/90397] Incompatibility with clang-tidy on std::variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90397 Evgeniy Dushistov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dushistov at mail dot ru ---

[Bug tree-optimization/90838] Detect table-based ctz implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90838 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/90837] Generate infinite loop when using -ftree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90837 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The access auwMulRRUPeakUsrInfo[0][uwUserCountCell1] can be out of bounds.

[Bug target/90513] asm thunks do not work on PowerPC64/VxWorks (kernel mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90513 --- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou --- > is that ok to commit and we regressed for powerpc and no-regress found . But this will pessimize e.g. VxWorks in RTP mode which works OK, so no.

Re: [Bug target/90513] asm thunks do not work on PowerPC64/VxWorks (kernel mode)

Hi Segher , We would like to know comments on the below proposed change ? Thank you ~Umesh On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:23 PM umesh.kalappa0 at gmail dot com wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90513 > > --- Comment #17 from Umesh Kalappa --- > the following change > >

[Bug target/90513] asm thunks do not work on PowerPC64/VxWorks (kernel mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90513 --- Comment #17 from Umesh Kalappa --- the following change #undef TARGET_ASM_CAN_OUTPUT_MI_THUNK #define TARGET_ASM_CAN_OUTPUT_MI_THUNK rs6000_can_output_mi_thunk /* Return true if rs6000_output_mi_thunk would be able to output the

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 11 16:44:41 2019 New Revision: 272163 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272163=gcc=rev Log: PR target/90811 * config/nvptx/nvptx.c

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 11 16:43:09 2019 New Revision: 272162 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272162=gcc=rev Log: PR target/90811 * config/nvptx/nvptx.c

[Bug testsuite/90806] Warray-bounds-2.c fail on cross-aarch64 on RH6 host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 11 16:40:10 2019 New Revision: 272161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272161=gcc=rev Log: PR target/90811 * config/nvptx/nvptx.c

[Bug target/90822] Remove PowerPC lfiwax and lfiwzx patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90822 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90579] [8/9/10] Huge store forward stall due to vectorizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90579 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Huge store forward stall|[8/9/10] Huge store forward

[Bug tree-optimization/90839] New: Detect lsb ones counting loop (final value replacement?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90839 Bug ID: 90839 Summary: Detect lsb ones counting loop (final value replacement?) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/90838] New: Detect table-based ctz implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90838 Bug ID: 90838 Summary: Detect table-based ctz implementation Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug other/44209] [meta-bug] Some warnings are not linked to diagnostics options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209 Bug 44209 depends on bug 90449, which changed state. Bug 90449 Summary: No way to turn off warning about inaccessible base https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90449 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/90449] No way to turn off warning about inaccessible base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90449 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90449] No way to turn off warning about inaccessible base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90449 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Jun 11 15:03:21 2019 New Revision: 272157 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272157=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/90449 - add -Winaccessible-base option. * doc/invoke.texi

[Bug tree-optimization/90837] New: Generate infinite loop when using -ftree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90837 Bug ID: 90837 Summary: Generate infinite loop when using -ftree-vrp Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/90801] A recurring hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90801 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jun 11 14:03:41 2019 New Revision: 272156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272156=gcc=rev Log: 2019-06-11 Richard Biener PR c++/90801 * typeck2.c

[Bug c++/90801] A recurring hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90801 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/90832] [9/10 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression at gcc/cp/constexpr.c:2314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90832 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/90836] Missing popcount pattern matching

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90836 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/90796] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC: O2 vs O3 output differs on simple test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90796 --- Comment #5 from Michael Matz --- FWIW, the reduced testcase from comment #3 is wrong. Even with -O0 or with gcc 4.3 or 6 I get: b:48 Aborted (core dumped) But I can reproduce the problem with the original testcase.

[Bug c++/90810] [8/9/10 Regression] Different intrinsics behavior on G++ 7.4 and G++ 8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90810 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90810] [8/9/10 Regression] Different intrinsics behavior on G++ 7.4 and G++ 8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90810 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 11 13:42:07 2019 New Revision: 272155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272155=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/90810 * init.c (constant_value_1): Handle VECTOR_CST

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- does the existing availability hack work [below]? *if the person who originally put it into pr83531 doesn't post it soon - I plan to apply it anyway - having re-tested with 10.13/10.14(SDK2) * for the other

[Bug tree-optimization/90836] New: Missing popcount pattern matching

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90836 Bug ID: 90836 Summary: Missing popcount pattern matching Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 46480 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46480=edit macOS 10.15 header patches to allow bootstrap to complete

[Bug target/90835] New: Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 Bug ID: 90835 Summary: Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/90834] Header and startup objects not found on macOS 10.15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90834 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > possible dup of bug 90808? no, not in this case - although it gets hard to figure out what's going on when partial sysroots are copied into place, that seemed to

[Bug c++/90810] [8/9/10 Regression] Different intrinsics behavior on G++ 7.4 and G++ 8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90810 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 11 13:08:47 2019 New Revision: 272154 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272154=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/90810 * init.c (constant_value_1): Handle VECTOR_CST

[Bug target/90834] Header and startup objects not found on macOS 10.15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90834 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/90810] [8/9/10 Regression] Different intrinsics behavior on G++ 7.4 and G++ 8.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90810 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 11 13:01:40 2019 New Revision: 272152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272152=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/90810 * init.c (constant_value_1): Handle VECTOR_CST

[Bug tree-optimization/62041] vector fneg codegen uses a subtract instead of an xor (x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62041 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/62041] vector fneg codegen uses a subtract instead of an xor (x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62041 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Tue Jun 11 12:48:26 2019 New Revision: 272151 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272151=gcc=rev Log: fold_real_zero_addition_p for vectors 2019-06-11 Marc Glisse PR

[Bug fortran/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi there, That might well have pinpointed the problem sufficiently. Thanks Paul On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 at 20:18, seurer at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > >

[Bug target/90834] Header and startup objects not found on macOS 10.15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90834 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1) > I don't have 10.15 or xcode 11 yet .. > > does ... > configure --prefix ... > --with-sysroot=/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk > . >

[Bug target/90834] Header and startup objects not found on macOS 10.15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90834 --- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe --- I don't have 10.15 or xcode 11 yet .. does ... configure --prefix ... --with-sysroot=/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk . CC="clang

[Bug target/90834] New: Header and startup objects not found on macOS 10.15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90834 Bug ID: 90834 Summary: Header and startup objects not found on macOS 10.15 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Created attachment 46479 [details] > gcc10-pr90811-overalign.patch > > Perhaps during estimate_stack_frame_size we should make sure not to adjust >

[Bug c++/86634] no type named 'iterator_category' in 'ForwardIterator'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86634 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 46479 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46479=edit gcc10-pr90811-overalign.patch Perhaps during estimate_stack_frame_size we should make sure not to adjust DECL_ALIGN

[Bug c++/86501] shadow template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86501 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86478] Crashed on legal code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86478 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86473] a problem in member lookup?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86473 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86430] ambiguous overload?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86430 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/88784] Middle end is missing some optimizations about unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784 --- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, helijia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88784 > > --- Comment #25 from Li Jia He --- > Indeed, this patch cannot catch all

[Bug c++/86299] no member named 'value'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86299 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90801] A recurring hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90801 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/90833] Inline specification is changed?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90833 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/90781] ubsan bootstrap with -O3 -march=native fails at compare stage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90781 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

  1   2   >