[Bug target/91041] New: obsolete arm-pe support in arm backend

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91041 Bug ID: 91041 Summary: obsolete arm-pe support in arm backend Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/80782] Configure options to use llvm/clang assembler on Mac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80782 --- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #13) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #12) > > AFAIK the use of the clang assembler (i.e. calling cctools as which then > > spawns clang -cc1as) is working on

[Bug jit/64196] No automated test coverage for debugging of JIT-generated code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug jit/66074] gcc_jit_result_get_code returns a void*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66074 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/11799] The toplevel should handle multi-libs.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11799 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Nathanael Nerode already said that he is working on it > 07/msg01872.html> so reassign this bug to him. repasting the link so

[Bug c++/91040] New: Incorrect "invalid use of non-lvalue array" error in conditional assignment with throw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91040 Bug ID: 91040 Summary: Incorrect "invalid use of non-lvalue array" error in conditional assignment with throw Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/61339] add mismatch between struct and class [-Wmismatched-tags] to non-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61339 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- The warning I prototyped is meant to help enforce the GCC coding convention to "use the struct keyword for plain old data (POD) types." Depending on how strictly the sentence is interpreted the warning would

[Bug target/61577] [4.9.0] can't compile on hp-ux v3 ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577 EML changed: What|Removed |Added CC||elowe at elowe dot com --- Comment #17 from EML

[Bug libfortran/91030] Poor performance of I/O -fconvert=big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91030 --- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 46537 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46537=edit Something to benchmark.

[Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||urbanjost at comcast dot net ---

[Bug fortran/91039] LHS size to small to hold RHS but no error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91039 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/91027] [10 regression] SEGV in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/90835] Incompatibilities with macOS 10.15 headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/61339] add mismatch between struct and class [-Wmismatched-tags] to non-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61339 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/91039] LHS size to small to hold RHS but no error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91039 --- Comment #2 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- After posting this for comment on the Fortran newsgroup I realize this is not technically a bug, but I would like it to remain as an enhancement request that this type of bug be reported when

[Bug web/63873] target links in Concepts Index in gccint do not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63873 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||author at shakthimaan dot com ---

[Bug fortran/91039] LHS size to small to hold RHS but no error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91039 --- Comment #1 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- implicit none integer :: fx1(10)=1 integer :: fx2(20)=2 integer,allocatable :: a(:) a=-fx1 ! I would expect errors like "different shape for array assignment" where indicated? a(:)=[fx2+1];

[Bug fortran/91039] New: LHS size to small to hold RHS but no error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91039 Bug ID: 91039 Summary: LHS size to small to hold RHS but no error Product: gcc Version: 7.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug web/87461] Web site should use a responsive template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87461 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||author at shakthimaan dot com ---

[Bug web/90334] documentation for getting read-write SVN access is misleading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90334 Shakthi Kannan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||author at shakthimaan dot com ---

[Bug bootstrap/91034] In tree build of gmp fails on Raspberry Pi4 (ARM Cortex A72) with `mls r1,r4,r8,r11' not supported in ARM mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91034 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Roberts --- OK I tried again using the latest gmp snapshot: gmp-6.1.99-20190630.tar.lz I still get the same error.

[Bug c/91038] ICE with VLA type and statement expression (gimplify_var_or_parm_decl)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91038 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Most likely a dup of bug 29970.

[Bug c/91038] New: internal compiler error: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91038 Bug ID: 91038 Summary: internal compiler error: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2786 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: